| Course | MGMT 645 Quality Management (MGMT645) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 4 |
| Assignment | DB Forum 2 |
| Paper type | Discussion thread |
| Length | about 533 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a thread of 400 to 1,000 words demonstrating course-related knowledge, followed by replies to two classmates of 250 to 300 words each |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 30 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MS in Management and Leadership |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 4 in Liberty's published MGMT 645 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGMT 645 Week 4
Discussion Board Forum 2: Thread
MGMT 645 Quality Management, Discussion Board Forum 2: Thread
Thread by [Student Name]
The prompt and the print shop's mailing job are composites standing in for the course's own forum; Rose's text, the PMBOK Guide, the scholarly sources and Scripture are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for MGMT 645.
Our print and mail shop produced an 84,000-piece postcard mailing last fall for a regional hospital's flu clinic campaign. The artwork was proofed twice, the color was excellent, and the job mailed on schedule. Two weeks later the hospital's marketing director called. Residents were posting photographs of three and four identical postcards on social media, and the post office had returned more than 5,000 as undeliverable. The address file the hospital supplied had never been checked for duplicates or run against the postal service's change-of-address data, and no one at our shop had asked whether it had been. We later found 9,600 duplicate records and about 6,100 outdated addresses. To keep the account, we reprinted and remailed the job to a cleaned file at our own expense.
The cost of quality framework makes the lesson plain. Schiffauerova and Thomson (2006), reviewing research on quality costing, found that the classic prevention, appraisal and failure model is the approach most commonly used, and that companies that adopt cost of quality methods are successful in reducing quality costs, even though most quality programs do not use them. Applied to this job, the four categories look like this. Prevention cost was close to zero: no one had written down an address hygiene step, and no one had been trained to ask for one. Appraisal cost was about $300 for two artwork proofs, which checked the wrong thing. Internal failure cost was also zero, because nothing was caught inside the shop. External failure cost was about $41,000, including $28,400 in reprinting and postage, staff overtime, and a discount on the hospital's next order. A deduplication and change-of-address run would have cost about $350.
Crosby (1979) made his famous case that prevention pays for itself out of the failures it never lets happen, and our numbers make his point with a ratio of more than a hundred to one. Rose (2014) stresses that quality is planned and built in rather than inspected in at the end. Our two artwork proofs were inspection; they confirmed the postcard looked right and never asked whether it would reach the right people. In PMBOK Guide terms, the job had a control step for one output but no managing-quality step for the process, the activity that checks whether the work is being done in a way that will meet requirements (Project Management Institute, 2017). Address data was simply outside anyone's view of quality.
We changed three things. Every mailing job now includes a required data hygiene step before printing, with a report sent to the client. The intake form asks who maintains the address file and when it was last cleaned. And the quality check at sign-off includes a sample of 200 records reviewed by a person, not only the software.
Ecclesiastes pictures a worker whose iron tool has gone blunt and who must put in more force for less result, and commends the wisdom that keeps the edge (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Ecclesiastes 10:10). Prevention is the sharpening of the axe; it looks like delay until you count the swings it saves.
Classmates: where does your organization spend its quality money, on prevention, on checking, or on fixing what reaches the customer?
References
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill.
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.).
Rose, K. H. (2014). Project quality management: Why, what and how (2nd ed.). J. Ross Publishing.
Schiffauerova, A., & Thomson, V. (2006). A review of research on cost of quality models and best practices. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 23(6), 647-669. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710610672470
What the MGMT 645 Week 4 instructions ask
The second forum in MGMT 645 is due in Module/Week 4, worth 30 points, with PMBOK Guide sections 8.2 and 8.3, chapter 5 of Rose and a presentation; its 20-point reply follows in Module/Week 5 alongside the Forum 3 thread. As with every MGMT 645 forum, the thread must fall within 400 to 1,000 words and demonstrate course-related knowledge, and a pair of replies in the 250-to-300-word range comes after. The week's reading turns from planning quality to managing it during the work and controlling it in the results, which makes cost of quality a natural subject: it is the measure that tells an organization whether money spent on prevention and checking is worth what failures would cost. With the 200-point Project Management Plan just submitted, a thread that prices quality on a real job can sharpen the quality section of that plan.
