| Course | MGMT 645 Quality Management (MGMT645) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 3 |
| Assignment | Project Management Plan |
| Paper type | Project management plan |
| Length | about 1,097 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: per the course guide, a full project management plan that builds on the Week 2 charter and proposal for the same project |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 200 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MS in Management and Leadership |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 3 in Liberty's published MGMT 645 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGMT 645 Week 3
Project Management Plan: The CPA Firm's Secure Client Portal Rollout
[Student Name]
School of Business, Liberty University
MGMT 645: Quality Management
Project Management Plan
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The accounting firm, its staff and every figure continue the composite project chartered in this sample's Week 2 assignment; Rose's text, the PMBOK Guide and the study cited are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for MGMT 645.
Project Management Plan: The CPA Firm's Secure Client Portal Rollout
Purpose and Background
This plan describes how the firm will deliver the secure client portal approved in the project charter. The project will move the firm's client document intake from email to an encrypted portal between December 1 and January 12, so that the filing season begins with every active client invited, every staff member trained and a document checklist guiding each upload. The charter's goals, success criteria, budget and dates are carried into this plan unchanged, and the sections below explain how each will be met.
Scope and Work Breakdown Structure
The project's scope covers configuring the portal, building client folders and checklists, training staff, inviting and supporting clients, and retiring email intake. It excludes changes to tax software, billing and engagement letters, and the digitizing of prior years' records.
| WBS | Deliverable and work packages |
|---|---|
| 1.0 | Portal configuration: vendor contract, security settings, client data import |
| 2.0 | Client folders and checklists: individual, business and trust checklists; senior review |
| 3.0 | Staff readiness: two training sessions; test client for each staff member; procedures guide |
| 4.0 | Client rollout: 30-client pilot; invitations in two waves; help line; follow-up calls |
| 5.0 | Email retirement: auto-reply; exception procedure; partner announcement |
Schedule
The schedule follows the charter's six-week milestone plan. In week one, the vendor contract is signed and the portal configured. In week two, folders and checklists are built and the first staff training held. Week three is the pilot with 30 clients chosen to represent individual, business and older clients, followed by checklist corrections and the second training session. Invitations go out in two waves during week four, over the holidays, with the help line open. In week five, the office administrator calls clients who have not logged in, and the email policy takes effect. Week six is the launch review on January 12. The critical path runs through the checklist build and the pilot, because invitations cannot go out until the checklists are corrected.
Cost Baseline
| Item | Budget |
|---|---|
| Portal licenses, 12 users, first year | $6,600 |
| Vendor setup and data migration | $3,200 |
| Client guide printing and video | $700 |
| Staff overtime for help line and training | $3,000 |
| Reserve | $1,000 |
| Total | $14,500 |
Quality Management Plan
The quality management plan follows PMBOK Guide section 8.1, which calls for identifying the quality requirements and standards for the project and its deliverables and documenting how the project will demonstrate compliance (Project Management Institute, 2017). Rose (2014) stresses that quality is planned in and that prevention costs less than correction, and the plan is organized around preventing the two defects the charter identified.
Quality standards. A document set is complete when every item on the client's checklist has been uploaded or marked not applicable. A document is correctly filed when it sits in the folder of the client who uploaded it and carries the right tax year and form type. Every client checklist must match the forms on the client's prior-year return.
Quality metrics. The plan tracks four metrics: the percentage of checklists that pass senior review without correction, with a target of 95 percent before invitations; the percentage of pilot clients who complete an upload without calling for help, target 75 percent; the percentage of document sets complete on first upload during the first four weeks of the season, target 85 percent; and the number of misfiled documents, target zero.
Quality assurance. The senior accountant reviews the process for building checklists before they are built, confirming that the import from the practice management system pulls every form type. The pilot in week three is the main assurance step: it tests the entire process, invitation, login, upload and staff review, with real clients before the full rollout. The operations manager reviews pilot results and decides whether the process is ready.
Quality control. The senior accountant checks every business client's checklist and a random 10 percent of individual checklists against prior-year returns. During the season, staff confirm each completed document set against its checklist before preparing the return, and any document found in the wrong folder is logged and reported to the operations manager the same day.
Responsibilities. The operations manager owns the quality plan and reports the metrics weekly. The senior accountant owns checklist quality. The office administrator tracks pilot help calls. Each staff member owns the completeness check for returns assigned to them.
Sousa and Voss (2002), reviewing the quality management literature, organize the field around how quality management is defined, how it affects performance and how it is implemented, and their review supports tailoring quality practices to an organization's situation rather than adopting a standard list. This plan is deliberately small, four metrics and three checkpoints, because the firm is small and the project is short.
Roles and Responsibilities
As sponsor, the managing partner signs off on changes and tells clients about the new policy. The operations manager plans and controls the work and reports weekly. The office administrator handles invitations, the help line and follow-up calls. The senior accountant builds and reviews checklists. Portal setup and the client data import belong to the vendor's implementation specialist. Each staff member completes training and processes a test client.
Communication Plan
The project team meets for fifteen minutes every Monday morning during the six weeks, and the operations manager sends the managing partner a one-page status note every Friday with progress against the milestones and the quality metrics. Clients receive an announcement letter from the managing partner in week three, an invitation email in week four, a reminder after seven days and a follow-up call in week five if they have not logged in. Staff receive the procedures guide after the first training session.
Risk Management
The charter's five high-level risks are carried into a risk register kept by the operations manager and reviewed at each Monday meeting. The two highest risks, older clients struggling with the portal and staff continuing to accept email, have owners and responses: the office administrator offers phone help and office drop-off scanning, and the managing partner's announcement and an email auto-reply reinforce the new policy. New risks found during the pilot will be added and scored.
