NURS 519 Week 3 Discussion Board Forum 2 on Advance Care Planning Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 519 Week 3 example is a Discussion Board Forum 2 post arguing that advance care planning works best as an ongoing conversation rather than a single signed form, because seriously ill patients often change their end-of-life preferences as their health and emotions change. Liberty University NURS 519 sets the second of its two 100-point forums in Module/Week 3, when MSN students read two more chapters of Matzo and Sherman, and keeps the first forum's rules, so students again post 500 words resting on two cited works and answer one peer in 250 words resting on one more, with textbooks, Scripture and journal articles all accepted. The post draws on a 2025 systematic review of 25 studies, distinguishes advance directives from portable medical orders, and replies to a peer with a study of goals-of-care talks led by emergency nurses.

CourseNURS 519 Strategies for End of Life Care (NURS519)
Module/Week3
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 2 on Advance Care Planning
Paper typeDiscussion thread (500+ words, 2+ citations) with one reply (250+ words, 1+ citation)
Lengthabout 637 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 500 words supported by at least 2 citations, and one reply of at least 250 words with at least 1 citation; the textbooks, the Bible and peer-reviewed articles are acceptable sources
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points100
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramMSN
Where it sitsModule/Week 3 in Liberty's published NURS 519 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 519 Week 3

1

Discussion Board Forum 2: Advance Directives, POLST and Preferences That Shift

NURS 519 Strategies for End of Life Care, Discussion Board Forum 2

Thread by [Student Name]

The patient example and the classmate replied to are composites written for a model discussion.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread states its position in the first sentences, which gives the 500 words a direction the rubric can reward.
2

We often treat a signed advance directive as the finish line of advance care planning. This week's reading and a recent review persuaded me that it is closer to a starting point, and that nurses are well placed to keep the conversation going.

Three documents are often confused. An advance directive is the person's own statement, which may include a living will describing treatments they would or would not want and a health care power of attorney naming an agent to decide if they cannot. Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment, known as POLST, work differently: it is a medical order, signed by a clinician, for a person with serious illness, and it travels with the patient so that emergency crews and hospitals can act on it (Matzo & Sherman, 2018). The directive speaks for the future; the medical order governs care now.

The difficulty is that preferences change. In a systematic review of 25 studies involving 5,711 seriously ill patients in seven countries, Murali et al. (2025) found that in 10 studies at least half of patients changed their end-of-life goals or preferences over time. Changes in health, emotions and understanding of prognosis drove the shifts, and studies that asked more often detected more change. Prior advance care planning did not make preferences more stable, which suggests that a document signed months ago may not reflect what a patient wants today. The authors argue that advance care planning should be reframed as ongoing preparation for decisions made in real time.

I have seen this. A composite patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease signed a directive refusing intubation after a frightening admission, then, a year later and feeling better, told me they would accept a short trial of a ventilator to see a grandchild's wedding. Neither choice was wrong; they reflected different moments. If no one had asked, the earlier document would have guided care.

For nurses, the implication is practical: revisit goals at every transition, such as admission, a new diagnosis or decline, and discharge. A simple question, "Has anything changed about what matters most to you?", can reveal shifts, and documenting the answer and alerting the team keeps orders current. Preparing the health care agent matters just as much, because the agent will face decisions no form anticipated.

The psalmist wrote, "My times are in your hand" (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Psalm 31:15). Our patients' futures are uncertain to them and to us. Advance care planning cannot remove that uncertainty, but walking with patients through it, and helping them prepare their families, is a way of honoring both their choices and the One who holds their times.

Why this part earns its pointsThe composite patient shows a preference changing in a way the review describes, which ties the evidence to practice.
3

Reply to Jordan

Jordan, your point that advance care planning conversations happen too late, often in a crisis, matches what I see, and I agree nurses could start them earlier. One study suggests nurses can lead them even in a busy emergency department. Bigelow et al. (2024) trained experienced emergency department nurses, each with three or more years in that setting, to hold goals-of-care conversations with seriously ill adults, such as those with heart failure, advanced lung or kidney disease, or metastatic cancer. Of 133 patients approached, 94 agreed; every conversation was documented in the record, and half of the patients who arrived without a portable medical order left with one. Satisfaction was high, with 95% of surviving patients rating the experience 4 or 5 out of 5. Hospitalizations and intensive care admissions did not change significantly, which reminds us that a conversation is a means of respecting wishes, not a cost-saving tool. Combined with the evidence that preferences change, this supports your idea of making goals a standing nursing question rather than a one-time physician task. Did your unit consider scripting a goals question into the admission assessment, and would the nurses on your floor feel prepared to ask it?

