NURS 836 Week 6 Content Outline Example

Course	NURS 836 Translational Research in Health Care (NURS836)
Module/Week	6
Assignment	Content Outline for the Dissemination Plan
Paper type	Alpha-numeric content outline focused on the dissemination plan (12 to 15 references besides the textbook and the Bible)
Length	about 567 words, 2 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: an alpha-numeric content outline in current APA format that focuses on the dissemination plan, with 12 to 15 references in addition to the course textbook and the Bible
Format	APA 7 student paper
Points	50
School	Liberty University Online
Program	DNP
Where it sits	Module/Week 6 in Liberty's published NURS 836 course guide; current sections can differ
Updated	October 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 836 Week 6

Alpha-Numeric Content Outline for a Dissemination Plan: Telling Surgeons, Nurses, Leaders and the Profession About Silicone Foam Dressings in Surgeries of Three Hours or More

[Student Name]

School of Nursing, Liberty University

NURS 836: Translational Research in Health Care

Content Outline

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

The hospital is a composite; the textbook, studies, guideline and Scripture cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe outline opens with purpose and evidence points tied to sources, so the reader sees the case before the audiences who must hear it.

Alpha-Numeric Content Outline for a Dissemination Plan: Telling Surgeons, Nurses, Leaders and the Profession About Silicone Foam Dressings in Surgeries of Three Hours or More

I. Introduction

A. Problem: perioperative pressure injuries in surgeries of three hours or more remain common despite effective prevention; device-related injuries reached 30% in one prospective study of long surgeries (Adıgüzel Akbaba et al., 2026)
B. Purpose: disseminate evidence and project results so that prophylactic silicone foam dressings become standard for eligible patients
C. Gap: evidence has not reached practice; time lags from research to routine use are long and uneven (Morris et al., 2011)

II. Evidence to Disseminate

A. Effectiveness
1. Ten-trial meta-analysis: silicone foam reduced sacral and heel injuries (Fu et al., 2025)
2. Network meta-analysis: silicone ranked most effective of six dressing options (Al Jehani et al., 2026)
3. Eleven-study meta-analysis: risk ratio 0.30, similar in intensive care and other settings (Rahman-Synthia et al., 2023)
4. Surgical trials: fewer intraoperative injuries (Wang et al., 2026) and fewer injuries after general surgery (Yeo et al., 2023)
B. Risk: diabetes, higher body mass index, low albumin and vasoactive drugs associated with surgical pressure injury (Johansson et al., 2026)
C. Guideline support for prophylactic dressings in high-risk patients (European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel et al., 2019)

Why this part earns its pointsNaming four distinct audiences, each with its own message and channel, is what separates a dissemination plan from a single presentation.

III. Target Audiences

A. Circulating nurses and anesthesia staff: apply the dressing
B. Surgeons: accept placement and timing
C. Perioperative and nursing leaders, finance and the board quality committee: approve and fund
D. External: perioperative nurses in other hospitals

IV. Messages by Audience

A. Staff: "Applying sacral and heel dressings before positioning prevents injuries you see in recovery"
B. Surgeons: "Placement agreed with you avoids the prep field; trials show fewer injuries"
C. Leaders: "A low-cost supply prevents injuries that extend stays and must be reported"
D. Profession: results, barriers and strategies from a community hospital rollout

V. Channels and Products

A. Internal
1. Morning huddles and a one-page visual guide at each operating room
2. Surgical department meeting presentation with the evidence summary
3. Monthly dashboard of dressing use and injuries
4. Board quality committee report at months 6 and 12
B. External
1. Poster at a regional perioperative nursing conference
2. Manuscript submitted to a perioperative nursing journal
3. Scholarly project presentation and repository

VI. Link to the Implementation Plan

A. Determinants identified with CFIR 2.0 (Damschroder et al., 2022), consistent with operating room nurses' barriers (Gao et al., 2026)
B. Strategies from the ERIC compilation matched to barriers (Powell et al., 2015)
C. Hybrid type 2 study measuring both injuries and implementation (Curran et al., 2022)

VII. Evaluating Dissemination

A. RE-AIM reach and adoption: percent of staff briefed; services using the dressing (Glasgow et al., 2019)
B. Implementation outcomes: acceptability survey; penetration of eligible cases (Proctor et al., 2011)
C. Products completed: poster accepted, manuscript submitted

VIII. Timeline

A. Months 1 to 2: leader and surgeon briefings
B. Months 2 to 4: staff huddles and visual guides
C. Months 6 and 12: board reports
D. Months 12 to 15: poster and manuscript

IX. Resources

A. Staff time for huddles and audits
B. Printing and dashboard development
C. Conference registration and travel

X. Ethical Considerations

A. Quality improvement determination by the institutional review board before any publication
B. De-identified data in all external products

XI. Christian Worldview

A. Care for the body as God's creation (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
B. Sharing knowledge freely as service to other patients and nurses

XII. Conclusion

A. Dissemination as several targeted conversations, not a single poster (Brownson et al., 2018)
B. Expected outcome: dressings standard for eligible cases and lessons shared beyond the hospital

Why this part earns its pointsLinking the outline's evaluation section to RE-AIM and Proctor's outcomes shows dissemination will be judged by whether it changed practice, not by whether a poster was printed.

Dissemination is not finished when the poster is printed; it is finished when the circulating nurse reaches for the dressing without being reminded.

