NURS 718 Week 4 Case Study 2 on Telecommunications Infrastructure for Telehealth Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

In this NURS 718 Week 4 sample, a DNP student analyzes a telehealth infrastructure failure: during a pilot telestroke consultation at a 25-bed critical access hospital, the video froze for four minutes while a patient's thrombolysis decision waited, and the analysis traces the event to a single internet connection, an unmanaged cart and no downtime procedure, then recommends fixes in network design, security, contingency planning and staff readiness. Liberty University NURS 718 assigns Case Study 2 for 100 points in Module/Week 4, when DNP students read Tan and Payton's chapters on technology infrastructure along with two technology briefs. Every case question is answered in APA under its own heading. Sources include international guidance on running telestroke where resources are thin and a readiness survey of 135 clinicians in an island network.

CourseNURS 718 Informatics, Technology and Trends for Transforming Health Care (NURS718)
Module/Week4
AssignmentCase Study 2 on Telecommunications Infrastructure for Telehealth
Paper typeCase study analysis (case questions answered in APA)
Lengthabout 968 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a case study analysis in current APA that thoroughly addresses each case question, using the course textbooks and other sources as needed
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points100
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramDNP
Where it sitsModule/Week 4 in Liberty's published NURS 718 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 718 Week 4

1

Case Study 2: Four Minutes of Frozen Video, Infrastructure, Security and Downtime Planning for Telehealth in a Critical Access Hospital

 

[Student Name]

School of Nursing, Liberty University

NURS 718: Informatics, Technology and Trends for Transforming Health Care

Case Study 2

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The case hospital, the event and its details are composites written for a model case analysis; the textbook, studies and Scripture cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsA brief event summary anchors every later answer to what actually happened in the case.
2

Case Study 2: Four Minutes of Frozen Video, Infrastructure, Security and Downtime Planning for Telehealth in a Critical Access Hospital

Case Summary

During the second month of a telestroke pilot, a 71-year-old woman was brought to the small hospital's emergency room with weakness on her right side and difficulty speaking that had begun forty minutes earlier. The nurse rolled the telestroke cart to the bedside and connected to the neurologist at the comprehensive stroke center. Midway through the neurological examination, the video froze and the audio dropped. For four minutes, the nurse tried to reconnect while the neurologist waited on a phone line that no one had thought to open. The connection returned, the examination was completed and thrombolysis was given, but the door-to-needle time exceeded the target by eleven minutes. The hospital has one commercial internet connection, two information technology staff who work days, and a telestroke cart that had not received a software update since installation.

Question 1: What Infrastructure Does Telehealth Require?

Tan and Payton (2010) describe information systems as resting on technical infrastructure, including networks, hardware, software and the people who support them, and clinical applications are only as reliable as that foundation. Telehealth for acute stroke has unusually strict requirements: high-quality, two-way video and audio with very little delay, available at any hour, from a cart that can move to the bedside or the imaging suite. That requires adequate bandwidth reserved for the clinical video, a redundant connection from a second provider, wireless coverage throughout the emergency department and imaging areas, managed devices that receive updates and are monitored for problems, and technical support available around the clock, either in house or through the vendor or the hub hospital.

Question 2: What Caused the Failure?

The root cause analysis points to four contributing factors. First, the hospital relied on a single internet connection with no failover. Second, the cart's software had not been updated, and the vendor later reported a known issue with reconnection in that version. Third, wireless coverage was weak near the room where the patient was being examined. Fourth, there was no downtime procedure, so the nurse focused on reconnecting rather than switching immediately to a telephone consultation that could have continued the history and decision-making. The video failed for technical reasons, but the delay grew for a human one: no one had decided in advance what to do when it failed.

