| Course | BUSI 690 Policy and Strategy in Global Competition (BUSI690) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 7 |
| Assignment | Group Case Study 3 |
| Paper type | Group strategic case analysis |
| Length | about 3,568 words, 13 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: an in-depth team case analysis using the entire strategic management process, a narrative of at least 15 pages of text with appendices, submitted with an Excel workbook of three years of historical statements with deltas, at least three years of pro forma statements with deltas and the NPV of the proposed strategy |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 150 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MBA |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 7 in Liberty's published BUSI 690 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 690 Week 7
Boot Barn Holdings: Strategic Analysis of a Western and Work Wear Retailer and a Proposal for an Employer Safety-Footwear Program
[Student Name]
School of Business, Liberty University
BUSI 690: Policy and Strategy in Global Competition
Group Case Study 3
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The company assigned to each group varies by section; Boot Barn Holdings stands in for it here. Historical figures come from Boot Barn's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2026, the pro forma statements and NPV rest on the assumptions stated in the paper, and the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 690.
Boot Barn Holdings: Strategic Analysis of a Western and Work Wear Retailer and a Proposal for an Employer Safety-Footwear Program
Summary of Findings
Boot Barn Holdings is the largest specialty retailer of western and work wear in the United States. In fiscal 2026, which ended March 28, 2026, its net sales rose 17.9 percent to $2.25 billion and net income rose 24.9 percent to $225.9 million, as it opened 80 stores and grew same store sales 7.2 percent (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., 2026). The company believes it can reach 1,200 domestic stores, more than twice today's 539. Our analysis finds that its advantage rests on assortment depth, exclusive brands and a store network more than four times the size of its nearest direct competitor, and that its main weaknesses are a heavy, slow-turning inventory and dependence on store growth for most of its sales increase. We recommend that Boot Barn launch a formal employer safety-footwear program, selling work boots and protective apparel to companies that provide footwear allowances to their employees, using its stores for fitting and its e-commerce systems for ordering and billing. On our assumptions, the program reaches $175 million of annual sales in its fourth year and has an NPV of $56.3 million at an 11 percent discount rate.
Company History and Strategic Vision
Boot Barn was founded in 1978 and grew both by opening stores and by acquiring regional chains, which it rebranded under the Boot Barn name, including the Sheplers stores and website it bought in 2015. It went public in 2014. Its stores carry boots, apparel and accessories for western, work and country lifestyles from brands such as Ariat, Cinch, Justin, Wrangler, Carhartt, Thorogood and Timberland Pro, alongside exclusive brands including Cody James, Shyanne, Idyllwind, Moonshine Spirit and El Dorado (Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., 2026). It sells online through its websites, app and third-party marketplaces, and e-commerce provided about 10.4 percent of net sales in fiscal 2026.
The company's stated aim is to be the trusted specialty retailer for customers' everyday western and work needs. Rothaermel (2015) notes that a vision states what an organization wants to become and that the most useful visions are tied to customer needs rather than to products. Boot Barn's vision does this well: it names a customer group, people who live and work in a western or industrial setting, and the everyday needs the company will meet. Its strategy follows from that choice, through four drivers the 10-K describes: expanding the store base, increasing same store sales, building exclusive brands and strengthening the omni-channel platform.
Customers and Demand Drivers
Boot Barn serves three overlapping groups. The first is the traditional western customer, ranchers, rodeo participants and rural families, who buy boots, hats and jeans for daily life and value durability and fit. The second is the work customer, men and women in construction, energy, utilities, manufacturing and agriculture who need boots with safety toes, slip-resistant soles or electrical hazard ratings, and who often replace them every year. The third, and the fastest growing in recent years, is the fashion and country-lifestyle customer, many of them women and younger shoppers in suburban and urban markets, drawn by country music, western-themed entertainment and the western look in mainstream fashion. Each group responds to different demand drivers. Western buyers follow rural incomes and tradition, work buyers follow employment and safety rules, and fashion buyers follow trends that can fade. The work customer is the steadiest of the three, because a safety boot is a requirement of the job rather than a choice, and that steadiness is why the team looked for a strategy built around this segment.
