| Course | CEFS 691 Substance Abuse: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention (CEFS691) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 4 |
| Assignment | DB Forum 2 (AA) |
| Paper type | Discussion thread and replies |
| Length | about 764 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a thread of 350 to 450 words demonstrating course-related knowledge and replies to 2 classmates of 200 to 300 words each |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 50 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MA in Clinical Mental Health Counseling |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 4 in Liberty's published CEFS 691 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for CEFS 691 Week 4
Discussion Board Forum 2 (AA): Thread and Two Replies
CEFS 691 Substance Abuse: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention, Discussion Board Forum 2 (thread and two replies)
Thread by [Student Name]
The prompt, the meetings described and the classmates' posts are composites standing in for the course's own forum, with no AA member identifiable; the textbooks, Scripture and published studies are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for CEFS 691.
Thread
At the first meeting I attended, a man who said it was his first time was handed a small booklet with first names and phone numbers before he left. Three members told him to call anytime. That moment taught me more about referral than anything I had read: what helps a newcomer is not the name of the group but a person who will answer the phone. I had planned, as a future counselor, to hand clients a printed meeting schedule; after that evening, a schedule alone seemed far too little.
The research supports that impression. Kaskutas (2009) reviewed the evidence on AA's effectiveness against the criteria used to establish causation and found that rates of abstinence were about twice as high among those who attend AA, that higher attendance was related to higher abstinence, and that the relationship held across samples and follow-up periods, while noting that experimental evidence for a specific AA effect was less conclusive. Timko et al. (2006) tested how counselors refer. In a randomized trial with 345 outpatients, an intensive referral that connected patients with AA volunteers led to more involvement, such as having a sponsor and doing service, than a standard referral, and to more attendance among patients with little prior experience of meetings.
A referral, then, is a relationship, not a phone number. I would make it using the skills in Miller and Rollnick (2013): ask what the client already knows about AA, elicit their concerns, offer information with permission, and, if they agree, arrange for a member to meet them before their first meeting. Because fellowships offer support at hours no counselor keeps, as Capuzzi and Stauffer (2016) point out, a careful referral may be among a counselor's most useful acts.
The Preacher pities the person who falls with no companion to help him up (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Ecclesiastes 4:9-10). The phone list I saw handed out was that verse in practice, a fellowship making sure no newcomer walks out alone.
Classmates: what would you say to a client who agrees to try AA but has no one to go with?
Reply to Megan
Megan, you wrote honestly that the references to God and a higher power at your meeting made you uneasy, and you wondered how you would refer a client who is not religious. That is a fair concern, and research suggests a way to address it. Kelly (2017), reviewing 25 years of studies on how AA produces change, found that while AA's founding literature describes recovery as a spiritual awakening, most members benefit through social, cognitive and affective changes, such as building sober friendships, gaining confidence in handling high-risk situations and reducing craving. Spiritual change seemed central mainly for members with the most severe addiction.
That suggests a counselor can present AA honestly to a nonreligious client: the program uses spiritual language, members interpret it in many ways, and much of its benefit comes from the people and practices of the fellowship. A client who remains uncomfortable could also be offered secular mutual-help options, while the counselor respects the client's choice.
As a Christian, I also find it meaningful that the program leaves room for faith without requiring it, which allows clients to approach God, or not, in their own time.
Would you feel comfortable explaining AA's spiritual language to a client who asked you directly what you believe?
Reply to Darius
Darius, you noticed several people at your meeting who never spoke and wondered whether they were getting anything from it. I noticed the same at both meetings I attended, and I think the readings suggest they may be getting more than it appears. Miller and Rollnick (2013) describe change as a process in which ambivalence is normal, and a person sitting silently at the back of a meeting may be in the middle of resolving it. Simply hearing others describe the same struggles can make change feel possible.
The research on attendance supports patience. Kaskutas (2009) reported that higher levels of attendance were related to higher rates of abstinence, and that earlier attendance predicted later abstinence, which suggests that showing up has value even before a person participates actively. For a counselor, the implication is to affirm a client's attendance and explore what they are noticing, rather than pressing them to share before they are ready. A question such as "What did you hear tonight that stayed with you?" invites reflection without asking the client to perform.
Did any of the quiet members you saw seem to be newcomers, or were some of them long-time attenders who simply preferred to listen and greet people afterward?
References
Capuzzi, D., & Stauffer, M. D. (2016). Foundations of addictions counseling (3rd ed.). Pearson.
