| Course | BUSI 681 Advanced Project Management II (BUSI681) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 4 |
| Assignment | Group DB Forum 2 Part 2 |
| Paper type | Collaborative group discussion reply |
| Length | about 491 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a synthesized group reply of 450 to 600 words referencing at least 3 peer-reviewed sources and including at least 1 biblical integration, completing the forum begun with individual Part 1 threads in Module/Week 3 |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 25 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | MBA |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 4 in Liberty's published BUSI 681 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 681 Week 4
Group Discussion Board Forum 2: Part 2 (Group Reply)
BUSI 681 Advanced Project Management II, Group Discussion Board Forum 2: Part 2 (synthesized group reply)
Thread by [Student Name]
The group, its members' projects and the threads being synthesized are composites standing in for the course's own; the textbook, Scripture and research cited are real, and the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 681.
Group Reply
Our four Part 1 threads described teams in trouble: Dana's reservoir design team, Luis's software rollout, Grace's clinic build-out and Ben's product launch. Reading them side by side, we noticed that every team that struggled included members from another company. Dana's consultants, Luis's offshore developers, Grace's general contractor and Ben's packaging vendor all answered first to their employers, and their priorities were set by contracts written before the teams formed. Chapter 12 of Gray and Larson (2018) treats this as the central challenge of outsourced project work and recommends practices such as partnering charters, co-location, shared incentives and long-term relationships.
Research cautions against expecting those practices to work automatically. Bresnen and Marshall (2000) reviewed partnering in construction and questioned the presumed link between partnering and cultural change, arguing that organizational complexity and the subtleties of culture limit how much a partnering arrangement can change behavior by itself. A charter signed at kickoff, they suggest, does not make a contractor's estimator think like the client's engineer. Dana's thread confirms it: her reservoir team signed a partnering charter at its first meeting, framed it on the conference room wall and then reverted to arguing through formal correspondence within two months.
The contract also shapes behavior. Gopal et al. (2003) analyzed 93 offshore software projects at a leading Indian vendor and found that requirement uncertainty, team size and resource shortage helped explain whether projects used fixed-price or time-and-materials contracts, and that contract choice significantly affected the vendor's project profits. In Luis's rollout, a fixed-price contract signed while requirements were still shifting gave the offshore developers every reason to resist changes, which the in-house team experienced as unwillingness to collaborate. The contract was writing the team's culture before anyone met.
Partnerships can also create value no single firm could create alone. Dyer and Singh (1998) traced the extra returns that partners can earn together to four sources: investments tailored to the relationship, regular ways of sharing what each knows, resources that fit together and governance that keeps both sides honest. Grace's clinic project, the one outsourced effort in our threads that recovered, did so when the health system and contractor began weekly joint problem-solving meetings and shared their cost data, a knowledge-sharing routine of exactly that kind.
Scripture describes the faithfulness such relationships need. The psalmist's portrait of the person who may dwell with God includes one who holds to a sworn promise even when keeping it costs him (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Psalm 15:4), honoring a promise after it has turned expensive. Partnerships last when each side keeps its commitments through the difficult middle of a project, when the original price looks too low to the vendor and the original scope too narrow to the client.
We recommend matching contract type to requirement uncertainty, pairing every partnering charter with routines that share information, such as joint weekly reviews, and treating outside members as full team participants in the development stages chapter 11 described.
References
Bresnen, M., & Marshall, N. (2000). Partnering in construction: A critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Construction Management and Economics, 18(2), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370852
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. https://doi.org/10.2307/259056
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Gopal, A., Sivaramakrishnan, K., Krishnan, M. S., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2003). Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 49(12), 1671-1683. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.12.1671.25120
Gray, C. F., & Larson, E. W. (2018). Project management: The managerial process (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
What the BUSI 681 Week 4 instructions ask
Forum 2's synthesized reply comes due in Module/Week 4 of BUSI 681, alongside Gray and Larson's chapter 12 on outsourcing and managing interorganizational relations, one presentation and Quiz 4. The group combines its members' Part 1 threads on project teams into one response of 450 to 600 words, grounds it in a minimum of three peer-reviewed studies of outsourcing or teams, draws on Scripture and formats it in APA style, for 25 points. Chapter 12 explains the advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing project work, best practices such as well-defined requirements, partnering charters, long-term relationships and shared incentives, and the art of negotiating, which lets the group reread team problems as relationship problems between organizations.
