PSYC 336 Week 1 Blog Entry 1 Example

Reviewed by Allison Pemberton, PhD · Liberty University · Updated

This PSYC 336 Week 1 example is Blog Entry 1, the 15-point first entry in Liberty University PSYC 336, Psychology of Aging, a BS in Psychology course, written after chapters 1 and 4 of Quadagno's Aging and the Life Course and a presentation, alongside the first LearnSmart assignment. The guide asks students to keep a weekly blog noting events they encounter that bear on their understanding of aging, and to comment substantially on one classmate's blog each week. This entry describes a grocery clerk speaking loudly and slowly to an older man who had asked a simple question about a coupon, and connects the moment to research on ageism. It draws on Chang and colleagues' worldwide review, in which nearly every study of ageism found some harm to older people's health. The comment responds to a classmate's blog about a grandmother's first smartphone.

CoursePSYC 336 Gerontology (PSYC336)
Module/Week1
AssignmentBlog Entry 1
Paper typeBlog entry and comment
Lengthabout 543 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a weekly blog entry noting an encounter with an event relevant to understanding aging, plus a substantial comment on 1 classmate's blog each module
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points15
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Psychology
Where it sitsModule/Week 1 in Liberty's published PSYC 336 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSYC 336 Week 1

1

Blog Entry 1 and Comment

PSYC 336 Gerontology, Blog Entry 1 (entry and one comment)

Thread by [Student Name]

The encounter, the people in it and the classmate's blog are composites standing in for the student's own; the textbook and published studies are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for PSYC 336.

Blog Entry

Why this part earns its pointsThe entry describes the scene before interpreting it, which keeps the reflection grounded in what actually happened.
2

On Saturday, I stood in line at the grocery store behind a man who looked to be in his eighties. He asked the clerk whether a coupon for cereal applied to the larger box. The clerk, who seemed friendly, leaned toward him and answered very slowly and loudly, "THIS COUPON, HONEY, IS FOR THE SMALL ONE." The man nodded, said he understood, and paid. As he left, he glanced back at me and rolled his eyes. He had not asked anything confusing, and he had heard her perfectly well the first time. Two people behind me laughed, which seemed to make it worse.

Researchers call this kind of talk elderspeak: speech that sounds the way adults talk to young children, slower, louder and simpler, often with words like "honey." The clerk was not trying to be unkind. That is exactly what makes it a useful example of ageism, the stereotyping of people because of their age. Quadagno (2018) describes how age stereotypes are built into everyday expectations, so that people act on them without noticing. The clerk assumed, because of his age, that he could not hear or understand, and she adjusted her speech before he gave her any reason to.

It would be easy to dismiss the moment as harmless, but research suggests otherwise. When Chang et al. (2020) gathered more than four hundred studies from around the world, spanning a quarter century and many kinds of health outcomes, they found the same message almost everywhere. In all but a handful of those studies, older people exposed to ageism fared worse in body or mind, and the proportion of studies finding harm rose over the years the review covered. The review included both structural ageism, such as unequal access to care, and individual ageism, such as older people absorbing negative stereotypes about themselves. Small, repeated encounters like the one I saw are part of how those stereotypes are communicated.

The scene also made me examine myself. I realized I do something similar when I speak to my grandmother on the phone: I raise my voice before she has asked me to. From now on, I want to wait and adjust only if she needs it. She has never once told me she cannot hear me, and I suspect the habit says more about my assumptions than her hearing.

Readers: have you noticed elderspeak, or done it yourself without meaning to?

Comment on Danielle's Blog

Why this part earns its pointsThe comment adds a concept from the reading to the classmate's observation, which makes it substantial rather than brief praise.
3

Danielle, your story about your grandmother learning to video-call her great-grandchildren on her first smartphone was a great counterexample to the stereotype that older adults cannot learn new technology. It took her longer to learn the steps, but once she did, she used the phone every day. That fits the textbook's point that many age-related differences are smaller and more individual than stereotypes suggest (Quadagno, 2018). It also connects to my blog: if the salesperson had assumed she could not learn and refused to teach her, she might never have tried. Expectations shape what older adults are given the chance to do. Your grandmother also seems to have been motivated by something she cared about, seeing the children, which the textbook would say matters more than age for learning. Did she find it easier to learn from family than from the store?