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Kaskutas, L. A. (2009). Alcoholics Anonymous effectiveness: Faith meets science. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 28(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550880902772464
Kelly, J. F. (2017). Is Alcoholics Anonymous religious, spiritual, neither? Findings from 25 years of mechanisms of behavior change research. Addiction, 112(6), 929-936. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13590
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Timko, C., DeBenedetti, A., & Billow, R. (2006). Intensive referral to 12-step self-help groups and 6-month substance use disorder outcomes. Addiction, 101(5), 678-688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01391.x
What the CEFS 691 Week 4 instructions ask
Worth 50 points, Forum 2 of CEFS 691 closes in Module/Week 4, next to Quizzes 9 to 11 and the reading of chapters 9 to 11 of Capuzzi and Stauffer and chapters 6 to 8 of Miller and Rollnick. Coming right after the AA paper, it asks students what the meetings taught them. The opening post must land between 350 and 450 words and use the readings, and each of two answers to classmates must land between 200 and 300 words. Though no source count is set, linking the meetings to research on mutual-help groups lifts the discussion.
How this CEFS 691 Week 4 example is built
The thread begins with a moment from a meeting, a newcomer being handed a list of phone numbers, and draws the lesson that connection is the active ingredient of a good referral. It reports a review that weighs AA's effectiveness against the criteria for establishing causation and a randomized trial in which intensive referral, linking patients with AA volunteers, increased meeting attendance and involvement. It then describes how a counselor might make such a referral using motivational interviewing, and ends on a Bible verse and a question for the group. The replies take up two classmates' concerns about AA, and each brings in fresh research or a reading while staying below 300 words. No member is identifiable in either post.
CEFS 691 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
The AA forum earns its points through knowledge of the readings and through posts that respect both word bands, a thread of 350 to 450 words and replies of 200 to 300 words apiece. Graders value threads that tie a specific, anonymous observation to the readings and research and then draw a lesson for counseling, rather than simply recounting the meeting. They value replies that take a classmate's reaction seriously and add a study or a perspective from the texts. Members must never be identifiable, and accurate citation, a respectful tone and clear writing complete the evaluation. Graders also notice whether the lesson drawn would change what a counselor actually does.
CEFS 691 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points
The best AA forum threads move from what you saw to what you will do. Choose one observation, such as how newcomers were welcomed or how members spoke about sponsors, and ask what it means for how you refer clients. Research on referral methods gives your conclusion a basis, and the motivational interviewing chapters show how to make a referral without pressure. Never identify members, even by description. In replies, respect classmates' honest reactions, including discomfort, and offer a perspective rather than a correction. Keep the thread under 450 words and each reply under 300, which means choosing one idea and developing it well, with one example from the meeting and one source to support it. Reread your AA paper first.
Related CEFS 691 sample papers
Other CEFS 691 weeks
- CEFS 691 Week 1: Substance Abuse Certification Paper
- CEFS 691 Week 2: Forum 1: Motivational Interviewing
- CEFS 691 Week 3: Experiential Paper: AA Meetings
- CEFS 691 Week 5: Experiential Paper: NA Meetings
- CEFS 691 Week 6: Forum 3: NA Meetings
- CEFS 691 Week 7: Theoretical Models Paper
- CEFS 691 Week 8: Forum 4: Al-Anon Meetings
More MA in Clinical Mental Health Counseling sample papers
- CEFS 500 Week 1: Forum 1: Counselor Identity
- CEFS 620 Week 4: Forum 2: Bullying Online and Off
- COUC 500 Week 1: Forum 1: The Helping Relationship
- COUC 504 Week 4: Forum 3: Microaggressions
CEFS 691 Week 4 questions, answered
What is CEFS 691 DB Forum 2 (AA)?
Students use this 50-point Module/Week 4 forum to talk through what their AA visits showed them, in one bounded thread and two bounded replies.
Where can I find a free CEFS 691 Week 4 sample paper?
This page shows a complete CEFS 691 Week 4 forum on what attending AA meetings teaches a counselor about referral, with two replies.
Do people who attend AA do better?
A review weighing the evidence against criteria for causation found abstinence rates about twice as high among AA attenders and a dose-response relationship with attendance.
How should counselors refer clients to AA?
A randomized trial found that intensive referral, which connected patients with AA volunteers, increased meeting attendance and involvement compared with simply recommending meetings.
What if a client is uncomfortable with AA's spiritual language?
Research on how AA works suggests its benefits come mostly from social and psychological changes, and members interpret a higher power in many ways, which counselors can explain.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom CEFS 691 Week 4 sample · All CEFS 691 weeks · All courses