References

Adıgüzel Akbaba, M., Uslu, Y., Aytar, F., & Eren, E. (2026). Intraoperative device-related pressure injuries in patients undergoing prolonged surgery. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000510

Al Jehani, M., Al Mazrou, F., Bafail, A., Alhwsawi, H., Albalawi, I., Alanazi, G., Halawani, I., Alhije, F., & Alalola, R. (2026). Prophylactic dressing in the prevention of bedsore: A network meta-analysis. Journal of Surgical Research, 317, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.09.065

Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (Eds.). (2018). Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Curran, G. M., Landes, S. J., McBain, S. A., Pyne, J. M., Smith, J. D., Fernandez, M. E., Chambers, D. A., & Mittman, B. S. (2022). Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies. Frontiers in Health Services, 2, Article 1053496. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1053496

Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science, 17(1), Article 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, & Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. (2019). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: Clinical practice guideline. The international guideline (E. Haesler, Ed.; 3rd ed.). EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA.

Fu, T., Wu, X., & Yu, B. (2025). Efficacy of silicone foam dressings in preventing pressure injuries in the sacral and heel areas of patients: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, Article 1644290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1644290

Gao, Y., Chen, J., Guang, W., Xu, W., Wei, Z., & Yang, H. (2026). A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to intraoperative acquired pressure injury prevention implementation in operating room nurses based on the CFIR framework. Frontiers in Health Services, 6, Article 1877556. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1877556

Glasgow, R. E., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., Ory, M. G., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2019). RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, Article 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064

Johansson, V. R., Dahl, O., Falk, A. C., Nilsson, U., Dehara, M., & von Vogelsang, A. C. (2026). Risk factors for position-related injuries in adult surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 11, Article 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100676

Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180

Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1

Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

Rahman-Synthia, S. S., Kumar, S., Boparai, S., Gupta, S., Mohtashim, A., & Ali, D. (2023). Prophylactic use of silicone dressing to minimize pressure injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Enfermería Clínica, 33(1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2022.05.002

Wang, C. Y., Liao, H. H., Hsieh, M. Y., & Lee, C. H. (2026). Soft silicone foam dressing for preventing intraoperative pressure injuries: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2026.08.022

Yeo, H., Hwang, J., Lee, M., No, D., & Jang, I. (2023). Effect of a prophylactic dressing for sacral pressure injuries in non-critically ill patients after general surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 20(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12651

What the NURS 836 Week 6 instructions ask

The Content Outline in NURS 836, due in Module/Week 6 alongside the sixth forum, prepares the student to write the Draft Dissemination and Implementation Plan in Module/Week 8. The course guide asks for an alpha-numeric outline in current APA focused on the dissemination plan, supported by twelve to fifteen references in addition to the textbook and the Bible. The guide's emphasis on dissemination matters, and it is easy to lose sight of in a project that has so far concentrated on evidence and implementation: the outline should show who needs to hear about the project and its results, what each audience needs to hear, how it will reach them and how the student will know it did, as well as how the implementation plan connects.

How this NURS 836 Week 6 example is built

The outline begins with the problem and purpose, then summarizes the evidence in points, each tied to a source. It identifies four audiences, the circulating nurses and anesthesia staff who apply the dressing, the surgeons who must accept it, the hospital leaders who fund it and the wider perioperative profession, and gives each a tailored message and channel. Further sections link dissemination to the implementation frameworks and strategies chosen earlier in the course, set out dissemination evaluation using reach and adoption, and give a timeline, resources and ethical considerations. The outline ends with a faith perspective on sharing knowledge and a brief conclusion.

NURS 836 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go

Content outlines are usually evaluated on logical alpha-numeric organization, coverage of the elements a dissemination plan needs, the specificity of audiences, messages and channels, integration of the reference requirement, APA formatting and a clear link to the full plan. Instructors look for points that state content rather than headings alone, so that the outline could be expanded into paragraphs without new research. Audience-specific messages and a plan to evaluate dissemination distinguish a strong outline from one that treats dissemination as a single poster. Citations placed at the points they support, rather than gathered at the end, also show the grader that the reference requirement serves the content.

NURS 836 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost points

Outlines for dissemination plans often name "staff education" and "a conference poster" and stop. Think of dissemination as several targeted conversations: who must act on the evidence, who must approve it, and who outside your hospital could use what you learn. Give each audience a message in a sentence, a channel and a timing. Attach a source to each evidence point so the reference count is met naturally. Keep the alpha-numeric levels consistent, and write each point as a phrase that says something rather than a one-word label. Check that every source in the reference list appears somewhere in the outline, and that the outline already contains the order of the final plan, so that writing it becomes a matter of turning points into paragraphs.

Related NURS 836 sample papers

Other NURS 836 weeks

More DNP sample papers

NURS 836 Week 6 questions, answered

What is the NURS 836 Content Outline?

A Module/Week 6 assignment worth 50 points: an alpha-numeric outline in current APA focused on the dissemination plan, with twelve to fifteen references besides the textbook and the Bible.

Where can I find a free NURS 836 Week 6 sample paper?

This page shows the full NURS 836 Week 6 content outline for disseminating a perioperative dressing project, every section and all references, free of charge.

What is an alpha-numeric outline?

An outline that uses Roman numerals for main sections, capital letters for subsections, Arabic numerals for points and lowercase letters for subpoints, each level indented beneath the last.

Who are the audiences for a DNP dissemination plan?

Usually the staff who will carry out the practice, the clinicians who must accept it, the leaders who fund and approve it, and external professional audiences through presentations and publications.

How is dissemination evaluated?

By measuring whether messages reached the intended audiences and led to action, for example the share of staff who attended a briefing and the share of services that adopted the practice afterward.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Ask for a custom NURS 836 Week 6 sample · All NURS 836 weeks · All courses

NURS 836 Week 6 Content Outline for the Dissemination Plan Example