MGMT 610 Week 3 Case Study Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This MGMT 610 Week 3 sample is the Case Study, a 135-point risk profile in Liberty University MGMT 610 Risk Management, written for the MS in Project Management in the week that assigns chapter 2 of Wilson. The guide asks each student to choose an organization, consider the projects it is likely to undertake, and write five to six pages on its industry's particulars, trends and risks before turning to the likely risks of one project, supported by at least eight sources, of which four or more are refereed studies no older than five years. The sample profiles a composite family-owned general contractor in Columbus, Ohio, that earns about 40 percent of its revenue from healthcare work, and examines its next project: a 72-bed behavioral health hospital on a regional health system's campus. Labor shortages, material price volatility, supply chain risk and ligature-resistant design shape the profile.

CourseMGMT 610 Risk Management (MGMT610)
Module/Week3
AssignmentCase Study
Paper typeCase study risk profile
Lengthabout 1,376 words, 5 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: per the course guide, a 5-6-page case study risk profile covering industry particulars, industry trends, industry risks and the likely risks of a project in the industry, with at least eight references, four of them peer-reviewed and dated within the last five years
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points135
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramMS in Management and Leadership
Where it sitsModule/Week 3 in Liberty's published MGMT 610 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MGMT 610 Week 3

1

A Case Study Risk Profile: A Healthcare General Contractor and Its 72-Bed Behavioral Health Hospital Project

 

[Student Name]

School of Business, Liberty University

MGMT 610: Risk Management

Case Study (risk profile)

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The contractor, the health system and the project are composites standing in for the organization a student selects; the peer-reviewed studies, the industry guidelines and the textbooks are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for MGMT 610.

Why this part earns its pointsThe introduction names the organization, the project and the four parts of the profile, mirroring the guide's own list.
2

A Case Study Risk Profile: A Healthcare General Contractor and Its 72-Bed Behavioral Health Hospital Project

This case study profiles the risks facing a family-owned general contractor in Columbus, Ohio, and one project it is about to begin. The contractor, referred to here as the company, employs about 210 people, completes roughly $280 million in construction each year and earns about 40 percent of that revenue from healthcare work. Its next major project is a 72-bed behavioral health hospital, to be built for about $68 million on the campus of a regional health system and operated through a joint venture between the health system and a national behavioral health company. The profile describes the industry's particulars, its current trends and its characteristic risks, and then identifies the risks most likely to affect this project.

The Organization and Its Projects

The company works mostly as a construction manager at risk, a delivery method in which it joins the project during design, provides cost estimates and guarantees a maximum price before construction begins. It self-performs concrete and some carpentry and subcontracts most other trades, including mechanical, electrical and plumbing work. Its healthcare portfolio includes outpatient centers, surgical suites and renovations inside operating hospitals. The behavioral health hospital will be its first freestanding psychiatric facility, a fact that shapes several of the risks discussed below.

Industry Particulars

Commercial construction is a project-based industry in which every building is in some sense a prototype. General contractors coordinate dozens of specialty subcontractors, carry the risk of a guaranteed price and depend on suppliers whose own schedules they cannot control. Healthcare construction adds a layer of regulation. In Ohio and most states, hospital design follows the Guidelines for Design and Construction of Hospitals (Facility Guidelines Institute, 2022), which set requirements for room sizes, ventilation, infection control and, for psychiatric units, the safety of the environment. Those guidelines call for a safety risk assessment during design, including an assessment of the risks specific to behavioral and mental health patients. Healthcare owners also tend to be demanding clients. Clinical leaders often join design late, after the program is set, and their requests for changes arrive when walls are already framed. Health systems also expect contractors to work around operating facilities without disrupting patient care, which limits hours, routes and noise. Healthcare projects also end differently from other buildings: a hospital cannot open until state licensing inspectors and accreditation surveyors have reviewed it, so the last weeks of a schedule carry unusual weight.

Trends in the Industry

Why this part earns its pointsThe trends section supports each claim with recent peer-reviewed research, which meets the guide's five-year rule and shows the trends are measured, not assumed.
3

Four trends dominate the industry's current risk picture. The first is the shortage of skilled labor. Elbashbishy and El-adaway (2024), analyzing documentation from 67 construction projects and surveying experts, identified ten key labor-intensive trades and found the highest degrees of skilled labor shortage in plumbing and electrical work. Shiha and El-adaway (2025) add that construction labor moves little between regions, so shortages are local and vary by metropolitan area, and they built a measure of shortage severity from employment and earnings data in nine metropolitan statistical areas. For the company, this means that the electricians and plumbers a hospital needs in quantity may be the hardest workers to find in its own market.

The second trend is volatility in material prices. Jezzini et al. (2025) note that research has focused on forecasting material prices rather than on gauging the overall cost risk that price swings create for a project, and they developed a framework that uses producer price index histories for materials such as steel reinforcement and concrete to estimate the probability distribution of a project's cost exposure. Their work matters for a contractor that guarantees a maximum price months before it buys materials.

