PSYC 309 Week 2 DB Forum 2 Example

Reviewed by Allison Pemberton, PhD · Liberty University · Updated

This PSYC 309 Week 2 example is DB Forum 2 of Liberty University PSYC 309, Human Sexuality, a 60-point discussion for BS in Psychology students written after chapters 3 and 4 of Balswick and Balswick on sexual development, four presentations and two sets of lecture notes, with Exam 1 also on the calendar. Its composite prompt asks who should shape a young person's understanding of sexuality and how. The thread argues that parents are meant to be primary teachers and draws on a meta-analysis of 52 studies with 25,314 adolescents in which parent-adolescent sexual communication was linked with safer behavior, with stronger effects for conversations with mothers and with daughters. It grounds the argument in Deuteronomy's picture of teaching in the ordinary moments of family life. One reply discusses why fathers' conversations showed smaller effects; the other considers how churches can support parents.

CoursePSYC 309 Healthy Sexuality (PSYC309)
Module/Week2
AssignmentDB Forum 2
Paper typeDiscussion thread and replies
Lengthabout 908 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a thread of at least 350 words answering the provided question, due Friday, and replies to at least 2 classmates of at least 200 words each, due Monday, with the thread and replies citing course materials or external research
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points60
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Psychology
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published PSYC 309 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSYC 309 Week 2

1

Discussion Board Forum 2: Thread and Two Replies

PSYC 309 Healthy Sexuality, Discussion Board Forum 2 (thread and two replies)

Thread by [Student Name]

The prompt, the writer's example and the classmates' posts are composites standing in for the course's own forum; the textbook, Scripture and published meta-analysis are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for PSYC 309.

Thread

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread starts with a familiar experience, which makes the question of who teaches young people concrete.
2

When I was thirteen, my father handed me a book about growing up, said I could ask him anything and left the room. We never discussed it again. Many of my classmates describe something similar: a single awkward talk, or none at all, while friends, the internet and entertainment filled in the rest. This week's question asks who should shape a young person's understanding of sexuality, and the evidence suggests parents matter more than they often realize. My answer is that parents are meant to be the primary teachers, with churches, schools and health professionals supporting rather than replacing them.

Balswick and Balswick (2008) describe sexual development as a process that begins in childhood, long before puberty, as children learn from their families what bodies, affection and relationships mean. They emphasize that families teach about sexuality whether or not they speak about it directly, through how parents show affection, handle questions and model their own relationships. A child who learns that questions about the body are met with embarrassment or anger learns something about sexuality as surely as a child who is given careful answers. Development continues through adolescence, when questions become more pressing and peers and media compete loudly for influence.

Research supports the importance of direct conversation as well. Widman et al. (2016) meta-analyzed 52 studies, representing more than three decades of research and 25,314 adolescents with an average age of about 15. Adolescents who reported more sexual communication with their parents also reported safer sex behavior, with a small but significant overall correlation of 0.10. The effect was larger for conversations with mothers than with fathers, and larger for daughters than for sons, which suggests that many families leave boys and fathers out of the conversation. The effects were similar in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, though the authors noted weaknesses in how communication was measured. Because the studies were correlational, the results cannot prove that conversations cause safer behavior; families who talk openly may differ in other ways too. Still, the consistency of the link across three decades of research is hard to ignore.

Deuteronomy 6:6-7 describes parents teaching God's words to their children while sitting at home, walking along the road, lying down and rising up (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). That picture suggests a model for sexuality as well: not one talk, but many ordinary conversations over years, adjusted to the child's age and questions, and set within a larger vision of relationships shaped by faith.

Classmates: what made conversations about sexuality in your family easier or harder?

Reply to Rachel

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply takes up the classmate's question about fathers and connects it to the meta-analysis's moderators.
3

Rachel, you asked why fathers' conversations seemed to make so little difference in the meta-analysis, and whether that means fathers should leave the topic to mothers. I do not think it does. Widman et al. (2016) found that communication with fathers had a much smaller association with safer behavior than communication with mothers, and the authors called for clearer measures that specify which parent is involved. One possibility, which the meta-analysis did not test, is that many fathers' conversations are rare or brief, so a small average effect may reflect how little fathers say rather than whether their words can matter.

The textbook's emphasis on modeling also applies here. Balswick and Balswick (2008) note that children learn from how parents treat each other and express affection. A father who shows respect and tenderness toward his wife teaches his sons and daughters something about sexuality and relationships even without a formal conversation.

Ephesians 6:4 gives fathers, specifically, the charge of raising children in the Lord's training and teaching (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016), which suggests an active rather than absent role. Perhaps the research is less a verdict on fathers than an invitation for them to become more involved, starting early, before adolescence makes the topic feel harder. Do you think fathers avoid these conversations more from embarrassment or from uncertainty about what to say? If it is uncertainty, a little preparation might go a long way, and a church or counselor could help provide it.

