BUSI 360 Week 2 Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

In this BUSI 360 Week 2 sample, two classmates' Forum 1 posts on whether globalization is retreating get researched answers. The opening reply addresses a classmate's claim that tariffs protect American jobs, adding a study of the 2018 trade war that found U.S. consumers and firms bore the cost, while retaliatory tariffs hit farm regions hardest. The second engages a classmate who urged companies to bring all production home, using a model of supply chain resilience that shows why diversifying across countries can protect a firm better than reshoring alone. Each reply carries two citations, including the course's Annual Editions reader, as the guide requires. Liberty University BUSI 360 grades the replies at 60 points, the same as the thread, so BS in Business Administration students cannot treat them as an afterthought.

CourseBUSI 360 Contemporary Issues in International Business (BUSI360)
Module/Week2
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 1 Replies
Paper typeTwo discussion replies
Lengthabout 326 words (thread and replies). Course guide: substantial replies of at least 150 words to 2 classmates' threads in college-level writing, each with at least 2 citations, in current APA format
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points60
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published BUSI 360 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 360 Week 2

1

Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies: The State of Globalization

BUSI 360 Contemporary Issues in International Business, Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies

Thread by [Student Name]

The two classmates and their threads are composites; the textbook and research cited are real.

Reply to Logan

Why this part earns its pointsThe first reply grants the classmate's concern for workers and then adds evidence on who paid.
2

Logan, your thread argued that tariffs protect American manufacturing jobs, and your concern for the factory workers in towns hit by import competition is well founded; the course reader documents how unevenly globalization's costs fell (Maidment, 2013).

The 2018 tariffs suggest, though, that protection came at a high price. Fajgelbaum et al. (2020) studied the trade war in detail and found that the tariffs showed up almost entirely in what U.S. buyers. After counting tariff revenue and gains to protected producers, the net effect on U.S. real income was a modest loss, and retaliatory tariffs from trading partners fell heavily on agricultural counties. Jobs protected in one sector were partly offset by losses in others, including manufacturers that relied on imported steel and parts as inputs and suddenly faced higher costs than foreign competitors. In your view, would targeted support for affected workers, such as retraining, achieve your goal at lower cost?

Reply to Renee

Why this part earns its pointsThe second reply qualifies the classmate's call for full reshoring with research on resilience.
3

Renee, your thread argued that the pandemic proved companies should bring all production home, and the shortages you described were real disruptions. The course reader also notes how fragile long supply chains can be (Maidment, 2013).

Bringing everything home may not maximize resilience, however, and it can make a firm more exposed to shocks at home. Grossman et al. (2023) built a model of resilient supply chains showing that the answer depends on where shocks come from: domestic production faces its own disruptions, and spreading suppliers across several countries can reduce the chance that one shock stops everything. Their model also showed that forcing production home is not necessarily better than spreading it across countries. A company might keep some production at home and spread the rest. A nearby partner such as Mexico can also shorten shipping times while keeping costs below domestic levels, which combines some of the benefits of both approaches. Which parts of the supply chain you described would you bring home first, and which would you spread across other countries?

4

References

Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020). The return to protectionism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz036

Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., & Lhuillier, H. (2023). Supply chain resilience: Should policy promote international diversification or reshoring? Journal of Political Economy, 131(12), 3462-3496. https://doi.org/10.1086/725173

Maidment, F. H. (Ed.). (2013). Annual editions: International business. McGraw-Hill.

What the BUSI 360 Week 2 instructions ask

Module/Week 2 is a review module/week for Unit 1 of Maidment, with a presentation, the Forum 1 replies and the submission of a research paper topic for instructor approval. The research topic earns no points, but nothing else in the research project can begin until it is approved. The replies, worth 60 points, go to two classmates. Each is a substantial response of at least 150 words in college-level writing, contains at least two citations and, like the thread, is expected to reference the assigned videos. Because the threads in this forum debated whether globalization is ending, replies can test classmates' claims about tariffs, jobs and supply chains against research.

How this BUSI 360 Week 2 example is built

Both replies follow the same shape: name the classmate's claim, grant what is right about it, add research that complicates it, and close with a question. The first reply brings the most comprehensive study of the 2018 trade war to bear on a claim that tariffs protect jobs, and notes the retaliation farmers faced. The second answers a call to bring all production home with a theoretical model showing when diversification beats reshoring. Each cites two sources, one of them the course reader, which meets the guide's two-citation rule, and each stays somewhat above the 150-word minimum so it can make its point fully. Neither reply repeats the classmate's argument back at length.

BUSI 360 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Replies are graded on whether they are substantial, demonstrate college-level writing, run 150 words or more and carry two or more citations in current APA style, with the assigned materials referenced. A reply that introduces research the classmate did not consider, or tests a claim against evidence, is the kind of substantial contribution the guide describes. Agreement without new content earns little. Because international business topics often carry political views, instructors reward replies that stay with evidence and treat the classmate's view fairly. Each reply must meet the citation and length requirements on its own. Replies that recognize a classmate's strongest evidence before qualifying it read as collegial rather than combative.

BUSI 360 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Read several threads and choose two whose claims you can engage with research. Grant the classmate's strongest point before adding evidence. Use one peer-reviewed study per reply, plus the course reader or an assigned video, to meet the two-citation requirement. Put the finding in your own words and show how it alters the classmate's conclusion. Avoid political language; stay with what the evidence shows. End on a question that gives the classmate somewhere to go. Reach at least 150 words in each reply, and list each reply's references below it in APA format. Use your topic approval request this module/week to test whether enough research exists on the subject you plan to study.

Related BUSI 360 sample papers

Other BUSI 360 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 360 Week 2 questions, answered

What are the BUSI 360 Forum 1 replies?

A pair of substantial responses to Forum 1 threads, 60 points in Module/Week 2, each 150 or more words with two citations in APA format.

Where can I find a free BUSI 360 Week 2 sample paper?

Here you will find a complete BUSI 360 Week 2 pair of replies on whether tariffs protect jobs and whether reshoring builds resilience. Each reply carries two citations.

Did the 2018 tariffs help the U.S. economy?

A major study found the tariffs were fully passed through to U.S. buyers and, after counting tariff revenue and gains to protected producers, produced a modest net loss in real income.

Is reshoring the best way to make supply chains resilient?

Not always; research suggests diversifying suppliers across several countries can reduce risk more efficiently than moving all production home. Diversifying across countries can help more.

What else is due in BUSI 360 Module/Week 2?

The research paper topic goes to the instructor for approval, worth no points but required before the outline, alongside a review of Unit 1 of Maidment.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Ask for a custom BUSI 360 Week 2 sample · All BUSI 360 weeks · All courses