PSYC 320 Week 2 DB Forum 2 Example

Reviewed by Allison Pemberton, PhD · Liberty University · Updated

This PSYC 320 Week 2 example works through the reinforcement forum, DB Forum 2, a 30-point Liberty University PSYC 320 discussion in the BS in Psychology posted after Miltenberger's chapters on graphing behavior and on reinforcement, with two presentations and Exam 1 also due. Its composite prompt asks whether rewarding a behavior can undermine a person's own interest in it. The thread explains positive and negative reinforcement with a classroom sticker chart, then sets two meta-analyses against each other: one of 128 experiments finding that expected tangible rewards reduced free-choice interest, and a reply from behavior analysts concluding that rewards tied to performance level do not harm motivation and that verbal praise helps. It draws a practical middle path and a biblical concept of reward from Colossians. The replies discuss fading rewards and praise that is specific.

CoursePSYC 320 Behavior Modification (PSYC320)
Module/Week2
AssignmentDB Forum 2
Paper typeDiscussion thread and replies
Lengthabout 607 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a thread of 300 to 500 words and replies of 100 to 150 words to 2 classmates, each citing the Bible, the textbook and at least 1 peer-reviewed article in current APA format, with a references section
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points30
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Psychology
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published PSYC 320 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSYC 320 Week 2

1

Discussion Board Forum 2: Thread and Two Replies

PSYC 320 Behavior Modification, Discussion Board Forum 2 (thread and two replies)

Thread by [Student Name]

The prompt, the writer's example and the classmates' posts are composites standing in for the course's own forum; the textbook, Scripture and peer-reviewed meta-analyses are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for PSYC 320.

Thread

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread grounds the debate in a classroom example, which keeps the definitions concrete.
2

A second-grade teacher gives a sticker for every book a student reads, and a parent worries that her daughter now reads only for stickers. Is she right? The question is older than this classroom; teachers, parents and employers have argued about rewards for decades.

Miltenberger (2015) defines positive reinforcement as adding a stimulus after a behavior so that the behavior is strengthened, and negative reinforcement as removing an aversive stimulus after a behavior with the same strengthening effect. Both are defined by what happens to the behavior, not by whether the consequence seems pleasant. The sticker is positive reinforcement if reading increases. The worry is about something else: whether the reward changes why the child reads. If the stickers stop, will she put the books down?

Two meta-analyses reached different conclusions. Deci et al. (1999) reviewed 128 experiments and found that rewards expected in advance and given simply for doing or completing a task reduced how much people chose to keep doing it later, while positive feedback increased both free-choice behavior and interest. Cameron et al. (2001) reanalyzed the literature and concluded that rewards do not have pervasive negative effects. Rewards for low-interest tasks increased later interest, verbal rewards helped, and harm appeared mainly when tangible rewards were expected and only loosely tied to performance. When rewards were linked to the level of performance, measures of interest rose or stayed the same as in unrewarded groups.

Read together, the studies point to a practical middle path: tie rewards to the quality or amount of performance, pair them with specific praise and fade them as the activity becomes rewarding in itself. On a graph, a well-designed program would show reading rising during the reward phase and staying high as stickers are thinned out. If reading collapsed when stickers ended, the teacher would know the program needed a slower fade or more social reinforcement.

In Colossians 3:23-24, labor done for the Lord rather than for human approval is promised an inheritance from him (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). Scripture does not treat reward as opposed to wholehearted effort; it treats the right reward as part of what sustains it.

Classmates: when has a reward helped you come to enjoy something you first did only for the reward?

Reply to Morgan

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply adds the textbook's guidance on fading, which answers the classmate's worry directly.
3

Morgan, you worried that your nephew will stop practicing piano once the reward chart ends. It is a common concern. Miltenberger (2015) addresses it by recommending that reinforcement be thinned gradually, moving from continuous to intermittent schedules so the behavior persists. Cameron et al. (2001) found that rewards for low-interest tasks, and early piano practice is often one, can actually increase later interest, which suggests the chart may help piano become rewarding in itself. Proverbs 22:6 promises that early training shapes a child for life (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016), and training often begins with outside support before it becomes habit. Could you reward every other practice next month and see whether practice holds steady?

