NURS 751 Week 2 Symptom Analysis Evaluation 1 on Chronic Mood Swings Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 751 Week 2 sample is a complete symptom analysis evaluation of a chronic symptom, mood swings, in a 27-year-old dental hygienist whose highs and lows have alternated since college without ever reaching a full episode. The evaluation breaks the symptom down by onset, pattern, triggers and impact, describes the interview, screening and laboratory workup, and weighs six diagnoses, including bipolar II disorder, borderline personality disorder and ADHD, before reaching cyclothymic disorder under DSM-5 criteria. The treatment plan favors psychoeducation, mood and sleep charting and a rhythm-based psychotherapy, explains caution about antidepressant monotherapy using a 2025 network meta-analysis, and sets follow-up for progression. Liberty University NURS 751 assigns the first of two evaluations in Module/Week 2 of the DNP psychiatric nurse practitioner sequence for 100 points.

CourseNURS 751 Neurobiology and Differential Diagnosis of Mental Disorders (NURS751)
Module/Week2
AssignmentSymptom Analysis Evaluation 1 on Chronic Mood Swings
Paper typeSymptom analysis evaluation (assessment, diagnosis and treatment plan for a chronic mental health symptom, at least 5 references)
Lengthabout 1,463 words, 5 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a written evaluation of an assigned case focused on the assessment, diagnosis and treatment plan of a chronic mental health symptom, with at least five references in APA format, which may include the course textbook
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points100
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramDNP
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published NURS 751 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 751 Week 2

1

Up for Days, Flat for a Week, Since Sophomore Year: A Symptom Analysis Evaluation of Chronic Mood Swings in a 27-Year-Old Dental Hygienist That Arrives at Cyclothymic Disorder

 

[Student Name]

School of Nursing, Liberty University

NURS 751: Neurobiology and Differential Diagnosis of Mental Disorders

Symptom Analysis Evaluation 1

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The patient is a composite written as a model case; the diagnostic manual, textbook and studies cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe case opens with the reason for referral and the patient's own words, so the symptom is defined by the person who has it before it is analyzed.
2

Up for Days, Flat for a Week, Since Sophomore Year: A Symptom Analysis Evaluation of Chronic Mood Swings in a 27-Year-Old Dental Hygienist That Arrives at Cyclothymic Disorder

Case Presentation

Ms. R., a 27-year-old dental hygienist, was referred to the psychiatric clinic by her primary care nurse practitioner after an emergency visit for chest tightness that was attributed to anxiety. She describes her chief concern as "mood swings I've had since sophomore year of college." She reports stretches of four to six days in which she sleeps five hours a night, feels sharp and talkative, takes on extra shifts, rearranges her apartment and spends more than she planned, followed by a week or more of feeling flat, tired, unmotivated and self-critical, during which she calls in sick and avoids friends. She has never been hospitalized, never had a period of a week or more of continuous high energy, and denies psychotic symptoms. She has never had two weeks of depression severe enough that she stopped functioning entirely, although she describes the low weeks as "barely getting through."

Her history includes a sertraline trial at 22 for low mood, which she stopped after three weeks because she felt "wired and irritable and couldn't sleep." She drinks two to four drinks on weekend nights during high periods, denies other substances and takes an oral contraceptive. Her mother was treated for depression; a maternal uncle had what the family calls a breakdown and was hospitalized in his thirties. She denies suicidal ideation now but says that during two low stretches she hoped, passively, that she might simply not wake in the past year.

Symptom Analysis

The chronic symptom under evaluation is mood instability: recurring alternation between periods of elevated and depressed mood.

ElementFindings
OnsetAge 19, gradual, during the second year of college
DurationEight years, without a symptom-free period longer than about three weeks
Frequency and patternHighs of 4 to 6 days, lows of 7 to 12 days, often back to back; about 60% of days affected
Character of highsDecreased need for sleep, talkativeness, increased goal-directed activity, overspending, irritability when interrupted
Character of lowsLow energy, anhedonia, poor concentration, guilt, withdrawal, hypersomnia
TriggersOften none identifiable; sometimes schedule changes or travel
Aggravating factorsAlcohol, irregular sleep, night shifts during a previous job
Relieving factorsRegular routine, exercise, time with her sister
ImpactMissed workdays, credit card debt, two ended relationships, strain with her employer
Associated symptomsAnxiety, chest tightness, passive death wishes during lows

Three features stand out. The symptoms are chronic and nearly continuous, not episodic. The highs and lows each fall short of the duration and severity of full episodes. And the shifts often occur without an external trigger, which suggests an endogenous mood process rather than a reaction to events.