The third trend is greater attention to supply chain risk. Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh et al. (2024), reviewing research on construction supply chain risk management published from 1999 to 2023, found that the field has expanded from identifying and assessing risks to allocating, prioritizing and recovering from them, and that the use of artificial intelligence methods has grown since 2016 alongside traditional techniques. The review reflects an industry that learned during and after the pandemic how quickly late deliveries can spread through a schedule.

The fourth trend, specific to the company's market, is demand for psychiatric beds. Lindenfeld et al. (2025), using federal cost report data for 2011 to 2023, found that the total number of inpatient psychiatric beds did not change while the number in general acute care hospitals fell, and that 1,449 counties had never had any such beds. McBain et al. (2022) estimated shortages of psychiatric beds across the United States. Health systems are responding by building freestanding behavioral health hospitals, often in partnership with specialized operators, which is exactly the kind of project the company is now pursuing.

Risks in the Industry

The industry's characteristic risks can be grouped into five categories, summarized below. The categories follow the PMBOK Guide's suggestion that teams organize risks into a breakdown structure so that none is overlooked (Project Management Institute, 2017).

CategoryTypical risksUsual effect
LaborShortages of electricians, plumbers and other trades; subcontractor turnoverSchedule delay, overtime cost, quality problems
Materials and supplyPrice escalation after the guaranteed price is set; long lead times; supplier failureCost overrun, resequencing, delay
Design and ownerLate design changes; incomplete drawings at pricing; owner decision delaysChange orders, disputes, delay
RegulatoryCode interpretations; licensing and accreditation inspections; permit timingDelayed opening, rework
Site and safetyUnforeseen soil or utility conditions; weather; worker injuriesDelay, cost, liability

Wilson (2015) treats risk planning as the foundation for controlling unexpected problems later in a project, and this categorization is the first step: it tells the company where to look on any healthcare job before it turns to the risks of a particular one.

The Company's Risk Position

The company's contract position shapes how these industry risks reach it. Under a guaranteed maximum price, the company absorbs cost increases that are not caused by owner changes, so material escalation and labor premiums fall largely on its own margin. It can protect itself in part through contingency, escalation clauses for specific materials, and early purchase of long-lead items, but each of these must be negotiated with the owners before the price is signed. The company's balance sheet can absorb a modest overrun on a $68 million project, but a loss on its first freestanding psychiatric hospital would also cost it the reputation it hopes to build in a growing market. Its risk tolerance on this project is therefore lower than its size alone would suggest.

Likely Risks for the Behavioral Health Hospital Project

Why this part earns its pointsThe project section ties each risk to the industry analysis and ranks the three most serious, which shows judgment rather than a list.
4

Applying the categories to the 72-bed hospital produces eight likely risks. First, ligature-resistant hardware, door assemblies and specialty glazing have long lead times and few suppliers, and any change to the safety risk assessment late in design could reopen orders already placed. Second, the project needs a large electrical crew for nurse call, security, access control and camera systems, the trade the research identifies as among the scarcest. Third, plumbing fixtures designed to resist self-harm are specialized and must be installed precisely. Fourth, material prices for concrete and steel could rise between the guaranteed price and procurement. Fifth, the joint venture structure means two owners must approve design changes, which can slow decisions. Sixth, the hospital must pass state licensing and accreditation surveys before it admits a patient, so any deficiency in the final weeks delays revenue for the owners. Seventh, because the site is on an active hospital campus connected by a corridor, an infection control risk assessment will govern dust, noise and access, limiting work hours near the connection. Eighth, as the company's first freestanding psychiatric facility, the project carries a learning-curve risk in estimating and sequencing work it has not done before.

Of these, three stand out: the ligature-resistant hardware supply, the electrical labor shortage and the final licensing inspections, because each falls on the schedule's critical path. The first and third are linked, since a late hardware delivery would compress the time available to correct inspection findings. Together they suggest that the company's risk management plan should begin with early procurement, a committed electrical subcontractor and a mock licensing walk-through months before substantial completion.

Conclusion

The company enters this project from a position of strength in healthcare construction but with limited experience in behavioral health. The industry's current trends, scarce skilled trades, volatile prices and fragile supply chains, meet a project type with specialized products and an unforgiving regulatory finish. Identifying those risks now, while design is still underway, gives the company the chance to address them through procurement, contracts and scheduling rather than through change orders and delays later. The analysis also suggests that the company's advantage in this market will come less from price than from reliability. Health systems building behavioral health capacity need hospitals that open on the date they promised to regulators, staff and patients, and a contractor that can show it has identified and planned for these risks will be better placed to win the next one.

