BUSI 344 Week 7 Discussion Board Forum 7 Example

Reviewed by Laura Hargrove, MPH · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 344 Week 7 sample thread applies the week's chapter on employee relations to one of the hardest decisions human resources faces: what to do with a nurse who made a serious medication error. It contrasts punitive discipline with a just culture approach that separates honest human error, at-risk choices and reckless conduct, and treats each differently. Research explains why the distinction matters: in a survey of 572 nurses, the distress of being a second victim of an error was linked to stronger intention to leave, and a review argues that peer accountability, not blame from above, is what makes safety practices stick. The thread proposes a decision guide and a support process. A passage on restoring someone gently frames the response. Replies address zero-tolerance policies and peer support. Liberty University BUSI 344, part of the healthcare administration degree, grades this Module/Week 7 forum out of 50 points.

CourseBUSI 344 Human Resource Management in Healthcare Administration (BUSI344)
Module/Week7
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 7
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 702 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 300 words with replies to at least 2 classmates of at least 150 words each; each thread and reply includes at least 1 biblical integration, at least 2 peer-reviewed source citations in current APA format and at least 1 reference to the text
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Healthcare Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 7 in Liberty's published BUSI 344 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 344 Week 7

1

Discussion Board Forum 7: Employee Relations, Discipline and Just Culture

BUSI 344 Human Resource Management in Healthcare Administration, Discussion Board Forum 7

Thread by [Student Name]

The hospital, the error and the classmates are composites; the textbook, Scripture and the peer-reviewed articles cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread starts with the manager's first instinct, because the case for a different approach rests on what that instinct would cost.
2

Last month, a nurse on our cardiac unit programmed an infusion pump with a tenfold dose of a heart medication. A second nurse, checking the pump during rounds, caught the error within twenty minutes, and the patient recovered, but the unit manager's first instinct was to suspend the nurse and place her on a final warning. Human resources was asked to process it. Niles (2013) describes progressive discipline as a sequence of steps, from coaching to warnings to termination, applied consistently and with respect for employees' rights, including the right to know the reason and to respond. Discipline is meant to correct behavior, but not every error is a behavior problem, and treating system failures as personal failings teaches staff to hide mistakes.

A just culture approach separates three kinds of events: honest human error, which calls for support and system fixes; at-risk choices, such as skipping a double check, which call for coaching; and reckless disregard for safety, which may warrant discipline. Our review found that the pump's drug library had not been updated and the nurse was covering two extra patients, which made this an honest error in a weak system.

Why this part earns its pointsThe research explains why punishing honest errors backfires, both for the employee and for patient safety.
3

The consequences of getting this wrong are real. Xu et al. (2025) surveyed 572 nurses and found that the distress of being a second victim of an error was positively associated with intention to leave. Martínez (2026) contends that safety practices succeed when colleagues hold one another to shared standards, and that blame-based accountability from above undermines it.

Our human resources plan adopts a written decision guide based on the three categories, requires a review by a manager and a safety officer before any discipline for an error and offers every involved employee counseling and a peer supporter. The nurse in this case received coaching and support, the pump library was fixed and the unit's staffing on nights was reviewed. She stayed, and three weeks later she was the one who caught a similar error on another unit. Paul instructed that anyone caught in a transgression should be restored in a spirit of gentleness (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Galatians 6:1). Punishing honest errors does not make care safer; it only makes errors harder to see.

Reply to Brianna

Brianna, your hospital has a zero-tolerance rule that any medication error leads to a written warning. I understand the wish to show that safety matters, and patients deserve that seriousness, but research suggests such rules may reduce reporting, because nurses who expect a warning have a reason to stay quiet about near misses. A review of dozens of studies on whether health workers voice concerns concluded that the surrounding culture largely decides it (Lainidi et al., 2023). Xu et al. (2025) linked the distress of error involvement to nurses' intention to leave, so automatic warnings may cost both safety and staff. Niles (2013) emphasizes that discipline should be consistent and fair, which is different from automatic. Micah calls God's people to do justice and to love mercy (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Micah 6:8). Could your hospital track whether error and near-miss reports fell after the rule took effect? A drop in reports would likely mean fewer errors seen, not fewer errors made.

