| Course | SOWK 425 Social Work in International Settings (SOWK425) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 8 |
| Assignment | DB Forum 4 |
| Paper type | Discussion thread and replies |
| Length | about 677 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a thread of 250 to 350 words demonstrating course-related knowledge and replies of 200 to 250 words to at least 2 classmates, with at least 1 APA reference and biblical integration where appropriate |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 90 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BSW |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 8 in Liberty's published SOWK 425 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for SOWK 425 Week 8
Discussion Board Forum 4: Thread and Two Replies
SOWK 425 Social Work in International Settings, Discussion Board Forum 4 (thread and two replies)
Thread by [Student Name]
The prompt, the worker, the program and the classmates' posts are composites standing in for the course's own forum; Scripture, the handbook, the books and the declaration are real and described from their published sources; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for SOWK 425.
Thread
Aïcha, a composite Nigerien social worker, runs a girls' education program in the Maradi region of Niger, where many girls are married before eighteen and some by fourteen. Parents she meets are not cruel. They describe marriage as protection for daughters, a way to secure family alliances and relief from the cost of feeding another child in a drought year.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that marriage requires the free and full consent of both spouses (United Nations General Assembly, 1948), and a fourteen-year-old cannot meaningfully give that consent. Mapp (2014) describes the long debate between universalism, which holds that human rights apply to everyone, and cultural relativism, which holds that practices should be judged within their own cultural context, and she suggests that rights can be advanced through engagement with local communities rather than imposed from outside. Healy and Link (2012) present human rights as part of the foundation of the global profession, which places Aïcha on the universal side of that debate.
I agree, but with a qualification about method. The right is universal, while the path to honoring it must be local. Aïcha is more likely to delay marriages by working with imams, mothers and village chiefs on girls' schooling and family income than by lecturing parents about international law. Her standing as a Nigerien woman who shares their faith and language gives her a credibility no foreign worker could have.
Can outsiders legitimately challenge a custom like this, or should that role belong only to people within the culture?
Reply to Rachel
Rachel, you agreed that Aïcha should work through local leaders, and a rights-based framework can make that approach more systematic. Androff (2016) identifies five principles of human rights-based social work practice: human dignity, nondiscrimination, participation, transparency and accountability. The principles apply to how the work is done as well as to its goals. For Aïcha's program, dignity means treating parents as partners who want good lives for their daughters, not as violators. Nondiscrimination means ensuring that girls from the poorest households and minority groups are reached first, since they face the highest risk. Participation may be the most important: girls themselves, along with mothers and religious leaders, should help design the program rather than receive it. Transparency means being honest about the program's aims and funding, and accountability means reporting results to the community as well as to donors. Applied together, the principles would keep Aïcha's program from becoming one more project designed in an office far from Maradi. They would also give the community ways to correct the program if it drifts, which is how participation becomes ownership. A village committee that reviews enrollment and marriage figures each season, for instance, would let families see for themselves whether keeping girls in school is changing their community.
Reply to Ethan
Ethan, you argued that social workers should not interfere with long-standing customs because doing so repeats colonial patterns. That history is real, and your caution deserves respect. Yet the evidence suggests a third path between imposing change and staying silent. In Senegal, the organization Tostan offered community education on health, literacy and human rights, and thousands of villages afterward chose to declare publicly that they would abandon female genital cutting and child marriage. The change came from community deliberation, not outside pressure, which is why it has tended to last. Scripture also speaks to the question. Genesis 1:27 teaches that every person, male and female, is created in the image of God (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016), so a girl's dignity does not depend on her culture's view of her. In Proverbs 31:8-9, a mother instructs a king to raise his voice on behalf of people unable to plead their own case and to judge fairly for those who are poor and in need. A fourteen-year-old bride in Maradi often cannot speak for herself. Supporting local voices who speak with her, as Aïcha does, honors both your concern about imposition and the girl's God-given worth. Silence, in her case, is not neutral, because it leaves the decision with those who already hold power over her.
References
Androff, D. (2016). Practicing rights: Human rights-based approaches to social work practice. Routledge.
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Healy, L. M., & Link, R. J. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of international social work: Human rights, development, and the global profession. Oxford University Press.
