BUSI 409 Week 2 Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 409 Week 2 sample responds to a pair of Forum 1 essays about how nonprofit boards govern. The first reply takes up a classmate's claim that board members should be recruited mainly for their ability to give or raise money, agreeing that fundraising matters but showing from research on board competencies that strategic and contextual skills are linked to better organizational performance. The second responds to a classmate who described tension between a board chair and an executive director, using Worth's account of the board-executive partnership to suggest how such conflict can become productive. Each reply applies a biblical principle with a verse, one on the many members of one body and one on bearing with one another in unity. These Forum 1 replies earn 40 points in Liberty University BUSI 409, where BS in Business Administration students study nonprofit governance.

CourseBUSI 409 Nonprofit Management and Governance (BUSI409)
Module/Week2
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 1 Replies
Paper typeTwo discussion replies
Lengthabout 528 words (thread and replies). Course guide: two substantive replies of at least 250 words each to classmates' Forum 1 essays, each with at least 1 biblical principle and Bible verse and citations with their locations, in current APA format
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points40
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published BUSI 409 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 409 Week 2

1

Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies: Nonprofit Governance

BUSI 409 Nonprofit Management and Governance, Discussion Board Forum 1 Replies

Thread by [Student Name]

The two classmates and their threads are composites; the textbook, research and Scripture cited are real, and textbook locations are given by chapter because page numbers differ between printings.

Reply to Victoria

Why this part earns its pointsThe first reply broadens the classmate's view of board recruitment with research on competencies.
2

Victoria, your essay argued that a nonprofit should recruit board members mainly for their ability to give or raise money, and you are right that many organizations depend on board giving. Worth (2017), in Chapter 4, notes that resource development is one of the board's core responsibilities. I would suggest, though, that money is only part of what a board needs.

Brown (2005) found that board competencies such as contributing to strategy and understanding the organization's environment were associated with stronger organizational performance. A board made up only of generous donors may lack people who can read a budget critically, understand the community the nonprofit serves or ask whether programs achieve their mission. A food bank, for example, benefits from a donor, but also from someone who knows logistics and someone who has experienced food insecurity and can speak to the clients' needs.

Paul pictures the church as a single body whose many members each serve a different purpose (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Romans 12:4-5). A board works the same way: its strength comes from members whose different gifts serve one mission. A recruitment plan that lists the skills the board lacks, and then seeks candidates who bring them, follows that principle. Givers remain essential, but they are one gift among several, and a board that values only money may discourage capable people who cannot give large sums from serving at all. Would your organization consider creating a board matrix that lists needed skills alongside giving expectations, so that both are visible when the nominating committee meets?

Reply to Isaac

Why this part earns its pointsThe second reply reframes the classmate's account of conflict as a partnership that needs structure.
3

Isaac, your essay described a nonprofit where the board chair and the executive director disagree about almost everything, and you concluded that one of them should leave. Worth (2017), in Chapter 5, describes the board-executive relationship as a partnership in which tension is normal, because the board represents the public interest while the executive manages day to day. Some disagreement means the board is doing its job, and an executive who never hears a challenge from the board may be leading without real oversight.

The problem in your example may be structure rather than people. When roles are unclear, a chair can drift into managing staff and an executive can feel second-guessed at every turn. Writing down who decides what, holding regular one-on-one meetings and bringing unresolved issues to the full board rather than fighting them out privately can turn conflict into better decisions. Many boards also adopt a simple rule that the chair speaks for the board only on matters the full board has decided, which keeps one strong personality from substituting for the group. Herman and Renz (2008) also note that boards and executives often judge effectiveness differently, so agreeing on a few shared measures of success can reduce disputes.

Paul urged believers to bear with one another in love, working hard to keep the Spirit's unity through peace (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Ephesians 4:2-3). Unity in a nonprofit does not mean the absence of disagreement; it means disagreeing in ways that serve the mission. Before recommending that someone leave, would it help to try a facilitated retreat where the chair and executive clarify their roles together?

4

References

Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 317-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.71

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2008). Advancing nonprofit organizational effectiveness research and theory: Nine theses. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(4), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.195

Worth, M. J. (2017). Nonprofit management: Principles and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

What the BUSI 409 Week 2 instructions ask

Module/Week 2 assigns a presentation and a website rather than new chapters, and the graded work is the Forum 1 replies plus the group research paper topic, which the group leader submits. Each student writes substantive responses to two classmates' Forum 1 essays. Every response must reach 250 words and include at least one biblical principle with a Bible verse, citations that give the page or other location of the material cited and a reference list, in current APA format. The pair is worth 40 points. With no chapters assigned for Week 2, replies should draw on chapters 1 through 5 from the previous module/week and on outside research.

How this BUSI 409 Week 2 example is built

Both replies build on a classmate's argument rather than restating it. The first accepts that fundraising ability matters and broadens the view of what a board needs, supported by a study of board competencies. The second takes a classmate's description of conflict between a chair and an executive and reframes it, using Worth's chapter on executive leadership, as a normal part of a healthy partnership that needs structure. Each reply ties a biblical principle to the classmate's situation briefly and specifically, never as a closing afterthought. Chapter locations appear in every textbook citation, and both replies invite the classmate to answer.

BUSI 409 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Replies are graded on substance, length of at least 250 words each, a biblical principle with a Bible verse in each, and citations with locations plus references in current APA format. Higher marks go to replies that move the classmate's thinking forward, by adding evidence, offering a different angle or posing a useful question, rather than praising the essay. Applying a verse to the classmate's specific example shows integration. Because there is no new reading this module/week, replies that bring in outside research or connect the previous chapters to the classmate's argument demonstrate initiative. Each reply is assessed separately against the requirements. Replies should name the classmate and the point being answered in the opening sentence. Clean writing helps.

BUSI 409 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose essays that make a claim you can extend or question respectfully. Reread the relevant textbook chapter before replying and cite it with a location. Add at least one source the classmate did not use, preferably peer-reviewed. Pick a verse that fits the classmate's situation and explain the connection. End on something the classmate can reply to. Keep each reply above 250 words, and check that both include their own biblical principle and references. Submitting the group topic early, as the guide advises, keeps your group's preferred subject from being taken. A board skills matrix or a written role description makes a concrete suggestion a classmate can use. Quote the classmate accurately.

Related BUSI 409 sample papers

Other BUSI 409 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 409 Week 2 questions, answered

What are the BUSI 409 Forum 1 replies?

A pair of substantive answers to Forum 1 essays, 40 points for Week 2, with 250 or more words apiece with a biblical principle, a verse and located citations.

Where can I find a free BUSI 409 Week 2 sample paper?

Here you will find a complete BUSI 409 Week 2 pair of replies on recruiting nonprofit board members and handling board-executive conflict. Both replies include a verse.

Should nonprofit board members be chosen for fundraising ability?

Fundraising matters, but research links strategic and contextual competencies on boards to stronger organizational performance, so boards need a mix of skills, not only donors.

How should a nonprofit handle conflict between the board chair and executive director?

By clarifying roles in writing, meeting regularly, keeping disagreements private and focused on the mission, and using the board as a whole rather than one person to resolve disputes.

What else is due in BUSI 409 Module/Week 2?

The group research paper topic, submitted by the group leader, along with one presentation and one website; there is no new chapter reading this module/week.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.