PSYC 345 Week 6 DB Forum 5 Example

Reviewed by Allison Pemberton, PhD · Liberty University · Updated

Anxious children are the focus of this PSYC 345 Week 6 example, DB Forum 5 of Liberty University PSYC 345, written for the BS in Psychology after chapters 9 and 10 of Parritz and Troy, with Mastery Training 9 and 10, two video quizzes and Exam 6 in the same module. The composite question asks what the best evidence says about treating anxiety disorders in school-age children. The thread follows a ten-year-old who has stopped sleeping at friends' houses and complains of stomachaches every school morning, and reports the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study, which randomly assigned 488 young people aged 7 to 17 to cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, both or a placebo for twelve weeks. Four in five children receiving the combination were much improved, against about one in four on placebo. The reply weighs a classmate's worry about medication for children.

CoursePSYC 345 Exceptional Child (PSYC345)
Module/Week6
AssignmentDB Forum 5
Paper typeDiscussion thread and reply
Lengthabout 804 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a thread of at least 400 words and a reply of at least 300 words to 1 classmate, each in current APA format with at least 1 textbook or research citation and 1 Bible citation
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Psychology
Where it sitsModule/Week 6 in Liberty's published PSYC 345 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSYC 345 Week 6

1

Discussion Board Forum 5: Thread and Reply

PSYC 345 Exceptional Child, Discussion Board Forum 5 (thread and one reply)

Thread by [Student Name]

The prompt, the composite child and the classmate's post are composites standing in for the course's own forum; the textbook, Scripture and published trial are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for PSYC 345.

Thread

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread opens with a child's everyday symptoms, which shows how anxiety appears in school-age children before any diagnosis is named.
2

Every school morning, ten-year-old Grace tells her mother she has a stomachache. Some days she cries at the car door. She no longer sleeps at friends' houses, and at night she asks her parents again and again whether a burglar could get in. Her pediatrician found nothing physically wrong. Her parents, worried and tired, have started letting her stay home when the stomachaches are bad, which makes the next morning even harder. Her teacher says that once Grace is in the classroom she settles within twenty minutes, a detail that suggests the fear is about getting there, not about school itself.

Parritz and Troy (2018) describe anxiety disorders as among the most common problems of childhood and note that they often appear as physical complaints, avoidance and repeated requests for reassurance. Avoidance brings immediate relief, which reinforces it, so the child never learns that the feared situation can be faced. Well-meaning parents can be drawn into this cycle, as Grace's parents have been. The chapters also note that anxiety often runs in families and that anxious children tend to interpret ambiguous situations as threatening, which makes everyday events feel dangerous.

The best-known treatment comparison is the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study. In the trial reported by Walkup et al. (2008), nearly five hundred young people between 7 and 17, each referred for one of the fear-driven conditions most often seen in school-age children, were randomly given one of four twelve-week treatments: fourteen therapy sessions, daily sertraline, the two together, or a sugar pill. By the end, independent evaluators judged roughly four of every five children on the combined treatment to be substantially better, against six in ten on therapy, a little over half on sertraline and fewer than one in four on the pill. All three active treatments beat placebo, and the combination beat each single treatment.

The therapy in such trials is not general talk. It teaches children to recognize anxious thoughts and body signals and then to face feared situations step by step, from short separations to a full school day, while parents learn to praise brave behavior instead of rescuing. For Grace, that might mean going to school even with a stomachache, practicing a sleepover at a relative's house first and limiting the nighttime questions to one answer. Each step is planned in advance, rated for difficulty and rewarded when completed, so courage becomes something she can see herself building.

Philippians 4:6-7 invites believers to bring their anxieties to God in prayer and promises a peace that guards the heart (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). For a Christian family, prayer can sit alongside treatment, giving Grace a way to name her fears without implying that her anxiety is a failure of faith.

Classmates: how would you help parents stop rescuing an anxious child without seeming harsh?

Reply to Elena

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply takes the classmate's medication concern seriously and places the evidence in a balanced frame.
3

Elena, you wrote that you would never want a child on medication for anxiety and that therapy alone should always be tried first. Your instinct to start with the least intrusive option is understandable, and many families feel the same, especially when they worry about side effects or about a child coming to see herself as needing pills to cope. The CAMS results actually give some support to that approach: Walkup et al. (2008) found that cognitive behavioral therapy alone helped nearly 60% of children, about the same as sertraline alone, so therapy is a reasonable first step for many families.

At the same time, the trial found that combining therapy and medication helped the most children, about four in five, a difference large enough to matter for families facing severe symptoms. For a child whose anxiety is severe, keeps her out of school for weeks or does not improve with therapy, medication discussed carefully with a physician may be part of a responsible plan. Parritz and Troy (2018) emphasize that untreated anxiety in childhood can interfere with friendships, learning and later adjustment, so delay has costs too. The decision is not between a natural and an unnatural choice but between different ways of reducing suffering, each with benefits and risks that families must weigh with their doctor.

