BUSI 344 Week 6 Discussion Board Forum 6 Example

Reviewed by Laura Hargrove, MPH · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 344 Week 6 sample thread draws on chapters 8 and 9 about compensation and benefits to examine a hospital that raised nurse pay twice in two years and still lost staff. It argues for a total rewards approach, in which wages, benefits and working conditions are designed together, and focuses on one benefit that costs little money: control over one's schedule. A systematic review of 23 studies found that self-scheduling often improved nurses' satisfaction and work-life balance, though results were mixed and depended on how it was introduced, and nursing home staff ranked recognition and flexibility alongside pay as reasons to stay. A command to pay workers fairly and promptly frames the pay side of the equation. Replies weigh an across-the-board raise and a wellness program. In Module/Week 6, Liberty University BUSI 344 gives this forum 50 points toward the healthcare administration bachelor's.

CourseBUSI 344 Human Resource Management in Healthcare Administration (BUSI344)
Module/Week6
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 6
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 708 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 300 words with replies to at least 2 classmates of at least 150 words each; each thread and reply includes at least 1 biblical integration, at least 2 peer-reviewed source citations in current APA format and at least 1 reference to the text
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Healthcare Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 6 in Liberty's published BUSI 344 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 344 Week 6

1

Discussion Board Forum 6: Compensation, Benefits and Total Rewards

BUSI 344 Human Resource Management in Healthcare Administration, Discussion Board Forum 6

Thread by [Student Name]

The hospital, its pay data and the classmates are composites; the textbook, Scripture and the peer-reviewed articles cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread starts with two raises that did not work, which points the analysis beyond pay.
2

Over the past two years, our hospital raised registered nurse base pay twice, by 4% and then by 6%, after market surveys showed we had fallen behind competitors. Turnover barely moved. Exit interviews explained why: nurses who left for other hospitals often took similar pay, and many cited rigid schedules, mandatory overtime and little say over their weekends. Niles (2013) describes compensation as one component of the rewards an organization offers, alongside benefits and the conditions of work, and notes that pay must be internally fair and externally competitive. We had fixed the competitive gap but ignored the rest of the package, and the raises cost the hospital several million dollars a year without buying the stability leaders expected.

The research supports a broader view. Ramanan et al. (2026) held focus groups with nursing home staff and found that recognition, culture, flexibility and management were among the reasons they would stay, along with smaller perks. On scheduling specifically, Wynendaele et al. (2021) reviewed 23 studies of self-scheduling and found that several reported better job satisfaction, work-life balance and involvement in planning, while others found no change or negative effects, often because of how the change was introduced. Self-scheduling is not magic, but it is a benefit that costs little money when designed well, and it gives nurses something pay cannot: a measure of control over their own lives.

Why this part earns its pointsThe pilot includes rules and measurement, because the review showed that implementation determines whether self-scheduling helps.
3

Our plan pilots self-scheduling on two medical-surgical units whose managers volunteered and whose nurses voted to try it. Nurses choose shifts within clear rules: a fair rotation of weekends and holidays, minimum staffing for each shift and a charge nurse who resolves gaps before the schedule posts. Human resources will compare turnover, overtime hours and satisfaction scores with two similar units for one year, and the pilot units' nurses will help revise the rules after the first three months.

Deuteronomy commanded employers to pay a hired worker his wages on the same day, before the sun set, because he is poor and counts on it (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Deuteronomy 24:14-15). Fair pay is owed to workers; a fair schedule is how an employer shows it sees them as people with lives.

Reply to Kendra

Kendra, you argued that a single large raise would solve your hospital's retention problem. Pay certainly matters to every employee, and Niles (2013) is clear that compensation must be competitive to attract staff. But research suggests pay is rarely the only reason people leave, and a raise given without other changes can disappoint everyone who expected it to fix morale. De Vries et al. (2024), pooling studies of hospital nurses and physicians, found that burnout, support and working conditions were among the main determinants of intention to leave. Muir et al. (2026) found that heavier patient loads went along with more burnout and plans to quit, so a raise that leaves workloads unchanged may not hold nurses for long. James warns against withholding wages from laborers (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, James 5:4), so fair pay is a duty, but it may not be a complete strategy. Has your hospital asked departing nurses whether pay was their main reason, or only assumed it? Exit interview data could show whether the money would be better spent on staffing.

Reply to Andre

Andre, your idea shows real concern for staff. You proposed a wellness program with gym memberships and resilience classes. Wellness benefits can help and show that the organization cares, but research suggests they work best when they address the causes of stress rather than only its symptoms. Bolton et al. (2026) found that leadership shaped nurses' moral distress and burnout, and that honest communication and solidarity within teams did more good than individual coping strategies alone. Porter and Lyngaas (2026) raised engagement on a neonatal unit by offering incentives tied to schedules, balance between work and home and recognition, changes that alter the job itself. Niles (2013) treats benefits as part of a broader strategy, so a wellness program might be paired with changes in staffing or scheduling. Jesus invited the weary to come to Him and find rest (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Matthew 11:28). Could your wellness program include protected breaks on every shift and a quarterly check on workload, so it treats causes as well as symptoms?

