NURS 721 Week 2 Discussion Board Forum 2 on Leadership, Communication and Patient Safety Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 721 Week 2 sample has a DNP student and nurse director examine a near miss in which a new graduate nurse hesitated for forty minutes before questioning a heparin order, and asks what leaders do, or fail to do, that decides whether nurses speak up about safety. Drawing on a 2026 scoping review of how nurse managers build psychological safety and a 2026 survey of 288 clinical nurses that found leaders' own courage tied more directly to speaking up than psychological safety was, the thread argues that leaders must model voice, not only invite it. The 50-point forum falls in Module/Week 2 of Liberty University NURS 721, as DNP students read the next three chapters of Clawson along with four websites, and the thread is followed by replies to at least two classmates.

CourseNURS 721 Leadership, Policy and Ethics (NURS721)
Module/Week2
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 2 on Leadership, Communication and Patient Safety
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 903 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread answering the forum prompt, judged on how deeply and widely it explores the topic, with replies to at least two classmates
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramDNP
Where it sitsModule/Week 2 in Liberty's published NURS 721 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 721 Week 2

1

Discussion Board Forum 2: Leadership, Communication and Safety

NURS 721 Leadership, Policy and Ethics, Discussion Board Forum 2

Thread by [Student Name]

The hospital, the event and the classmates replied to are composites written for a model discussion.

Why this part earns its pointsA near miss with a forty-minute delay gives the thread a precise question: why did a nurse who saw the error wait?
2

Last month a nurse eight weeks out of orientation on one of my units noticed that a heparin infusion order for a post-operative patient appeared to be ten times the usual dose. She checked the protocol, asked another new nurse, rechecked the protocol, and finally called the surgical resident forty minutes after she first saw the order. The resident corrected it immediately and thanked her for the call. The infusion had not been started, and no harm occurred. When the nurse manager and I met with her afterward, she said she had been afraid of being wrong and of the reaction she might get. She had heard stories about a surgeon who shouted at nurses who questioned him. That surgeon left the hospital three years before she was hired.

Clawson (2012) argues that what people do is driven by what lies beneath: the values, assumptions, beliefs and expectations they carry, often without examining them. The nurse's delay was not a knowledge problem; she knew the dose was wrong. It was a belief, inherited from stories told on the unit, that questioning a physician carries a personal cost. Leaders who want nurses to speak up must change that belief, and the evidence suggests how. A belief about what happens to people who speak up can outlive every person who created it.

A 2026 scoping review of 25 sources on how nurse managers promote psychological safety and patient safety culture found that relational behaviors, including visible presence, active listening, emotional support and constructive feedback, were the key strategies, and that psychological safety may link leadership to communication, speaking up, incident reporting and learning (Augusto et al., 2026). The same review found that leadership alone is not enough: punitive environments, hierarchy, workload and resource constraints were barriers that leaders must also address.

A second 2026 study complicated the picture in a useful way. Abousoliman and Elgamal (2026) surveyed 288 nurses working in thirteen Egyptian hospitals. Nurses who rated their leaders as courageous also reported a fairer response to errors, felt safer with colleagues and spoke up more. The surprise came in the pathway analysis: feeling psychologically safe did not, in this sample, travel with speaking up, and the fair-culture and safety measures together did not explain why courageous leadership and voice went together. What remained was a direct association between a leader's courage and nurses' willingness to raise concerns. Because everything was measured at one point in time, the design cannot establish which came first, but the pattern hints that nurses may learn to speak up partly by watching their leaders do it. It also cautions against assuming that a pleasant, supportive unit will automatically be a vocal one.

Why this part earns its pointsReporting a finding that runs against the expected story, rather than leaving it out, shows the depth of reading the forum rewards.
3

That finding changes my plan. Beyond asking nurses to speak up, I will practice three behaviors. I will round on each unit during the evening shift change, when new nurses are most often alone with questions. I will tell the story of this near miss, with the nurse's permission, as an example of a good catch, and thank her publicly for it. And I will question unsafe orders or practices myself in front of staff when I see them, so the belief that speaking up is dangerous meets visible evidence that it is not. Esther hesitated before approaching the king unsummoned, but she went, saying, "If I perish, I perish" (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Esther 4:16). Leaders cannot ask nurses for courage they do not show themselves.

Reply to Jordan

Jordan, you wrote that servant leadership is the answer to speaking up because nurses speak freely to leaders who care for them. I agree that caring matters, but a 2026 study of Japanese nurses suggests it may not be enough by itself. In that study, organizational climate was significantly associated with psychological safety, which in turn was associated with work engagement, but servant leadership showed no significant effect on either psychological safety or engagement in the tested model (Hontake et al., 2026). The authors concluded that the wider workplace environment, one where nurses can speak openly and seek consultation, may matter more than any single leader's style. Clawson (2012) would describe that climate as a set of shared expectations that outlast individual leaders. On my unit, the surgeon's legacy was part of the climate. Do you think a servant leader on your unit could change the climate alone, or would it take changes in policies, such as how errors are reviewed, as well?

