| Course | BUSI 455 Conflict Resolution and Negotiation (BUSI455) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 2 |
| Assignment | Discussion Board Forum Replies and ExpertNegotiator Analysis |
| Paper type | Two discussion replies and a 100-word self-analysis |
| Length | about 611 words (thread and replies). Course guide: replies of at least 200 words to 2 classmates, each with at least 2 scholarly sources in current APA format, plus a 100-word self-analysis posted in ExpertNegotiator |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 100 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 2 in Liberty's published BUSI 455 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 455 Week 2
Discussion Board Forum Replies and ExpertNegotiator Analysis
BUSI 455 Conflict Resolution and Negotiation, Discussion Board Forum Replies and ExpertNegotiator Analysis
Thread by [Student Name]
The classmates' threads are composites; the textbook, the research and the Scripture cited are real.
Reply to Megan
Megan, I appreciated your honesty in describing yourself as conflict-avoidant and in tracing how your silence with a roommate let a small issue grow. Sande and Johnson (2015) would place that silence on the escape side of the slippery slope, but I think the research offers some encouragement: avoiding is not always wrong.
Rahim (1983) developed a widely used measure of five styles of handling interpersonal conflict, defined by two dimensions, concern for self and concern for others: integrating, obliging, dominating, avoiding and compromising. Thomas (1992) reflected on this two-dimensional model and argued that each style fits some situations; avoiding can be appropriate when an issue is trivial, when emotions need time to cool or when the costs of confronting outweigh the benefits. The problem arises when avoiding is the only style a person uses, regardless of the issue. Rahim's measure also shows that people tend to lean toward one or two styles, which makes the habit easy to miss in oneself; knowing your default is the first step to choosing a different style when the situation calls for it.
That fits Sande and Johnson's (2015) distinction between overlooking an offense, which is a deliberate peacemaking choice, and escaping, which leaves a problem unresolved while resentment grows. The test is whether you can truly let it go. With your roommate, the issue kept bothering you, which suggests it needed an integrating conversation rather than more silence. Could you try naming one small issue early next time, before it grows, to practice a different style?
Reply to Jordan
Jordan, your story about apologizing to a coworker after missing a deadline, only to find that the relationship stayed cold, shows how hard repair can be. I wonder whether the apology itself, rather than your coworker's stubbornness, might explain part of it.
Lewicki et al. (2016) asked people to evaluate apologies built from six possible components, such as expressing regret, explaining what went wrong, acknowledging responsibility, declaring repentance, offering repair and requesting forgiveness. Acknowledging responsibility was rated the most important component, followed by an offer of repair, while requesting forgiveness mattered least. Your thread said you explained that another project had run late; that may have sounded like an excuse rather than an acknowledgment.
McCullough et al. (1997) found that apology influenced forgiveness largely by increasing the offended person's empathy for the offender. An apology that clearly owns the harm helps the other person see the offender as someone who regrets it. Sande and Johnson (2015) make the same point in their guidance on confession: avoid words that shift blame, admit specifically, and accept the consequences. A second conversation acknowledging the impact on your coworker's work, and offering to take part of the next deliverable, might do what the first could not. It would also show your coworker that the apology was more than a way to end an awkward moment, since an offer of repair costs the offender something and is harder to fake than words. Proverbs 28:13 promises mercy to the one who confesses and forsakes wrongdoing (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016).
ExpertNegotiator Self-Analysis
In this course I want to become a negotiator who prepares rather than improvises. My three goals are to set a target and a walk-away point for every issue before each negotiation, to open with my own number whenever my information is solid rather than wait for theirs, and to ask questions that uncover the other side's interests. I will use ExpertNegotiator's planning posts to write my targets and walk-away points with my partner, use the negotiation threads to practice opening offers and questions, and use the results and reflection posts to compare each outcome with my plan and learn from the gap.
References
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Lewicki, R. J., Polin, B., & Lount, R. B., Jr. (2016). An exploration of the structure of effective apologies. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 9(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12073
McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321
Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.5465/255985
Sande, K., & Johnson, K. (2015). Resolving everyday conflict (Rev. ed.). Baker Books.
