| Course | NURS 489 Leadership in Nursing (NURS489) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 4 |
| Assignment | Discussion Board Forum 3 |
| Paper type | Discussion thread with two replies |
| Length | about 804 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 400 words supported by at least 2 APA citations, with 2 replies of at least 200 words each, each citing at least 1 source and incorporating 1 biblical reference |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 75 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BSN |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 4 in Liberty's published NURS 489 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 489 Week 4
Discussion Board Forum 3: Preparing Frontline Leaders
NURS 489 Leadership in Nursing, Discussion Board Forum 3
Thread by [Student Name]
The unit, the writer's experience and the classmates are composites; the textbooks, Scripture and journal articles cited are real.
Eight months ago, my manager asked if I would take charge on nights. After one shift shadowing the regular charge nurse, I was on my own. I knew how to make assignments, call the house supervisor and run a rapid response. What I did not know was how to tell a senior nurse that her assignment was not fair to others, how to calm two nurses arguing over a float or how to keep a new graduate from quitting after a terrible night. I had been prepared for the tasks of charge, not for leading people.
Finkelman (2016) distinguishes leadership from management and describes leadership competencies, including communication, decision-making, delegation and conflict resolution, that every nurse needs and that frontline leaders use constantly. De Pree (2008) argues that leaders owe their people clarity: a voice that tells them what matters and a presence they can count on. On my first nights, I had neither the confidence to speak clearly nor the skills to resolve conflict, and the staff noticed. Two nurses told the manager they did not feel supported at night, and one new graduate transferred to another unit after a shift when I was too busy with admissions to check on her. None of that was because I did not care. I simply had no framework for what a charge nurse owes the people on her shift beyond a fair assignment and a quick answer to questions, and no one had ever asked me to think about it.
Preparation can change that. Oscar and Best (2026) describe a six-month Clinical Charge Nurse Leadership Development Program at a large academic hospital, grounded in the American Organization for Nursing Leadership competencies. New and aspiring charge nurses completed self-assessments, case-based learning, scenario practice and mentorship, with content on emotional intelligence, conflict and change management, professional practice models, human resources and basic finance. Participants reported greater confidence, better communication and conflict resolution and a clearer understanding of operational responsibilities, and several took on additional leadership roles afterward. The authors note that preparing charge nurses before they take on the role supports retention and team effectiveness. What struck me most was the mentorship: each participant had an experienced leader to call after a hard shift, which is exactly what I lacked.
My proposal for our unit is modest. Before anyone takes charge alone, they should complete at least four shadow shifts with different charge nurses, a short course on conflict and difficult conversations and a monthly debrief with the manager for the first six months. A charge nurse is the leader most staff see most often, and we prepare them the least.
Reply to Jasmine
Jasmine, your unit's move from a primary nursing model to a team model sounds challenging, especially your worry that nurses would lose their sense of ownership. Polancich et al. (2025) described a medical-surgical neurology and spinal unit that adopted a care-based delivery model supported by brief education using in situ simulations focused on teamwork and delegation; during the pilot, job satisfaction improved 23% and six missed care elements and seven teamwork elements improved significantly. That suggests that a model change can work when staff are trained in the teamwork it requires, not only told about it. Scripture describes a team in which every member matters: "the body does not consist of one member but of many" (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, 1 Corinthians 12:14). A team model might honor that if every member knows their part. I would add one caution from my own experience: the nurses most attached to the old model are often the ones who cared most about their patients, so their concerns deserve a hearing rather than dismissal. Including them in the simulations might turn critics into teachers. Is your unit offering simulation or training for the new model, or only a policy?
Reply to Brandon
Brandon, you were frank about your frustration that nursing assistants on your unit do not report vital signs promptly. Wong et al. (2025) reviewed 38 studies of teamwork between registered nurses and unlicensed assistive personnel and identified role clarity, delegation, communication, ward culture and interpersonal relationships as the key factors, noting that excluding assistive staff from shift handover undermined shared goals for patient care. I wonder whether your assistants are included in handover on your unit. If they hear which patients the nurses are worried about, they may understand why a set of vital signs matters. Paul encouraged believers to "outdo one another in showing honor" (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Romans 12:10), which might apply to how licensed and unlicensed staff treat each other. It may also help to tell assistants plainly which values must be reported right away and to thank them when they catch a change early, because people repeat what is noticed and appreciated. Could you try inviting the assistants to your next handover huddle?
References
De Pree, M. (2008). Leadership jazz: The essential elements of a great leader (Rev. ed.). Doubleday.
