| Course | ACCT 635 Advanced Research for Financial Reporting (ACCT635) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 4 |
| Assignment | Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography |
| Paper type | Research outline and annotated bibliography |
| Length | about 802 words, 3 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a working outline of the 12-15 page research paper and an annotated bibliography of the sources it will use, at least five beyond the textbook and the Bible, in current APA format |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 50 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MS in Accounting |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 4 in Liberty's published ACCT 635 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ACCT 635 Week 4
New U.S. Accounting Standards in Target Corporation's 2025 Form 10-K: Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography
[Student Name]
School of Business, Liberty University
ACCT 635: Advanced Research for Financial Reporting
Individual Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The project company is real and its figures come from its filed 10-K; every annotated source is real and checkable.
New U.S. Accounting Standards in Target Corporation's 2025 Form 10-K: Research Project Outline and Annotated Bibliography
Company and Research Question
The company is Target Corporation, a U.S. general merchandise retailer listed on the New York Stock Exchange that reports under U.S. GAAP, and the filing is the annual report it filed in 2026 for fiscal 2025, which ended on the final day of January 2026. The research question is this: how have four recent FASB updates, on supplier finance programs, segment reporting, income tax disclosures and expense disaggregation, changed what Target's 10-K tells investors, and does the change bring the filing closer to the conceptual framework's goal of decision-useful information?
Outline
I. Introduction: Target's size and the reason a retailer is a useful test case. II. Theory: the objective of financial reporting, relevance and faithful representation, and economic consequences. III. Supplier finance programs: what ASU 2022-04 requires and what Target's roll-forward shows. IV. Segment reporting for a single-segment company: what ASU 2023-07 changed and what Target now discloses. V. Income taxes: the new rate reconciliation and taxes-paid disclosures under ASU 2023-09, using Target's fiscal 2025 figures. VI. Expense disaggregation: what ASU 2024-03 will require of Target and what research suggests investors will gain. VII. Evaluation: whether the changes improve decision usefulness, at what cost. VIII. Conclusion, including a biblical perspective on transparency.
Annotated Bibliography
Ai, L., Gu, X., & Yu, K. (2025). The effects of ASC 842 on the value and risk relevance of operating lease liabilities. European Accounting Review, 35(1), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2025.2513951
Ai et al. (2025) find that recognizing operating lease liabilities under ASC 842 increased their value relevance and risk relevance compared with the earlier footnote disclosure, because recognition made the amounts more reliable and easier to process. The study is recent, large-sample and published in a leading international journal. It will support Section II's argument that recognition and disclosure are not equivalent, a point the paper applies to Target's supplier finance and tax disclosures.
Blann, J. J., & Moon, J. R. (2026). Income statement expense disaggregation. The Accounting Review, 101(3), 137-165. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2023-0545
Blann and Moon (2026) study expense disaggregation that companies provided voluntarily before ASU 2024-03 and find it common and growing, with evidence that cost of goods sold detail is decision-useful for investors and analysts while selling and administrative detail is not. As the most direct large-sample evidence on the coming standard, it is central to Section VI, where the paper predicts which of Target's new disclosures will matter most.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2022). Accounting standards update No. 2022-04: Liabilities, supplier finance programs (Subtopic 405-50): Disclosure of supplier finance program obligations.
The FASB (2022) update requires buyers that use supplier finance programs to disclose the programs' key terms, the amount outstanding, where it is presented on the balance sheet and a roll-forward of the obligation, the roll-forward taking effect a year after the rest. It is the authoritative source for Section III and frames the analysis of Target's figures.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2023a). Accounting standards update No. 2023-07: Segment reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to reportable segment disclosures.
The FASB (2023a) update makes companies show the major segment costs their top decision maker sees routinely, a figure for everything else and who that decision maker is, and it pulls one-segment companies fully into the rules. A company with one segment still has to explain how management reads its own numbers. It is the authoritative basis for Section IV, since Target reports one segment.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2023b). Accounting standards update No. 2023-09: Income taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to income tax disclosures.
The FASB (2023b) update requires public companies to present the rate reconciliation in both amounts and percentages using specified categories, to disclose reconciling items above a threshold separately and to disaggregate income taxes paid by federal, state and foreign jurisdictions. It took effect for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, making Target's fiscal 2025 10-K its first year of application, and it anchors Section V.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2024). Accounting standards update No. 2024-03: Income statement, reporting comprehensive income, expense disaggregation disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of income statement expenses.
The FASB (2024) update will make public companies itemize what sits inside each major expense line, inventory bought, wages and benefits, depreciation and intangible amortization, for years starting after mid-December 2026. It defines what Target must add in a later filing and supports Section VI.
Hanlon, M. (2003). What can we infer about a firm's taxable income from its financial statements? National Tax Journal, 56(4), 831-863. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.4.07
Hanlon (2003) explains why the tax figures in financial statements are a poor guide to a company's actual taxable income and taxes paid, citing differences in consolidation, the treatment of stock options and the limits of tax footnote disclosure. Although it predates the new standard by two decades, it states clearly the problem ASU 2023-09 addresses and will support Section V's argument about why investors asked for better tax disclosure.