Environmental Scan
PESTEL
Political and legal factors weigh heavily on Boot Barn because much of its footwear is made abroad. Tariffs on imported boots and apparel raise costs and can force price increases, and trade policy has shifted repeatedly since 2018. Economic conditions matter in two directions. Western wear is partly a fashion purchase that rises and falls with consumer confidence and with interest in country music and rodeo culture, while work boots follow employment in construction, energy, agriculture and manufacturing. Sociocultural trends have helped: country music, western films and television series and the western aesthetic in mainstream fashion broadened the company's customer base beyond ranch and rural shoppers. Technologically, mobile commerce and in-store tablets let a store sell items it does not stock. Ecological factors are modest but rising, including leather sourcing and the durability of products. Legal requirements for workplace safety footwear, under occupational safety rules that require protective footwear where foot injuries are possible, create a steady demand base that the proposed strategy aims to serve.
Industry Forces
The specialty western and work wear industry looks moderately attractive under Porter's framework as Rothaermel (2015) presents it. The threat of entry is low to moderate: opening a store is easy, but matching Boot Barn's assortment, vendor terms and store network would take years and hundreds of millions of dollars. Supplier power is moderate to high, since a few national brands such as Ariat command loyalty and allocate their newest styles, which is one reason Boot Barn invests in its own brands. Buyer power is moderate; customers can compare prices online, but fit matters greatly in boots, and many shoppers want to try them on. Substitutes are moderate: general footwear retailers, farm and ranch stores, Amazon and brands' own websites all sell some of the same products. Rivalry is moderate; the 10-K calls the western and work wear retail industry highly fragmented and made up mainly of regional competitors, which leaves no rival with comparable national scale.
Competitor Profile
Boot Barn's closest specialty rival is Cavender's, a privately held western chain based in Texas with a much smaller footprint. Tractor Supply sells work boots and some western apparel in rural markets, though as a side line to farm and animal supplies. Department stores and outdoor retailers sell western-influenced fashion, and Amazon and brands' websites sell everything online. Rothaermel (2015) describes strategic groups as firms following similar strategies, separated by mobility barriers. Boot Barn defines its own group: no other company combines a national network of hundreds of dedicated western and work stores with a deep assortment and strong online sales. That position is the core of its advantage, and it widens as the company opens about 80 stores a year.
Internal Assessment
Resources and VRIO
Barney (1991) tied durable advantage to a short list of conditions on what a firm owns: customers must care about it, few competitors may have it, and copying it or finding a stand-in for it must be expensive. The team assessed Boot Barn's main resources against those conditions and the further question of organization.
| Resource | Valuable | Rare | Hard to imitate | Organized | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National network of 539 western and work stores | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Sustained advantage |
| Assortment depth and size runs in boots | Yes | Yes | Partly | Yes | Temporary to sustained |
| Exclusive brands (Cody James, Shyanne and others) | Yes | Yes | Partly | Yes | Temporary advantage |
| Omni-channel platform and in-store tablets | Yes | No | No | Yes | Parity |
| B Rewarded loyalty data | Yes | Partly | Partly | Partly | Temporary advantage |
The store network passes every test. Its value comes from fit: a customer who needs a specific size and width of a work boot can usually find it in stock nearby, and the depth of inventory needed to do that is beyond what most rivals can finance. That same depth, however, is the source of the company's heavy inventory, which is the cost of the advantage.
Value Chain
Among primary activities, purchasing and merchandise planning are central, since Boot Barn must decide how many sizes and widths of each style to carry across 539 stores. Outbound logistics run through distribution centers that feed both stores and online orders. In-store sales, where staff fit boots, distinguish the company from online sellers. Marketing has shifted toward the B Rewarded program and digital channels. Among support activities, exclusive brand development has become a capability of its own. Verhoef et al. (2015) describe omni-channel retailing as the management of channels and customer touchpoints together, so that customers move freely between store and screen; Boot Barn's tablets, which let in-store customers order from the online warehouse and many vendors' inventories, are an example of that integration.
Exclusive Brands as a Capability
Boot Barn's exclusive brands deserve separate attention. The company designs and sources lines such as Cody James for men, Shyanne and Idyllwind for women, and Cody James Work and El Dorado among its work and premium labels, and it sells them only through its own stores and website. Because the retailer captures the margin a national brand would otherwise keep, exclusive brands earn higher merchandise margins, and the 10-K credits rising exclusive brand penetration as one cause of its margin gains. They also give shoppers products they cannot compare on price at another store. Rothaermel (2015) would classify this as a move up the value chain into activities a retailer traditionally left to its suppliers. The risk is that national brands such as Ariat, whose products draw customers into the stores, may see Boot Barn as a competitor and allocate their best styles elsewhere. The company has so far balanced the two, and its exclusive brands now include safety-rated work boots, which matters for the strategy proposed below.
