| Course | PSYC 336 Gerontology (PSYC336) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 6 |
| Assignment | Blog Entry 6 |
| Paper type | Blog entry and comment |
| Length | about 481 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a weekly blog entry noting an encounter with an event relevant to understanding aging, plus a substantial comment on 1 classmate's blog each module |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 15 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BS in Psychology |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 6 in Liberty's published PSYC 336 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PSYC 336 Week 6
Blog Entry 6 and Comment
PSYC 336 Gerontology, Blog Entry 6 (entry and one comment)
Thread by [Student Name]
The visit, the people in it and the classmate's blog are composites standing in for the student's own; the textbook and published meta-analysis are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for PSYC 336.
Blog Entry
On Sunday afternoon I helped lead fifteen teenagers from our church youth group on a visit to a nursing home across town. In the van on the way, most of them were quiet, and one boy asked whether the residents would remember us after we left. In the activity room, each teen sat with a resident for an hour.
Two moments stayed with me. A shy fourteen-year-old who rarely speaks at youth group discovered that his resident had played minor league baseball as a catcher in the 1960s, and the two of them talked about curveballs until the staff called dinner. A girl who had told me she was "scared of old people" learned a card game from a woman of 97, lost four times and asked to come back for a rematch. On the drive home, the van was loud with stories about whose resident was the funniest, and three teens asked when we could go back.
The afternoon made me wonder whether visits like this actually change how young people think about aging, or whether the good feelings fade by Tuesday. Youth groups often do one visit a year at Christmas, and I suspect that pattern does little. Burnes et al. (2019) gathered controlled studies of programs meant to shrink young people's and adults' prejudice against the old. They compared three approaches: education about aging, intergenerational contact and programs that combine the two. All three improved attitudes, and combined programs, which pair accurate information with real relationships, produced the largest effects. That suggests our visit was a good start but could be stronger. Next month, I plan to spend fifteen minutes before the visit talking with the teens about common myths of aging, drawing on what Quadagno (2018) writes about stereotypes and the variety of older adults' lives.
I also had to admit something about myself. Before this course, I would have described a nursing home as a sad place. The residents I met on Sunday were funny, opinionated and curious, and several asked the teens more questions than the teens asked them.
Readers: has a single visit or conversation ever changed your view of older adults, and did the change last?
Comment on Marcus's Blog
Marcus, your blog about your grandfather's move into assisted living was moving, especially the detail that he insisted on bringing his workbench even though he had no room for it. That detail captures what the textbook describes as the importance of continuity and control when older adults change living arrangements (Quadagno, 2018). The workbench may matter less as furniture than as a sign that his identity as a builder is coming with him. Many facilities have a workshop or garden for residents, and some invite residents to repair things for the community. Has the facility found a way for him to keep working with his hands, perhaps in a hobby room or a project for other residents?
References
Burnes, D., Sheppard, C., Henderson, C. R., Jr., Wassel, M., Cope, R., Barber, C., & Pillemer, K. (2019). Interventions to reduce ageism against older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 109(8), e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305123
Quadagno, J. (2018). Aging and the life course: An introduction to social gerontology (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
What the PSYC 336 Week 6 instructions ask
The sixth PSYC 336 blog, worth 15 points, comes in Module/Week 6 alongside the LearnSmart assignment and Exam 3, after chapters 9 and 10 of Quadagno and a presentation. The blog continues the weekly pattern set in Module/Week 1. Students note an event they encountered that week that bears on their understanding of aging and reflect on it, and they comment on one classmate's blog. The guide's description of comments, not necessarily long but substantial, applies here as in every module. By the sixth entry, many students begin connecting new encounters to earlier ones, which shows how their understanding has grown since the first week of the course.
How this PSYC 336 Week 6 example is built
The entry begins with the scene in the nursing home's activity room and two moments that stood out, a shy boy who found he shared a love of baseball with a former minor league catcher, and a girl who learned to play a card game from a woman of 97. It then names the question the afternoon raised, whether such visits change attitudes, and turns to the meta-analysis for evidence, explaining the three intervention types it compared. The writer applies the finding to the youth group's next visit. A brief reflection on the writer's own earlier attitudes ends the entry, followed by a comment on a classmate's blog about assisted living.
PSYC 336 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go
Graders look for a genuine, specific encounter relevant to aging, reflection that uses the course's ideas accurately and, where research appears, careful description of what it found. The sixth entry is stronger if it shows development, for example by connecting the encounter to an earlier blog or forum on ageism or relationships. Respectful description of residents and young people, with no identifying details, is expected in every entry. The comment on a classmate's blog must engage the specific event the classmate described and add a concept, question or connection. Writing that sounds like the student yet stays professional, and APA citations for any source mentioned, round out the 15 points.
PSYC 336 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost points
Blogs about visits to care settings can slip into describing residents as sad or helpless. Describe what people actually said and did, and let individual personalities come through. Ask a question the visit raised and look for evidence that answers it, such as research on intergenerational contact. Avoid names and details that could identify residents, and ask the facility before writing about anything you saw there. If you mention a study, say what it compared and what it found, in plain words. In the comment, connect the classmate's event to the textbook chapters for the week, such as housing or long-term care, and ask something that invites further reflection rather than a yes or no answer.
Related PSYC 336 sample papers
Other PSYC 336 weeks
- PSYC 336 Week 1: Blog 1: Ageism at the Checkout
- PSYC 336 Week 2: Field Experience Arrangement
- PSYC 336 Week 3: Forum 1: Smaller Circles Later
- PSYC 336 Week 4: Forum 2: The Cost of Caregiving
- PSYC 336 Week 5: Forum 3: Expecting to Age Well
- PSYC 336 Week 7: Research Paper: Ageism and Health
- PSYC 336 Week 8: Field Experience Final Submission
More BS in Psychology sample papers
- PSYC 235 Week 6: Blog 2: Personality After Thirty
- PSYC 255 Week 6: Forum 4: Qualitative Research
- PSYC 309 Week 6: Forum 5: Living Together First
- PSYC 320 Week 6: BMP Treatment Phase Report
PSYC 336 Week 6 questions, answered
What is PSYC 336 Blog Entry 6?
The sixth weekly PSYC 336 blog entry, worth 15 points in Module/Week 6, reflecting on an encounter relevant to aging, with a substantial comment on one classmate's blog.
Where can I find a free PSYC 336 Week 6 sample paper?
A complete PSYC 336 Week 6 blog entry on a youth group's nursing home visit and research on reducing ageism, with a comment on a classmate's blog, is on this page.
Does intergenerational contact reduce ageism?
Burnes and colleagues found that contact with older people, lessons about aging and programs mixing both all improved attitudes, and the mixed programs did best.
What should a PSYC 336 blog comment include?
The guide says comments need not be long but must be substantial, so they should engage the classmate's specific event and add an idea, question or connection to the course.
What else is due in PSYC 336 Module/Week 6?
The week's LearnSmart assignment and Exam 3, an open-book exam based on the textbook with 50 multiple-choice and true-false items and a 90-minute time limit.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom PSYC 336 Week 6 sample · All PSYC 336 weeks · All courses