| Course | NURS 440 Post-licensure Strategies for Community Health Care (NURS440) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 3 |
| Assignment | Epidemiology Case Study |
| Paper type | Two-part epidemiology case study |
| Length | about 712 words, 3 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a two-part epidemiology case study completed in Module/Week 3, with at least 2 citations published within the last 5 years in current APA format |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 75 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BSN |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 3 in Liberty's published NURS 440 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 440 Week 3
Epidemiology Case Study: Investigating a Gastroenteritis Outbreak After a Church Fellowship Dinner
[Student Name]
School of Nursing, Liberty University
NURS 440: Post-licensure Strategies for Community Health Care
Epidemiology Case Study
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The outbreak, the church and all case data are invented for this case study; the textbook and the surveillance sources cited are real.
Epidemiology Case Study: Investigating a Gastroenteritis Outbreak After a Church Fellowship Dinner
Part 1: Descriptive Epidemiology
On a Monday in February, two families phoned the local health district to report vomiting and diarrhea that began after a church's Saturday evening fellowship dinner. Sixty-four people attended, and the church provided a list of attendees. Maurer and Smith (2013) describe outbreak investigation as beginning with confirmation of the outbreak and a clear case definition, followed by a systematic description of cases.
Case definition: A person who attended the church dinner on Saturday and developed vomiting or three or more loose stools within 72 hours afterward.
All 64 attendees were interviewed by phone with a standard questionnaire covering symptoms, onset time and foods eaten. Thirty-one people met the case definition.
Person: Cases ranged in age from 6 to 81 years, with no clear difference by sex. Most cases reported vomiting (84%), diarrhea (77%) and nausea; fewer reported low-grade fever. Illness lasted 24 to 48 hours. Two older adults visited an emergency department for dehydration, and none was admitted.
Place: All cases attended the dinner; no illness was reported among church members who did not attend.
Time: Onsets began about 18 hours after the meal, rose to a peak between 30 and 36 hours and ended by 54 hours. The epidemic curve showed a single peak with a rapid rise and fall, the signature of a single shared exposure at one meal. Three later cases among household members of ill attendees appeared after the main peak and were excluded under the case definition but noted as possible secondary spread.
Part 2: Analytic Epidemiology
The overall attack rate was 31 ill out of 64 attendees, or 48.4%. Food-specific attack rates were calculated for each dish served.
| Food | Ate: ill / total (attack rate) | Did not eat: ill / total (attack rate) | Relative risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken salad | 27 / 36 (75.0%) | 4 / 28 (14.3%) | 5.25 |
| Green beans | 20 / 40 (50.0%) | 11 / 24 (45.8%) | 1.09 |
| Dinner rolls | 24 / 50 (48.0%) | 7 / 14 (50.0%) | 0.96 |
| Banana pudding | 16 / 30 (53.3%) | 15 / 34 (44.1%) | 1.21 |
For chicken salad, the attack rate among those who ate it was 27 divided by 36, or 75.0%, and among those who did not eat it, 4 divided by 28, or 14.3%. The relative risk is 75.0 divided by 14.3, or about 5.25: illness was roughly five times more common among those who had chicken salad than among those who skipped it. The other three dishes had relative risks close to 1, meaning illness was about as common whether or not people ate them. The four ill people who did not report eating chicken salad may have misremembered what they ate or taken a spoonful without noticing, a common problem with food histories, or may have been infected another way, such as by contact with ill people or contaminated serving utensils.
The agent is most likely norovirus. The incubation period of roughly 18 to 54 hours, the predominance of vomiting, the short illness and the February timing all fit. National surveillance shows that norovirus outbreaks in the United States follow a winter season, generally from October to May (Kambhampati et al., 2023). Stool testing of three ill attendees was requested to confirm the agent. Laboratory confirmation matters because other agents, such as some bacterial toxins, can cause similar outbreaks with shorter incubation periods, and the control measures differ.
How did the salad become contaminated? The volunteer who prepared it reported vomiting on the Thursday before the dinner and felt well by Friday, when she cooked. Holst et al. (2025), analyzing 2,677 foodborne outbreaks reported nationally from 2014 to 2022 with contributing factor data, found that contamination factors, problems that allow pathogens to get into food, were present in more than 80% of outbreaks in each period studied. A recently ill food handler preparing a dish that is not cooked after handling is a classic contamination pathway.
Control and Prevention
Immediate measures include advising ill people to stay home until 48 hours after symptoms resolve, teaching thorough handwashing with soap and water, since alcohol gel is less effective against norovirus, and cleaning surfaces in the church kitchen with a bleach-based disinfectant. For prevention, the community health nurse can work with the church to adopt a simple food safety policy: no one prepares food for church events within 48 hours of vomiting or diarrhea, gloves and utensils are used for ready-to-eat foods and handwashing supplies are stocked at every event. The nurse can also offer a short food safety talk for the church's kitchen volunteers before the next fellowship dinner. The relative risk pointed to a salad, but the prevention plan has to reach the person who made it and every volunteer who will cook next.