Reply to Chris

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply sharpens the classmate's praise example with research on the kind of feedback that helps.
4

Chris, you said you plan to praise your students constantly, which shows real care for them. Deci et al. (1999) found that positive feedback increased both free-choice behavior and interest, so praise is a good tool. Miltenberger (2015) adds that reinforcement works best when it follows the behavior immediately and is contingent on it, so specific praise naming exactly what the student did, such as "You found three examples in that paragraph" is stronger than general praise. In 1 Thessalonians 5:11, Paul tells the church to keep strengthening each other with words of encouragement (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). Praise also loses value if it follows everything. How will you keep praise specific in a busy classroom?

5

References

Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392017

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Miltenberger, R. G. (2015). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

What the PSYC 320 Week 2 instructions ask

PSYC 320's second forum carries 30 points in Module/Week 2, beside Exam 1 on chapters 1 to 4, after Miltenberger's chapters 3 and 4 and two presentations. The forum rules from the syllabus apply as in Forum 1. The opening post falls between 300 and 500 words, each reply to the two classmates falls between 100 and 150, and each post cites the Bible, Miltenberger and a minimum of one refereed journal source, formatted in APA with a reference list. Because chapter 3 covers graphing, posts can also describe how a change in behavior would appear on a graph, which prepares students for the baseline and treatment reports of the Behavior Modification Project.

How this PSYC 320 Week 2 example is built

The post begins with a second-grade teacher's sticker chart for reading and the worry a parent raised about it. It defines positive and negative reinforcement from the reading, then presents the two meta-analyses on rewards and intrinsic motivation in turn, noting the conditions under which each found harm or benefit and where they agree. A paragraph proposes practical guidelines that follow from both, such as tying rewards to performance and pairing them with specific praise. Colossians 3:23-24 offers a biblical picture of working wholeheartedly while looking to a reward. The replies address how to fade a reward chart without losing the behavior and what makes praise effective rather than empty.

PSYC 320 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Graders look for accurate definitions of reinforcement from the chapter, a balanced account of the research debate rather than a one-sided summary, and a clear practical conclusion. The thread must stay within its word range and the replies within theirs, and every post needs the three required source types cited correctly. Replies earn credit by engaging the classmate's example and adding a point from the textbook or research. Since this module also covers graphing, a thread that describes how data would show the effect of a reward demonstrates integration of both chapters. Posts that report the conditions under which each meta-analysis found harm or benefit, rather than only its headline, show careful reading.

PSYC 320 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

The reward debate tempts students to pick a side based on intuition. Describe what each meta-analysis found, including the conditions under which rewards helped or hurt, and then say what a practitioner should do. Distinguish positive reinforcement from bribery: reinforcement follows the behavior, while a bribe is offered to start it. Remember that negative reinforcement is not punishment; it increases behavior by removing something unpleasant. Keep replies tight, since the 150-word cap leaves room for one idea and one citation of each type, so choose the single point most likely to help the classmate. Format the Bible reference correctly in APA style, and list every source in the references section so readers can check them.

Related PSYC 320 sample papers

Other PSYC 320 weeks

More BS in Psychology sample papers

PSYC 320 Week 2 questions, answered

What is PSYC 320 DB Forum 2?

PSYC 320's reinforcement forum, worth 30 points in the second module, where the opening post and both brief replies carry Scripture, textbook and journal citations.

Where can I find a free PSYC 320 Week 2 sample paper?

A complete PSYC 320 Week 2 forum on whether rewards undermine intrinsic motivation, weighing two meta-analyses, with two cited replies, is reproduced in full on this page.

Do rewards reduce intrinsic motivation?

It depends on the reward: one meta-analysis found that expected tangible rewards reduced free-choice interest, while another found that rewards tied to performance level and verbal praise did not harm motivation.

What is the difference between positive and negative reinforcement?

Both increase a behavior; positive reinforcement adds something desirable after it, while negative reinforcement removes something unpleasant after it, such as ending an alarm by getting up.

What does Exam 1 in PSYC 320 cover?

Chapters 1 to 4 of Miltenberger, on foundations, observing and recording, graphing and reinforcement, in an open-book, open-note exam of multiple-choice questions worth 100 points.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.