Reply to Tyler

Tyler, you proposed a peer support program for staff involved in serious errors, staffed by trained volunteers from each department. The evidence suggests it addresses a real need that most hospitals overlook, since the patient's recovery usually ends the organization's attention to the event. Xu et al. (2025) found that second victim distress was associated with stronger intention to leave, and that posttraumatic growth partly offset that effect, which suggests support can help people recover. In addition, Heller and Souter (2024) note that training and institutional programs help clinicians handle the aftermath of adverse events, including disclosure to patients. The textbook treats staff well-being as part of the human resource mandate (Niles, 2013), so your proposal fits squarely within the department's work. Paul urged believers to comfort one another and build one another up (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, 1 Thessalonians 5:11). Who would recruit and train the peer supporters, how would staff request one quickly after an event and how would the program protect the confidentiality of those conversations?

4

References

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Heller, K. O., & Souter, K. J. (2024). Disclosure of adverse events and medical errors: A framework for anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology Clinics, 42(3), 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2023.12.003

Lainidi, O., Jendeby, M. K., Montgomery, A., Mouratidis, C., Paitaridou, K., Cook, C., Johnson, J., & Karakasidou, E. (2023). An integrative systematic review of employee silence and voice in healthcare: What are we really measuring? Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1111579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1111579

Martínez, M. (2026). Peer accountability in patient safety: An under-examined determinant of team performance. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 38(3), mzag134. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag134

Niles, N. J. (2013). Basic concepts of health care human resource management. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Xu, Y., Jin, Q., Zhou, Q., Zhang, R., & Ding, W. (2025). Relationship between second victim experience and turnover intention in Chinese nurses: Assessing the mediating role of posttraumatic growth using structural equation modeling. Journal of Nursing Management, 2025, 7327139. https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/7327139

What the BUSI 344 Week 7 instructions ask

Forum 7 shares Module/Week 7 of BUSI 344 with the busiest part of the research project: the group's completed paper and the last peer evaluation, plus a quiz. The reading is chapter 10 of Niles with a presentation. Students open with a post of no fewer than 300 words and answer at least two peers with posts of no fewer than 150 words. Each of those posts draws on Scripture, cites a couple of peer-reviewed studies and points back to Niles at least once, using APA style. Draft the thread early in the week so the final group paper does not crowd it out. The forum closes Monday night with the rest of the week's work.

How this BUSI 344 Week 7 example is built

The thread begins with a nurse who gave a tenfold dose of a medication after a pump programming error and the manager's first instinct to suspend her. It uses the chapter to describe progressive discipline and the employee's rights in the process, then introduces a just culture framework that distinguishes error from risky choices and recklessness. Two studies show how errors affect the nurses who make them and why shared accountability works better than blame. The human resources plan sets out a decision guide, a review process and support for the employee. A passage from Galatians frames restoration. Replies address zero tolerance and peer support programs. Both replies end with a question. The plan includes a review step before any discipline. Support continues after the review.

BUSI 344 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go

In the employee relations forum, each post must still meet its minimum and bring in a verse, a pair of journal studies and the textbook, but the heart of the grade is whether the proposed process is fair. In an employee relations forum, faculty look for fair processes that respect employees' rights, a distinction between human error and misconduct and attention to the organization's systems as well as individual behavior. Replies that bring evidence about how discipline affects reporting and retention show mature judgment. Posts that protect employees' rights while also fixing the system stand out. Clear organization helps.

BUSI 344 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose an employee relations situation you have seen, such as an error, a conflict or a policy violation, and describe it without identifying anyone. Use the chapter to explain the organization's disciplinary process and the employee's rights. Find two peer-reviewed studies on how errors or discipline affect staff and safety. Propose a fair process that distinguishes honest mistakes from reckless choices. Connect your approach to Scripture. For the replies, work in the textbook, two more studies and a fitting verse, and propose one change to the classmate's process. Change every identifying detail. Explain who would decide and on what evidence. Then explain how the process protects reporting. Describe the review step that would come before any discipline.

Related BUSI 344 sample papers

Other BUSI 344 weeks

More BS in Healthcare Administration sample papers

BUSI 344 Week 7 questions, answered

What is BUSI 344 Discussion Board Forum 7?

Chapter 10 grounds this 50-point discussion, in which students design a fair response to an employee relations problem such as an error or a conflict.

Where can I find a free BUSI 344 Week 7 sample paper?

This page offers the whole BUSI 344 Week 7 sample on just culture after a medication error, replies and references included, free of charge.

What is a just culture?

An approach to accountability that distinguishes honest human error, which calls for support and system fixes, from at-risk choices, which call for coaching, and reckless conduct, which may warrant discipline.

What is a second victim?

A health care worker who is emotionally harmed after involvement in an error or adverse event; research links these experiences to burnout and stronger intention to leave.

What else is due in BUSI 344 Module/Week 7?

Besides the forum, the group submits its finished research paper, every member completes the fourth peer evaluation and each student takes the seventh quiz that week.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.