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130307
What the BUSI 455 Week 2 instructions ask
Module/Week 2 of BUSI 455 assigns chapters 14 and 16 of Lewicki et al.'s Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases with one presentation, the Discussion Board Forum replies, worth 60 points, and the ExpertNegotiator Analysis, worth 40. A reply has to reach 200 words and bring two scholarly works of its own, cited in APA style, and two replies are required. The analysis is a 100-word self-assessment, posted in the designated block of the ExpertNegotiator software after viewing its tutorials and demonstrations, stating what the student wishes to accomplish in the course and how the software will help. Together they prepare for the paired negotiations that begin in Module/Week 3.
How this BUSI 455 Week 2 example is built
Each reply opens by naming something specific in the classmate's thread, then adds research the classmate did not use. The first reply brings in two studies of conflict-handling styles, explaining the five styles and when avoiding fits, and suggests a step for the classmate's situation. The second uses a study of the components of effective apologies and a study of how forgiveness develops in close relationships to explain why the classmate's apology fell short, linking both to the book's guidance on confession. The self-analysis is exactly the length the assignment asks for, with three goals tied to features of the software rather than general hopes.
BUSI 455 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go
Reply grades depend on reaching 200 words, citing a pair of scholarly works apiece, answering what the classmate actually wrote and showing the week's reading, with APA citations throughout. A reply that brings fresh evidence or a new angle outscores one that agrees and restates the thread. Ending each reply with a question gives the classmate something to answer, which keeps the discussion moving. The ExpertNegotiator Analysis is graded on whether it states clear goals for the course, explains how the software will be used to meet them and keeps to about 100 words. Using Sande and Johnson's and Lewicki et al.'s terms in both pieces shows that the week's reading is being applied, and a self-analysis grounded in real weaknesses is more useful than one listing strengths.
BUSI 455 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points
Read several classmates' threads and reply to the two where you have something to add, not only the first two posted. Line up a pair of journal studies per reply before drafting it; studies of conflict styles, apology, forgiveness and negotiation behavior are plentiful in psychology and management journals. Name the classmate's point in the first sentence and close by asking something or proposing a next step. For the analysis, watch the software tutorials first, then name two or three goals you can actually measure in the negotiations, such as preparing a walk-away point or making the first offer. Keep it near 100 words.
Related BUSI 455 sample papers
Other BUSI 455 weeks
- BUSI 455 Week 1: Forum Thread: A Workplace Conflict
- BUSI 455 Week 3: Negotiation 1 Planning: Supply Deal
- BUSI 455 Week 4: Negotiation 1: Results
- BUSI 455 Week 5: Ethics Paper: Deception
- BUSI 455 Week 6: Negotiation 2 Planning: Lease
- BUSI 455 Week 7: Negotiation 2: The Record
- BUSI 455 Week 8: Negotiation 2 Self-Critique
More BS in Business Administration sample papers
- BUSI 444 Week 2: Case Study 1: Training and Strategy
- BUSI 446 Week 2: Project Report 1: Market Strategy
- BUSI 453 Week 2: QMR Draft 1: Problem and Approach
- BUSI 464 Week 2: Essay 1: Mexico and NAFTA
BUSI 455 Week 2 questions, answered
What is due in BUSI 455 Module/Week 2?
Two forum replies of at least 200 words with two scholarly sources each, worth 60 points, and the 100-word ExpertNegotiator Analysis, worth 40, after chapters 14 and 16 of Lewicki et al.
Where can I find a free BUSI 455 Week 2 sample paper?
Below is a complete BUSI 455 Week 2 sample: two forum replies on conflict styles and apology, each with two scholarly studies, and a 100-word ExpertNegotiator self-analysis.
What is the BUSI 455 ExpertNegotiator Analysis?
A 100-word self-analysis, posted in the ExpertNegotiator software after its tutorials, stating what the student wants to accomplish in the course and how the software will help.
What are the five conflict-handling styles?
Integrating or collaborating, obliging or accommodating, dominating or competing, avoiding, and compromising, defined by how much concern a person shows for their own and the other party's outcomes.
How many sources do BUSI 455 replies need?
Each reply needs a minimum of two scholarly sources, cited in current APA format, and it must also respond to the specific argument in the classmate's thread rather than to the topic in general.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom BUSI 455 Week 2 sample · All BUSI 455 weeks · All courses