Reply to Daniel

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply builds on the classmate's interest in churches by suggesting how a congregation can support parents rather than replace them.
4

Daniel, you suggested that churches should take over sexuality education because many parents feel unprepared. I understand the concern, since many parents I know feel exactly that way. But the research and the textbook both suggest that churches may serve families best by equipping parents rather than replacing them. Widman et al. (2016) found that parent-adolescent communication was linked with safer behavior across many studies, and Balswick and Balswick (2008) present the family as the first place children learn what sexuality means. A youth group lesson cannot substitute for years of ordinary conversation at home.

A church could support parents in several practical ways: offering classes that give parents accurate, age-appropriate information and a biblical framework, providing sample questions and language for different ages, and creating settings where fathers in particular can learn from one another. Churches can also give teenagers trusted adult mentors in addition to their parents, people who share the family's values but are not the parents themselves, which matters especially for young people whose families cannot or will not talk with them.

Titus 2 describes older believers teaching younger ones (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016), which offers a model of church and family working together rather than competing for the same role. Such programs work best when they respect parents' authority and are candid about the limits of the evidence. What would a parent class at your church need to include for you to recommend it?

5

References

Balswick, J. K., & Balswick, J. O. (2008). Authentic human sexuality: An integrated Christian approach (2nd ed.). IVP Academic.

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., Noar, S. M., Nesi, J., & Garrett, K. (2016). Parent-adolescent sexual communication and adolescent safer sex behavior: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 170(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2731

What the PSYC 309 Week 2 instructions ask

The second PSYC 309 forum belongs to Module/Week 2 and is worth 60 points, with Exam 1 due in the same week, after the textbook's third and fourth chapters and the week's video and written lectures. As in Forum 1, the work has two parts with two deadlines. The student's thread answers the posted question in 350 words or more before Friday ends on the East Coast, and the replies, at least two and each 200 words or more, follow by Monday night. Course materials or outside research should be cited throughout. The module's chapters trace sexual development from childhood through adolescence, which frames this week's question.

How this PSYC 309 Week 2 example is built

The thread opens with the writer's memory of an awkward conversation with a parent and the question it raises about who teaches young people about sexuality. It then summarizes the textbook's view of development and of the family's role, presents the meta-analysis on parent communication, including its moderators and limits, and interprets the findings. A paragraph from Deuteronomy reframes parental teaching as ongoing conversation rather than a single talk, and a question closes the thread. The first reply explores the smaller effects found for fathers and what they might mean, and the second considers how a congregation can equip parents instead of replacing them.

PSYC 309 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Forum 2 is graded on a thread that answers the question with accurate use of the developmental chapters and research, meets the Friday deadline and length, and cites its sources, and on Monday replies that engage two classmates with their own citations. Graders look for careful description of research findings, including effect sizes and what a correlation can and cannot show, and for a Christian perspective integrated with the evidence. Respectful, age-appropriate language about adolescents and families is essential, since the topic touches every classmate's own history. Threads that tie the developmental chapters to the research findings, and explain what each contributes, show the strongest integration. Replies should add a perspective, a study or a practical idea rather than simple agreement.

PSYC 309 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Many posts on this topic either assume parents are the only influence or dismiss them as irrelevant. The research suggests something in between, so report the size of the effect honestly; a correlation of 0.10 is small but meaningful across many families. Describe what the meta-analysis measured, adolescents' reports of communication and their safer sex behavior, rather than overstating it. Use the textbook's account of development to explain why conversations should change as children grow. Keep the discussion clinical and respectful. In replies, consider differences among families, such as single parents, blended families or families with different religious commitments, and avoid assuming every reader grew up in the same kind of home.

Related PSYC 309 sample papers

Other PSYC 309 weeks

More BS in Psychology sample papers

PSYC 309 Week 2 questions, answered

What is PSYC 309 DB Forum 2?

The second PSYC 309 discussion, a 60-point Module/Week 2 forum on sexual development, with a thread due Friday answering the posted question and replies to two classmates due Monday, each citing sources.

Where can I find a free PSYC 309 Week 2 sample paper?

A complete PSYC 309 Week 2 forum on parents as teachers of sexuality, drawing on a meta-analysis of parent-adolescent communication, appears here with two cited replies.

Does talking with parents about sex affect teenagers' behavior?

A meta-analysis of 52 studies with 25,314 adolescents found a small but significant link (r = 0.10) between parent-adolescent sexual communication and safer sex behavior.

Are mothers or fathers more influential in these conversations?

In that meta-analysis, effects were larger for communication with mothers (r = 0.14) than with fathers (r = 0.03), and larger for daughters (r = 0.12) than sons (r = 0.04).

What else is due in PSYC 309 Module/Week 2?

Exam 1, the first of five open-book PSYC 309 exams, covering the module's presentations and lecture notes in 40 items and due by Monday night.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.