BUSI 344 Week 2 Discussion Board Forum 2 Example

Reviewed by Laura Hargrove, MPH · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 344 Week 2 sample thread applies the week's chapter on the legal environment of health care human resources to violence against staff, a problem that is both a safety hazard and a legal obligation for employers. It starts from a hospital where reported assaults on nurses had doubled in two years, explains why federal law obliges employers to protect workers from known serious hazards and shows what human resources can do about it. Research supports the plan: a review of 45 studies estimated that 67% of nurses experience verbal abuse, and a 2026 inpatient program that screened patients for aggression and added proactive rounding cut violent events from 5.30% to 3.71% of patients. A psalm frames the commitment. Replies address abuse from physicians and support after an assault. Liberty University BUSI 344 grades this Module/Week 2 forum, part of healthcare administration, out of 50.

CourseBUSI 344 Human Resource Management in Healthcare Administration (BUSI344)
Module/Week2
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 2
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 725 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 300 words with replies to at least 2 classmates of at least 150 words each; each thread and reply includes at least 1 biblical integration, at least 2 peer-reviewed source citations in current APA format and at least 1 reference to the text
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Healthcare Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published BUSI 344 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 344 Week 2

1

Discussion Board Forum 2: Human Resources, the Law and Workplace Violence

BUSI 344 Human Resource Management in Healthcare Administration, Discussion Board Forum 2

Thread by [Student Name]

The hospital, its incidents and the classmates are composites; the textbook, Scripture and the peer-reviewed articles cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread starts with a rising incident count, which shows why the legal duty is not abstract for human resources.
2

At our 220-bed hospital, reported assaults on staff doubled in two years, from 31 to 64, and many more verbal threats went unreported. Until last year, human resources handled each report as an individual employee relations matter: an injured nurse filed for workers' compensation, a manager wrote an incident report and nothing changed. This week's chapter showed why that approach falls short. Niles (2013) explains that health care employers operate within a body of law that shapes every human resource decision, including the obligation to keep employees safe. Federal workplace safety law requires employers to provide a workplace free from recognized serious hazards, and violence from patients and visitors is now a well-recognized hazard in health care.

The scale of the problem is large. Wang et al. (2025) pooled 45 studies and estimated that 67% of nurses experience verbal abuse, most often from patients' relatives and friends and, troublingly, from physicians as well. Physical assaults are less common but more harmful, and both drive burnout, sick leave and turnover. For human resources, every unaddressed incident is also a recruiting problem, because nurses talk about which hospitals keep them safe.

Why this part earns its pointsThe prevention study gives human resources a specific program to adopt, rather than a general commitment.
3

Prevention can work. Kim et al. (2026) studied 7,625 patients on four nonpsychiatric inpatient units and found that screening every patient with a brief aggression risk tool, flagging high-risk patients and adding proactive rounding by a behavioral health nurse reduced violent events from 5.30% to 3.71% of patients, with a significant drop in physical assaults.

Our human resources plan now has four parts: a screening tool adopted with nursing leadership, a simple reporting system that staff can use in two minutes, de-escalation training for every new hire and a support process after any incident, including paid time off and counseling. We review incident data monthly with the safety committee and report trends to the board each quarter, so the problem stays visible to leaders who control the budget. The psalmist calls God a refuge and a fortress (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Psalm 91:2), and those who lead organizations reflect that care when they make the workplace a place of refuge rather than danger. Keeping staff safe is not an employee perk; it is the first promise an employer makes.

Reply to Kendra

Kendra, you wrote that the abuse nurses on your unit fear most comes not from patients but from one physician who shouts at them. That matches the research: Wang et al. (2025) found physicians among the leading perpetrators of verbal abuse against nurses. Niles (2013) notes that human resource policies on conduct must apply to everyone in the organization, which includes physicians with privileges, even when they are not employees. Lainidi et al. (2023), reviewing 76 studies, found that whether staff speak up depends heavily on organizational culture, so a policy is only as strong as leaders' willingness to enforce it. Ephesians urges believers to let no corrupting talk come out of their mouths, but only words that build up (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Ephesians 4:29). A clear process matters: nurses need to know where to report, that reports will be investigated by someone with authority and that they will not face retaliation for speaking up. Has your hospital's medical staff office been involved, since physician conduct often falls under its bylaws rather than ordinary human resource policy?