Reply to Priya

Priya, you pointed out that new graduates on your night shift rarely call physicians because they are afraid of waking them for nothing. That is the hierarchy barrier in concrete form. Augusto et al. (2026) found hierarchical structures and workload pressures among the main barriers to psychological safety, alongside punitive environments, and concluded that leadership must be aligned with organizational conditions and system-level support. One system change that has helped on my units is a written escalation guide that lists situations in which nurses are expected to call, so the decision does not rest on the nurse's judgment of whether the call is worth it. Another is pairing each new graduate with a named night resource nurse for the first three months. A third is to ask residents to end every night call with a short thank-you, which costs nothing and slowly changes the expectation of a hostile response. Has your unit considered something similar, and how do your residents respond when nurses call at night?

4

References

Abousoliman, A. D., & Elgamal, H. G. (2026). Courageous leadership and nurses' speaking-up behavior: The indirect roles of just culture and psychological safety: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 11, Article 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100663

Augusto, C., Pereira, S., Cunha, D., Rocha, I., Lumini, M. J., Santos, R., & Gonçalves, P. (2026). The role of nurse managers in promoting psychological safety and patient safety culture in nursing teams: A scoping review. Healthcare, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14162590

Clawson, J. G. (2012). Level three leadership: Getting below the surface (5th ed.). Pearson.

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Hontake, T., Nishi, M., Kuzushima, S., & Kamizawa, N. (2026). Effects of organizational climate and servant leadership on work engagement among Japanese nurses: The mediating role of psychological safety. Journal of Nursing Management, 2026(1), Article e5755950. https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/5755950

What the NURS 721 Week 2 instructions ask

The second NURS 721 forum continues the work with Clawson's Level Three Leadership, now in the chapters that follow the opening model, and adds four websites to the readings. The course outcome behind this module concerns leadership approaches that support effective communication, patient safety and efficient care, so a strong thread connects leadership behavior to what actually happens between clinicians at the bedside. Students post a thread and reply to at least two classmates, and the syllabus grades each thread on how thoroughly it develops the discussion and how much ground it covers. An event from the student's own practice gives the analysis something concrete to explain.

How this NURS 721 Week 2 example is built

The thread begins with a near miss: a new graduate nurse who suspected a tenfold heparin error waited forty minutes before calling the physician. It explains her hesitation as a Level Three belief about what happens to nurses who question orders, then reviews two 2026 studies, a scoping review of nurse managers' role in psychological safety and a survey linking courageous leadership directly to speaking up. It closes with three leadership behaviors the writer will adopt and a reflection on Esther's courage. The replies add a Japanese study that found organizational climate mattered more than servant leadership and discuss the barriers of hierarchy and workload. Margin notes mark where the analysis turns from story to evidence.

NURS 721 Week 2 grading rubric: where the points go

As with the first forum, the grade reflects how thoroughly and how widely the thread reasons: an accurate use of Clawson, a specific situation analyzed rather than retold, scholarly evidence that supports or complicates the argument, and a conclusion the student can carry into practice. Instructors value threads that report research honestly, including findings that do not fit the expected story. Replies should extend a classmate's thinking with a source, a question or a different angle rather than simply agree. Graduate-level writing and correct APA formatting apply to the thread and the replies alike, and a thread that names concrete leader behaviors shows practical judgment. Honest treatment of mixed evidence is itself a sign of depth.

NURS 721 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Patient safety threads often stay at the level of slogans, such as saying leaders should create a culture of safety, without explaining what leaders actually do. Others cite a study's conclusion without its findings, or ignore results that complicate the argument. Start with one real event, identify the belief that shaped the clinician's behavior, report what the research found in numbers or specific terms, admit where it surprised you, and finish with behaviors you will practice. In replies, bring something your classmate does not already have, such as a study, a counterexample or a practical question about their unit. Keep each reply to one idea, and end it with a question that invites your classmate to apply the point to their own unit.

Related NURS 721 sample papers

Other NURS 721 weeks

More DNP sample papers

NURS 721 Week 2 questions, answered

What is NURS 721 Discussion Board Forum 2?

The 50-point forum in Module/Week 2 on leadership that supports communication and patient safety, with a thread drawing on Clawson and replies to two or more classmates.

Where can I find a free NURS 721 Week 2 sample paper?

This page carries the complete NURS 721 Week 2 thread on leadership and speaking up about patient safety, with two replies and references, free to read.

What is psychological safety in nursing?

It is a shared belief among team members that it is safe to take interpersonal risks, such as asking questions, admitting mistakes or raising concerns, without being humiliated or punished.

How can nurse managers encourage speaking up?

Reviews point to visible presence, active listening, emotional support and constructive feedback, supported by a just culture and by leaders who model raising concerns themselves.

What is courageous leadership in nursing?

Leadership in which managers act on their values despite risk, such as challenging unsafe practices openly, which a 2026 study linked directly to nurses' speaking-up behavior.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.