How this MGMT 645 Week 4 example is built
The thread opens with the failure: 84,000 postcards printed and mailed to a client-supplied file with 9,600 duplicates and thousands of outdated addresses, a hospital furious about wasted postage, and a print shop that reprinted the job for free. It then sorts the costs into the classic four categories: prevention, which was nearly zero; appraisal, a single proof check of the artwork; internal failure, none, because nothing was caught inside the shop; and external failure, about $41,000 in reprinting, postage and lost goodwill. Schiffauerova and Thomson's review of quality costing explains why this prevention, appraisal and failure model is the most widely used. Crosby's claim that quality is free and Rose's prevention focus support the shop's new address hygiene step, and Ecclesiastes on sharpening the axe frames it.
MGMT 645 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
Forum 2 earns its 30 points through knowledge of quality costs, shown in 400 to 1,000 words. The best threads explains the cost of quality accurately, using the categories the course teaches, and applies them to a real job with figures a reader can follow. Graders look for a clear distinction between conformance costs, prevention and appraisal, and nonconformance costs, internal and external failure, and for an argument about where the money should go. Connections to the PMBOK Guide's processes for managing and controlling quality and to Rose show that the reading was understood. A scholarly source strengthens the thread, a biblical reference that bears on prevention adds the course's perspective, and a question for classmates sets up the replies.
MGMT 645 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points
Threads on cost of quality often list the four categories with textbook examples and stop. Price them for one job instead. Estimate what was spent on prevention and appraisal, what failures cost inside the organization and what they cost after reaching the customer, and show the totals. The comparison usually makes the argument by itself. Be careful to classify costs correctly: inspecting a proof is appraisal, training staff to clean data is prevention, and reprinting a job the customer has rejected is external failure. Do not overstate precision; round estimates are fine if you say how you reached them. Stay within 400 to 1,000 words, and finish with a question that asks classmates where their own organizations spend on quality.
Related MGMT 645 sample papers
Other MGMT 645 weeks
- MGMT 645 Week 1: Forum 1: What Quality Means
- MGMT 645 Week 2: Project Charter and Proposal
- MGMT 645 Week 3: Project Management Plan
- MGMT 645 Week 5: Forum 3: Control Charts
- MGMT 645 Week 6: Quality Improvement Plan
- MGMT 645 Week 7: Project Closeout and Lessons Learned
- MGMT 645 Week 8: Integration of Faith and Learning
More MS in Management and Leadership sample papers
- MGMT 501 Week 4: Annotated Bibliography and Outline
- MGMT 602 Week 4: Forum 2 Replies: After the Founder
- MGMT 610 Week 4: Forum 2: Risk Matrices and Numbers
MGMT 645 Week 4 questions, answered
What is MGMT 645 DB Forum 2?
MGMT 645's second forum, worth 30 points and posted in Module/Week 4 beside the PMBOK Guide's sections on managing and controlling quality, with its 20-point reply due in Module/Week 5.
Where can I find a free MGMT 645 Week 4 sample paper?
This page offers a complete MGMT 645 Week 4 thread pricing the cost of quality for a print shop's 84,000-piece mailing sent to an unchecked address file.
What are the four categories of the cost of quality?
Prevention costs to stop defects, appraisal costs to find them, internal failure costs for defects caught before delivery, and external failure costs for defects that reach the customer.
What does "quality is free" mean?
Philip Crosby's argument that the money spent preventing defects is less than the cost of the failures it avoids, so doing things right the first time pays for itself.
What is the difference between managing quality and controlling quality?
In the PMBOK Guide, managing quality turns the quality plan into executable activities and checks the process, while controlling quality measures the outputs to confirm they meet requirements.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom MGMT 645 Week 4 sample · All MGMT 645 weeks · All courses