BUSI 344 Week 3 Discussion Board Forum 3 Example

Reviewed by Laura Hargrove, MPH · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 344 Week 3 sample thread takes chapter 3's lessons on recruitment and selection to a hospital that kept losing new hires within months, and finds part of the cause in how it chose them: unstructured interviews in which each manager asked different questions and hired on impression. It replaces them with structured, behavior-based interviews scored against the same criteria and adds realistic job previews, drawing on a major reanalysis of selection research that ranked structured interviews among the strongest predictors of job performance and on interviews with community nurses who left when the job did not match what they had been told. A proverb about wise counsel frames the hiring team's work. Replies address personality tests and recruiting in rural areas. Liberty University BUSI 344, taken in the healthcare administration program, awards up to 50 points for this Module/Week 3 forum.

CourseBUSI 344 Human Resource Management in Healthcare Administration (BUSI344)
Module/Week3
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 3
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 747 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 300 words with replies to at least 2 classmates of at least 150 words each; each thread and reply includes at least 1 biblical integration, at least 2 peer-reviewed source citations in current APA format and at least 1 reference to the text
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Healthcare Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 3 in Liberty's published BUSI 344 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 344 Week 3

1

Discussion Board Forum 3: Recruitment and Selection in Health Care

BUSI 344 Human Resource Management in Healthcare Administration, Discussion Board Forum 3

Thread by [Student Name]

The hospital, its hiring data and the classmates are composites; the textbook, Scripture and the peer-reviewed articles cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread begins with first-year turnover, which points the analysis at the hiring process rather than at the new employees.
2

Last year, 29% of the nurses and nursing assistants our hospital hired left within their first twelve months, and exit interviews kept repeating the same phrase: the job was not what I expected. When human resources reviewed how those employees had been hired, the pattern was clear. Each manager interviewed in their own way, asked different questions and usually decided within the first ten minutes. Niles (2013) describes selection as a series of steps meant to match a candidate's knowledge, skills and abilities to the requirements of the job, from screening through interviews to the final offer. Our process skipped the matching and relied on impressions, which also left the hospital exposed if a rejected candidate ever claimed unfair treatment.

The research gave us a better method. Sackett et al. (2022) reanalyzed decades of meta-analytic evidence on personnel selection and concluded that structured interviews, where all candidates face identical questions about the job and are rated on one scale, were among the strongest predictors of job performance, ahead of several methods organizations often trust more. Expectations matter as much as skills. Chamanga et al. (2025) interviewed community nurses and service managers and found that recruitment and retention depended on factors such as alignment with organizational values, prior development and transition experience, job dissatisfaction and compassionate leadership, which suggests that candidates who understand the real job are more likely to stay.

Why this part earns its pointsThe plan pairs a better selection tool with honest previews, because accuracy without realistic expectations would still lose new hires.
3

Our plan has three parts. First, every unit now uses a structured guide of eight behavior-based questions, such as "Tell me about a shift when you were short-staffed," with a scoring rubric. Second, candidates are interviewed by a panel that includes a staff nurse, not only the manager. Third, finalists shadow a nurse for two hours and see a full shift schedule, including weekends and holidays, before accepting. We will compare first-year turnover for the next two hiring cohorts with last year's.

Proverbs teaches that victory comes through many advisers (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Proverbs 24:6), which is the logic of a panel interview. A fair hiring process tells candidates the truth about the job and judges every one of them by the same standard.

Reply to Brianna

Brianna, you described your health system's use of a personality test to screen applicants and asked whether it is worth continuing. The research suggests personality measures can add some information about a candidate, but they are rarely the strongest predictor of how someone will actually perform on a hospital unit. Sackett et al. (2022) found that structured interviews outperformed many common selection tools, so a personality test used alone may screen out good candidates while missing poor fits. De Vries et al. (2023), reviewing retention strategies in hospitals, found that onboarding and mentoring after hiring did more for retention than many other approaches, which suggests the system's effort might be better spent after the offer. Niles (2013) stresses that selection tools must be job-related and applied consistently, which is also a legal safeguard. Jesus warned against judging by appearances rather than with right judgment (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, John 7:24). Has your system checked whether the test scores of current employees relate to their performance ratings? If they do not, the test may be adding cost and legal risk without improving hiring.