5

References

Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh, M., Moehler, R. C., Fang, Y., Aboutorab, H., & Hijazi, A. A. (2024). Construction supply chain risk management. Automation in Construction, 162, Article 105396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105396

Elbashbishy, T., & El-adaway, I. H. (2024). Skilled worker shortage across key labor-intensive construction trades in union versus nonunion environments. Journal of Management in Engineering, 40(1), Article 04023063. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5649

Facility Guidelines Institute. (2022). Guidelines for design and construction of hospitals (2022 ed.).

Jezzini, Y., Assaad, R. H., & El-adaway, I. H. (2025). Modeling framework to quantify and gauge project cost risks due to construction material price volatilities using predictive probabilistic deep-learning algorithms and stochastic risk modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(7), Article 04025071. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-16055

Lindenfeld, Z., Cantor, J. H., McCullough, C. M., Bather, J. R., & McBain, R. K. (2025). Inpatient psychiatric bed capacity within CMS-certified U.S. hospitals, 2011-2023: A cross-sectional study. PLOS Medicine, 22(7), Article e1004682. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004682

McBain, R. K., Cantor, J. H., & Eberhart, N. K. (2022). Estimating psychiatric bed shortages in the US. JAMA Psychiatry, 79(4), 279-280. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4462

Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.).

Shiha, A., & El-adaway, I. H. (2025). Localized multivariate statistical assessment of United States construction labor shortages. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(8), Article 04025097. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15702

Wilson, R. (2015). Mastering risk and procurement in project management: A guide to planning, controlling, and resolving unexpected problems. Pearson FT Press.

What the MGMT 610 Week 3 instructions ask

The Case Study is the second graded paper of MGMT 610 and the only work due in Module/Week 3, read with chapter 2 of Wilson and a presentation. The guide leaves the organization to the student, whose current employer or another organization of interest will both serve, and asks the student to think about the projects such an organization undertakes. The profile then runs five to six pages and covers four things: what is particular about the industry, where the industry is heading, which risks the industry carries, and which risks are likely on a project the organization would take on. Academic and trade literature must both support the analysis, with a minimum of eight references, at least half of them refereed work from the five most recent years.

How this MGMT 610 Week 3 example is built

The paper begins with the contractor: 210 employees, about $280 million a year in work, a construction-manager-at-risk model on most hospital jobs. It then describes the industry's particulars, from thin margins and dependence on subcontractors to the regulated design of healthcare buildings under the Facility Guidelines Institute. A trends section draws on recent studies of the skilled labor shortage, material price volatility and supply chain risk, and on research showing psychiatric beds declining in general hospitals, which explains the demand for the new hospital. A table sorts industry risks into five categories. The final section identifies eight likely risks for the behavioral health project, among them long lead times for ligature-resistant hardware and a shortage of electricians, and ranks the three most serious.

MGMT 610 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

The case study is graded on the four areas the guide names and on the quality of its support. Industry particulars, trends and risks should be accurate and specific to the chosen industry, not generic statements about business risk. The project section should identify risks that follow from the industry analysis and from the particular project, so the reader can see the line from one to the other. The reference requirement is checked closely: eight or more sources, four or more of them refereed articles dated 2021 or later for a 2026 paper, drawn from both scholarly and trade literature. Clear organization under headings, current APA format, and a length within five to six pages complete the evaluation; a profile that ranks its risks shows judgment.

MGMT 610 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points

The most common shortfall is an industry section that could describe any industry. Use the industry's own facts: its contract types, its regulators, its labor market and its prices. Another is a reference list of older articles; the guide's recency rule covers four of the refereed sources, so search with a date filter and check each journal. Do not confuse trade literature with peer-reviewed research; both are required, and they count differently. Keep the organization description short and spend the space on risks. In the project section, describe each risk as a cause and an effect, for example a lead time that could delay a licensing inspection, rather than a single word such as delays. End by naming which risks matter most.

Related MGMT 610 sample papers

Other MGMT 610 weeks

More MS in Management and Leadership sample papers

MGMT 610 Week 3 questions, answered

What is the MGMT 610 Case Study?

A 135-point paper due in Module/Week 3: a five-to-six-page risk profile of an organization's industry, its trends and its risks, ending with the likely risks of one of its projects.

Where can I find a free MGMT 610 Week 3 sample paper?

This page contains a complete MGMT 610 Week 3 case study risk profile of a healthcare general contractor building a 72-bed behavioral health hospital.

How many sources does the MGMT 610 case study need?

Eight or more, and at least four must be peer-reviewed work no more than five years old; the guide also expects trade publications beside the academic ones.

What are the biggest risks in healthcare construction?

Skilled labor shortages, material price swings, long lead times for specialized equipment, design changes by the owner, and the regulatory inspections a hospital must pass before it can open.

What is ligature-resistant design?

Design for behavioral health settings that removes or limits fixtures a patient could use for self-harm, such as exposed hooks, handles and hinges, which requires specialized hardware.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.