Target Corporation. (2026). Form 10-K: 2025 annual report. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Target Corporation (2026) is the primary source for the project. Its financial statements and notes report net sales of $104.8 billion, an effective tax rate of 22.3 percent, a supplier finance obligation of $3.0 billion and one reportable segment, along with notes describing recently adopted and recently issued standards. Every empirical section of the paper draws on it.
Wolk, H. I., Dodd, J. L., & Rozycki, J. J. (2017). Accounting theory: Conceptual issues in a political and economic environment (9th ed.). SAGE.
Wolk et al. (2017), the course textbook, develop the conceptual framework, the economic consequences of standards and the political setting of standard setting. It will supply the theory in Section II and the evaluative lens in Section VII.
Closing Note
The sources cover every section of the outline, with the 10-K and the four updates supplying the evidence and the three studies supplying the evaluation. One gap remains: research on segment disclosures for single-segment companies is thin, so Section IV may rely mainly on the update and the filing. I will look for a recent study before drafting.
What the ACCT 635 Week 4 instructions ask
The outline and annotated bibliography fall due in Module/Week 4 of ACCT 635, two weeks after each student names the company and three weeks before the paper itself, while Forum 4 runs alongside it, together with the textbook's sixth chapter and a pair of PowerPoints. The final paper will need twelve to fifteen APA pages on how new U.S. standards show up in a recent 10-K of a GAAP-reporting U.S. public company, with a reference list that reaches five sources even after the textbook and Bible are set aside. This middle checkpoint shows the instructor that the student has a usable plan and enough sources to carry it, early enough to change course.
How this ACCT 635 Week 4 example is built
First comes a brief paragraph naming the company, the filing and the question, so the scope is clear at once. A section-by-section outline follows, with a sentence for each section saying what it will show and which sources support it. The annotated bibliography then lists nine sources in APA order. Every annotation follows one pattern, summary, then a judgment of the source's weight, then the section where it will appear. Because the project depends on primary documents, the 10-K and the four Accounting Standards Updates are annotated as carefully as the journal articles. A closing note maps sources to sections and names one gap still to fill.
ACCT 635 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
The checkpoint is graded on whether the outline shows a coherent paper that answers the assignment and whether the bibliography supplies enough relevant, credible sources to write it. Instructors look for a specific company and filing, a research question about the effect of new standards on that filing, and an outline that moves from standards to evidence to evaluation. Annotations earn credit when they go beyond summary to judge each source and say how it will be used. Since the paper needs five sources besides Wolk et al. and Scripture, a bibliography that already reaches that number, in current APA format, signals the project is on track for the 200-point paper.
ACCT 635 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points
Choose a company whose most recent 10-K shows the effects of standards adopted in the last two or three years, and read its notes on recently adopted and recently issued pronouncements first, since they list what applies. Frame one research question and build the outline around it, not around a list of standards. Annotate the 10-K and the Accounting Standards Updates as sources, because they are the paper's primary evidence. For each journal article, say what it found and why it matters to your company. Note which section each source will support, and confirm five remain after the textbook and Bible are left out of the count. Format every entry in current APA style.
Related ACCT 635 sample papers
Other ACCT 635 weeks
- ACCT 635 Week 1: Discussion Board Forum 1
- ACCT 635 Week 2: Discussion Board Forum 2
- ACCT 635 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 3
- ACCT 635 Week 5: Discussion Board Forum 5
- ACCT 635 Week 6: Discussion Board Forum 6
- ACCT 635 Week 7: Research Project Paper
- ACCT 635 Week 8: Research Project Presentation
More MS in Accounting sample papers
- ACCT 614 Week 4: Case Study 2
- ACCT 616 Week 4: Discussion Board Forum 3
- ACCT 618 Week 1: Reflection Essay
- ACCT 622 Week 4: Forum 2 Critique
ACCT 635 Week 4 questions, answered
What is the ACCT 635 Outline and Annotated Bibliography?
The 50-point research project checkpoint in Module/Week 4: an outline of the 12-15 page paper on new accounting standards in a company's 10-K and an annotated bibliography of its sources.
Where can I find a free ACCT 635 Week 4 sample paper?
This page shows a complete ACCT 635 Week 4 outline and annotated bibliography sample for a research project on new FASB standards in Target Corporation's 10-K for fiscal 2025.
How many sources does the ACCT 635 research paper need?
Five or more, not counting Wolk et al. or Scripture, and this Module/Week 4 bibliography is where a student proves those sources are already found and read.
Which FASB updates affect a 2025 or 2026 Form 10-K?
Recent filings show supplier finance program roll-forwards, expanded segment disclosures under ASU 2023-07, and the new income tax disclosures under ASU 2023-09, with expense disaggregation under ASU 2024-03 still to come.
What else is due in ACCT 635 Module/Week 4?
Forum 4 shares the Module/Week 4 deadline, while chapter 6 of the textbook and a pair of PowerPoints make up the week's assigned reading.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom ACCT 635 Week 4 sample · All ACCT 635 weeks · All courses