Reply to Andre

Andre, you asked what a hospital should do after an assault, beyond filing a report. Sammut et al. (2025) reviewed 27 studies of post-incident strategies and found three types: support for staff through debriefs and psychological help, plans and accountability for aggressors and system-level responses such as investigations and feedback. They noted that the evidence for these strategies is still thin and that success is too often measured only as fewer incidents, not as staff feeling safe. Kim et al. (2026) showed that prevention reduces incidents, so post-incident support should feed lessons back into screening. Niles (2013) places employee well-being within human resource responsibilities, which supports making these steps routine. Paul urged believers to bear one another's burdens (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Galatians 6:2). In practice, that could mean a standard checklist after every incident: immediate medical care, a debrief within a day, an offer of counseling, paid recovery time and a follow-up conversation a week later. Does your hospital follow up with injured staff a week later, not just on the day of the incident?

4

References

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Kim, S. C., Vejnovich, C., Hall, L., & Hultman, S. (2026). Workplace violence prevention program targeting patients at risk of violence in nonpsychiatric inpatient units: A prospective interventional study. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2026.08.010

Lainidi, O., Jendeby, M. K., Montgomery, A., Mouratidis, C., Paitaridou, K., Cook, C., Johnson, J., & Karakasidou, E. (2023). An integrative systematic review of employee silence and voice in healthcare: What are we really measuring? Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1111579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1111579

Niles, N. J. (2013). Basic concepts of health care human resource management. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Sammut, D., Hallett, N., & Lees-Deutsch, L. (2025). Post-event strategies for workplace violence affecting hospital staff: A scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70460

Wang, Q., Yang, Y. P., Li, Z. Y., Yu, F. Y., He, Y., Zhang, M., Luo, C., Tung, T. H., & Chen, H. X. (2025). Prevalence and associated factor of verbal abuse against nurses: A systematic review. International Nursing Review, 72(1), e13095. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13095

What the BUSI 344 Week 2 instructions ask

Forum 2 in BUSI 344 falls in Module/Week 2, when students read chapter 2 of Niles and watch one presentation, and the second quiz is also due. An opening post of 300 words or more applies the chapter; then at least two peers receive responses of 150 words or more. All of those posts need a link to Scripture, two journal studies and the Niles book, cited in APA. Because the chapter introduces the legal duties that shape human resource practice, a thread that applies one of those duties to a real workplace problem suits the week and offers peers a concrete case to discuss. The quiz is separate.

How this BUSI 344 Week 2 example is built

The thread begins with a hospital whose staff reported twice as many assaults as two years earlier and a human resources department that had treated each incident as a separate employee relations case. It explains the employer's legal duty to address recognized hazards, then presents evidence on how common abuse is and on a prevention program that reduced violent events. The human resources plan that follows combines screening, reporting, training and support after incidents. A psalm frames the duty to protect workers. One reply addresses verbal abuse from physicians and the policy response it requires; the other examines what staff need after an assault. Both replies finish with a question about the peer's workplace. The plan assigns an owner to each step.

BUSI 344 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

For this legal-environment forum, graders confirm that every post is long enough, states the employer's duty correctly and brings a biblical link, two peer-reviewed sources and a citation of the textbook. In a forum on the legal environment, faculty look for a correct statement of the employer's obligation and for practical human resource actions that meet it. Replies that recognize the difference between preventing harm and responding after it, and that cite evidence for both, show a mature understanding of the human resource role. Plans with named owners and timelines are stronger than general commitments.

BUSI 344 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose one legal duty from the chapter, such as safety, nondiscrimination or accommodation, and a workplace problem it applies to. Explain the duty in plain terms using the textbook, then find two peer-reviewed studies that show how common the problem is and what reduces it. Propose a human resource response with steps and owners. Connect the obligation to Scripture. In every reply, cite the textbook at least once, add two peer-reviewed studies and include a verse, and make each reply long enough to say something new. Keep incident details general to protect privacy. Name who would own each step. Check how your own state handles the duty you choose. Name a measure of success.

Related BUSI 344 sample papers

Other BUSI 344 weeks

More BS in Healthcare Administration sample papers

BUSI 344 Week 2 questions, answered

What is BUSI 344 Discussion Board Forum 2?

In this 50-point Module/Week 2 discussion, students take one legal duty from chapter 2, apply it to a workplace hazard or dispute and debate the human resource response with peers.

Where can I find a free BUSI 344 Week 2 sample paper?

This site posts the whole BUSI 344 Week 2 discussion on the employer's duty to prevent workplace violence, replies and sources included, without charge.

Do employers have a legal duty to prevent workplace violence?

Under federal workplace safety law, employers must provide a workplace free from recognized serious hazards, and violence against health care workers is a widely recognized hazard.

How common is verbal abuse against nurses?

A review of 45 studies estimated that 67% of nurses experience verbal abuse, most often from patients' relatives and friends, followed by physicians.

Do workplace violence prevention programs work?

A 2026 study on nonpsychiatric inpatient units found that screening patients for aggression plus proactive rounding by a behavioral health nurse reduced violent events from 5.30% to 3.71% of patients.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.