NURS 220 Week 3 Discussion Board Forum 1 Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 220 Week 3 sample thread applies the week's chapter on learning to look, the skill of noticing when a conversation stops feeling safe, to a clinical moment the student watched: a new graduate nurse who went quiet after a physician dismissed her concern about a patient's rising heart rate. It explains the two ways people respond when safety disappears, silence and violence, names the specific forms the writer saw and connects the pattern to a 2026 study of 288 clinical nurses in which psychological safety and a just culture helped explain whether nurses spoke up. Replies address cognitive rehearsal for bullying and a unit's monthly conflict meetings. Liberty University NURS 220 sets this first forum of its BSN communication course at 75 points in Module/Week 3.

CourseNURS 220 Advanced Nursing Communication (NURS220)
Module/Week3
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 1
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 570 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 250 words in formal language with 1 peer-reviewed source (the textbook or a journal article from the last 5 years), and replies to 2 classmates of at least 150 words each, each with 1 peer-reviewed source
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points75
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBSN
Where it sitsModule/Week 3 in Liberty's published NURS 220 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 220 Week 3

1

Discussion Board Forum 1: Silence, Violence and Safety in a Clinical Conversation

NURS 220 Advanced Nursing Communication, Discussion Board Forum 1

Thread by [Student Name]

The clinical scene and classmates are composites; the textbook and journal articles cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread starts with a short, neutral account of the exchange, so the analysis that follows is about behavior rather than blame.
2

During my clinical rotation, I watched a new graduate nurse call a physician about a patient whose heart rate had climbed from 88 to 126 over two hours. She began, "I'm sorry to bother you," and before she reached the trend, he interrupted: "Is he symptomatic? Then I don't know why you're calling." She answered, "No, it's fine, sorry," and hung up. The patient was later found to be bleeding internally.

Patterson et al. (2012) teach that the first skill in a high-stakes conversation is to watch for the moment it turns from routine to risky and, above all, for signs that people no longer feel safe. When safety goes, people move toward silence or violence. Silence withholds meaning: masking, avoiding and withdrawing. Violence tries to force meaning: controlling, labeling and attacking. In this call, the physician's interruption moved toward violence by controlling the conversation, and the nurse moved immediately to silence. Her "it's fine" was masking, since she did not believe it was fine, and hanging up was withdrawing. The authors also ask us to watch ourselves; her apology at the start suggested she expected to be unwelcome before she spoke.

Why this part earns its pointsThe study widens the lens from one call to the unit, because silence like this is shaped by culture as much as by courage.
3

This pattern is not only about one nurse's courage. Abousoliman and Elgamal (2026) surveyed 288 clinical nurses and found that courageous leadership was positively associated with speaking up, with just culture and psychological safety helping to explain that link. When nurses believe that raising a concern will be met fairly, they are more likely to do it. I have started to watch for my own first signs of silence, such as apologizing before I have said anything. If I were in her place, I would want a sentence ready that states the trend and the request plainly: "His heart rate has risen from 88 to 126 over two hours, and I'm concerned about bleeding; I'd like you to evaluate him." Silence that protects the nurse from an uncomfortable minute can leave the patient unprotected for hours.

Reply to Taylor

Taylor, your account of an experienced nurse rolling her eyes and saying "Good luck with that" when you asked for help sounds like the bullying many new nurses describe. Matousek et al. (2026) report that some in nursing still treat bullying of new graduates as a rite of passage, even though it erodes confidence and is linked to errors and falls. Their project used cognitive rehearsal training, in which new nurses practiced scripted responses to scenarios such as gossip, negative nonverbal behavior and direct remarks. A rehearsed sentence, such as "I'd like to learn this the right way; could you show me?", might give you a way to respond that is neither silence nor violence. Would your unit educator be open to practicing a few scenarios?

Reply to Jordan

Jordan, you described a unit where night and day shift blame each other at every handoff. That sounds like violence on both sides, mostly labeling. Sims et al. (2026) describe a critical care unit where leaders met monthly with nurses and nursing assistants to discuss teamwork barriers, decide on strategies and deliver the chosen solutions, a structured approach they call the Triple D Method, while also promoting well-being practices. Bringing the conflict into a regular, structured meeting may make it safer to talk about than at the bedside at 7 a.m. It also matches the chapter's advice to step out of the content and restore safety before continuing. Does your unit have a forum like that?