Why this part earns its pointsPresenting the symptom analysis as a table lets the reader see the chronic, subthreshold, often untriggered pattern that drives the diagnosis.
3

Assessment

Interview

Hypomania is easy to miss because patients rarely see it as a problem. Carlat (2017) recommends asking about it directly and normalizing the question, for example by asking whether there have been times the patient felt so good or energetic that others noticed, or needed much less sleep without feeling tired. I asked Ms. R. to describe her most recent high in detail, day by day, and asked her sister, with permission, to describe what she sees. Her sister described "weeks when she's a ball of fire" and confirmed that the pattern began in college.

Mental Status Examination

Ms. R. was casually dressed and well groomed, cooperative, with normal psychomotor activity. Speech was slightly rapid but interruptible. She described her mood as "in between" and her affect was mildly anxious with full range. Thought process was linear, with no delusions, hallucinations, suicidal or homicidal ideation at the time of the visit. Cognition was intact, and insight and judgment were fair.

Screening Tools and Mood Charting

She completed the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, endorsing 8 of 13 symptoms occurring together, with moderate problems, which is a positive screen. Her PHQ-9 score was 9 on a day she described as average. Because screening tools cannot establish duration, she kept a daily mood and sleep chart for two weeks, rating mood from minus 3 to plus 3. The chart showed a five-day elevated stretch with four to five hours of sleep a night and a nine-day low stretch with ten hours a night, with no day at either extreme.

Medical Workup

To exclude medical and substance causes, I ordered thyroid studies (TSH with free thyroxine), blood counts, a metabolic panel and a urine drug screen, and reviewed her medications. All results were normal and the drug screen was negative. A pregnancy test was negative, which matters for any medication decision.

Strengths and Protective Factors

The assessment also identified strengths the plan can build on. Ms. R. has stable employment she values, a sister who lives nearby and noticed the pattern before she did, no history of suicide attempts and a record of feeling better when her routine is regular. She is curious about her symptoms rather than defensive, and she completed the mood chart every day without reminders. She described her church small group as a place she misses during low weeks and would like to return to, which offers both social rhythm and spiritual support. These factors lower her immediate risk and make a psychotherapy-first plan realistic.

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisForAgainst
Bipolar II disorderFamily history; highs with less sleep and more activity; antidepressant-induced activationNo high has lasted four days with marked change observed by others meeting hypomanic criteria; no full major depressive episode
Cyclothymic disorderEight years of numerous subthreshold highs and lows; symptoms most days; never symptom-free more than two monthsMust exclude full episodes, which mood charting and history did not show
Borderline personality disorderEnded relationships, impulsive spending, passive death wishesShifts last days rather than hours, are often untriggered; no identity disturbance, chronic emptiness or fear of abandonment
Major depressive disorder, recurrentLow periods with anhedonia and guiltLows do not meet two-week criteria; highs exclude a unipolar diagnosis
ADHDDistractibility, overcommitmentSymptoms episodic, not continuous since childhood; attention normal between lows
Substance or medication-induced mood disorderWeekend alcoholMood shifts preceded drinking and occur during sober weeks; negative drug screen

The strongest alternative is bipolar II disorder. Cyclothymic temperament is closely linked to bipolarity, and in a study of 1,723 adult outpatients it was a strong predictor of bipolar disorder, especially bipolar II and substance-induced bipolarity (Karam et al., 2023). A systematic review of features that distinguish bipolar from unipolar depression in general practice also names cyclothymic temperament, early onset, family history and suicide attempts among the most consistent indicators (Niktabe & Massoubre, 2026). Ms. R.'s history makes progression to bipolar II disorder a real risk to monitor. Borderline personality disorder was the second alternative. Ruffalo and Ray (2026) distinguish cyclothymia, which reflects subsyndromal, endogenous mood fluctuations, from borderline personality disorder, which involves identity disturbance, interpersonal hypersensitivity and primitive defenses. Ms. R.'s shifts are endogenous and last days, and she shows none of the identity or abandonment features, although the possibility should be revisited if new information emerges.

