NURS 210 Week 3 SOAP Note Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 210 Week 3 sample is a SOAP note for a focused face, head and neck examination of the same adult volunteer whose health history opened the course. The subjective section records her own account of twice-monthly headaches she describes as a tight band, and the objective section reports a complete examination of the head, face, cranial nerves V and VII, temporomandibular joints, neck, trachea, thyroid, carotid pulses and ten lymph node chains, all in correct terms. The assessment states a NANDA-I nursing diagnosis, Readiness for enhanced health self-management, with its defining characteristics, rather than a medical diagnosis, and the plan sets goals, teaching and follow-up. Liberty University NURS 210 in the BSN program assigns this 75-point SOAP note in Module/Week 3, citing the textbook and a NANDA-I source.

CourseNURS 210 Pre-licensure Health Assessment (NURS210)
Module/Week3
AssignmentSOAP Note
Paper typeSOAP note for a focused examination
Lengthabout 1,068 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a SOAP note on the face, head and neck examination recorded on the course's SOAP Note Form, in current APA format, citing 2 sources: the course textbook and a source for a NANDA-approved nursing diagnosis
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points75
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBSN
Where it sitsModule/Week 3 in Liberty's published NURS 210 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 210 Week 3

1

SOAP Note: Face, Head and Neck Examination of an Adult Volunteer With Recurrent Tension-Type Headaches

 

[Student Name]

School of Nursing, Liberty University

NURS 210: Pre-licensure Health Assessment

SOAP Note

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The volunteer is a composite and all identifying details are invented; the textbook and the NANDA-I classification cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsS is limited to what the client reports, in her own words where possible, which keeps it separate from the examiner's findings.
2

SOAP Note: Face, Head and Neck Examination of an Adult Volunteer With Recurrent Tension-Type Headaches

S: Subjective

Client: Ms. R., 52-year-old woman, consenting adult volunteer.

Reason for examination: course assignment; client reports recurring headaches and asked whether anything in her head or neck "looks wrong."

History of present concern: Headaches began about two years ago, occurring about twice a month, usually late in the workday at the end of the month. She describes them as "a tight band around my forehead and the back of my head," both sides, rating them 4 out of 10 at worst. They last two to four hours. Ibuprofen 400 mg relieves them within an hour. She denies visual changes, nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light, numbness or weakness with the headaches and denies the "worst headache of my life." Stress and missed lunch make them worse; walking and sleep make them better. She reports some jaw tightness in the morning and says her husband has heard her grind her teeth.

Relevant history: seasonal allergic rhinitis; borderline blood pressure reading at a pharmacy kiosk; family history of hypertension and stroke. Medications: loratadine 10 mg daily in season, ibuprofen 400 mg as needed about twice a month. Allergies: penicillin (rash). Last dental visit four months ago.

Client goal in her words: "I'd like to get fewer headaches without taking more pills."

O: Objective

Vital signs: temperature 98.2 °F oral; pulse 74, regular; respirations 16, unlabored; blood pressure 134/84 right arm and 132/82 left arm, seated, after five minutes' rest; oxygen saturation 98% on room air. She rated her pain as 0 of 10 during the visit.

Head: normocephalic and symmetric. Scalp intact without lesions, scaling or tenderness. Hair evenly distributed. Temporal arteries soft, nontender, pulses palpable bilaterally.

Face: symmetric at rest and with movement. No edema, lesions or involuntary movements. Frontal and maxillary sinuses nontender to palpation.

Cranial nerve V (trigeminal): light touch sensation intact over forehead, cheeks and jaw bilaterally; masseter and temporalis muscles contract equally when client clenches teeth. Mild tenderness to palpation over both masseter muscles.

Cranial nerve VII (facial): raises eyebrows, closes eyes against resistance, smiles, puffs cheeks and frowns symmetrically.

Temporomandibular joints: full range of motion; opening to three fingerbreadths; soft click palpated on the right with opening, without pain or locking.