Procurement
The project makes one purchase, the portal subscription and setup services. The operations manager compared three vendors on security certifications, ease of client use and integration with the firm's practice management system, and recommends the vendor already used by two peer firms. The contract will include a setup completion date of December 12 and a named implementation contact.
Stakeholder Engagement
Clients are the stakeholders most affected. Long-time clients over seventy, about 180 households, will receive a printed guide and a personal phone call rather than an email invitation. Business clients' bookkeepers will be invited directly with the owner's permission. Staff concerns about extra work during the holidays will be addressed by scheduling training before December 20 and paying overtime for help line hours.
Change Control
Because the completion date cannot move, any change that would delay January 12 must be approved by the managing partner and offset by a reduction elsewhere in scope. The operations manager may approve changes costing less than $250 that do not affect the schedule. All changes are recorded in a change log with their reason and effect. In a six-week project with a fixed finish, the quality plan and the change rules protect the same thing: a filing season that starts clean.
References
Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.).
Rose, K. H. (2014). Project quality management: Why, what and how (2nd ed.). J. Ross Publishing.
Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2002). Quality management re-visited: A reflective review and agenda for future research. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00088-2
What the MGMT 645 Week 3 instructions ask
The Project Management Plan is the single graded item in Module/Week 3 of MGMT 645 and one of three 200-point assignments in the course, read with the PMBOK Guide's chapter 4 and section 8.1, chapter 4 of Rose and a presentation. The guide's instruction is brief: build on the Project Charter and Proposal from Module/Week 2 and, using the same project, produce a full project management plan. In PMBOK Guide terms, a full plan pulls together the subsidiary plans, from scope, time and money through quality, people, communication, risk, buying and stakeholders, with baselines and change control. Because the course's subject is quality, the quality management plan, the topic of section 8.1, deserves the most care, and the Week 6 Quality Improvement Plan is derived directly from this document.
How this MGMT 645 Week 3 example is built
The plan restates the charter's purpose and then sets the scope with a work breakdown structure of five deliverables, from portal configuration to email retirement. A six-week schedule assigns each work package to a week and a person. The cost baseline divides the $14,500 budget among licenses, vendor setup and staff time, with a small reserve. The quality management plan defines two defect types, incomplete document sets and misfiled documents, sets metrics and targets for each, names the checks at each stage, from checklist review to pilot to launch, and assigns responsibility. Shorter sections cover roles, communication, risk, procurement of the portal and stakeholder engagement, and the plan closes with change control rules tied to the fixed January 12 date.
MGMT 645 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go
The plan is graded on completeness, on its continuity with the charter, and on the strength of its quality planning. Graders check that the plan uses the same project as the charter and develops each of its elements into a workable plan: scope with a WBS, schedule, cost, roles, communication, risk and change control. The quality management plan should define quality standards and measurable metrics, describe how quality assurance and quality control will be performed and who is responsible, consistent with the PMBOK Guide's section 8.1 and Rose. Baselines that agree with one another, a plan realistic for a six-week project, clear tables and headings, and consistent use of course terms complete the evaluation.
MGMT 645 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points
A frequent weakness is a plan that copies the charter and adds headings. Each section should move from what the charter promised to how the team will deliver it: who does which work package in which week, how money is spent, and how progress and quality will be checked. Make the quality management plan the strongest section, with defects defined, metrics stated as numbers and checks scheduled. Keep the plan proportionate to a six-week project; a small project does not need a procurement strategy of ten pages, but it does need its one purchase planned. Check that the WBS, the schedule and the budget agree, and carry the charter's success criteria into the plan unchanged unless the change is explained.
Related MGMT 645 sample papers
Other MGMT 645 weeks
- MGMT 645 Week 1: Forum 1: What Quality Means
- MGMT 645 Week 2: Project Charter and Proposal
- MGMT 645 Week 4: Forum 2: The Cost of Quality
- MGMT 645 Week 5: Forum 3: Control Charts
- MGMT 645 Week 6: Quality Improvement Plan
- MGMT 645 Week 7: Project Closeout and Lessons Learned
- MGMT 645 Week 8: Integration of Faith and Learning
More MS in Management and Leadership sample papers
- MGMT 501 Week 3: Group Forum 3: Motivation
- MGMT 602 Week 3: Forum 2: Founder's Syndrome
- MGMT 610 Week 3: Case Study: Contractor Risk Profile
MGMT 645 Week 3 questions, answered
What is the MGMT 645 Project Management Plan?
A 200-point Module/Week 3 assignment that builds on the Week 2 charter for the same project and develops it into a full plan, including a quality management plan.
Where can I find a free MGMT 645 Week 3 sample paper?
This page shows a complete MGMT 645 Week 3 project management plan for a CPA firm's six-week secure client portal rollout, with a detailed quality management plan.
What is a quality management plan?
The part of a project plan, described in PMBOK Guide section 8.1, that sets the quality standards and metrics for the project and explains how quality will be assured and controlled and by whom.
What is the difference between quality assurance and quality control?
Quality assurance checks that the processes used to do the work are sound, while quality control inspects the outputs themselves to find defects before they reach the customer.
Does the MGMT 645 plan have to use the same project as the charter?
Yes; the guide asks students to build on the Week 2 charter and proposal with the same project, which also carries into the quality improvement plan and closeout.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom MGMT 645 Week 3 sample · All MGMT 645 weeks · All courses