NURS 220 Week 1 Worldview Checkpoint 1 Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 220 Week 1 sample is a worldview checkpoint, the short weekly post in which BSN students respond to an assigned video by explaining how their own perspective shapes their view of it. Writing in the first week of a course built on Patterson and colleagues' book about high-stakes talk, the student reflects on a moment as a nursing assistant when they saw a patient's call light ignored and said nothing, and asks why silence felt safer than speaking. The post connects the book's opening claim, that the conversations people avoid are often the ones that matter most, with a Christian conviction that truth is to be spoken in love, and ends with one commitment for the term. Liberty University NURS 220 opens its weekly worldview checkpoints, worth 5 points each, in Module/Week 1.

CourseNURS 220 Advanced Nursing Communication (NURS220)
Module/Week1
AssignmentWorldview Checkpoint 1
Paper typeWorldview discussion post
Lengthabout 452 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a post of at least 250 words responding to the module/week's assigned video and expressing the student's personal perspective or worldview; replies and citations encouraged but not required
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points5
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBSN
Where it sitsModule/Week 1 in Liberty's published NURS 220 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 220 Week 1

1

Worldview Checkpoint 1: My Worldview and the Conversations Nurses Avoid

NURS 220 Advanced Nursing Communication, Worldview Checkpoint 1

Thread by [Student Name]

The clinical memory and its people are composites; the textbook and Scripture cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe post starts with a personal memory, which is what a worldview checkpoint asks for: the student's own perspective, not a summary.
2

Before nursing school, I worked as a nursing assistant on a busy medical unit. One evening, an older man's call light stayed on for almost forty minutes while two staff members talked at the desk about their weekend. I knew he needed help to the bathroom. I said nothing, because they were senior to me and I did not want to be the new person who caused trouble. When I finally went in, he had been incontinent and was embarrassed. I still think about that evening, and about how easy it would have been to walk past the desk and into his room the moment I noticed the light.

This week's theme put a name to what happened. Patterson et al. (2012) describe the conversations their book is about as ones in which the stakes are high, opinions vary and emotions run strong, and they observe that people tend to handle these moments in one of three ways: avoiding them, facing them and handling them poorly or facing them and handling them well. I avoided mine. Silence felt safer for me, but it was not safer for him.

Why this part earns its pointsThe worldview is applied to the specific failure in the memory, so the belief does work rather than decorating the post.
3

My Christian faith gives me a different way to think about speaking up. Paul writes that believers should be "speaking the truth in love" (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Ephesians 4:15). I used to think of that verse as being about kindness, but it asks for both things at once. Love without truth would have let me stay quiet to keep the peace; truth without love might have made me harsh with my coworkers. What the patient needed was someone willing to say, respectfully, "His light has been on for a while; I'm going to help him, and could one of you help me?"

My commitment for this course is to notice when I go silent and ask myself who is paying for my comfort. When I catch myself staying quiet, I want to have a sentence ready that is both honest and kind, so that speaking up does not depend on how brave I feel that day. A nurse's silence is never neutral; someone always carries its cost.

Reply to Hannah

Hannah, I appreciated your point that you were raised to respect authority and find it hard to question anyone senior to you. I share that, and I don't think respect and speaking up are opposites. The verse I used asks for truth and love together, and the book argues that the best communicators are both candid and respectful at the same time rather than choosing one (Patterson et al., 2012). Maybe respect is exactly what makes it possible to raise a concern well. I'm hoping this course gives both of us some words for that.

4

References

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2012). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

What the NURS 220 Week 1 instructions ask

NURS 220 asks for Worldview Checkpoint 1 in Module/Week 1, alongside the first chapter of the Patterson text, selected APA pages, three presentations, the checklist, the background check, introductions and the first two APA exercises. The course guide describes a checkpoint for each module/week in which the student views the assigned video and discusses it on the discussion board from their personal perspective or worldview in at least 250 words. Replies and citations are not required but are encouraged. The video changes by section, so this sample responds to the week's theme, why high-stakes conversations matter, rather than to a specific clip; connect your own post to the video you are assigned.

How this NURS 220 Week 1 example is built

The post opens with a personal memory that the week's theme brought back: a time the writer stayed silent when a patient was being neglected. It names why silence felt safer, using the book's description of how people handle high-stakes conversations badly or not at all. It then explains how the writer's Christian worldview reframes the problem, with a verse on speaking the truth in love, and why that matters for a nurse. The post ends with a specific commitment for the course. A short reply to a classmate, not required but encouraged, adds a thought about how fear and respect can coexist.

NURS 220 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go

Checkpoints are typically graded on meeting the 250-word minimum, responding to the assigned video and expressing a genuine personal perspective or worldview, with clear, respectful writing. Because they carry few points, faculty look mainly for thoughtful engagement rather than research. Posts that summarize the video without saying what the student thinks, or that state a belief without connecting it to the video's theme, tend to earn partial credit. A specific example from the student's life or work makes a post more credible than general statements. Replies and citations are optional but show engagement with the class. Faculty also value posts that show growth across the eight weekly checkpoints of the whole term.

NURS 220 Week 1 help: mistakes that cost points

Watch the video once for content and once while noting your own reactions. Choose one moment that connected to your own experience and write about that, in the first person. Say plainly what you believe and why, and how it shapes the way you would act as a nurse. If your worldview is Christian, a verse can anchor the point, but explain it rather than only quoting it. Keep to one main idea and reach at least 250 words. A short reply to a classmate is optional, but it builds the class community the checkpoints are designed to create. Proofread before posting, since formal language is expected even in short posts like these.

Related NURS 220 sample papers

Other NURS 220 weeks

More BSN sample papers

NURS 220 Week 1 questions, answered

What is NURS 220 Worldview Checkpoint 1?

The first of eight weekly 5-point posts in NURS 220, due in Module/Week 1, in which students respond to an assigned video in at least 250 words from their own perspective or worldview.

Where can I find a free NURS 220 Week 1 sample paper?

This page has a complete NURS 220 Week 1 worldview checkpoint on speaking up as a matter of conviction, with an optional reply, free to read.

Do NURS 220 worldview checkpoints need citations?

No. Replies and cited materials are not required for worldview checkpoints, though the course guide encourages both, and posts must reach at least 250 words.

What counts as a high-stakes conversation in this course?

In Patterson and colleagues' definition, a discussion between two or more people where the stakes are high, opinions vary and emotions run strong.

How does a Christian worldview apply to nursing communication?

Many students draw on the call to speak the truth in love: being honest about problems, including safety concerns, while treating the other person with respect and care.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Ask for a custom NURS 220 Week 1 sample · All NURS 220 weeks · All courses