Neck: moves her head forward, back, side to side and ear toward shoulder through a full range, pain-free. Mild tightness and tenderness along both upper trapezius muscles. No masses or visible pulsations.

Trachea: midline.

Thyroid: palpated from behind with the client swallowing water; gland smooth, nontender, without nodules or enlargement.

Carotid arteries: each side palpated separately, never both together; pulses 2+ and equal; no bruits heard with the bell.

Lymph nodes: none palpable on either side. Checked in order: in front of and behind the ears and at the base of the skull (preauricular, posterior auricular, occipital); along and under the jaw and chin (tonsillar, submandibular, submental); down the neck in front of, over and behind the sternocleidomastoid (superficial cervical, deep cervical chain, posterior cervical); and above the clavicles (supraclavicular).

D'Amico and Barbarito (2016) describe palpating the lymph nodes in a consistent sequence with the pads of the fingers in gentle circular motions, comparing sides, which is the method used here.

A: Assessment

Why this part earns its pointsThe assessment states a nursing diagnosis supported by both S and O, rather than naming the likely medical cause.
3

Nursing diagnosis: Readiness for enhanced health self-management, as evidenced by the client's expressed desire to reduce headaches "without taking more pills" and her desire to manage the stress and missed meals she identifies as triggers (Herdman et al., 2024).

Supporting data: recurring bilateral, band-like headaches associated with work stress and skipped meals; morning jaw tightness and reported teeth grinding; tenderness over the masseter and upper trapezius muscles; normal neurological findings of cranial nerves V and VII; no red-flag features reported, such as sudden severe onset, visual change or weakness; blood pressure in the borderline range on two readings.

Rationale: The client has no current pain and no evidence of a problem requiring a deficit-focused diagnosis such as acute pain. Her clearly stated wish to manage her health differently, and her ability to name her own triggers, match a health-promotion diagnosis. The NANDA-I classification describes readiness diagnoses as patterns that can be strengthened when the client expresses a desire to enhance them (Herdman et al., 2024).

Findings to Watch

Why this part earns its pointsThe note names what would change the assessment, which shows the student knows the difference between a normal finding today and a closed question.
4

Several findings would change this assessment if they appeared later. A headache that becomes sudden and severe, wakes her from sleep, worsens with lying down or comes with fever, stiff neck, vision loss, weakness or confusion would no longer fit the pattern she describes and would need prompt medical evaluation. New enlargement of a lymph node, a thyroid nodule or a carotid bruit would also call for referral. Her blood pressure readings, which are above the normal range on both arms today, are not a diagnosis on their own, but they add weight to her family history of hypertension and stroke and are the main reason the plan includes a primary care follow-up. Nothing in today's examination suggests that her headaches come from a structural problem in the head or neck; the muscle tenderness and jaw findings fit the stress and teeth-grinding she reports.

P: Plan

Goal: Within six weeks, the client will report no more than one headache per month and will have used ibuprofen no more than twice in that period, as recorded in a headache diary.

Interventions and teaching:

  • 1. Teach the client to keep a headache diary recording date, time, severity, possible triggers, meals and medication taken, and review it at follow-up.
  • 2. Discuss practical changes for her identified triggers: a planned lunch break at work and a small afternoon snack on deadline days.
  • 3. Teach simple neck and shoulder stretches and relaxation breathing for use at her desk, demonstrated with return demonstration.
  • 4. Encourage her to mention the jaw tightness and grinding to her dentist, who may recommend a night guard.
  • 5. Because her blood pressure was 134/84 and 132/82, measured with the seated, rested technique the American Heart Association recommends (Muntner et al., 2019), teach her to have her blood pressure checked by her primary care provider and to bring her kiosk and home readings, without labeling her as having hypertension.
  • 6. Teach warning signs that require prompt care: a sudden, severe headache, headache with weakness, confusion, vision loss or stiff neck with fever.

Evaluation: Review the diary and blood pressure follow-up at a check-in in six weeks; revise the plan if headaches have not decreased. The note documents a normal examination and still finds something useful to do, because the client told us what she wanted.

