BUSI 336 Week 6 Financial Feasibility Analysis (Group) Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 336 Week 6 sample tests whether SteadyHome Safety Services, the group's composite home safety venture for older adults, can make money: its Financial Feasibility Analysis. It estimates startup costs of $21,500, builds a first-year projected income statement from the cautious revenue forecast of Module/Week 4, calculates a break-even point of about 57 assessed households against a forecast of 110, and proposes funding through founder savings and a small loan. Research on how startups are financed, federal data on new business survival and a sensitivity test showing what happens if only half the forecast customers appear keep the analysis honest. Business Administration groups in Liberty University BUSI 336 submit it in Module/Week 6 for 60 points, the same module/week as their draft pitch.

CourseBUSI 336 Introduction to Entrepreneurship (BUSI336)
Module/Week6
AssignmentFinancial Feasibility Analysis (Group)
Paper typeGroup feasibility analysis
Lengthabout 503 words, 2 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a group analysis of the venture's startup capital needs, projected financial performance and overall financial attractiveness, with a biblical worldview, in current APA format
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points60
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 6 in Liberty's published BUSI 336 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 336 Week 6

1

Counting the Cost: A Financial Feasibility Analysis for SteadyHome Safety Services

 

[Student Name]

School of Business, Liberty University

BUSI 336: Introduction to Entrepreneurship

Financial Feasibility Analysis (Group)

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

SteadyHome and all of its financial figures are composites built from the earlier forecast; the research, federal data and Bible passages cited are real. The guide does not publish the analysis template, so the headings follow the startup cost, projected income, break-even and funding questions the module/week's readings cover.

2

Counting the Cost: A Financial Feasibility Analysis for SteadyHome Safety Services

Startup Capital Requirements

Why this part earns its pointsEvery startup cost includes a cash reserve, which first-time founders often forget.
3
ItemEstimated cost
Tools and installation equipment$4,000
Opening inventory of grab bars, railings and lighting$2,500
Business registration, contractor licensing and aging-in-place training$2,000
Insurance deposit (general liability)$1,800
Enclosed utility trailer for materials$3,500
Website, brochures and assessment report templates$1,700
Cash reserve for three months of fixed costs$6,000
Total$21,500

The founder's existing pickup truck will tow the trailer, which avoids a vehicle purchase. Estimates come from supplier price lists and quotes the group gathered in Modules/Weeks 3 through 5.

Projected First-Year Income Statement

LineAmount
Assessment revenue, 110 households at $150$16,500
Less installation credits, 66 households at $150($9,900)
Installation revenue, 66 households at $900 average$59,400
Net revenue$66,000
Installation materials, 35 percent of installation revenue($20,790)
Installer and contractor labor($14,000)
Gross profit$31,210
Fixed operating expenses (insurance, vehicle costs, marketing, software, bookkeeping, depreciation)($16,000)
Operating income before owner's compensation$15,210

The founder will keep a hospital job during the first year, so the business does not need to pay a salary while it proves itself.

Why this part earns its pointsBreak-even is expressed in households, a unit the group can actually track.
4

Break-Even Analysis

Each assessed household produces average net revenue of $600 ($66,000 divided by 110) and variable costs of about $316 ($34,790 in materials and labor divided by 110), leaving a contribution of about $284. Dividing fixed costs of $16,000 by $284 gives a break-even point of about 57 households per year. The forecast of 110 households provides a margin of safety of roughly 48 percent.

Sensitivity Test

If only 55 households buy, half the forecast, net revenue falls to $33,000 and contribution to about $15,600, leaving a loss of roughly $400 before the founder's compensation. That loss could be covered from the $6,000 reserve. The business therefore survives a weak first year, though it would not yet justify leaving the founder's job. Federal data show why such tests matter: roughly one in five new private businesses close within their first year, and about half are gone within five years (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024). A plan that works only if every forecast comes true is a hope, not a plan.

Why this part earns its pointsFunding is sized to survive the pessimistic case, not only the forecast.
5

Funding Plan

Cassar (2004) studied the financing of new ventures and found that startups rely heavily on owners' funds and debt, with larger and more asset-intensive ventures more likely to use outside and bank financing. SteadyHome is small and light on assets, so the group proposes $12,000 from the founder's savings and a $10,000 microloan through a lender in the U.S. Small Business Administration's microloan program, for $22,000 in total. Keeping the loan small limits monthly payments to an amount the business can cover even in the sensitivity scenario.