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Finkelman, A. (2016). Leadership and management for nurses: Core competencies for quality care (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Oscar, N., & Best, R. (2026). Leadership at the point of care: Developing charge nurses for complex healthcare environments. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 50(3), 147-151. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000760
Polancich, S., Dick, T., Ledlow, J., White-Williams, C., Chambers, A., Thomas, K., Poe, T., & Miltner, R. (2025). Implementing a care-based nursing workforce model: Implications for missed care, teamwork, and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 40(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000815
Wong, K. L., Chua, W. L., Griffiths, P., Goh, Q. L. P., Low, K. W. C., Tan, J. Q. A., & Liaw, S. Y. (2025). Teamwork between registered nurses and unlicensed assistive personnel in acute care settings: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 8, 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100293
What the NURS 489 Week 4 instructions ask
Forum 3 of NURS 489 is due in Module/Week 4, with De Pree's chapters 10 through 12, Finkelman's chapter 15, a presentation, two websites and the second group project benchmark. The thread must be at least 400 words, with its assertions backed by two or more APA-formatted citations. Each of the two replies must be at least 200 words, cite at least one source and incorporate one biblical reference. The guide accepts websites, textbooks, the Bible, journal articles and other texts as sources, but a peer-reviewed article strengthens a leadership argument considerably more than a general website does.
How this NURS 489 Week 4 example is built
The thread opens with the writer's first night as charge nurse, when she realized she had been prepared for the tasks but not for leading people. It uses Finkelman to describe the competencies frontline leaders need and De Pree to name what staff need from a leader. A recent account of a structured charge nurse development program shows what preparation can look like and what it changed. The thread ends with a proposal for the writer's own unit. One reply connects a classmate's post about a new care delivery model to research on teamwork and missed care; the other responds to a classmate's frustration with nursing assistants, using a review of RN and assistive personnel teamwork.
NURS 489 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go
Forums in NURS 489 are usually graded on the 400- and 200-word minimums, accurate use of the week's readings, at least two APA citations in the thread, one source and one biblical reference in each reply, application to the student's practice and substantive engagement with classmates. Faculty look for threads that apply leadership concepts to real situations and propose something, not only describe a problem. Biblical references should connect to the classmate's point. Replies that offer practical ideas supported by a source earn more credit than agreement. Because this is a leadership course, faculty also notice whether the writer reflects honestly on her own growth as a leader and whether the proposal could realistically be carried out on a busy unit.
NURS 489 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points
Start with a leadership moment from your own practice, especially one where you felt unprepared or saw someone else struggle. Use the week's textbook chapters to name what was missing and a recent article to show what better preparation or practice looks like. End with a specific proposal. In replies, find something concrete in the classmate's post to build on, add a source and choose a verse that speaks to their situation, explaining the connection briefly. Count words before posting, since the thread must pass 400 and each reply 200, and a reply that reads well at 180 words still falls short. An early thread gives your peers more chances to answer it before Monday night.
Related NURS 489 sample papers
Other NURS 489 weeks
- NURS 489 Week 3: Servant Leader Interview
- NURS 489 Week 5: Nursing Peer Interviews
- NURS 489 Week 6: Discussion Board Forum 4
- NURS 489 Week 7: Discussion Board Forum 5
- NURS 489 Week 8: Group Project PowerPoint
More BSN sample papers
- NURS 325 Week 4: Nursing Mentor Outline
- NURS 440 Week 4: Community Assessment Part 2
- NURS 445 Week 4: Discussion Board Forum 3
- NURS 491 Week 4: Discussion Board Forum 3
NURS 489 Week 4 questions, answered
What is NURS 489 Discussion Board Forum 3?
The third forum in Liberty's RN-to-BSN leadership course, worth 75 points in Module/Week 4: a 400-word thread with two citations and two 200-word replies, each with a source and a Bible verse.
Where can I find a free NURS 489 Week 4 sample paper?
This page shows a complete NURS 489 Week 4 forum thread on preparing charge nurses as frontline leaders, with two replies, free to read.
Why do charge nurses need leadership training?
Charge nurses lead teams through staffing, conflict and emergencies, yet many take the role without preparation; structured programs improve confidence, communication and conflict resolution.
What sources can be used in NURS 489 forums?
The guide accepts websites, textbooks, the Bible, journal articles and other texts, with at least two citations in each thread and one source plus a biblical reference in each reply.
What is a frontline nurse leader?
A nurse who leads at the point of care, such as a charge nurse, team leader or preceptor, coordinating care and supporting staff during a shift, often without a management title.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom NURS 489 Week 4 sample · All NURS 489 weeks · All courses