| Course | BUSI 453 Applied Marketing Analysis (BUSI453) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 2 |
| Assignment | QMR Report: Draft 1 |
| Paper type | Marketing research report draft (steps 1 to 3) |
| Length | about 1,027 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: the first staged draft of the Quantitative Marketing Research Report, covering the opening steps of the six-step marketing research process in current APA format, with the word count and citations the assignment sets |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 100 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 2 in Liberty's published BUSI 453 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 453 Week 2
Should a Local Studio Sell On-Demand Classes? Problem Definition, Approach and Research Design
[Student Name]
School of Business, Liberty University
BUSI 453: Applied Marketing Analysis
Quantitative Marketing Research Report: Draft 1
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Riverside Cycle and Strength, its records and the draft's word and citation targets are composites standing in for the course's own; the textbook and research cited are real, and the structure follows Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 453.
Should a Local Studio Sell On-Demand Classes? Problem Definition, Approach and Research Design
Background
Riverside Cycle and Strength is an independent fitness studio in Lynchburg, Virginia, with 640 members paying $89 a month for unlimited live classes. Since 2022, average weekly attendance per member has fallen from 2.4 to 1.9 classes. Exit surveys show that 31 percent of members who canceled cited schedule conflicts, often travel or shift work. The owner is considering an on-demand library of recorded classes, filmed with the studio's own instructors, for $15 a month on top of membership. Filming equipment and editing would cost about $18,000 the first year. Two larger gyms in town already include app-based workouts in their memberships, but neither offers classes taught by instructors members know. The owner believes that familiarity is Riverside's edge, and wants evidence before spending a sum equal to about two months of the studio's profit.
Step 1: Problem Definition
In the terms Malhotra (2015) uses, the owner's choice is an action question, while the study must pin down the information that choice depends on. Here the management decision problem is whether Riverside should launch the $15 on-demand subscription. The marketing research problem is to determine members' likely adoption of an on-demand class library, the price they would accept and the member characteristics associated with adoption.
The specific components are:
- What share of members say they would subscribe at $15 a month?
- Which class types would they most want on demand?
- Do members who travel or work irregular hours report higher interest?
- Do members who already use online workout videos report higher interest?
The study does not ask whether the library should be free to all members, an option the owner ruled out because of its cost, or how to film and edit classes, which is an operational question rather than a marketing one. Keeping those questions out of scope keeps the survey short.
Step 2: Approach
Theoretical Framework
Davis's technology acceptance model proposes that whether someone plans to adopt a new technology rests chiefly on two beliefs, that the technology will help them and that it will be easy to use (Davis, 1989). Later work combined this model with others into a unified theory in which expected benefits, expected effort, the views of others and the support available all shape whether people intend to adopt and then do, with experience moderating several of those links (Venkatesh et al., 2003). For a fitness studio, perceived usefulness is whether recorded classes would help members exercise when they cannot attend, and prior experience with workout videos stands in for ease of use.
Analytical Model
Malhotra (2015) describes analytical models as verbal, graphical or mathematical representations of the theory. Stated verbally, the model for this study is that perceived usefulness leads to intention to subscribe, and that two member characteristics, prior video use and schedule constraint, raise intention both directly and by making the library seem more useful. Intention, in turn, is expected to relate to the price a member would pay. The model is simple on purpose, because a short member survey can measure only a few constructs well.
Research Questions and Hypotheses
- RQ1: How useful do members perceive on-demand classes to be, and how strongly do they intend to subscribe?
- RQ2: Does prior use of online workout videos relate to intention to subscribe?
- RQ3: Do schedule constraints relate to intention to subscribe?
- H1: Perceived usefulness of on-demand classes is positively related to intention to subscribe.
- H2: Members who have used online workout videos in the past six months report higher intention to subscribe than members who have not.
- H3: Members who travel for work at least monthly or work irregular shifts report higher intention to subscribe than members who do not.
Stated intentions overstate actual purchases, but they are useful predictors when measured carefully and adjusted (Morwitz et al., 2007). The survey will therefore treat stated intention as an upper bound and convert it to a conservative forecast before any revenue projection.
Information Needed
To answer the research questions, the study needs each member's perceived usefulness of on-demand classes, intention to subscribe at $15, highest acceptable monthly price, preferred class types, recent use of online workout videos, work travel and shift patterns, and length of membership. Membership length and attendance can be matched from the studio's records, which keeps the survey shorter.
Secondary Data
Malhotra (2015) advises reviewing secondary data before collecting primary data. The studio's booking system shows that 212 members, about a third, attended fewer than four classes in at least one of the past six months, and that cancellations peak in summer and December, when travel is common. These records identify the segment most likely to value on-demand classes, but they cannot reveal interest or acceptable price, which requires asking members directly. External secondary sources, such as published research on home exercise and trade reports on digital fitness, describe the market in general, but they report on large national brands rather than local studios and cannot say how Riverside's own members would respond to a library taught by their own instructors.
Step 3: Research Design
The study will use a descriptive, single cross-sectional design: a survey of a sample of members, measured once (Malhotra, 2015). An exploratory design such as focus groups would generate ideas about content but could not estimate the share of members likely to subscribe. A causal design, such as offering a trial at different prices, would give stronger evidence of purchase but would require building the library before knowing whether it is worth building. A survey fits the decision's timing and budget.