4

References

Abousoliman, A. D., & Elgamal, H. G. (2026). Courageous leadership and nurses' speaking-up behavior: The indirect roles of just culture and psychological safety: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 11, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100663

Matousek, C. M., Brooks, D., Elwell, J., Carafeno, T., & Alexander, I. M. (2026). Reducing ambulatory new graduate nurse bullying. American Journal of Nursing, 126(10), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJN.0000000000000375

Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2012). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Sims, T., Bacchus, M., Johnson, S., Adigler, B., Howard, L., Thomas, S., Maldonado, M., Ayabazu-Okoye, N., Ali, M., Linscheid, Y., & Spikes, K. (2026). Impact of the Triple D Method on conflict management and workplace engagement. Critical Care Nurse, 46(4), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2026391

What the NURS 220 Week 3 instructions ask

Forum 1 in NURS 220 falls in Module/Week 3, with an APA review, chapter 4 of the Patterson text, two presentations, two websites, the third worldview checkpoint, the APA paper draft and the individual group slide submission. The thread must reach 250 words, use formal language, show course knowledge and cite one peer-reviewed source in current APA format, either the textbook or a journal article from the last five years. The Bible may be used but does not count as the peer-reviewed source. Each of the two replies needs 150 words and its own peer-reviewed source; citations are not counted toward the word totals.

How this NURS 220 Week 3 example is built

The thread describes a short exchange the writer observed between a new nurse and a physician, then uses the chapter's framework to analyze it: what the nurse noticed in herself, the moment safety was lost and the forms of silence that followed, such as withdrawing and masking. A study of nurses' speaking-up behavior extends the analysis from one conversation to the unit's culture. The thread ends with what the writer will watch for in their own conversations. One reply suggests cognitive rehearsal to a classmate who described being bullied at work; the other adds a team method for conflict to a classmate's post about tension on a unit.

NURS 220 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

Forums in NURS 220 are typically graded on meeting the word minimums, formal academic language, accurate application of the week's chapter, correct APA citation of the required peer-reviewed sources and replies that add substance. Faculty look for threads that use the book's concepts to analyze a real conversation, naming specific behaviors rather than describing the conversation as "awkward" or "tense." Sources must be peer reviewed and recent; an older article or a website costs points even when the content is good. Replies earn credit when they apply a new source to the classmate's situation and suggest something the classmate could try. A respectful tone matters too, since several classmates may be describing painful experiences at work.

NURS 220 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose one conversation you took part in or watched, and describe it briefly and neutrally. Then apply the chapter's terms precisely: when did safety break down, and what forms of silence or violence appeared? Use your peer-reviewed source to connect the single conversation to a wider pattern in nursing. Write in formal language: no slang, contractions or text abbreviations. For replies, find one point in each classmate's post where a new source adds something useful, and cite it. Be gentle with classmates who share hard experiences from work or clinical. Confirm each source is either the course text or published in the past five years, and that each is formatted in current APA style.

Related NURS 220 sample papers

Other NURS 220 weeks

More BSN sample papers

NURS 220 Week 3 questions, answered

What is NURS 220 Discussion Board Forum 1?

The first of four forums in Liberty's BSN communication course, worth 75 points in Module/Week 3: a 250-word thread and two 150-word replies, each citing one peer-reviewed source.

Where can I find a free NURS 220 Week 3 sample paper?

This page offers a full NURS 220 Week 3 forum thread on silence, violence and safety in a clinical conversation, with two replies, free to read.

What are silence and violence in a difficult conversation?

Two ways people react when they stop feeling safe: silence withholds meaning through masking, avoiding or withdrawing, and violence forces meaning through controlling, labeling or attacking.

Can the Bible be used as a source in NURS 220 forums?

Yes, but it does not count as the required peer-reviewed source, which must be the course textbook or a scholarly journal article published within the last five years.

What is psychological safety in nursing?

A shared belief on a team that it is safe to speak up, ask questions or own up to errors without fear of ridicule or penalty, which supports nurses voicing safety concerns.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.