NURS 489 Week 7 Discussion Board Forum 5 Example

Reviewed by Rachel Stanton, MSN, RN · Liberty University · Updated

This NURS 489 Week 7 sample thread follows a charge nurse who must lead her unit through a change most of the staff did not ask for: moving shift report from the nurses' station to the patient's bedside. It describes the resistance she met, from worries about time to discomfort talking in front of families, and uses Lewin's three stages of change to plan the rollout. Evidence comes from a review of 22 handover improvement projects and a 2026 stepped-wedge trial in which structured bedside assessment and handover cut stage 2 to 4 pressure injuries by 41%. Replies take up a classmate whose unit abandoned bedside report after three months and one who asks how to win over senior nurses. Liberty University NURS 489 ends its run of BSN forums here, a thread worth 75 points that falls a week before the group presentation that closes the course.

CourseNURS 489 Leadership in Nursing (NURS489)
Module/Week7
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 5
Paper typeDiscussion thread with two replies
Lengthabout 808 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 400 words supported by at least 2 APA citations, with 2 replies of at least 200 words each, each citing at least 1 source and incorporating 1 biblical reference
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points75
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBSN
Where it sitsModule/Week 7 in Liberty's published NURS 489 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 489 Week 7

1

Discussion Board Forum 5: Leading Change on a Nursing Unit

NURS 489 Leadership in Nursing, Discussion Board Forum 5

Thread by [Student Name]

The unit, the change project and the classmates are composites; the textbook, Scripture and journal articles cited are real.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread starts with the staff's objections, because resistance is the part of change a leader actually has to manage.
2

When our manager asked me, as one of the charge nurses, to lead the move from shift report at the nurses' station to report at the bedside, I expected some grumbling. I got more than that. The night nurses said report would take twice as long. Several nurses said they could not speak freely about a difficult family or a sensitive diagnosis in front of the patient. One of our most experienced nurses said, "We tried this in 2017 and it didn't work." All of these were fair concerns, and this week's reading helped me see them as part of change rather than obstacles to it.

Finkelman (2016) presents Lewin's model, in which change moves through unfreezing, moving and refreezing, and notes that staff resist most when they do not understand why a change is needed or have no part in shaping it. Our first attempt in 2017 had skipped the first stage entirely: a memo announced the new process, and within months everyone was back at the station.

Why this part earns its pointsThe evidence is placed in the unfreezing stage, since a reason the staff accept is what makes people willing to let go of the old routine.
3

This time, I want to start by unfreezing, which means giving the staff a reason they can accept. Cho et al. (2022) reviewed 22 quality improvement projects on intershift handover and found that standardized tools and bedside handover with patient participation reduced adverse events and handover time and improved the satisfaction of both patients and nurses. Rihari-Thomas et al. (2026) went further with a stepped-wedge trial on nine wards in three hospitals covering 13,753 admissions. Nurses performed a structured assessment at the start of every shift, gave a patient-centered handover at the bedside and joined medical rounds. Stage 2 to 4 pressure injuries fell by 41%, nurses rated the safety culture higher and their perceived barriers to physical assessment dropped, although falls, emergency team calls and unplanned ICU admissions did not change. I plan to share both findings honestly, including what did not improve, at our next huddle.

For the moving stage, I will ask two night nurses who raised concerns to help write our script, including a rule that sensitive information is passed privately outside the room. For refreezing, we will audit ten reports a week for three months, post the results in the break room and ask patients at discharge whether they felt included in report. A change that is announced but never followed up is only a suggestion with a deadline.

Reply to Hannah

Hannah, your unit's experience is so close to ours: bedside report started with enthusiasm and faded within three months. I think the reason may lie in refreezing. Finkelman (2016) explains that new practices hold only when they are reinforced until they become the normal way of working, through feedback, visible support from leaders and attention to the problems staff run into. When managers stop checking and staff never hear whether the change made any difference, the old habit wins on the first busy night. If your unit tries again, you might suggest short audits shared at huddles and a quick way for nurses to report what gets in the way, such as rooms with a confused roommate. The Bible describes this same kind of persistence: "let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up" (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Galatians 6:9). Sustaining change takes a leader who keeps showing up after the launch, when the excitement is gone and the unit is tired. Did anyone on your unit ever collect data on whether the first attempt helped patients? Even a little local data might persuade staff that a second attempt is worth the effort it will take.

