| Course | NURS 836 Translational Research in Health Care (NURS836) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 5 |
| Assignment | Discussion Board Forum 5 on Selecting Implementation Strategies |
| Paper type | Discussion thread with two replies |
| Length | about 655 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread in response to the forum prompt with at least 2 peer-reviewed references besides the textbook, and replies to at least two classmates, each with at least 2 references, one of which may be the textbook and one of which must be peer-reviewed |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 75 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | DNP |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 5 in Liberty's published NURS 836 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 836 Week 5
Discussion Board Forum 5: A Strategy for Each Barrier
NURS 836 Translational Research in Health Care, Discussion Board Forum 5
Thread by [Student Name]
The hospital and the classmates replied to are composites written for a model discussion; the textbook and studies cited are real.
My first plan for introducing prophylactic dressings in our long surgeries was an in-service and a laminated card on the supply cart. This week's chapters made me see that I had chosen a strategy before I knew what problem it was meant to solve. Brownson et al. (2018) describe implementation strategies as the methods used to enhance the adoption, implementation and sustainability of a practice, and they are most useful when chosen to fit the barriers a setting actually has.
The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change project produced a compilation of 73 discrete strategies with standard names and definitions, grouped through expert consensus (Powell et al., 2015). Education is one of them, but so are revising professional roles, changing record systems, conducting local consensus discussions, using audit and feedback and altering incentive structures. Having names and definitions forces precision: "engage staff" is not a strategy, but "conduct local consensus discussions" is.
For our operating rooms, I identified four barriers, similar to those twelve operating room nurses described in a qualitative study, which included too few supplies, guidance that did not fit how operating rooms actually run and weak communication across departments (Gao et al., 2026).
| Barrier | Strategy | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| No one owns the decision to apply the dressing | Revise professional roles | Make the circulating nurse responsible, with authority to apply without an order |
| Preoperative checklist does not mention the dressing | Change record systems | Add a required checklist item for eligible cases |
| Surgeons worry the dressing shifts during prep | Conduct local consensus discussions | Agree with surgeons on placement and timing relative to prep |
| Operating room budget bears the cost; units gain the savings | Alter incentive structures | Move the dressing cost to a hospital-wide prevention budget |
Notice that education appears in none of these rows. Staff already know pressure injuries are harmful. What they lack is a clear role, a prompt, an agreement with surgeons and a budget that does not penalize the department doing the prevention. An in-service answers a question no one in our operating room is asking.
Choosing strategies remains a matter of judgment. In a study asking 169 implementation researchers and practitioners to match strategies to barriers defined by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, an average of 47 different strategies was endorsed for each barrier, and the authors built a tool to prioritize options while noting the wide disagreement (Waltz et al., 2019). That variation argues for treating my table as a hypothesis to test, with fidelity and adoption measures telling me which strategies work. If, after six weeks, the checklist item is completed but dressings are still not applied, the problem is not the prompt but something later in the workflow, and I will return to the staff to find it. Each strategy also has an owner: the perioperative director for the role change, the informatics nurse for the checklist, the chief of surgery for the consensus meeting and the chief financial officer for the budget change, each with a date by which the strategy should be in place.
Reply to Brianna
Brianna, your plan for improving chlorhexidine bathing relies mostly on education, but you also mentioned that bathing rates drop on weekends when float staff cover. That sounds like a workflow and feedback problem more than a knowledge problem. Audit and feedback is one of the named strategies in the ERIC compilation (Powell et al., 2015), and it fits a barrier where staff believe they are complying more than they are. Brownson et al. (2018) also emphasize that strategies should be matched to the specific determinants they are meant to change. Posting weekend bathing rates by unit, compared with weekdays, might change practice faster than another in-service. Which barrier do you think is strongest on weekends?
Reply to Owen
Owen, you chose a champion for your delirium screening project, which fits your barrier of nurses not knowing how to use the tool. My concern is what happens when the champion leaves. Waltz et al. (2019) found that experts endorsed many different strategies for the same barrier, which suggests building in more than one rather than relying on a single person. The ERIC compilation includes strategies such as developing educational materials that remain after the champion leaves and building the tool into the record system (Powell et al., 2015). Pairing your champion with a record prompt might sustain screening after the project. Is your champion's time protected, and for how long? Knowing that will tell you how soon the record prompt needs to be in place.
