PSYC 235 Week 3 Life Line Example

Reviewed by Allison Pemberton, PhD · Liberty University · Updated

This PSYC 235 Week 3 example is the Life Line, the 120-point project in Liberty University PSYC 235 for BS in Psychology students, completed after chapters 5 and 6 of Bjorklund on social roles and social relationships and a presentation. Students interview two family members, build three life lines for those relatives and themselves, and compare when important events and social roles arrived, then write a brief two-page summary. This composite family spans a grandmother born in 1948, a mother born in 1972 and a writer born in 1998. The life lines show marriage moving from age 19 to 26 to not yet, first births from 20 to 28, and the grandparent and caregiver roles arriving in new orders. The summary explains the shifts with the textbook's idea of the social clock and with studies of how emerging adults and their parents define adulthood.

CoursePSYC 235 Psychology of Adulthood (PSYC235)
Module/Week3
AssignmentLife Line
Paper typeLife line project with written summary
Lengthabout 570 words, 2 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: per the course guide, three life lines built from interviews with 2 family members and the student, comparing the timing of important life events and social roles, followed by a brief 2-page summary
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points120
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Psychology
Where it sitsModule/Week 3 in Liberty's published PSYC 235 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSYC 235 Week 3

1

Life Line Project: Three Generations of One Family Compared, the Timing of Life Events and Social Roles From 1948 to Today

 

[Student Name]

School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University

PSYC 235: Psychology of Adulthood

Life Line (three life lines and summary)

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The family members, interviews and dates are composites standing in for the student's own; the textbook and published studies are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for PSYC 235.

2

Life Line Project: Three Generations of One Family Compared, the Timing of Life Events and Social Roles From 1948 to Today

Method

Why this part earns its pointsThe method paragraph says who was interviewed and how, which lets a reader judge how reliable the life lines are.
3

For this project I interviewed my maternal grandmother, Ruth, born in 1948, by phone for about an hour, and my mother, Linda, born in 1972, in person over two evenings. I asked each about the ages at which major events occurred and when she first felt like an adult. Both agreed to the information shared here; names have been changed. My own life line is from my records and memory.

Event or roleGrandmother (b. 1948)Mother (b. 1972)Writer (b. 1998)
Finished schooling17, high school22, bachelor's degree24, bachelor's degree
First full-time job17, bank teller22, elementary teacher24, insurance claims
Left parents' home19, at marriage22, own apartment25, shared apartment
Married1926Not yet (engaged at 28)
First child2028Not yet
Caregiver for a parent58 (mother)49 (Ruth, after a stroke)Not yet
Grandparent47Not yetNot applicable
Retired62Planning at 60Not applicable
First felt like an adult20, first child28, first child26, paying own bills

Timing of Education, Work, Marriage and Parenthood

The three life lines show a clear shift in the timing of early adult roles. My grandmother finished school, married and became a mother within three years. My mother spread the same transitions over six years, and I have finished school and started work but not yet married or had children. Bjorklund (2015) describes the social clock, the shared expectations a society holds about when events should happen, and notes that these expectations have loosened as education has lengthened and economic pressures have changed. By my grandmother's clock, my mother married late and I am very late; by mine, all three of us are on time for our own cohorts. Education explains much of the difference. My grandmother began work at 17, while my mother and I each spent four more years in school, which pushed marriage and parenthood later. Economics also played a part: my grandmother and grandfather bought a house at 21 on one income, while my mother and father needed two incomes and waited until 30, and my fiance and I are still saving for a down payment.

Roles in New Orders

Why this part earns its pointsThis section focuses on roles that arrived in unexpected orders, which goes beyond comparing ages.
4

The life lines also show roles arriving in different sequences. My grandmother became a grandparent at 47, before she became a caregiver for her own mother at 58. My mother, in contrast, became a caregiver at 49, when my grandmother had a stroke, and has not yet become a grandparent. Bjorklund (2015) describes the middle generation as often carrying responsibilities in two directions at once; my mother cared for her mother while still helping me with rent after college. Because the generations are spaced further apart, my mother may become a grandparent later than her mother did, and she may face caregiving and grandparenting at the same time.