Financial Performance
The tables summarize the workbook's three historical statements. Fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to March 31.
| Income statement ($ millions) | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 | Change FY2025 | Change FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | 1,667.0 | 1,911.1 | 2,253.9 | +14.6% | +17.9% |
| Cost of goods sold, incl. buying and occupancy | 1,052.6 | 1,194.1 | 1,395.5 | +13.4% | +16.9% |
| Gross profit | 614.4 | 717.0 | 858.4 | +16.7% | +19.7% |
| Selling, general and administrative | 416.2 | 477.7 | 559.2 | +14.8% | +17.1% |
| Income from operations | 198.2 | 239.4 | 299.1 | +20.8% | +24.9% |
| Interest and other, net | -0.8 | 0.7 | 1.5 | n/m | +114.3% |
| Income before taxes | 197.4 | 240.1 | 300.6 | +21.6% | +25.2% |
| Income tax expense | 50.4 | 59.2 | 74.7 | +17.5% | +26.2% |
| Net income | 147.0 | 180.9 | 225.9 | +23.1% | +24.9% |
| Balance sheet ($ millions) | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 | Change FY2025 | Change FY2026 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 75.8 | 69.8 | 141.0 | -7.9% | +102.0% |
| Inventories | 599.1 | 747.2 | 844.6 | +24.7% | +13.0% |
| Total current assets | 729.6 | 864.0 | 1,034.4 | +18.4% | +19.7% |
| Property and equipment, net | 323.7 | 422.1 | 514.1 | +30.4% | +21.8% |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 382.0 | 461.7 | 631.4 | +20.9% | +36.8% |
| Goodwill and intangible assets | 256.2 | 256.2 | 256.5 | 0.0% | +0.1% |
| Total assets | 1,705.6 | 2,018.0 | 2,450.1 | +18.3% | +21.4% |
| Total current liabilities | 312.8 | 353.3 | 391.0 | +12.9% | +10.7% |
| Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent | 388.9 | 476.7 | 671.3 | +22.6% | +40.8% |
| Deferred taxes and other | 60.2 | 57.0 | 69.1 | -5.3% | +21.2% |
| Total liabilities | 761.9 | 887.0 | 1,131.4 | +16.4% | +27.6% |
| Stockholders' equity | 943.6 | 1,131.1 | 1,318.7 | +19.9% | +16.6% |
| Cash flows ($ millions) | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 | Change FY2025 | Change FY2026 |
| Net cash from operating activities | 236.1 | 147.5 | 304.9 | -37.5% | +106.7% |
| Purchases of property and equipment | -118.8 | -148.3 | -178.6 | +24.8% | +20.4% |
| Net cash used in investing activities | -118.8 | -148.2 | -178.8 | +24.7% | +20.6% |
| Net cash used in financing activities | -59.6 | -5.4 | -54.8 | -90.9% | n/m |
| Free cash flow (operating less purchases) | 117.3 | -0.8 | 126.3 | n/m | n/m |
Source: Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (2026); changes and free cash flow computed by the team. Interest and other is the difference between operating income and income before taxes.
| Ratio | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.9% | 37.5% | 38.1% |
| Operating margin | 11.9% | 12.5% | 13.3% |
| Net margin | 8.8% | 9.5% | 10.0% |
| Return on average equity | 17.1% | 17.4% | 18.4% |
| Return on average assets | 9.1% | 9.7% | 10.1% |
| Inventory turnover | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.75 |
| Current ratio | 2.33 | 2.45 | 2.65 |
The statements tell a consistent story. Margins have widened each year, as the 10-K attributes merchandise margin gains to buying scale, rising exclusive brand penetration and supply chain efficiencies. Returns on equity are solid without debt; the company carries no borrowings on its balance sheet, and its main fixed commitments are store leases, whose noncurrent liability jumped 40.8 percent in fiscal 2026 as 80 stores opened. The weak point is inventory. Turnover below two times a year means each dollar of stock sits on the shelf for more than six months, and in fiscal 2025 inventory rose by about $148 million, almost exactly consuming operating cash flow, so free cash flow was slightly negative. Boot Barn's profit grows with every store it opens, but so does the pile of boots it must finance before anyone buys them. A strategy that raises sales without adding stores, or that turns inventory faster, would improve cash conversion more than another year of store openings alone.