5

References

D'Amico, D., & Barbarito, C. (2016). Health and physical assessment in nursing (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Herdman, T. H., Kamitsuru, S., & Lopes, C. T. (Eds.). (2024). NANDA International nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification, 2024-2026 (13th ed.). Thieme.

Muntner, P., Shimbo, D., Carey, R. M., Charleston, J. B., Gaillard, T., Misra, S., Myers, M. G., Ogedegbe, G., Schwartz, J. E., Townsend, R. R., Urbina, E. M., Viera, A. J., White, W. B., & Wright, J. T. (2019). Measurement of blood pressure in humans: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension, 73(5), e35-e66. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087

What the NURS 210 Week 3 instructions ask

In NURS 210, the SOAP Note belongs to Module/Week 3, after D'Amico and Barbarito's chapters 15 and 16, a review of chapter 1 and two presentations. Per the course guide, the student writes a SOAP note based on the face, head and neck examination, recorded on the course's SOAP Note Form. The note follows current APA format and must include two sources: the course textbook and a source for NANDA-approved nursing diagnoses. Adding a third source for a specific finding, as this sample does for blood pressure technique, is acceptable when it supports the plan. Because the note is built on your own examination, perform the exam on your volunteer first, record findings as you go and write the note from those records rather than from memory.

How this NURS 210 Week 3 example is built

The sample follows the four parts of a SOAP note. S records the volunteer's reason for the exam and her own words about her headaches, covering when they started, where they are felt, how long they last, what they feel like and what helps or worsens them, plus relevant history. O reports vital signs and the examination of the head, face, cranial nerves V and VII, jaw, neck, trachea, thyroid, carotids and lymph nodes. A gives one NANDA-I nursing diagnosis with its defining characteristics from the subjective and objective data. P sets a measurable goal, nursing interventions, teaching and referral. A short rationale explains why the diagnosis was chosen over others.

NURS 210 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

Faculty grading the SOAP note look first at whether data sit in the correct section, using accurate terminology for findings, completing every part of the face, head and neck examination, choosing a NANDA-approved nursing diagnosis supported by the data, writing a measurable plan, citing the two required sources and following APA format. Faculty quickly notice objective findings placed under S, interpretations written as findings and medical diagnoses such as "tension headache" written as nursing diagnoses. A plan that responds to what the client wants and to what the data show earns more credit than a generic list of interventions.

NURS 210 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points

Keep S and O strictly separate: S is what the client tells you, in their words where possible, and O is what you see, hear, feel and measure. Use the textbook's sequence for the head and neck exam so you do not skip a lymph node chain. For A, choose a nursing diagnosis from the current NANDA-I list and check that its defining characteristics match your data. Avoid medical diagnoses. Make the goal measurable, with a time frame, and let the plan include teaching and follow-up. Cite the textbook and the NANDA-I source in APA format. Remove any identifying details before you submit the form.

Related NURS 210 sample papers

Other NURS 210 weeks

More BSN sample papers

NURS 210 Week 3 questions, answered

What is the NURS 210 SOAP Note?

A 75-point Module/Week 3 assignment in which the student writes a SOAP note on a face, head and neck examination, using the course form and citing the textbook and a NANDA-I source.

Where can I find a free NURS 210 Week 3 sample paper?

Read a complete NURS 210 Week 3 SOAP note for a face, head and neck exam on this page, with a NANDA-I diagnosis and plan, free of charge.

What goes in each part of a SOAP note?

S holds what the client reports, O what the nurse observes and measures, A the nurse's judgment, here a nursing diagnosis, and P the goals, interventions, teaching and follow-up.

Can a SOAP note in nursing use a medical diagnosis?

In a nursing SOAP note, the assessment should state a nursing diagnosis from the NANDA-I classification; a medical diagnosis may be mentioned as history but is not the nurse's assessment.

Which lymph nodes are checked in a neck exam?

Ten groups on each side: the nodes around the ears and skull base, those under the jaw and chin, the chains running down the neck and the nodes just above the collarbones, compared side to side.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.