NURS 220 Week 5 Discussion Board Forum 2 Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 220 Week 5 sample thread applies the week's chapter on mastering one's own stories, the idea that what people feel and do in a hard moment comes from the story they tell themselves about what they saw. The student describes coming to work as a patient care technician to find a coworker had left three patients unbathed, building a villain story about laziness within seconds and feeling anger that nearly led to a sharp remark at the nurses' station. Retracing the path from facts to story to feeling to action, the student finds the facts did not support the story. Replies discuss how stories make a new leader avoid conversations and how a short resilience skill can interrupt the rush from story to anger. Liberty University NURS 220 places this forum, worth 75 points, in the fifth module/week of the BSN program's communication course.

CourseNURS 220 Advanced Nursing Communication (NURS220)
Module/Week5
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 2
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 553 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 250 words in formal language with 1 peer-reviewed source (the textbook or a journal article from the last 5 years), and replies to 2 classmates of at least 150 words each, each with 1 peer-reviewed source
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points75
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBSN
Where it sitsModule/Week 5 in Liberty's published NURS 220 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 220 Week 5

1

Discussion Board Forum 2: The Stories I Tell Myself Before I Speak

NURS 220 Advanced Nursing Communication, Discussion Board Forum 2

Thread by [Student Name]

The workplace scene and classmates are composites; the textbook and journal articles cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread separates facts from story at the start, which is the exact skill the chapter teaches.
2

Here are the facts. I arrived for my 7 p.m. shift as a patient care technician. Three of my assigned patients had not been bathed, and one bed had not been changed. My coworker from the day shift was at the desk on her phone.

Here is the story I told myself within about five seconds: she was lazy, she had spent the afternoon on her phone and she had left her work for me because she knew I would do it. I felt angry, and I could feel my face getting hot. I walked toward the desk planning to say, loudly enough for others to hear, "Nice of you to leave me your baths."

Patterson et al. (2012) describe this sequence as the path to action: we see and hear, we tell a story, we feel and then we act. The trouble is that the story feels like a fact. My story was what the authors call a villain story, in which the other person is not just wrong but has bad motives, and it gave me permission to embarrass her. The chapter suggests retracing the path: separate what I actually saw from what I concluded, and ask why a reasonable, rational and decent person might have done what she did.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread reports what the writer learned by asking, which shows the rewritten story changing the action.
3

When I asked, instead of accusing, the facts changed. Two of her patients had been rapid responses that afternoon, and she had spent four hours helping with transfers. She was on her phone calling her son's school because she was late picking him up. She apologized for the baths before I said anything, and we finished two of them together before she left. I had been one sentence away from making an enemy of a coworker who had just had the hardest shift on the unit. The story I told myself took five seconds to write and would have taken weeks to repair.

Reply to Danielle

Danielle, you wrote that since becoming a charge nurse, you have avoided talking with a former peer who keeps taking long breaks, telling yourself, "If I say something, she'll think I've changed." That sounds like a helpless story, one in which the problem seems impossible to address. Mulcahy-Spence et al. (2026) describe avoidance of difficult conversations as a common pitfall when a colleague becomes a leader, alongside overcompensation and role conflict, and they recommend mentorship and deliberate attention to the relational shift. Perhaps the story could be rewritten as, "She may be waiting for me to set clear expectations." Would it help to talk with your own manager about how to open the conversation?

Reply to Isaiah

Isaiah, I related to your description of feeling your heart pound before you could think when a family member yelled at you. The chapter says we can master our stories only if we slow down long enough to notice them. Miller et al. (2026) taught new graduate nurses a one-hour, sensory-focused self-care approach called the Community Resiliency Model, designed to help regulate the nervous system under stress; resilience and burnout scores did not change significantly over three months, but 73% of the nurses reported using the skills. Even a few seconds of noticing your breathing might give you space to ask what story you are telling before you respond. Have you found anything that helps you pause before you answer an upset family member?

4

References

Miller, A. M., Tee, A., Giordano, N. A., Mcdermott, C., Hudson, J., & Duva, I. M. (2026). Effects of a resilience intervention within a nurse residency program. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70746

Mulcahy-Spence, A., Amidon, B., Clements, P. T., & Haddad, L. (2026). When the colleague becomes the boss: Navigating the shift from peer to nurse leader. Journal of Professional Nursing, 66, 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2026.07.022

Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2012). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

What the NURS 220 Week 5 instructions ask

Forum 2 of NURS 220 arrives in Module/Week 5 beside chapter 6 of the Patterson text, a presentation, a website, the fifth worldview checkpoint and the personal presentation. The forum rules are the same as for Forum 1: at least 250 words of formal prose grounded in the chapter, supported by one APA-cited scholarly source, which may be the Patterson text or an article from the last five years, and then a pair of 150-word-plus responses to peers, each resting on a separate peer-reviewed source. Scripture is welcome in these posts, though it cannot stand in for the scholarly source, and citation text is left out of every word count.

How this NURS 220 Week 5 example is built

The thread opens with the facts of a shift change the writer encountered, stated without interpretation. It then shows the story the writer told and the feeling it produced, using the chapter's path to action to trace each step backward. The writer identifies the story as a villain story, one of the three clever stories the chapter describes, and asks the questions the chapter recommends to rewrite it. The thread ends with what actually happened when the writer asked. One reply helps a classmate who, as a new charge nurse, has been avoiding a conversation; the other suggests a simple self-regulation skill to slow the move from story to emotion.

NURS 220 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go

For this chapter, graders want to see facts and stories pulled apart with care, and the type of story named correctly, whether victim, villain or helpless. A post in which the writer catches their own story, rather than diagnosing a coworker's, shows the self-awareness the chapter is really about. The mechanics still count: the 250- and 150-word floors, formal register without contractions or slang and a properly formatted peer-reviewed citation in the thread and in each reply. A reply that hands a classmate one specific next step, backed by its own source, will usually outscore warm encouragement, and a reply that simply repeats the chapter's definitions adds little to the conversation the forum is meant to build.

NURS 220 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points

Pick a moment when you felt a strong emotion about someone's behavior. Write down only the facts: what you saw and heard. Then write the story you told yourself, and notice how quickly it formed. Use the chapter's terms, such as the path to action and the three clever stories, and ask yourself the chapter's questions about what a reasonable person might have been doing. Keep formal language throughout, cite your source in APA format and keep the thread above 250 words. When replying, bring a fresh scholarly source to bear on the peer's problem and propose one concrete step they could try during their next shift.

Related NURS 220 sample papers

Other NURS 220 weeks

More BSN sample papers

NURS 220 Week 5 questions, answered

What is NURS 220 Discussion Board Forum 2?

Forum 2 of 4 in Liberty's BSN communication course, a Module/Week 5 assignment carrying 75 points: one thread past 250 words plus two answers to peers past 150, each with a peer-reviewed source.

Where can I find a free NURS 220 Week 5 sample paper?

A complete NURS 220 Week 5 forum thread on mastering your stories at work, with two cited replies, is open to every reader here.

What is the path to action in difficult conversations?

The sequence from what we see and hear, to the story we tell about it, to the feelings the story produces, to what we do; changing the story changes the feelings and actions.

What are victim, villain and helpless stories?

Three self-serving stories people tell in conflict: casting themselves as innocent victims, others as villains with bad motives or themselves as helpless to do anything useful.

How do you rewrite a villain story?

Ask why a reasonable, decent person might do what the other person did, and what your own role might be, then go back to the facts before you speak.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.