Strategic Issues
Three issues follow from the analysis. First, nearly all of Boot Barn's growth depends on new stores, which require capital, leases and inventory, and the pace of 80 a year cannot rise indefinitely. Second, the company's inventory model, essential to its advantage, ties up cash and turns slowly. Third, after a change of chief executive in 2025, the company must show that its growth model does not depend on one leader.
Strategic Options
Option A: Accelerate Store Openings
Boot Barn could raise openings from 80 to 110 a year to reach 1,200 stores sooner. This builds on its strongest resource, but each store needs inventory as well as fixtures and a lease, so faster openings would deepen the cash conversion problem, and sites opened sooner may be weaker.
Option B: International Expansion into Canada
Western wear has a market in Alberta and the prairie provinces, and work boots sell everywhere. But a new country brings new suppliers, tariffs, currency risk and a smaller population of target customers, and Rothaermel (2015) warns that the liability of foreignness raises costs for firms entering unfamiliar markets.
Option C: Employer Safety-Footwear Program
Many employers in construction, utilities, oil and gas, manufacturing and logistics require protective footwear and give workers an allowance or voucher to buy it. Boot Barn already sells the boots these workers need and has stores near many of the job sites. A formal program would sign employer accounts, let their workers buy approved safety boots in any store or online, and bill the employer directly. Lilien (2016) observes that business-to-business markets account for more economic activity than consumer markets yet receive less attention from marketing scholars, and that organizational buying involves formal procurement, several decision-makers and longer relationships. Those features make employer accounts harder to win than shoppers but more durable once won.
| Criterion (weight) | A: Faster stores | B: Canada | C: Employer program |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales growth (25%) | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Cash conversion and capital needs (25%) | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Fit with resources (30%) | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Risk (20%) | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Weighted score | 3.85 | 2.55 | 4.55 |
Each option was rated from 1, poor, to 5, excellent. Option C scores highest because it uses the store network and inventory Boot Barn already owns to earn more from them.
Why Not the Other Options
Option A is attractive on paper because it builds on the store network, but it compounds the problem the financial analysis exposed. Each new store needs roughly the same depth of boot inventory as an existing one, and opening thirty more a year would add several hundred million dollars of stock over three years before those stores mature. The company's own plan of about 80 openings already uses most of its operating cash flow. Option B offers growth in a new market but carries risks the company has not faced before, from Canadian product standards to a smaller and more dispersed customer base, while the domestic market still has room for hundreds of stores. Neither option addresses the cash conversion problem; Option C does.
Recommended Strategy and Rationale
The team recommends Option C, an employer safety-footwear program launched in fiscal 2027. The rationale is fourfold. First, the program makes the store network more productive without building more of it, because a worker sent by an employer fills a fitting chair in an existing store. Second, it improves cash conversion: much of the inventory a program customer buys is already on Boot Barn's shelves, so the program raises inventory turnover. Third, it creates recurring demand, since safety boots wear out and most allowances are annual. Fourth, it introduces workers to the stores, where many also buy jeans, shirts and western wear for themselves; the 10-K observes that many customers already buy from both the western and work sections. Grewal et al. (2017) argue that retail's future belongs to firms that use technology and data to make shopping easier across channels, and an employer program built on the existing online platform and loyalty data fits that direction.
The program also fits Boot Barn's position. Rothaermel (2015) explains that a business strategy should rest on activities that create value customers will pay for at a cost the firm can sustain. The value to an employer is administrative simplicity and compliance, workers outfitted correctly with one invoice, and the cost to Boot Barn is a small sales team and a billing system, since the stores and inventory exist.
Implementation Plan
The program would be organized as a small business unit reporting to the chief merchandising and digital officers.
| Step | Owner | Timing | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build employer portal, approved-product catalogs and direct billing | Digital and finance | First half of FY2027 | Portal live; first invoices issued |
| Hire 40 account managers in regions with high work boot demand | Sales leadership | FY2027 | Accounts signed per manager |
| Train store staff on safety standards and program checkout | Store operations | FY2027 | Program transactions per store |
| Add safety-rated styles to exclusive brands such as Cody James Work | Merchandising | FY2027 to FY2028 | Exclusive share of program sales |
| Report program profit, receivables and inventory turns | Finance | Quarterly | Contribution margin, days sales outstanding |
Rothaermel (2015) stresses that structure, culture and controls must support a new strategy. The program's controls are measurable from the start: accounts signed, sales per account, contribution margin after the employer discount and days sales outstanding on employer invoices. Store managers would receive credit for program sales in their bonus calculations so that the stores welcome rather than resist the program's customers. Early accounts should be regional employers rather than the largest national firms, whose purchasing departments demand deep discounts and long payment terms, so that the program can refine its processes before bidding for national contracts.