4

References

Bigelow, S., Medzon, R., Siegel, M., & Jin, R. (2024). Difficult conversations: Outcomes of emergency department nurse-directed goals-of-care discussions. Journal of Palliative Care, 39(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597221149402

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Matzo, M., & Sherman, D. W. (Eds.). (2018). Palliative care nursing: Quality care to the end of life (5th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

Murali, S., Poco, L. C., & Malhotra, C. (2025). Instability in end-of-life goals and preferences of patients who are seriously ill: A systematic review. JAMA Network Open, 8(11), Article e2541264. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.41264

What the NURS 519 Week 3 instructions ask

In Module/Week 3 the second and final forum of NURS 519 opens, again worth 100 points. Its posting load matches the first forum's: an initial post of 500 words or more whose claims rest on two or more APA citations, then one response to a classmate of at least 250 words that cites a source. Liberty names three kinds of acceptable support for these posts, namely the assigned books, Scripture and journal articles that passed peer review. The week's reading covers two chapters of Matzo and Sherman and a presentation, and prompts at this point in end-of-life courses commonly turn to the ethical and legal side of care, such as advance directives, surrogate decision-making and life-sustaining treatment.

How this NURS 519 Week 3 example is built

The thread takes a position in its first paragraph, that a signed directive alone does not guarantee care that matches a person's wishes, and supports it with a composite patient whose choices changed. It defines the documents involved, an advance directive, a health care power of attorney and a portable medical order such as POLST, because accurate terms matter in this week's legal content. The central evidence is a systematic review with its numbers. The thread then proposes what nurses can do differently, revisiting goals at each change in health, and ends with a short reflection on trusting God with uncertain times. The reply extends a classmate's point with a nurse-led study.

NURS 519 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

Graders of the second forum typically apply the same rubric as the first: a thoughtful, well-organized response to the prompt, a pair of credible sources behind the thread and a further source behind the response, a reply that advances the discussion, faith integration where relevant, and clear APA writing. In a week touching on legal and ethical content, precise definitions earn credit, and confusing an advance directive with a medical order costs it. Graders reward threads that take a defensible position and acknowledge the limits of evidence. The single reply carries more weight than in courses with two replies, so it should engage the classmate's argument directly.

NURS 519 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points

In advance care planning forums, students often praise advance directives without noting their limits, or describe POLST as if it were the same document. Others write about completing forms as the goal, missing the newer emphasis on preparing patients and families for decisions in the moment. Define each term once, use a study rather than general claims about what patients want, and connect your argument to the nurse's daily work, such as admission and discharge conversations. Keep the reply focused on the classmate's specific point and support it with a separate source, and avoid sharing details of a real patient that could identify them.

Related NURS 519 sample papers

Other NURS 519 weeks

More MSN sample papers

NURS 519 Week 3 questions, answered

What is NURS 519 Discussion Board Forum 2?

It is the second of two forums, in Module/Week 3, worth 100 points. Students post a thread of 500 words or more backed by two or more sources, then reply once to a peer in 250 words or more with a source of its own.

Where can I find a free NURS 519 Week 3 sample paper?

Read the NURS 519 Week 3 forum thread on advance care planning in full above, along with its reply to a classmate and the cited sources, each with a note on grading. It costs nothing.

What is the difference between an advance directive and POLST?

An advance directive is a person's own statement of wishes or choice of agent for future care. POLST is a medical order signed by a clinician for a seriously ill person, followed across settings now.

Do end-of-life preferences change over time?

Often. A 2025 review of 25 studies found that in 10 of them, at least half of seriously ill patients changed their goals or preferences, especially as health, emotions and understanding changed.

What is the nurse's role in advance care planning?

Nurses ask about goals, explain options in plain language, check that documents and orders reflect current wishes, and alert the team when a patient's preferences seem to have changed.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.