Reply to Kevin

Kevin, you asked how to bring along senior nurses who tell you they have "seen this before." I am facing the same thing, and I wonder whether their experience is an asset we have been treating as a barrier. Senior nurses often remember exactly why earlier attempts failed. In the ACCELERATE trial, Rihari-Thomas et al. (2026) found that ratings of leadership behavior and leader culture improved on the wards after the intervention, which suggests that how a change is led shapes how staff receive it. Rather than presenting the plan to your senior nurses, you might ask one or two of them to help design it and to act as the people others go to with questions. Asking them for advice shows respect for what they know. Paul told the Philippians to act in humility and count others as more significant than themselves (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Philippians 2:3), and a charge nurse who gives experienced colleagues real influence over a change is practicing that humility on a unit. Their buy-in also carries weight with newer nurses, who watch how senior staff respond. Have you considered asking your most skeptical nurse to be a champion? I am going to try that with ours next month.

4

References

Cho, S., Lee, J. L., Kim, K. S., & Kim, E. M. (2022). Systematic review of quality improvement projects related to intershift nursing handover. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 37(1), E8-E14. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000576

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Finkelman, A. (2016). Leadership and management for nurses: Core competencies for quality care (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Rihari-Thomas, J., Whittam, S., Thornton, A., Goncharov, L., Slade, D., McMahon, J., Coventry, A., Coughlan, K., Steadward, Y., Taylor, J., Liu, M., Walsh, S., Riddell, K., Tuqiri, K., Olesen, K., Dahm, M. R., Chien, L., Kelly, P., Ball, J., . . . Middleton, S. (2026). Assessment and communication excellence for safe patient outcomes (ACCELERATE): A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial evaluating the effectiveness of a nurse-led assessment and handover communication intervention on patient adverse events. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 183, 105652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2026.105652

What the NURS 489 Week 7 instructions ask

Module/Week 7 of NURS 489 holds the final discussion board, with De Pree's chapters 16 and 17, Finkelman's sixth chapter, one presentation and one website as the week's study. The rules for this last forum match the first four: a thread of 400 words or more resting on two or more citations in APA style, followed by a pair of classmate responses of 200 words or more, each with one cited source and one biblical reference. Respond to the posted prompt directly. A change you have seen, led or resisted on your own unit makes the strongest example. If you resisted it, say so; honest reflection on your own reaction often teaches more about change than a success story does.

How this NURS 489 Week 7 example is built

The thread opens with the charge nurse's announcement of bedside shift report and the objections it drew. It explains the change through Lewin's unfreezing, moving and refreezing stages and plans what to do at each one. Evidence from a review of handover improvement projects and a recent trial gives the staff a reason for the change beyond management's preference. The thread ends with how she will know whether the change has held. One reply helps a classmate understand why her unit's change faded and how to restart it; the other suggests inviting senior nurses to shape the change rather than receive it, so that the colleagues most likely to block it become the ones who teach it.

NURS 489 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go

Discussion threads in NURS 489 tend to be marked on how directly they address the prompt, whether at least two APA citations support the argument, how well the readings are applied to real practice and the quality of the writing. Replies are expected to extend the discussion with a cited source and a biblical reference that fits the point. For a forum on change, faculty look for a named change model applied step by step rather than mentioned, for honest treatment of resistance and for a plan to sustain the change. Replies offering a concrete, evidence-based suggestion score better than general encouragement.

NURS 489 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose a change you have experienced at work, such as a new documentation system, a care model or a handoff format. Describe how staff reacted and why. Apply a change model you learned in this course, stage by stage, and say what a leader should do at each stage. Support the reason for the change with two recent studies. Close with how you would measure whether it held after six months. In your replies, offer a specific idea with a source and connect it to a passage from Scripture that fits the leadership lesson. Keep both replies above 200 words, and check each one for its source and verse before posting.

Related NURS 489 sample papers

Other NURS 489 weeks

More BSN sample papers

NURS 489 Week 7 questions, answered

What is NURS 489 Discussion Board Forum 5?

The final 75-point forum of NURS 489, due in Module/Week 7, with a 400-word thread built on two APA citations and two 200-word replies that each add a source and a biblical reference.

Where can I find a free NURS 489 Week 7 sample paper?

The complete NURS 489 Week 7 forum thread on leading bedside shift report, along with both replies, appears on this page at no cost.

What are Lewin's three stages of change?

Unfreezing, when people come to see why the current way must change; moving, when the new practice is introduced and learned; and refreezing, when it becomes the normal way of working.

Does bedside shift report improve patient safety?

A 2026 stepped-wedge trial found that structured nurse assessment with bedside handover cut stage 2 to 4 pressure injuries by 41%, though it did not change falls or emergency team calls.

Why do changes on nursing units fade?

Often because the refreezing stage is skipped: leaders stop checking, staff are not given feedback on results and the old habit returns when the unit is busy.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.