References
Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (Eds.). (2018). Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Gao, Y., Chen, J., Guang, W., Xu, W., Wei, Z., & Yang, H. (2026). A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to intraoperative acquired pressure injury prevention implementation in operating room nurses based on the CFIR framework. Frontiers in Health Services, 6, Article 1877556. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1877556
Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1
Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Fernández, M. E., Abadie, B., & Damschroder, L. J. (2019). Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: Diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implementation Science, 14(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4
What the NURS 836 Week 5 instructions ask
Week five's forum in NURS 836 builds on the textbook's material on implementation strategies and the processes of putting evidence into practice. The scoring rules hold steady: the thread must show depth and range and rest on at least two refereed sources besides Brownson, and at least two replies each add substance and cite two sources, one of them refereed. The week's practical task is selection: with dozens of named strategies available, the student must choose the few that fit the barriers in their own setting and explain the match. A thread that ends with a short barrier-to-strategy table is easy for classmates to learn from.
How this NURS 836 Week 5 example is built
The thread opens by admitting that the writer's first plan for the dressing project was an in-service and a laminated card. It introduces the compilation of 73 discrete implementation strategies and explains why strategies should follow barriers. Four barriers from the writer's operating rooms, consistent with those reported by operating room nurses in a qualitative study, are each matched to one or two strategies with a sentence of reasoning. A study of expert matching shows that even experts disagree, which argues for local judgment and testing. The replies help one classmate replace education with an audit and feedback strategy and help another think about sustaining a strategy after the project ends.
NURS 836 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go
Forum 5 is generally judged on the accuracy of the strategy concepts, a clear and justified link between barriers and strategies, application to the student's own project, the required peer-reviewed sources, replies that add substance with their own references and graduate writing. The best threads avoid long lists and show reasoning: why this strategy for this barrier, and what evidence or logic supports the choice. Using the compilation's standard strategy names lets the grader see that the student has read the source rather than inventing labels, and a short table keeps the reasoning visible. Acknowledging that strategy selection involves uncertainty and planning to test choices shows mature understanding of implementation science.
NURS 836 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points
A common pattern in strategy threads is to list education, champions and reminders for every project, whatever the barriers. Start instead from your barriers, ideally identified with a framework, and ask what kind of problem each one is: knowledge, motivation, workflow, resources or authority. Then choose a strategy that acts on that kind of problem. Use the compilation's standard names so readers know exactly what you mean. In your replies, ask the classmate which barrier each strategy is meant to address; if they cannot say, the strategy may not be needed. And remember that a strategy also needs an owner and a date; a matched strategy no one carries out is no better than an unmatched one.
Related NURS 836 sample papers
Other NURS 836 weeks
- NURS 836 Week 1: Discussion Board Forum 1
- NURS 836 Week 2: Discussion Board Forum 2
- NURS 836 Week 3: Expanding the Literature Review
- NURS 836 Week 4: Discussion Board Forum 4
- NURS 836 Week 6: Content Outline
- NURS 836 Week 7: Discussion Board Forum 7
- NURS 836 Week 8: Draft Dissemination Plan
More DNP sample papers
- NURS 751 Week 1: Neuro Workshop Paper
- NURS 753 Week 1: Mental Health Policy Paper
- NURS 832 Week 5: Discussion Board Forum 3
- NURS 834 Week 5: Practice Initiative Part III
NURS 836 Week 5 questions, answered
What is NURS 836 Discussion Board Forum 5?
The Module/Week 5 forum in Liberty's DNP translational research course, worth 75 points, on choosing implementation strategies that fit the barriers in the student's project.
Where can I find a free NURS 836 Week 5 sample paper?
This page presents the full NURS 836 Week 5 thread matching operating room barriers to implementation strategies, with both replies and the references, free to read.
What is the ERIC compilation?
The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change project produced a compilation of 73 discrete implementation strategies with standard names and definitions, from audit and feedback to changing record systems.
How do you choose implementation strategies?
By identifying the barriers in the setting, ideally with a framework such as CFIR, and selecting strategies that act on each barrier, then testing and adjusting the choice as implementation proceeds.
Do experts agree on which strategies fit which barriers?
Not closely; in a 2019 study, 169 experts endorsed an average of 47 different strategies per barrier, which is why local judgment and testing matter.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom NURS 836 Week 5 sample · All NURS 836 weeks · All courses