Leadership and Culture
A strategy depends on the people who carry it out. Boot Barn's culture is built around store teams who know boots and the customers who wear them, and the employer program asks those teams to serve a new kind of customer, a worker sent with a voucher and a list of approved styles. The program's success will depend on whether store staff treat these visits as an opportunity rather than an interruption. Training, bonus credit and recognition for stores that build relationships with local employers would reinforce the right behavior. The program also gives the company's new chief executive an initiative that shows the growth model does not rest on store openings alone, which addresses one of the strategic issues identified above. Rothaermel (2015) describes strategic leaders as those who shape culture and make the strategy visible in daily decisions, and a program that sends workers into stores every week is a visible commitment to the work customer.
Risks
Four risks deserve attention. Employer discounts could erode margins, so the plan prices program sales at a 30 percent gross margin, below the company's 38.1 percent, and would walk away from accounts that demand more. Receivables from employers introduce credit risk that Boot Barn, which sells almost entirely to individuals paying at checkout, has not managed before; credit checks and payment terms of no more than 45 days limit that exposure. Specialist safety-footwear distributors and mobile shoe trucks already serve employers and would compete on service, which the store network should beat in most regions. Finally, a recession that cuts hiring in construction and energy would slow the program, as it would the stores.
Projected Financial Statements
The workbook's pro forma statements combine a base forecast with the program's effects. The base assumes net sales growth of 15 percent in fiscal 2027, 13 percent in 2028 and 12 percent in 2029 as store openings continue, a 38.1 percent gross margin and selling and administrative expense of 24.8 percent of sales. Program sales carry a 30 percent gross margin, variable costs of 9 percent of sales and fixed costs of $8 million to $9.5 million a year for the sales team and portal. The tax rate is 25 percent, and repurchases continue at $50 million a year.
| Pro forma income statement ($ millions) | FY2027 | FY2028 | FY2029 | Change FY2028 | Change FY2029 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | 2,627.0 | 3,013.9 | 3,420.4 | +14.7% | +13.5% |
| of which employer program | 35.0 | 85.0 | 140.0 | +142.9% | +64.7% |
| Gross profit | 998.0 | 1,141.4 | 1,291.8 | +14.4% | +13.2% |
| Selling, general and administrative | 654.0 | 743.0 | 835.6 | +13.6% | +12.5% |
| Income from operations | 344.1 | 398.4 | 456.2 | +15.8% | +14.5% |
| Net income | 260.3 | 301.0 | 344.4 | +15.6% | +14.4% |
| Pro forma balance sheet and cash flow ($ millions) | FY2027 | FY2028 | FY2029 | Change FY2028 | Change FY2029 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 162.1 | 223.1 | 324.2 | +37.6% | +45.3% |
| Accounts receivable (incl. employer accounts) | 21.8 | 30.4 | 40.1 | +39.4% | +31.9% |
| Inventories | 974.0 | 1,104.3 | 1,240.4 | +13.4% | +12.3% |
| Property and equipment, net | 639.8 | 753.3 | 864.3 | +17.7% | +14.7% |
| Total assets | 2,826.3 | 3,245.4 | 3,723.4 | +14.8% | +14.7% |
| Total liabilities | 1,280.3 | 1,431.4 | 1,597.9 | +11.8% | +11.6% |
| Stockholders' equity | 1,546.0 | 1,814.1 | 2,125.5 | +17.3% | +17.2% |
| Net cash from operating activities | 291.1 | 334.0 | 389.1 | +14.7% | +16.5% |
| Purchases of property and equipment | -220.0 | -223.0 | -238.0 | +1.4% | +6.7% |
The NPV uses the program's incremental cash flows only. Sales ramp from $35 million in fiscal 2027 to $175 million in 2030 and grow 4 percent a year after that. The portal and systems cost $15 million at launch, with $3 million a year of ongoing investment and an $8 million upgrade in year six, depreciated over five years. Net working capital equals 15 percent of program sales, covering employer receivables and dedicated safety-boot stock, and is recovered at the end of the ten-year horizon. No terminal value is included. The team chose 11 percent as the discount rate. Feeding a 4.2 percent Treasury yield, a 5.5 percent equity premium and an assumed beta of 1.3, a level common among specialty apparel chains, into the capital asset pricing model returns roughly 11.4 percent; with no borrowings on the balance sheet, that equity cost is effectively Boot Barn's whole cost of capital, and the team shaded it to 11 percent because the program runs on stores and stock the company already owns.