Diagnosis

Ms. R. meets DSM-5 criteria for cyclothymic disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 2013): for at least two years, numerous periods with hypomanic symptoms that do not meet criteria for a hypomanic episode and numerous periods with depressive symptoms that do not meet criteria for a major depressive episode; the symptoms have been present at least half the time without a symptom-free interval of more than two months; criteria for a major depressive, manic or hypomanic episode have never been met; the symptoms are not better explained by a psychotic disorder, cannot be traced to a drug, a medication or another medical illness, and cause clinically significant distress and impairment. What makes this cyclothymia rather than a milder bipolar II is not severity alone but the absence, so far, of a single full episode.

Why this part earns its pointsStating each DSM-5 criterion against a fact from the case shows the diagnosis was reached, not assumed.
4

Treatment Plan

Education and Self-Monitoring

I explained the diagnosis to Ms. R. and her sister, framing it as a lifelong tendency toward mood swings that can be managed, and naming the risk of progression to bipolar II disorder. She will continue the daily mood and sleep chart, which will serve both as a self-management tool and as the main way to detect a full episode.

Psychotherapy and Rhythm Regulation

Psychotherapy is the first-line treatment. I referred her for cognitive behavioral therapy adapted for mood instability with elements of interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, focusing on regular sleep and wake times, consistent meals and activity, recognition of early warning signs of highs and lows and a plan for each. She agreed to cap drinking at a single drink on any given day and to skip alcohol entirely during high periods, since alcohol worsened her lows and disrupts the sleep her plan depends on.

Pharmacologic Considerations

I did not start an antidepressant. Her earlier activation on sertraline is a warning sign, and most clinicians avoid antidepressant monotherapy for patients on the bipolar spectrum. The evidence is not simple. A 2025 network meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials in bipolar depression found that no antidepressant significantly increased switching to mania compared with placebo, although venlafaxine had the highest risk estimate and most trials studied antidepressants added to a mood stabilizer rather than given alone (Oliva et al., 2025). That finding does not apply directly to monotherapy in cyclothymia, and given her history I judged the risk not worth taking. If her symptoms remain impairing after eight to twelve weeks of therapy and routine, we will discuss a mood stabilizer, with lamotrigine or lithium as options, through shared decision-making that includes her contraceptive use and plans for pregnancy.

Safety and Follow-Up

Because she has had passive death wishes during lows, we completed a written safety plan with warning signs, coping steps, her sister and a crisis line. She will return in three weeks and then monthly, bringing her mood chart. At each visit I will reassess for a full hypomanic or major depressive episode, which would change the diagnosis to bipolar II disorder and the plan to include a mood stabilizer. I will also repeat the PHQ-9 at each visit, review her work attendance and spending as functional markers, and coordinate with her primary care nurse practitioner, who will be told to avoid prescribing an antidepressant for her anxiety without consulting the psychiatric clinic.

Conclusion

Ms. R.'s chronic mood swings, analyzed by onset, pattern, triggers and impact and confirmed with collateral history, screening and two weeks of charting, meet DSM-5 criteria for cyclothymic disorder after bipolar II disorder, borderline personality disorder and other alternatives were considered and set aside for specific reasons. The plan relies on education, self-monitoring, psychotherapy and rhythm regulation, avoids antidepressant monotherapy and watches closely for progression, so that if a full episode does come, it will be recognized early and treated quickly.