Biblical Worldview

In Luke, Jesus pictures a man who lays a tower's foundation without budgeting for the walls and becomes a joke to the neighbors when the money runs out (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Luke 14:28-30). This analysis is that counting. Proverbs also pictures the debtor as bound to the creditor (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Proverbs 22:7), which is why the group limited debt to less than half the startup capital and chose a loan the business can repay in a poor year.

The analysis leaves two questions open. The 35 percent materials ratio rests on supplier quotes for common installations and may rise if customers choose larger projects such as ramps. The contractor labor figure assumes the partner contractor handles only work requiring a license, so a change in that arrangement would raise costs.

Conclusion

SteadyHome is financially feasible as a part-time launch. Startup costs are modest, break-even requires about half the forecast customers and a pessimistic scenario produces only a small, covered loss. The business is not yet attractive enough to replace the founder's salary, which the plan acknowledges. The Draft Business Presentation will carry these figures forward with the earlier analyses.

6

References

Cassar, G. (2004). The financing of business start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00029-6

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Business employment dynamics: Establishment age and survival data. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/bdm/bdmage.htm

What the BUSI 336 Week 6 instructions ask

Financial feasibility arrives in BUSI 336's sixth module/week, along with its readings, Discussion Board 5, the group's Financial Feasibility Analysis, worth 60 points, and the Draft Business Presentation, also worth 60 points. The financial analysis completes the three feasibility tests and supplies the numbers the business presentation will need. It asks how much money the venture needs to start, whether it can become profitable at realistic sales levels and how it will be funded. A biblical worldview applies to how the venture uses debt and other people's money as much as to how it treats customers.

How this BUSI 336 Week 6 example is built

The analysis moves from what the business needs to what it can earn. A table of startup costs comes first, followed by a projected first-year income statement built on the revenue forecast from Module/Week 4. A break-even calculation shows how many households the business must serve to cover its fixed costs, and a sensitivity test cuts the forecast in half to see whether the business survives. A funding section, a faith section and an overall judgment of financial attractiveness close the paper. Tables carry the numbers, while the text explains each assumption and connects it to the earlier analyses, so a reader can trace every figure.

BUSI 336 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go

Points reward a full list of opening costs, an income projection that reuses the earlier forecast, break-even math that is right, frank attention to risk, funding sized to the venture, Scripture applied to money decisions and correct APA style. Instructors look for numbers that connect to the earlier analyses rather than appearing from nowhere, and for groups that test what happens when assumptions prove wrong. Analyses with arithmetic errors, missing costs such as insurance or with profits that depend on optimistic sales lose points. A sensitivity test, even a simple one that halves the forecast, shows the instructor that the group understands the uncertainty in a new venture's numbers. Funding choices should match the size of the venture and its risk.

BUSI 336 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost points

List every cost needed to open the doors, including insurance, licensing and a cash reserve, and say where each estimate comes from. Build the income statement from the revenue forecast you already made, so the course's analyses fit together. Calculate break-even in units customers understand, such as households served. Run at least one pessimistic scenario. Choose funding that matches the size of the risk, and finish early, since the draft presentation is due the same module/week. Federal data on business survival and peer-reviewed research on startup financing help justify the size and type of funding requested. Have one member recheck every calculation independently before submission, since arithmetic errors are the most common reason financial analyses lose points.

Related BUSI 336 sample papers

Other BUSI 336 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 336 Week 6 questions, answered

What is the BUSI 336 Financial Feasibility Analysis?

It is the third feasibility test, worth 60 points in Module/Week 6: the group prices its opening costs, projects a year of income, finds break-even and proposes how to fund the launch.

Where can I find a free BUSI 336 Week 6 sample paper?

This page holds a complete BUSI 336 Week 6 group analysis of startup costs, break-even and funding for a home safety service.

How do you calculate a break-even point for a service business?

Divide annual fixed costs by the contribution each customer makes, which is the average revenue per customer minus the variable costs of serving that customer.

How are most small startups financed?

Research on new ventures shows that most rely heavily on the founders' own money and on debt, with outside equity uncommon for small firms.

What else is due in BUSI 336 Module/Week 6?

Discussion Board 5 and the 60-point Draft Business Presentation are due the same module/week, and the draft should already use the numbers from this financial analysis.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.