| Course | ACCT 654 Fraud Examination (ACCT654) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 4 |
| Assignment | Discussion Board Forum 3 Reply |
| Paper type | Discussion reply |
| Length | about 300 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a single reply of 275 to 400 words to at least one classmate's Forum 3 thread, citing at least 1 credible, peer-reviewed source, in current APA format |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 25 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MS in Accounting |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 4 in Liberty's published ACCT 654 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ACCT 654 Week 4
Discussion Board Forum 3 Reply: Responding to a Classmate on Digital Analysis
ACCT 654 Fraud Examination, Discussion Board Forum 3 Reply
Thread by [Student Name]
The classmate's thread is a composite; the study and book cited are real.
Jordan, I agree that a first-digit test is a quick way to screen a large set of transactions, and your example of running it on a year of disbursements is a good one. I would add some detail about where the test fits, because it is not equally useful for every account in the general ledger.
Durtschi et al. (2004) explain that Benford's law should be expected to hold for data that arise from combining numbers, such as invoice amounts that equal quantity times price, in large data sets without built-in minimums or maximums. It should not be expected for assigned numbers like check or invoice numbers, for amounts shaped by human choices such as prices set at $9.99, or for accounts limited to a narrow range of values. Running the test on the whole ledger would mix conforming and nonconforming accounts, so a deviation could simply reflect the data, not fraud. Testing accounts one at a time, starting with vendor disbursements and employee expense reimbursements, would give much cleaner results.
The same authors point out a second limit. A first-digit test can only find a fraud that leaves numbers behind. Kickbacks paid outside the books, cash skimmed before it is recorded and a handful of large fake payments hidden among thousands of honest ones may not change the distribution at all. Nigrini (2012) therefore treats digit tests as one part of a set of analyses, followed by tests for duplicates, round numbers and amounts just below approval limits.
Combining the two approaches would make your plan stronger than either one alone. My question for you: if your test showed too many disbursements starting with the digit 4, how would you decide whether that spike came from fraud or from a legitimate pattern, such as a recurring $4,800 lease payment?
References
Durtschi, C., Hillison, W., & Pacini, C. (2004). The effective use of Benford's law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 5(1), 17-34.
Nigrini, M. J. (2012). Benford's law: Applications for forensic accounting, auditing, and fraud detection. Wiley.
What the ACCT 654 Week 4 instructions ask
In Module/Week 4, ACCT 654 students read Hopwood et al.'s seventh chapter, review the earlier chapters with one presentation, sit Exam 1 and post the reply that completes Forum 3. The reply answers at least one classmate's Module/Week 3 thread in 275 to 400 words. It must cite at least one credible, peer-reviewed source beyond those already in the thread and follow current APA style. The syllabus calls for a meaningful reply, which means adding to the classmate's argument with new evidence or a reasoned challenge. With so few words to work with, the reply should pursue one point fully rather than comment on everything in the thread.
How this ACCT 654 Week 4 example is built
The sample reply makes four moves in about 330 words. It names the classmate's proposal and agrees with its core, that a first-digit test is a fast way to screen large data sets. It then brings in a peer-reviewed study on when the test is appropriate, explaining which accounts should conform and which should not. A third paragraph points out the frauds the test cannot see, such as kickbacks, skimmed cash and a few large fraudulent payments in a big file. It closes with a question about what the classmate would do when a digit spikes, inviting a reply about follow-up procedures.
ACCT 654 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
The reply is graded on whether it engages the classmate's argument, adds a peer-reviewed source the thread did not use, stays between 275 and 400 words and follows current APA style. Instructors reward a reply that corrects or extends the classmate with accurate technical content, such as the conditions under which first-digit testing works. A reply that only praises the thread, restates it, or cites a website instead of a peer-reviewed source earns little. Tone also counts, since the forum is meant to be collaborative: disagreement should be specific and respectful, and a closing question shows that the student expects the conversation to continue. Citing the classmate by name and quoting a phrase from the thread also shows the reply was written for that post and not pasted in from elsewhere.
ACCT 654 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points
Choose one claim in your classmate's thread that you can extend or qualify with a source. Agree with what is right before you add what is missing, so the reply reads as help rather than criticism. Bring a peer-reviewed article the thread did not cite, and report what it says precisely. Keep technical points concrete, for example naming accounts that would or would not follow the expected pattern. End by asking something the classmate is well placed to answer. Check that the reply falls between 275 and 400 words, cite the source in APA style, and post it before taking Exam 1, which is due the same module/week.
Related ACCT 654 sample papers
Other ACCT 654 weeks
- ACCT 654 Week 1: Forum 1 Thread
- ACCT 654 Week 2: Forum 2 Thread
- ACCT 654 Week 3: Learning Project Proposal
- ACCT 654 Week 5: Forum 4 Thread
- ACCT 654 Week 6: Forum 5 Thread
- ACCT 654 Week 7: Learning Project Paper
More MS in Accounting sample papers
- ACCT 618 Week 1: Reflection Essay
- ACCT 622 Week 4: Forum 2 Critique
- ACCT 635 Week 4: Project Outline and Bibliography
- ACCT 650 Week 4: Forum 3 Reply
ACCT 654 Week 4 questions, answered
What is the ACCT 654 Forum 3 Reply?
The 25-point reply due in Module/Week 4 that completes Forum 3: 275 to 400 words answering a classmate's thread, with at least one more peer-reviewed source in APA style.
Where can I find a free ACCT 654 Week 4 sample paper?
Read the full ACCT 654 Week 4 reply on this page, which extends a classmate's thread on Benford's law with research on where first-digit tests work.
When does Benford's law apply to accounting data?
Data that come from combining numbers, such as quantity times price, in large sets with no built-in minimums or maximums tend to follow it; assigned numbers like check numbers do not.
What frauds can Benford's law not detect?
Frauds that leave no recorded transaction, such as kickbacks or skimmed cash, and schemes with only a few fraudulent entries in a large file will rarely show up in a first-digit test.
What else is due in ACCT 654 Module/Week 4?
Exam 1 falls in the same module/week: 100 points, open book and notes, 25 objective items to finish within an hour and a quarter.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom ACCT 654 Week 4 sample · All ACCT 654 weeks · All courses