5

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Carlat, D. J. (2017). The psychiatric interview (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Karam, E. G., Saab, D., Jabbour, S., Karam, G. E., Hantouche, E., & Angst, J. (2023). The role of affective temperaments in bipolar disorder: The solid role of the cyclothymic, the contentious role of the hyperthymic, and the neglected role of the irritable temperaments. European Psychiatry, 66(1), Article e37. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.16

Niktabe, D. S., & Massoubre, C. (2026). Distinguishing bipolar disorder from unipolar depression in general practice: A systematic review. European Journal of General Practice, 32(1), Article 2733396. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2026.2733396

Oliva, V., De Prisco, M., La Spina, E., Paolucci, S., Fico, G., Anmella, G., Hidalgo-Mazzei, D., Murru, A., Pompili, M., Fornaro, M., Solmi, M., Yildiz, A., Leucht, S., Vieta, E., & Radua, J. (2025). Switch to mania after acute antidepressant treatment for bipolar depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine, 87, Article 103413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103413

Ruffalo, M. L., & Ray, A. M. (2026). Distinguishing mood temperaments from personality disorders: Diagnostic and clinical implications. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 54(3), 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2026.54.3.381

What the NURS 751 Week 2 instructions ask

Symptom Analysis Evaluation 1 is due in Module/Week 2 of NURS 751, alongside readings in the DSM-5 on bipolar, depressive, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders and chapters on mood disorders and deliberate self-harm. The course guide describes it as a written evaluation of an assigned case study focused on the assessment, diagnosis and treatment plan of a chronic mental health symptom, with at least five references in APA format, one of which may be the course textbook. The faculty rubric in the course site sets the scoring, so the evaluation should give each of those three parts its own clearly labeled section.

How this NURS 751 Week 2 example is built

The evaluation begins with the case: a dental hygienist referred by a primary care nurse practitioner after an emergency visit for chest tightness, who describes a decade of alternating weeks of drive and weeks of flatness. A symptom analysis table breaks the mood swings into onset, duration, frequency, character, triggers, relieving factors and impact. The assessment section covers interview techniques for eliciting hypomania, a mental status examination, the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, a two-week mood chart and laboratory tests. A differential diagnosis table weighs six conditions before the DSM-5 diagnosis is stated. The plan covers education, therapy, medication decisions, safety and follow-up.

NURS 751 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

Symptom analysis evaluations are typically graded on the thoroughness of the symptom analysis, the quality and appropriateness of the assessment, including screening tools and tests, the reasoning of the differential diagnosis, the accuracy of the final diagnosis against DSM-5 criteria, and an evidence-based treatment plan with follow-up, as well as APA and reference requirements. Instructors look for a differential in which each alternative is ruled in or out with specific evidence from the case, not a list of possibilities. A plan that explains why a common choice was avoided earns as much credit as one that names what was chosen. Clear headings for assessment, diagnosis and plan also make it easy for the grader to find each rubric element.

NURS 751 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Evaluations of mood symptoms often jump from a depressed presentation to a depression diagnosis without asking about past highs, or list a differential with no reason for excluding each item. Ask about hypomanic symptoms directly, gather collateral from someone who knows the patient, and use a mood chart before deciding. Make the medical workup explicit, since thyroid disease and substances can mimic mood disorders. In the plan, give reasons for each choice and for each choice you did not make, and set out what would change the diagnosis at follow-up. Five references is a minimum; use the DSM-5 for criteria and recent studies for decisions. Finally, write the evaluation as you would a consultation note for a colleague, concise and specific, rather than as an essay about the disorder in general.

Related NURS 751 sample papers

Other NURS 751 weeks

More DNP sample papers

NURS 751 Week 2 questions, answered

What is the NURS 751 Symptom Analysis Evaluation?

A written evaluation of an assigned case focused on the assessment, diagnosis and treatment plan of a chronic mental health symptom, due in Module/Weeks 2 and 4 with at least five references.

Where can I find a free NURS 751 Week 2 sample paper?

This page presents the full NURS 751 Week 2 evaluation of chronic mood swings that reaches cyclothymic disorder, with its tables, plan and references, free to read.

What is cyclothymic disorder?

A DSM-5 bipolar-spectrum disorder in which numerous periods of hypomanic and depressive symptoms, none meeting full episode criteria, persist for at least two years in adults.

How is cyclothymia different from borderline personality disorder?

Cyclothymia involves endogenous mood shifts lasting days, while borderline personality disorder involves identity disturbance and reactive shifts within hours tied to relationships, although the two can coexist.

Should antidepressants be used alone in cyclothymic disorder?

Most clinicians avoid antidepressant monotherapy on the bipolar spectrum because of concern about switching and mood instability, favoring psychotherapy, rhythm regulation and, when needed, a mood stabilizer.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.