NURS 220 Week 6 Discussion Board Forum 3 Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 220 Week 6 sample thread works through the chapter's five-part method for raising a sensitive concern, summarized as STATE: share your facts, tell your story, ask for others' paths, talk tentatively and encourage testing. The setting is the course's own group presentation, where one member has missed two deadlines and stopped answering messages. The student drafts the actual words for each step, explains why the order matters and reports how the conversation went, including a fact the student had not known. Replies take up speaking up across a power difference, with evidence on psychological safety, and the silence that incivility produces among faculty. Liberty University NURS 220 places this 75-point forum, the third in its BSN communication course, in Module/Week 6.

CourseNURS 220 Advanced Nursing Communication (NURS220)
Module/Week6
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 3
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 568 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 250 words in formal language with 1 peer-reviewed source (the textbook or a journal article from the last 5 years), and replies to 2 classmates of at least 150 words each, each with 1 peer-reviewed source
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points75
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBSN
Where it sitsModule/Week 6 in Liberty's published NURS 220 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 220 Week 6

1

Discussion Board Forum 3: Using STATE to Talk With a Group Member Who Has Gone Quiet

NURS 220 Advanced Nursing Communication, Discussion Board Forum 3

Thread by [Student Name]

The group project scene and classmates are composites; the textbook and journal articles cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread presents the concern in neutral terms first, so the method is applied to a real problem from the start.
2

Our group presentation is due in Week 7. One member, whom I will call Kim, has missed two internal deadlines for her slides and has not replied to the group chat in eight days. I volunteered to talk with her, and I used this week's chapter to plan the conversation. My first instinct was to post a pointed message in the group chat, which would have embarrassed her in front of everyone and almost certainly made her more silent.

Patterson et al. (2012) present five skills for speaking persuasively about a sensitive concern without becoming abrasive, summarized as STATE. I wrote out each step.

Share your facts: "Kim, the slide draft we agreed on for last Thursday hasn't been posted, and the last message from you in our group chat was eight days ago." I removed my first version, which said she had "disappeared," because that was a conclusion.

Tell your story: "I'm starting to wonder whether the project has dropped down your list, or whether something else is going on." The authors stress that the story must come after the facts, since facts make the story easier to hear.

Ask for others' paths: "How do you see it?" Talk tentatively: I used "I'm starting to wonder" rather than "Clearly you don't care." Encourage testing: "If I've got this wrong, I'd really like to know."

Why this part earns its pointsThe outcome is reported honestly, including the fact the writer had missed, which shows why the method asks for the other person's path.
3

When I called her, she was quiet for a moment and then explained that her father had been hospitalized and she had been driving back and forth to another state. She had been embarrassed to tell the group. We agreed that she would take the shorter reference slides and that I would draft one of hers. She posted her first slide two days later, and the group chat, which had grown tense, became friendly again once the others knew what had happened. The facts opened the conversation; asking for her path is what made it a conversation.

Reply to Olivia

Olivia, you described watching a preceptor skip hand hygiene between two patients and being unsure whether a student could say anything. STATE seems made for that moment: "I noticed we went from Mr. A's room to Mrs. B's without sanitizing; am I missing something about the protocol here?" Your fear is understandable, but it is not only about you. Augusto et al. (2026), in a scoping review, charted the evidence on what nurse managers do, through their behaviors and strategies, to make teams feel safe to speak and to build a culture of patient safety, which suggests that whether a student can speak up depends partly on the unit's climate. If you are unsure of the climate, raising it with your clinical instructor first is a reasonable step. Would your instructor want to know?

Reply to Marcus

Marcus, your post about overhearing a faculty member mock a student's question in a hallway, and staying quiet, connects this chapter to a wider pattern. Sariköse et al. (2026) interviewed 20 academics in nursing and midwifery faculties and described how incivility becomes normalized and how silence serves as self-protection, reinforcing a cycle that weakens psychological safety. That research suggests that one quiet witness is part of a larger system, not simply a coward. A tentative approach could fit here too, perhaps with the student rather than the faculty member: "I heard that exchange; I thought your question was a good one." Sometimes restoring safety for the person harmed is the first step.