| Program cash flows ($ millions) | FY2027 | FY2028 | FY2029 | FY2030 | FY2031 | FY2032-FY2036 total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program sales | 35.0 | 85.0 | 140.0 | 175.0 | 182.0 | 1,025.2 |
| Operating cash flow before tax (EBITDA) | -0.7 | 8.8 | 19.9 | 26.8 | 27.9 | 159.0 |
| Free cash flow | -20.0 | -3.0 | 4.7 | 13.0 | 18.2 | 131.5 |
Discounted at 11 percent, the program is worth $56.3 million in present value, and the rate that would bring that value to zero is about 41 percent, high because the program needs little capital beyond working capital. A pessimistic case in which program sales reach only 60 percent of the projection still leaves the NPV positive at about $6 million, because most of the program's costs are variable and shrink with its sales.
Stakeholder Effects
The program touches more stakeholders than a store opening does. Employers gain a simpler way to meet their safety obligations, with one invoice, an approved product list and stores near their job sites, and workers gain boots that are fitted rather than ordered by size from a catalog. Store employees gain more traffic and, under the plan, bonus credit for program sales. Vendors gain a new channel for their safety lines, though national brands may want assurance that the program will not favor exclusive brands unfairly; the plan answers this by letting employers choose from both. Shareholders gain a higher return on capital, since the program's sales come mostly from assets already in place. The community benefit is real as well: fewer foot injuries mean fewer lost workdays for families who depend on physical work. The team judged that no stakeholder is made worse off by the program, provided that pricing to employers is transparent and that workers are never pressed to buy beyond their allowance, a safeguard the plan writes into the employer agreements.
How the Program Raises Cash Flow
The employer program increases Boot Barn's cash flows through four channels. It adds sales that reach $175 million a year by fiscal 2030 and contribute about $27 million of annual operating cash flow before tax at maturity. It raises the productivity of inventory and stores the company has already paid for, so the added sales require far less capital than the same sales from new stores: an employer program dollar needs about 15 cents of working capital and almost no fixed investment, while a new store needs a lease, fixtures and a full stock of boots. It brings recurring buyers, workers whose allowances renew each year, into stores where many will also buy for themselves. And by improving inventory turnover, it addresses the cash conversion weakness visible in fiscal 2025, when inventory growth consumed nearly all operating cash flow.
The team's view of this strategy was shaped by Scripture's regard for work. Paul urged the Colossian believers to throw their whole selves into each task, since the One they ultimately served was the Lord and not an earthly boss (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Colossians 3:23), and a company that equips people for physical labor serves that calling in a practical way. A safety boot that fits keeps a worker on the job and out of the emergency room. The program's measure of success should therefore include the safety of the workers it outfits, not only its profit, and the team recommends that Boot Barn report injury-related feedback from employer accounts alongside sales.
Conclusion
Boot Barn has built an advantage from a national network of stores, a deep assortment and growing exclusive brands, and each of the last three fiscal years brought wider margins and higher returns. Its dependence on store openings and its slow-turning inventory are the issues that matter most for the next stage. An employer safety-footwear program uses the company's existing stores and stock to serve a steady, regulated source of demand, improves cash conversion and, on the team's assumptions, creates $56.3 million of value. The team recommends launching it in fiscal 2027 with regional employers, measuring it quarterly and expanding to national accounts once its processes are proven.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (2026). Annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2026. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1610250/000110465926061346/boot-20260328x10k.htm
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Nordfält, J. (2017). The future of retailing. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.008
Lilien, G. L. (2016). The B2B knowledge gap. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(3), 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.003
Rothaermel, F. T. (2015). Strategic management: Concepts and cases (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). From multi-channel retailing to omni-channel retailing: Introduction to the special issue on multi-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.02.005
What the BUSI 690 Week 7 instructions ask
The third group case falls in Module/Week 7, the next-to-last week, when teammates also submit Peer Evaluation 2. The deliverables are the same as before. One file is the team's written analysis, fifteen or more pages of text applying every stage of strategic management to the assigned firm, appendices extra. The other is a spreadsheet with past results for the latest three years, year-to-year differences included, projections for three or more years ahead with their differences, and the net present value work. The narrative's last section must lay out the proposed strategy, the reasons for choosing it and the way it will raise cash flows. Each team receives a different company. The case carries 150 points, multiplied by the student's peer evaluation average.