It also matters that the trial lasted twelve weeks. Families should ask about longer-term effects and side effects, and therapy skills may last after treatment ends in a way that medication benefits may not. A family might reasonably begin with therapy, set a date to review progress, and consider adding medication if the child is still missing school by then.

The wisdom saying in Proverbs 15:22 about plans failing without counsel and succeeding with many counselors (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016) fits here: parents, therapists and physicians together are more likely to choose well than any one alone. In what situation, if any, would you consider medication appropriate for a child, and who should make the final decision?

4

References

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Parritz, R. H., & Troy, M. F. (2018). Disorders of childhood: Development and psychopathology (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.

Walkup, J. T., Albano, A. M., Piacentini, J., Birmaher, B., Compton, S. N., Sherrill, J. T., Ginsburg, G. S., Rynn, M. A., McCracken, J., Waslick, B., Iyengar, S., March, J. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2008). Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359(26), 2753-2766. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804633

What the PSYC 345 Week 6 instructions ask

Forum 5 is the module's discussion in Module/Week 6 of PSYC 345, worth 50 points, and it shares the week with Mastery Training 9 and 10, two chapter video quizzes and Exam 6, after chapters 9 and 10 of Parritz and Troy. The same two-part standard applies as in the earlier forums, without exception: a thread of at least 400 words, in APA format, supported by the textbook or research and by a Bible citation, and one reply to a classmate of at least 300 words with both kinds of citation. The Case Study Paper is due the following week, so many students use this forum to rehearse the treatment section of that paper before writing it.

How this PSYC 345 Week 6 example is built

A ten-year-old's morning stomachaches and refusals open the thread, followed by the chapter's description of how anxiety disorders show themselves in childhood and why avoidance keeps them going. The CAMS trial is then described in a single paragraph: its participants, the four treatment arms and the share of children rated much improved in each. A paragraph explains what exposure-based therapy asks of a child and family, step by planned step. Philippians 4 on bringing anxiety to God offers a biblical frame that complements treatment rather than replacing it. A question about helping parents stop rescuing ends the thread, and the reply discusses how families can weigh medication.

PSYC 345 Week 6 grading rubric: where the points go

Forum 5 rewards accurate use of the chapters on internalizing problems, a clear account of a treatment study's design and results, and a thread and reply that each carry the scholarly and biblical support the course requires. Faculty look for explanation of how treatment works, especially the role of gradual exposure and of parents' responses, and for care in describing medication evidence without endorsing or dismissing it. Respect for anxious children's experience matters, since their distress is real even when the feared outcome is unlikely, and posts that mock a child's fears lose credibility. The reply should engage the classmate's concern seriously and suggest a balanced way forward.

PSYC 345 Week 6 help: mistakes that cost points

Posts on childhood anxiety sometimes recommend reassurance, which can keep anxiety going. Use the chapters to explain why avoidance and reassurance maintain fear and why gradual exposure helps. Report the trial's numbers as response rates for each group and note that the combination did best, while therapy and medication alone were similar. When discussing medication, avoid medical advice; describe the evidence and the importance of decisions made with a physician. Choose a Bible passage about worry thoughtfully and explain how you mean it, so it supports rather than shames a child who cannot simply stop being anxious. In the reply, take the classmate's view seriously and add evidence from a trial or the chapters.

Related PSYC 345 sample papers

Other PSYC 345 weeks

More BS in Psychology sample papers

PSYC 345 Week 6 questions, answered

What is PSYC 345 DB Forum 5?

The fifth PSYC 345 forum, worth 50 points in the sixth module, on the chapters about internalizing problems such as anxiety and depression, answered with a long thread and one long reply.

Where can I find a free PSYC 345 Week 6 sample paper?

A complete PSYC 345 Week 6 forum on treating childhood anxiety with therapy, medication or both, based on the CAMS trial, with a reply about medication concerns, is on this page.

What did the CAMS trial find?

Among 488 children and adolescents with anxiety disorders, 80.7% improved with combined CBT and sertraline, 59.7% with CBT alone, 54.9% with sertraline alone and 23.7% with placebo after twelve weeks.

Why does reassurance not help anxious children?

Repeated reassurance and avoidance relieve fear briefly but prevent the child from learning that feared situations are manageable, so anxiety returns and often grows.

What else is due in PSYC 345 Module/Week 6?

Mastery Training 9 and 10, the chapter 9 and 10 video quizzes and Exam 6, with the Case Study Paper following in Module/Week 7.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.