How this BUSI 681 Week 4 example is built
Its first paragraph states what the group noticed, that every struggling team included outside members whose priorities came from their employers' contracts. It then examines that pattern with three sources. Bresnen and Marshall's review questions the assumption that partnering changes organizational culture on its own. Gopal, Sivaramakrishnan, Krishnan and Mukhopadhyay show that requirement uncertainty and other project features drive the choice between contract types, which in turn affects outcomes. Dyer and Singh explain how relation-specific investments, knowledge sharing and good governance create joint advantage. The group's recommendations follow the chapter's best practices, and a psalm about faithfulness to commitments frames the trust that partnering requires.
BUSI 681 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
The synthesized reply is graded on its integration of members' threads, accurate use of chapter 12, critical treatment of research and the forum's rules on length, sources, Scripture and APA formatting. Chapter 12 concepts that earn credit include reasons for outsourcing and its risks, contract types and their incentives, partnering and its charter, conflict management across organizations, long-term relationships and principled negotiation. Graders value a reply that turns members' individual examples into a shared insight and tests it against evidence, including evidence that complicates the textbook's optimism about partnering. A single, well-edited voice demonstrates the collaboration the forum is designed to build. The reply should also show the group checked the textbook's recommendations against at least one study that complicates them.
BUSI 681 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points
A synthesized reply should not read like four summaries. Look for the thread that runs through every member's example, as this group did with outside team members, and build the reply around it. Use chapter 12's practices as the response, but test them against research that questions how well they work in practice. Be precise about contract types; fixed-price and cost-plus arrangements give vendors different incentives. Choose Scripture that speaks to the relational issue, such as keeping commitments. Settle the draft early in the week so that every member can review it before posting. Bring one member's contract to the drafting call if possible, since its terms often explain the team's behavior.
Related BUSI 681 sample papers
Other BUSI 681 weeks
- BUSI 681 Week 1: Forum 1: Crashing a Late Project
- BUSI 681 Week 2: Forum 1 Part 2: Leading a Crash
- BUSI 681 Week 3: Forum 2: Building a Split Team
- BUSI 681 Week 5: Forum 3: Earned Value as Warning
- BUSI 681 Week 6: Project Model Part 1: Lead Lines
- BUSI 681 Week 7: Forum 4: An Offshore Model Team
- BUSI 681 Week 8: Project Model Part 2: Lead Lines
More MBA sample papers
- BUSI 644 Week 4: Forum 2: Beyond the Smile Sheet
- BUSI 645 Week 1: Forum 1: Lead, Match or Lag Pay?
- BUSI 650 Week 4: ILP Annotated Bibliography
- BUSI 680 Week 4: Annotated Bibliography: Hybrid PM
BUSI 681 Week 4 questions, answered
What is BUSI 681 Group Discussion Board Forum 2 Part 2?
Forum 2's group-written second half, worth 25 points in the fourth module, combining members' Part 1 threads on project teams in 450 to 600 words with three peer-reviewed sources and Scripture.
Where can I find a free BUSI 681 Week 4 sample paper?
A full BUSI 681 Week 4 group reply is on this page, connecting team problems to outsourcing and partnering with research on contracts, partnering and interfirm advantage.
What is partnering in project management?
A method of managing relationships among organizations on a project, typically through a charter, joint goals, shared processes for resolving problems and attention to trust, rather than relying on the contract alone.
Which contract type is best for outsourced project work?
No single type is best; it depends on the project: research on offshore software projects found that requirement uncertainty, team size and resource shortage influenced whether fixed-price or time-and-materials contracts were chosen, and the choice affected vendor profits.
What else is due in BUSI 681 Module/Week 4?
Quiz 4 on outsourcing and relations between organizations, thirty questions answered with the book open, together with the chapter, a presentation and the group's own drafting meetings.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom BUSI 681 Week 4 sample · All BUSI 681 weeks · All courses