CauseClinical effectRecommended fixCost category
Single internet connectionTotal loss of video and audioSecond connection from a different provider with automatic failoverModerate
Outdated cart softwareFailure to reconnectManaged update schedule with the vendorLow
Weak wireless coverageUnstable signal at the bedsideAdditional access point in emergency department and imagingLow
No downtime procedureFour minutes without consultationWritten procedure and telephone backup on every consultLow
Why this part earns its pointsThe cause-and-fix table lets a small hospital see which low-cost changes remove most of the risk.
3

Contributing Organizational Factors

Behind the technical causes lay organizational ones. The pilot was launched on the vendor's standard checklist, which assumed an urban hospital with a dedicated information technology team on site around the clock. No one had tested the cart in every room where a stroke patient might be examined, and no one had been assigned to own the cart between consultations. The hub hospital assumed the spoke would manage its own equipment, while the spoke assumed the hub's telestroke program would. Each gap was small, but together they meant that nobody was responsible for readiness.

Why this part earns its pointsIdentifying the ownership gap between hub and spoke explains why technical fixes alone would not prevent a repeat.
4

Question 3: What Security and Privacy Safeguards Are Needed?

Telehealth carries protected health information across networks, so the system must use encrypted connections, authenticated access and devices managed by the organization rather than personal phones or laptops. The cart should be locked to its clinical function, sessions should not be recorded unless policy requires it and the patient is informed, and access logs should be reviewed. Because the critical access hospital's information technology staff is small, the hospital should rely on the hub hospital's or vendor's security monitoring under a written agreement that defines responsibilities. Security measures must not slow access in an emergency, which argues for single sign-on and a cart that is ready the moment it is powered on. The hospital should also complete a security risk assessment of the telestroke workflow, including the video platform, the cart, the network path and any images shared with the hub, and repeat it whenever the system changes.

Question 4: What Should Downtime and Contingency Planning Include?

A downtime plan should specify that every telestroke consultation begins with an open telephone line to the neurologist alongside the video, so that a video failure becomes a switch rather than a gap. It should include a printed stroke checklist and the hub's direct number at every cart, a two-minute rule after which the team proceeds by telephone, and a process for reporting every failure to the information technology team and the telestroke program. The World Stroke Organization's statement on telestroke in resource-limited settings emphasizes quality assurance and pragmatic models adapted to local resources (Tunkl et al., 2026), and a simple, rehearsed fallback is exactly such an adaptation.

Question 5: How Does Staff Readiness Affect Performance?

Technology reliability depends partly on the people using it. In a survey of 135 health professionals in an island stroke network, respondents scored telemedicine's value above its fit with how their units actually worked, and barely six in ten had watched a system operate (Chatzidaki et al., 2026). A mixed methods review of digital health in rural areas likewise identified workforce constraints, including staff shortages and heavy workloads, alongside technical problems and poor connectivity as key barriers (Sahakyan et al., 2026). For this hospital, readiness means monthly simulated consultations that include a planned video failure, so nurses practice switching to the telephone, and a named nurse champion on each shift who knows how to restart the cart.

Christian Reflection

Jesus told a parable of ten virgins, five of whom brought extra oil for their lamps and were ready when the bridegroom came at midnight (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Matthew 25:1-13). Preparation for failure is part of faithful care. A patient whose stroke treatment depends on a video link deserves an organization that has prepared for the moment the link fails.

Conclusion

The four-minute failure resulted from a single connection, outdated software, weak wireless coverage and the absence of a downtime plan. Most of the fixes are low in cost: a managed update schedule, an access point, a written procedure with a telephone backup and regular simulation. The one moderate investment, a redundant connection, should be a condition of expanding the telestroke network. These steps will be built into the infrastructure section of the HMIS project.

5

References

Chatzidaki, S., Anargyros, K., & Xanthos, T. (2026). Human readiness for stroke telemedicine in a Greek island network: A cross-sectional study. Telemedicine and e-Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261492660

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Sahakyan, S., Akseer, S., Abrahamyan, L., Metcalf, O., Allin, S., Chenhall, R., & Seto, E. (2026). Barriers and facilitators to implementing digital health technologies for remote management of NCDs in rural areas: Mixed methods systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 28, Article e93875. https://doi.org/10.2196/93875

Tan, J. K. H., & Payton, F. C. (2010). Adaptive health management information systems: Concepts, cases, and practical applications (3rd ed.). Jones and Bartlett.