4

References

Bolton, S., Baldwin, A., Adams, A. M. N., Willis, E., Cutmore, E., Johnston, S., Snaith, N., & Dafny, H. A. (2026). The moral of the story: Perception of leadership with moral distress in registered nurses: A qualitative systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 35(10), 4106-4123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70354

De Vries, N., Maniscalco, L., Matranga, D., Bouman, J., & De Winter, J. P. (2024). Determinants of intention to leave among nurses and physicians in a hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0300377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300377

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Muir, K. J., Aiken, L. H., Brom, H., Hovsepian, V., Lasater, K. B., & McHugh, M. D. (2026). Safe minimum nurse staffing requirements for hospitals: Evidence from Pennsylvania. Medical Care, 64(7), 447-455. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002332

Niles, N. J. (2013). Basic concepts of health care human resource management. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Porter, M., & Lyngaas, T. (2026). Incentivizing excellence: Strategies for enhancing nurse engagement through leadership. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 50(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000723

Ramanan, H., Kalarchian, M., Pezzone, A., Rhoads, C., & Linkov, F. (2026). Enhancing employee retention in nursing homes through non-monetary incentives: Insights from focus groups. Geriatric Nursing, 70, 103983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2026.103983

Wynendaele, H., Gemmel, P., Pattyn, E., Myny, D., & Trybou, J. (2021). Systematic review: What is the impact of self-scheduling on the patient, nurse and organization? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(1), 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14579

What the BUSI 344 Week 6 instructions ask

No group project work is due in Module/Week 6 of BUSI 344, so Forum 6 and the sixth quiz are the graded work, while students work through chapters 8 and 9 of the Niles text and view one presentation. The week asks for a thread that clears 300 words and for replies to two or more peers that each clear 150. Scripture, a pair of peer-reviewed studies and a nod to the course text must appear in the thread and again in every reply, all in APA form. The lighter load is a chance to read peers' threads closely and write replies with real substance. Both the forum replies and the open-book quiz close at the end of the module/week.

How this BUSI 344 Week 6 example is built

The thread opens with the hospital's two pay increases and the turnover that continued anyway. It uses the chapters to describe compensation as one part of a total rewards package that includes benefits and working conditions, then focuses on scheduling flexibility as a low-cost benefit. A systematic review of self-scheduling and focus group research on what keeps staff supply the evidence, including its limits. The human resources plan pilots self-scheduling on two units with clear rules. A passage from Deuteronomy on paying workers promptly frames fair wages. Replies address a classmate who favors a single large raise and one who proposes a wellness program. Both replies close with a question. Every figure is labeled. The pilot has clear rules.

BUSI 344 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go

For the compensation forum, instructors expect every post to meet its length and include a verse, two peer-reviewed citations and the textbook, and they reward analysis that treats pay as one part of a larger package. For a compensation forum, faculty look for an understanding that pay must be competitive and fair but that benefits and working conditions also shape retention, and for proposals whose costs and effects are considered. Replies that ask whether a classmate's reward actually addresses the reason staff leave show sound judgment. Cost estimates make a reward proposal more credible. Clear structure helps readers. Accurate citations are expected.

BUSI 344 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost points

Describe the pay and benefits your organization offers for one role and what employees say about them. Use the chapters to explain the parts of a total rewards package. Find two peer-reviewed studies on what health care workers value or on the effects of a specific benefit. Propose one change, estimate its cost and say how you would measure its effect on retention or satisfaction. Connect fair compensation to Scripture. When replying, bring the course text, two fresh studies and a passage of Scripture, and ask whether the classmate's idea fits the reasons staff actually leave. Keep pay figures general. Then say who would run it. Be realistic. State how employees would learn about the new benefit.

Related BUSI 344 sample papers

Other BUSI 344 weeks

More BS in Healthcare Administration sample papers

BUSI 344 Week 6 questions, answered

What is BUSI 344 Discussion Board Forum 6?

Worth 50 points, this Module/Week 6 discussion examines pay and benefits as one package and asks whether a proposed reward fits why staff actually leave.

Where can I find a free BUSI 344 Week 6 sample paper?

The BUSI 344 Week 6 sample on total rewards and self-scheduling, including both replies and its reference list, can be read below for free.

What is a total rewards approach?

An approach that treats wages, benefits, recognition, development and working conditions such as schedules as one package designed to attract and keep employees.

Does self-scheduling help nurses?

A review of 23 studies found that self-scheduling often improved satisfaction and work-life balance, but some studies found no change or negative effects, depending on how it was implemented.

Is there a research project deliverable in BUSI 344 Module/Week 6?

No. Module/Week 6 is the one week after the bibliography with no group deliverable; only the forum and the sixth quiz are graded, and the final paper follows in Module/Week 7.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.