4

References

Chang, E.-S., Kannoth, S., Levy, S., Wang, S.-Y., Lee, J. E., & Levy, B. R. (2020). Global reach of ageism on older persons' health: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 15(1), Article e0220857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220857

Quadagno, J. (2018). Aging and the life course: An introduction to social gerontology (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

What the PSYC 336 Week 1 instructions ask

Blog Entry 1 opens PSYC 336 in Module/Week 1 for 15 points, in the same week as the syllabus checklist, introductions and the first LearnSmart activity, after chapters 1 and 4 of Quadagno and a presentation. The course asks for seven weekly blog entries, one in each of Modules/Weeks 1 to 7. Each entry notes something the student encountered that week that has relevance for understanding aging, whether an experience, a conversation or something in the news. Each week the student also comments on one classmate's blog. Comments, the guide says, can be brief as long as they have substance, which means engaging the classmate's observation rather than simply praising it.

How this PSYC 336 Week 1 example is built

The entry opens with a short scene at a grocery checkout and describes what the writer saw and heard before interpreting it. It then names the behavior as a form of elderspeak, an everyday expression of ageism, and connects it to the textbook's account of age stereotypes. A paragraph brings in the systematic review of ageism and health to show why such small moments matter. The writer reflects on a personal habit the scene revealed, speaking loudly to a grandmother who hears well, and ends with a question for readers. A substantial comment on a classmate's blog about a grandmother learning technology follows, adding a point from the reading.

PSYC 336 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go

Blog entries are graded on whether they describe a genuine encounter relevant to aging, connect it thoughtfully to the course material and show reflection on what it means. Graders look for observation that is specific and respectful, interpretation that uses the textbook's concepts accurately and, where research is cited, careful description of findings. The weekly comment on a classmate's blog must be substantial, engaging the classmate's specific observation and adding an idea or connection. Clear, personal but professional writing completes the evaluation, and APA citations are expected where sources are used. Because the seven entries build on one another, an early entry that names a question to watch for gives later entries something to return to.

PSYC 336 Week 1 help: mistakes that cost points

First blog entries often summarize the reading rather than report an encounter. Start with something you actually saw or heard this week, describe it in a few sentences and then explain why it matters for understanding aging. Avoid identifying details about the people involved. Connect the encounter to one concept from the chapters, such as age stereotypes, and, if you like, one study. Reflect honestly on your own reaction, since the blog is meant to track your developing understanding over the course. In your comment, respond to the classmate's specific event and add a concept or question, such as whether a stereotype was challenged or confirmed.

Related PSYC 336 sample papers

Other PSYC 336 weeks

More BS in Psychology sample papers

PSYC 336 Week 1 questions, answered

What is PSYC 336 Blog Entry 1?

The first of seven weekly PSYC 336 blog entries, worth 15 points in Module/Week 1, describing an encounter relevant to aging and connecting it to the course, with a substantial comment on a classmate's blog.

Where can I find a free PSYC 336 Week 1 sample paper?

A complete PSYC 336 Week 1 blog entry on an everyday encounter with ageism at a grocery store, linked to research on ageism and health, with a comment, is on this page.

What is elderspeak?

Talk aimed at older people that copies the style adults use with toddlers, slowed down, louder than needed, oversimplified and sprinkled with pet names, which many older listeners find condescending.

Does ageism affect older people's health?

Chang and colleagues reviewed research from dozens of countries and found that almost all of the studies linked ageism with poorer physical or mental health, a pattern that grew stronger over time.

How many blog entries are required in PSYC 336?

Seven weekly blog entries in Modules/Weeks 1 to 7, worth 15 points each, plus a substantial comment on one classmate's blog every module.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.