Defining Adulthood

Why this part earns its pointsThe definitions of adulthood are compared with recent research, which turns a family conversation into evidence.
5

The most interesting difference came from the question about feeling like an adult. My grandmother and mother both named the birth of a first child, while I named the month I began paying all my own bills. Recent studies help explain this. Walczak (2023) surveyed 303 Polish emerging adults and found that responsibility and independence, including financial independence, were the most common markers of adulthood, while marriage, parenthood and finishing school had lost importance. Vleioras (2021) compared 73 emerging adults with their parents and found that both generations ranked accepting responsibility for one's actions highest and agreed strongly on the order of criteria, though the young adults rated the criteria as less important overall. My family fits both findings: all three of us talked about responsibility, but my mother and grandmother tied it to parenthood, while I tied it to financial independence.

Completing these life lines made me see my own timing less as a delay and more as a pattern shared by my generation, and it gave me a new appreciation for how early my grandmother took on adult responsibilities. It also made me curious about the next generation: if my children follow the trend, their life lines may look as different from mine as mine looks from my grandmother's.

6

References

Bjorklund, B. R. (2015). The journey of adulthood (8th ed.). Pearson.

Vleioras, G. (2021). What is adulthood? A comparison of the adulthood criteria of Greek emerging adults and their parents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 182(6), 495-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2021.1957761

Walczak, A. (2023). What does it mean to be an adult? Adulthood markers in the perspective of emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 11(6), 1335-1345. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231194887

What the PSYC 235 Week 3 instructions ask

Nothing else is due in Module/Week 3 of PSYC 235 besides the 120-point Life Line, while students read chapters 5 and 6 of Bjorklund and view a presentation. Each student interviews two family members about the major events of their lives, then constructs three life lines: one for each relative and one for the student. The project compares and contrasts the timing of important life events and of social roles across the three people. After the interviews and life lines are complete, the student writes a brief summary of about two pages explaining what the comparison shows. The project brings the module's chapters on roles and relationships into a student's own family history.

How this PSYC 235 Week 3 example is built

A brief method paragraph names who was interviewed and how, followed by a table that serves as the three life lines, listing ages at major events for each person. The summary then has three short sections. The first compares the timing of education, work, marriage and parenthood and explains the shifts with the social clock. The second looks at roles that arrived in different orders, such as the mother becoming a caregiver for her own mother before becoming a grandparent. The third compares how each person defines being an adult, drawing on two recent studies, and ends with a short reflection on what the comparison changed in the writer's view of their own timing.

PSYC 235 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

The Life Line is graded on completeness, three accurate life lines built from two genuine interviews and the student's own history, and on the quality of the comparison and summary. Graders look for clear contrasts in the timing of events and roles, explanations that use the module's concepts accurately, and a summary that interprets rather than lists. Respect for family members' privacy, with details shared only as far as they agreed, is part of good practice. A neat, readable format for the life lines, a summary of about two pages and correct citation of the textbook and any studies complete the assessment.

PSYC 235 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points

Students sometimes produce three timelines and a summary that simply repeats them. The value is in the comparison, so ask why each difference exists: economics, education, culture, faith or a family event. Prepare interview questions in advance about education, work, marriage, children, moves, losses and roles such as caregiver or grandparent, and ask each relative when they first felt like an adult. Ask permission before including sensitive events such as divorce, and leave out anything they prefer to keep private. Use the textbook's terms, such as on-time and off-time events, and keep the summary close to the two-page length the guide sets, with the life lines in a table or figure so the summary can stay focused on interpretation.

Related PSYC 235 sample papers

Other PSYC 235 weeks

More BS in Psychology sample papers

PSYC 235 Week 3 questions, answered

What is the PSYC 235 Life Line assignment?

A 120-point Module/Week 3 project in which students interview two family members, build life lines for them and themselves, compare the timing of life events and social roles and write a two-page summary.

Where can I find a free PSYC 235 Week 3 sample paper?

A complete PSYC 235 Week 3 life line project comparing three generations of one family, with a table of life events and a two-page summary using the social clock, is on this page.

What is the social clock?

The set of age-related expectations a society holds about when major life events, such as finishing school, marrying and having children, should happen, which makes events feel on time or off time.

How do emerging adults and their parents define adulthood?

A study of 73 Greek parent and child pairs found that both ranked accepting responsibility for one's actions highest, agreed strongly on the order of criteria and that the young adults rated the criteria as less important overall.

What should I ask family members for the PSYC 235 Life Line?

Ask at what ages they finished school, began work, married, had children, moved, lost loved ones and took on roles such as caregiver or grandparent, and when they first felt like an adult.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.