4

References

Augusto, C., Pereira, S., Cunha, D., Rocha, I., Lumini, M. J., Santos, R., & Gonçalves, P. (2026). The role of nurse managers in promoting psychological safety and patient safety culture in nursing teams: A scoping review. Healthcare, 14(16), 2590. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14162590

Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2012). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Sariköse, S., Sengul, T., Doğan, E., & Kaya, N. (2026). The iceberg of a healthy work environment: Understanding the spiral of incivility and silence in nursing and midwifery faculties: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 164, 107131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107131

What the NURS 220 Week 6 instructions ask

Module/Week 6 of NURS 220 pairs this third forum with the seventh Patterson chapter, one recorded lecture, an assigned web page, the sixth worldview checkpoint and the review-and-corrections plan for the APA paper. Threads must pass 250 words in formal academic language and lean on one scholarly source, the Patterson book itself or recent journal research no more than five years old, formatted in current APA style. Each of the two replies must pass 150 words and bring in its own peer-reviewed support. Biblical references are allowed but are not counted as the scholarly source, and words inside citations are not part of the count.

How this NURS 220 Week 6 example is built

The thread names the situation in two sentences and then walks through each of the five STATE steps in order, giving the exact words the writer planned to use and explaining the purpose of each step with the chapter. The writer's facts come first, the tentative story second, and an open question invites the group member's view. The thread closes by reporting the conversation: the group member had a family emergency, and the group agreed on a new division of work. One reply addresses a classmate afraid to question a preceptor's technique; the other responds to a classmate who notices faculty incivility and wonders whether to say anything.

NURS 220 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go

Expect this forum to be judged on whether the STATE steps are used correctly and in sequence, with the student's own words shown for each, rather than the acronym simply explained. Faculty check that the facts are truly facts, free of judgment words, and that the story is offered tentatively, with phrases such as "I'm starting to wonder" rather than conclusions. The required mechanics still apply: formal language, the word floors and an APA-cited scholarly source in the thread and in each reply. Replies that help a classmate draft their own opening line, supported by evidence, show applied understanding better than general praise for the method. Respect for the people described in a thread, including protecting their identities, is part of the formal tone the course expects.

NURS 220 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose a concern you actually need to raise, perhaps in your group project, and write the conversation out before you have it. List your facts first and strike out any word that judges, such as "lazy" or "never." Phrase your story tentatively, then write a real question that invites the other person's view and mean it. End by inviting them to correct you. Use the chapter's language in your analysis and cite it in APA style. In replies, help a peer find their first sentence, and support your suggestion with a new peer-reviewed article. Keep the thread above 250 words in a formal register, and change names or details so that no one in your course can be identified.

Related NURS 220 sample papers

Other NURS 220 weeks

More BSN sample papers

NURS 220 Week 6 questions, answered

What is NURS 220 Discussion Board Forum 3?

The third forum in Liberty's BSN communication course, a 75-point Module/Week 6 assignment in which a thread of 250-plus words and two peer replies each cite a scholarly source.

Where can I find a free NURS 220 Week 6 sample paper?

This page shows, at no charge, a complete NURS 220 Week 6 thread that uses STATE to raise a group project concern, with two cited replies.

What does STATE stand for in difficult conversations?

Share your facts, Tell your story, Ask for others' paths, Talk tentatively and Encourage testing, five skills for raising a sensitive concern honestly while keeping the conversation safe.

Why share facts before your story?

Facts are the least controversial and most persuasive part of what you know; starting with them, then offering your interpretation tentatively, keeps the other person from becoming defensive.

What does talking tentatively mean?

Stating your view as your interpretation rather than as fact, with phrases such as "I'm beginning to wonder" or "in my opinion," which invites the other person to respond rather than defend.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.