How this BUSI 690 Week 7 example is built
Because it is the third case, the paper is organized to show the full process at a glance: strategic analysis first, then formulation, then implementation and valuation. A short opening summary gives the recommendation and its value. Boot Barn's history and vision lead into a PESTEL scan, a five forces assessment and a comparison with Tractor Supply, Cavender's, Sheplers' online heirs and department stores. Resources are tested with VRIO and placed on the value chain, and the financial section presents the workbook's statements and ratios with a reading of what they show. Three options are scored, the employer program is chosen, and its pro forma effects and fifteen-row cash flow schedule end with how it raises cash flow.
BUSI 690 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go
The 150 points reward depth and consistency more than length alone. Graders check that each stage of the strategic management process is present and applied to the company, that the historical statements match the 10-K and that the pro forma statements carry the strategy's revenue, cost and capital spending in visible lines. A recommendation earns full credit only when it follows from the analysis, when its rationale is stated plainly and when the NPV rests on assumptions a reader can trace, including working capital and a stated discount rate. The final section must connect the strategy to higher cash flows explicitly. The remaining credit depends on prose that sounds like one author, APA citations done to the current edition, a narrative long enough to meet the page minimum and numbers that match between the two files.
BUSI 690 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points
By the third case, teams often reuse the structure of the first two and lose points for analysis that could describe any retailer. Find what is particular about the assigned company, here a customer who buys work boots because a job requires them, and build the strategy around it. Check fiscal year ends; Boot Barn's year closes in late March, so a data service may mislabel the years. Look at cash flow, not only earnings: a growing retailer can report rising profit while inventory absorbs its cash. Choose a strategy whose investment and returns can be estimated from the filing and stated assumptions. Run a pessimistic case, and keep one editor responsible for the final read.
Related BUSI 690 sample papers
Other BUSI 690 weeks
- BUSI 690 Week 1: Rothaermel Exercise 1: Lincoln
- BUSI 690 Week 2: DB Forum: In-N-Out Hybrid Strategy
- BUSI 690 Week 3: Rothaermel Exercise 3: Nucor
- BUSI 690 Week 4: BMG Exercise 1: Lovesac Canvas
- BUSI 690 Week 5: BMG Exercise 2: Rent the Runway
- BUSI 690 Week 6: Group Case Study 2: Sprouts
- BUSI 690 Week 8: Faith and Learning Paper
More MBA sample papers
- BUSI 685 Week 7: Faith and Learning Paper: Payables
- BUSI 686 Week 1: Forum 1: Plans Clients Ignore
- BUSI 687 Week 1: Forum 1: A Family's Risk Plan
- BUSI 688 Week 1: Forum 1: Claim at 62 or Wait?
BUSI 690 Week 7 questions, answered
What is BUSI 690 Group Case Study 3?
BUSI 690's closing group case, a 150-point Module/Week 7 project: every team takes its own assigned firm from analysis to a recommended strategy, then supports the plan with a workbook of actual and projected financials and a net present value.
Where can I find a free BUSI 690 Week 7 sample paper?
The complete BUSI 690 Week 7 case shown here analyzes Boot Barn Holdings, presents three fiscal years of statements with changes and ratios, and values a proposed employer safety-footwear program with pro forma statements and an NPV.
What discount rate should I use for the NPV in a BUSI 690 case?
Use the company's estimated cost of capital, built from a current Treasury yield, an equity premium and the stock's beta, and add a margin when the strategy is riskier than the firm's existing business; state every input.
Why did Boot Barn's free cash flow fall in fiscal 2025?
Inventory rose by about $148 million that year while capital spending grew with new stores, so operating cash flow of $147.5 million fell just short of capital spending of $148.3 million.
Is there a peer evaluation with Group Case Study 3?
Yes. Peer Evaluation 2 is due in Module/Week 7 and the third in Module/Week 8, and the average of all peer scores multiplies each student's group grades.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom BUSI 690 Week 7 sample · All BUSI 690 weeks · All courses