Reply to Tyler

Tyler, your rural hospital has advertised a physical therapist position for nine months without a single qualified applicant. Rural recruiting needs a different approach from the one city hospitals use, because the applicant pool is small and candidates are choosing a place to live as much as a job. George et al. (2026) interviewed allied health professionals who had worked in rural and remote settings and found that what drew and kept them went well beyond pay, including the nature of rural practice, community connections and support for their professional growth. Chamanga et al. (2025) similarly found that alignment with an organization's values and supportive leadership influenced whether nurses joined and stayed. Niles (2013) describes recruitment as reaching the right applicant pool, which for a rural hospital may mean local students, clinical rotations and people with family ties to the area. Through Jeremiah, God told the exiles in Babylon to work and pray for the good of the city where they had been sent (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Jeremiah 29:7), and rural hospitals often recruit best by inviting clinicians into a community, not just a job. Could your hospital host therapy students for clinical rotations, so that future applicants get to know the community before they graduate?

4

References

Chamanga, E., Dyson, J., Jarrett, M., & McKeown, E. (2025). Investigating factors influencing recruitment and retention of adult community nurses: An exploratory qualitative study across NHS trusts in England. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 26, e87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625100480

De Vries, N., Lavreysen, O., Boone, A., Bouman, J., Szemik, S., Baranski, K., Godderis, L., & De Winter, P. (2023). Retaining healthcare workers: A systematic review of strategies for sustaining power in the workplace. Healthcare, 11(13), 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131887

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

George, J., Kayes, N., & Larmer, P. (2026). Understanding the complexities of recruitment and retention of allied health professionals in rural health settings across Aotearoa: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14083-3

Niles, N. J. (2013). Basic concepts of health care human resource management. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & Lievens, F. (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2040-2068. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000994

What the BUSI 344 Week 3 instructions ask

BUSI 344 schedules Forum 3 for Module/Week 3, together with the group's annotated bibliography of at least 20 peer-reviewed sources, the first peer evaluation and the third quiz, with chapter 3 of Niles and a presentation as the reading. The first post should pass 300 words, and the responses to at least two classmates should each pass 150. Every post must include a biblical integration, two or more peer-reviewed citations and a reference to the textbook, formatted in APA. Because the annotated bibliography requires so many sources, the research you do for it this week can often supply evidence for the forum as well. Forum and bibliography are graded separately. Post early in the week.

How this BUSI 344 Week 3 example is built

The sample begins with the hospital's first-year turnover and a review of how its managers interviewed candidates. Using the chapter's account of the selection process, it explains why unstructured interviews are unreliable and how structured, behavior-based interviews and realistic job previews improve both hiring decisions and early retention. Two studies supply the evidence: a reanalysis of decades of selection research and qualitative interviews with nurses about why they stayed or left. The human resources plan includes interview guides, scoring rubrics and panel interviews. A proverb about many counselors frames the panel approach. Replies discuss personality testing and rural recruiting. Both replies close with a question. The plan includes a way to measure results.

BUSI 344 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

In the selection forum, faculty first check the basics of each post, its length, its verse, its pair of peer-reviewed studies and its textbook citation, and then look closely at the hiring method being proposed. In a selection forum, faculty look for posts that connect a hiring method to an outcome, such as turnover in the first year or performance ratings, and that address fairness as well as accuracy. Replies that question a classmate's preferred tool with evidence, and suggest a better use for it, show human resource judgment. Posts that set a measure for judging the new process show the right instinct. Clear writing helps.

BUSI 344 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points

Look at how your organization hires for one role, such as nurses, aides or front desk staff, and what happens to new hires in their first year. Use the chapter to describe the stages of selection and where your organization's process is weak. Find two peer-reviewed studies on selection methods or on why new employees stay or leave. Propose specific changes, such as interview guides or job previews, and how you would measure them. Connect hiring to a biblical principle. In replies, cite the textbook once, add two studies and include a verse. Keep turnover figures general. Name one outcome you would track. A sample interview question or two makes the thread concrete.

Related BUSI 344 sample papers

Other BUSI 344 weeks

More BS in Healthcare Administration sample papers

BUSI 344 Week 3 questions, answered

What is BUSI 344 Discussion Board Forum 3?

Built on chapter 3, this 50-point discussion has students critique how their organization recruits and selects staff, propose better hiring methods and respond to classmates' proposals.

Where can I find a free BUSI 344 Week 3 sample paper?

The BUSI 344 Week 3 sample on structured interviews and realistic job previews is posted in full below, with two replies and references, for free.

What is a structured interview?

An interview in which every candidate is asked the same job-related questions, often about past behavior, and answers are scored against the same rubric by trained interviewers.

Why use realistic job previews in health care hiring?

Showing candidates the real demands of a job, including difficult parts, helps them judge their fit and reduces early turnover caused by unmet expectations.

What else is due in BUSI 344 Module/Week 3?

Groups submit their bibliography of twenty or more annotated journal articles, members rate one another for the first time and everyone takes the third quiz.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.