Mapp, S. C. (2014). Human rights and social justice in a global perspective: An introduction to international social work (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights (Resolution 217 A).
What the SOWK 425 Week 8 instructions ask
The final week of SOWK 425 pairs DB Forum 4, worth 90 points, with a 40-point survey of four short-answer questions, once chapter 25 and Section X of the handbook, a lecture and two videos are complete. This last forum keeps the format used all term. A first post responds to the instructor's question in no fewer than 250 and no more than 350 words, drawing on what the course has covered, and the student follows with responses to two or more peers that each fall from 200 to 250 words. One or more APA-style sources must be cited across the posts, and Scripture should be woven in where it helps. A closing forum on human rights lets students draw together the course's themes of justice, culture and the global profession.
How this SOWK 425 Week 8 example is built
The thread opens with Aïcha, a composite Nigerien social worker with a girls' education program in the Maradi region, where many girls are married before eighteen. It cites the Universal Declaration's requirement of free and full consent to marriage and Mapp's discussion of universalism and cultural relativism, and it argues that rights are universal but change works best through local dialogue. It asks classmates whether outsiders can legitimately challenge a custom. One reply applies Androff's principles of dignity, nondiscrimination, participation, transparency and accountability to Aïcha's program. The other responds to a classmate who argued for noninterference with the example of Tostan in Senegal and with Genesis 1:27 and Proverbs 31:8-9, each applied to the girls in Maradi.
SOWK 425 Week 8 grading rubric: where the points go
Grading for Forum 4 rewards a first post that holds to 250 to 350 words and uses the closing readings correctly, at least two peer responses held to 200 to 250 words that answer the case each peer made and a cited APA source with faith integration where it belongs. The best threads commit to a position on how universal rights and respect for culture fit together and back it with a source and a specific example, rather than declaring that both matter without explaining how. Replies should add a framework, an example or a respectful challenge. Scripture should speak to human dignity or justice in a way that fits the argument. Because the topic is sensitive, a respectful tone toward the cultures discussed is part of a strong post.
SOWK 425 Week 8 help: mistakes that cost points
Choose an example where rights and culture genuinely conflict, such as child marriage or girls' education, and describe the community's perspective fairly before evaluating it. Cite the human rights document that applies. Then explain how change could happen, which matters more than simply declaring a practice wrong. Research on community-led programs gives evidence that change chosen by communities lasts longer than change imposed from outside. Keep within 350 words. In replies, push classmates on what they would actually do, and bring in a model or principle they did not use. Leave an evening for the four survey questions, which close the course alongside this forum.
Related SOWK 425 sample papers
Other SOWK 425 weeks
- SOWK 425 Week 1: Forum 1: International at Home
- SOWK 425 Week 2: Theory Paper: Green Social Work
- SOWK 425 Week 3: Forum 2: Orphanage Volunteering
- SOWK 425 Week 5: Forum 3: Refugee Mental Health
- SOWK 425 Week 6: Presentation: Global Mental Health
- SOWK 425 Week 7: Disaster Plan: Terrorism Annex
More BSW sample papers
SOWK 425 Week 8 questions, answered
What is SOWK 425 DB Forum 4?
The closing discussion of SOWK 425, worth 90 points in Module/Week 8, where students take a position on human rights and culture and then answer two or more classmates in shorter posts.
Where can I find a free SOWK 425 Week 8 sample paper?
The full SOWK 425 Week 8 forum on universal human rights, child marriage in Niger and community-chosen change, with both replies, is on this page.
What is cultural relativism in international social work?
The view that practices should be judged by the standards of the culture in which they occur, often contrasted with universalism, which holds that human rights apply to every person regardless of culture.
What are Androff's principles of rights-based practice?
David Androff describes five principles for human rights-based social work practice: human dignity, nondiscrimination, participation, transparency and accountability, which shape both the goals and the methods of intervention.
What else is due in SOWK 425 Module/Week 8?
The course survey, worth 40 points, asks four short-answer questions about social work and is submitted in the same final week as DB Forum 4.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom SOWK 425 Week 8 sample · All SOWK 425 weeks · All courses