Malhotra (2015) compares survey methods by their flexibility, speed, cost, response rate and control of the data collection environment. A telephone survey would allow follow-up questions but would cost staff time and reach members during work hours. A paper survey at the front desk would miss exactly the members the study most needs, those who rarely visit. An online survey is fast and inexpensive, lets members answer when convenient, and reaches the infrequent visitors through the app and email.
The survey will be delivered online through the studio's member app and email, which reaches all members at no cost, with a $10 smoothie credit for completion. Draft 2 will develop the measurement scales and questionnaire, and Draft 3 will report fieldwork and test the three hypotheses with a correlation and two independent-samples t-tests.
References
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Malhotra, N. K. (2015). Essentials of marketing research: A hands-on orientation. Pearson.
Morwitz, V. G., Steckel, J. H., & Gupta, A. (2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales? International Journal of Forecasting, 23(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.05.015
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
What the BUSI 453 Week 2 instructions ask
Module/Week 2 of BUSI 453 assigns chapters 3, 4 and 6 of Malhotra, on research design, exploratory research with secondary and syndicated data, and descriptive research through surveys and observation, with one presentation and QMR Report: Draft 1, worth 100 points. The report as a whole follows the six-step marketing research process, is written in current APA format and is built in three drafts and a final submission of 2,850 to 3,600 words with at least 10 references beyond the textbook and the Bible. Each stage carries its own word count and citation requirements, given in the assignment instructions, and the first draft sets the problem that every later stage must answer.
How this BUSI 453 Week 2 example is built
The draft opens with the studio's situation and the decision its owner faces, then states the owner's action question and the information question behind it before listing the specific components. The approach section grounds the study in the technology acceptance model, states three research questions and three testable hypotheses, and names the variables. A short section reports what secondary data from the studio's own records already reveal, which narrows what the survey must ask. The research design section explains why a descriptive cross-sectional survey of members fits better than focus groups or an experiment, and previews how the data will test each hypothesis in Draft 3.
BUSI 453 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go
Draft 1 is graded on a clearly defined problem, an approach grounded in theory, research questions and hypotheses that can be tested, a research design suited to them, use of course concepts and sources, and APA writing that meets the stage's word and citation requirements. Instructors look for Malhotra's vocabulary used precisely: management decision problem, marketing research problem, theoretical framework, analytical model, research questions, hypotheses, exploratory, descriptive and causal designs, and cross-sectional versus longitudinal. Hypotheses must state a relationship that data could reject. The strongest drafts pair every research question with where its data will come from and how they will be analyzed.
BUSI 453 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points
Choose a decision you can gather data on, such as a business you know or a group you can survey, since later drafts need real or realistic results. Phrase the owner's decision as something to do and the research problem as something to learn, then split the latter into components. Pick one theory that predicts the outcome, and turn it into hypotheses with a direction. Report any secondary data first; it may answer part of the problem without a survey. Justify the design against the alternatives. Keep a source list from the start, because the final report needs 10 references beyond the textbook and the Bible. A one-paragraph background on the business at the top saves the instructor from guessing at the context.
Related BUSI 453 sample papers
Other BUSI 453 weeks
- BUSI 453 Week 1: Forum 1: Research Problems
- BUSI 453 Week 3: Forum 2: Interviews vs. Experiments
- BUSI 453 Week 4: QMR Draft 2: The Questionnaire
- BUSI 453 Week 5: Forum 3: Sampling and Nonresponse
- BUSI 453 Week 6: QMR Draft 3: Fieldwork and Results
- BUSI 453 Week 7: Forum 4: Research Ethics
- BUSI 453 Week 8: QMR Final Report: On-Demand Classes
More BS in Business Administration sample papers
- BUSI 444 Week 2: Case Study 1: Training and Strategy
- BUSI 446 Week 2: Project Report 1: Market Strategy
- BUSI 455 Week 2: Forum Replies and Self-Analysis
- BUSI 464 Week 2: Essay 1: Mexico and NAFTA
BUSI 453 Week 2 questions, answered
What is BUSI 453 QMR Report Draft 1?
The first 100-point stage of the Quantitative Marketing Research Report, due in Module/Week 2, covering problem definition, the approach and the research design.
Where can I find a free BUSI 453 Week 2 sample paper?
A complete BUSI 453 Week 2 QMR Draft 1 is below, defining the research problem for a fitness studio's on-demand classes, with hypotheses and a survey design.
What goes in the approach to a marketing research problem?
Malhotra lists the objective or theoretical framework, an analytical model, research questions, hypotheses and the specific information needed to answer them, all decided before any data are gathered.
What is a descriptive cross-sectional design?
A design that measures a sample of the population once, at one point in time, to describe characteristics and test relationships among variables.
What else is due in BUSI 453 Module/Week 2?
Nothing else is graded; Draft 1 is the week's only assignment, alongside chapters 3, 4 and 6 of Malhotra and one presentation.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom BUSI 453 Week 2 sample · All BUSI 453 weeks · All courses