References
Holst, M. M., Wittry, B. C., Crisp, C., Torres, J., Irving, D. J., & Nicholas, D. (2025). Contributing factors of foodborne illness outbreaks: National Outbreak Reporting System, United States, 2014-2022. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 74(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7401a1
Kambhampati, A. K., Calderwood, L., Wikswo, M. E., Barclay, L., Mattison, C. P., Balachandran, N., Vinjé, J., Hall, A. J., & Mirza, S. A. (2023). Spatiotemporal trends in norovirus outbreaks in the United States, 2009-2019. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 76(4), 667-673. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac627
Maurer, F. A., & Smith, C. M. (2013). Community/public health nursing practice: Health for families and populations (5th ed.). Elsevier Saunders.
What the NURS 440 Week 3 instructions ask
NURS 440 schedules the Epidemiology Case Study for Module/Week 3, with Maurer and Smith's chapters 7 through 9 and the individual slides for the cultural group project. Students review and complete a two-part case study supplied in the course, and it must cite at least two works published in the past five years, in APA style. The course's own case provides the data, so this sample builds a parallel outbreak to show the method: how to define cases, calculate rates, compare exposed and unexposed groups and turn the numbers into public health action. Show every calculation, since faculty grade the reasoning as well as the answer, and state each conclusion in plain words a church committee or school board could understand.
How this NURS 440 Week 3 example is built
The sample follows the two-part structure of an outbreak investigation. Part 1 describes the situation, states a case definition, summarizes the line list and describes the outbreak by person, place and time, including the shape of the epidemic curve and what it implies. Part 2 calculates the overall attack rate and food-specific attack rates in a table, computes relative risks, identifies the food most strongly associated with illness and reasons about the agent from incubation period and symptoms. It closes with control and prevention measures and the community health nurse's role, citing recent national surveillance reports.
NURS 440 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go
Epidemiology case studies are generally graded on a clear case definition, accurate calculations shown step by step, correct use of terms such as attack rate and relative risk, sound interpretation of the epidemic curve and the food-specific data, reasonable conclusions about the source and agent, appropriate control measures and at least two recent citations in APA format. Faculty notice when calculations are correct but unexplained, or when a relative risk is interpreted without noting that the exposed group must be compared with the unexposed. Recognizing limitations, such as recall bias in food histories, shows epidemiological judgment. Control measures that fit the setting, written so the people involved can follow them, show the community health nursing perspective the course emphasizes.
NURS 440 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points
Read the whole case before calculating anything, and write your case definition first, including time, place and symptoms. Build a simple table for food-specific attack rates with columns for ate and did not eat, and calculate each rate before computing relative risks. A relative risk well above 1 with a large difference in attack rates points to the likely source. Use incubation period and symptoms to reason about the agent. Then move from numbers to action: what should be done now and what would prevent the next outbreak? Cite recent surveillance reports for context, and acknowledge limits such as recall bias in what people say they ate.
Related NURS 440 sample papers
Other NURS 440 weeks
- NURS 440 Week 1: Discussion Board Forum 1
- NURS 440 Week 2: Windshield Survey
- NURS 440 Week 4: Community Assessment Part 2
- NURS 440 Week 6: Health Education Program Part 2
- NURS 440 Week 7: Disaster Response PowerPoint
- NURS 440 Week 8: Patient Education Assessment
More BSN sample papers
- NURS 215 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 2
- NURS 220 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 1
- NURS 225 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 2
- NURS 325 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 3
NURS 440 Week 3 questions, answered
What is the NURS 440 Epidemiology Case Study?
Due in the third module/week for 75 points, it asks RN-to-BSN students to complete a two-part epidemiology case study, citing at least two sources from the last five years in APA format.
Where can I find a free NURS 440 Week 3 sample paper?
This page works a full NURS 440 Week 3 outbreak case study with attack rates, relative risks and control measures, free for students to read.
How do you calculate an attack rate?
Divide the number of people who became ill by the number of people exposed and multiply by 100; food-specific attack rates do this separately for those who ate and did not eat each food.
What does relative risk mean in an outbreak investigation?
The attack rate among people who ate a food divided by the attack rate among those who did not; a value well above 1 suggests the food is associated with illness.
Why is norovirus suspected in many outbreaks?
Norovirus causes sudden vomiting and diarrhea after about 12 to 48 hours, spreads easily from ill food handlers and surfaces and peaks from late fall to spring in the United States.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom NURS 440 Week 3 sample · All NURS 440 weeks · All courses