Tunkl, C., Carbonera, L. A., Hubert, G., Agarwal, A., Adcock, A. K., Liberato, B., Yperzeele, L., Roushdy, T., Collantes, E. M., Bonifacio Delgadillo, D. M., Bladin, C., & Ranta, A. (2026). Telestroke care in resource-limited settings: A World Stroke Organization scientific statement. International Journal of Stroke. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930261480603

What the NURS 718 Week 4 instructions ask

Case Study 2 continues the NURS 718 series of three case analyses, each requiring the student to address every case question thoroughly in current APA, drawing on the textbooks and other sources. The Week 4 readings in Tan and Payton, with two technology briefs, concern the technical foundations of health information systems, so this case turns on infrastructure: the networks, devices, security and support that clinical applications depend on. A good analysis connects technical facts to clinical consequences, explaining not only what failed but what it meant for the patient and the clinicians, and it recommends solutions proportionate to a small hospital's resources. Each recommendation should state who will carry it out.

How this NURS 718 Week 4 example is built

The analysis opens with a summary of the event and then answers five questions under separate headings: what infrastructure telehealth requires, what caused the failure, what security and privacy safeguards are needed, what downtime and contingency planning should include, and how staff readiness affects technical performance. A table lists each identified cause with its recommended fix and an estimated cost category, so a small hospital can see what to do first. Recommendations are scaled to a hospital with two information technology staff, and the conclusion links the case to the broader telestroke plan developed in the course project. A section on organizational causes explains why the technical fixes alone would not have been enough.

NURS 718 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go

As with Case Study 1, the grade depends on answering every question thoroughly, applying course concepts to the case facts, justifying recommendations and using the textbooks and outside evidence in correct APA. For an infrastructure case, instructors also look for technical accuracy expressed in terms clinicians and leaders can follow, and for recommendations that fit the setting's size and budget. Analyses that connect the technical failure to patient risk, and that include a downtime plan, show the integration of informatics and clinical judgment expected of a DNP. Clear ownership of equipment and readiness is often the missing piece in small hospitals. Plain language matters here throughout the paper.

NURS 718 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points

Infrastructure cases tempt students into either vague advice, such as upgrading the network, or technical detail no clinical leader could use. Others focus only on the technology and forget the people who must run it at 2 a.m. Some omit security entirely. Explain each cause in one or two plain sentences, link it to its clinical effect, propose a fix sized to the hospital, include privacy and security safeguards, write a downtime procedure a nurse could follow, and cite evidence on readiness and on telestroke in low-resource settings. Name who owns the equipment. A cause-and-fix table with rough cost categories helps leaders decide what to fund first.

Related NURS 718 sample papers

Other NURS 718 weeks

More DNP sample papers

NURS 718 Week 4 questions, answered

What is NURS 718 Case Study 2?

The second 100-point case analysis in NURS 718, due in Module/Week 4, answering each case question thoroughly in APA with the textbooks and other sources.

Where can I find a free NURS 718 Week 4 sample paper?

A complete NURS 718 Week 4 case analysis of a telehealth video failure in a critical access hospital, with its cause-and-fix table, can be opened here for free.

What infrastructure does telehealth need in a hospital?

It needs reliable connectivity with a second, independent connection, enough reserved bandwidth for clinical video, secured and managed devices, network monitoring, support at all hours and written downtime procedures.

What is a telehealth downtime procedure?

A written plan for continuing care when video or network connections fail, such as switching to telephone consultation with the remote specialist and following a local checklist.

How do staff affect telehealth reliability?

Staff readiness, familiarity with the equipment and regular practice with failure scenarios determine how quickly problems are noticed, reported and worked around, so people are part of the system's reliability.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.