MGMT 651 Week 4 Agile Project Plan: Outline Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This MGMT 651 Week 4 sample is the Agile Project Plan outline, the 50-point first step toward the 16-page final plan in Liberty University MGMT 651, an agile course for project management master's students, prepared alongside chapters 6 and 7 of Gido and colleagues. The guide asks for a well-developed outline of one to two pages using at least three levels of headings. This sample outlines a plan for a federally qualified community health center that will build a mobile app to send appointment reminders in English and Spanish, let patients confirm or reschedule, and check them in for telehealth visits, over twelve two-week Scrum sprints. Its twelve first-level sections run from the product vision and Scrum roles through the backlog, release plan, estimation, quality, risk and communication to a biblical integration, each broken into second- and third-level points that name the sources the final plan will use.

CourseMGMT 651 Agile Project Management (MGMT651)
Module/Week4
AssignmentAgile Project Plan: Outline
Paper typeProject plan outline with three levels of headings
Lengthabout 281 words, 1 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: per the course guide, a well-developed 1-2-page outline of the Agile Project Plan with at least three levels of headings
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramMS in Project Management
Where it sitsModule/Week 4 in Liberty's published MGMT 651 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for MGMT 651 Week 4

1

Agile Project Plan Outline: A Community Health Center's Appointment Reminder and Telehealth Check-In App

 

[Student Name]

School of Business, Liberty University

MGMT 651: Agile Project Management

Agile Project Plan: Outline

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The health center and its app are composites standing in for the project a student plans; the sources named in the outline are real; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for MGMT 651.

2

Agile Project Plan Outline: A Community Health Center's Appointment Reminder and Telehealth Check-In App

Project Overview

Why this part earns its pointsThe overview gives the project's numbers first, so every later section can be planned against a concrete problem.
3

Organization and problem

  • Federally qualified health center, three clinics, 14,000 patients
  • No-show rate 22 percent; telehealth visits lost when patients cannot find the link
  • Grant funding for a twelve-month digital access project

Product vision

  • A bilingual app that reminds, confirms, reschedules and checks patients in for telehealth
  • Research on reminder effectiveness to support the business case

Agile Framework and Roles

Why Scrum

  • Changing requirements, close patient feedback, small team (Serrador & Pinto, 2015)

Roles

  • Product owner: director of patient access
  • Scrum master: the center's project manager
  • Developers: five-person contracted team (Schwaber & Sutherland, 2020)

Product Backlog

Epics

  • Reminders and confirmations; rescheduling; telehealth check-in; staff dashboard

User stories and acceptance criteria

  • Written with front desk staff and patient advisors (Cohn, 2004)

Nonfunctional requirements

  • Privacy, accessibility, Spanish translation, reading level

Release and Sprint Planning

Why this part earns its pointsReleases are tied to sprint numbers, which shows the twelve-sprint plan fits the grant's twelve months.
4

Release plan

  • Release 1 after sprint 4: text reminders and confirmations
  • Release 2 after sprint 8: rescheduling and check-in
  • Release 3 after sprint 12: dashboard and refinements

Sprint cadence

  • Two-week sprints; planning, daily scrum, review with patients, retrospective

Estimation and Velocity

Estimating stories

  • Story points and planning poker

Forecasting

  • Velocity from the first three sprints; release burn-up chart

Quality and Definition of Done

Definition of done

  • Tested by two patient advisors; translated; privacy review

Measures

  • No-show rate, telehealth start success, patient satisfaction

Risk Management

Main risks

  • Integration with the scheduling system; patient phone access; staff adoption

Responses and owners

  • Early integration spike; text fallback; front desk champions (Gido et al., 2018)

Team, Stakeholders and Communication

Stakeholders

  • Patients, front desk staff, clinicians, grant funder, board

Communication

  • Sprint reviews open to staff; monthly board summary; grant reports

Budget and Schedule Constraints

Grant limits

  • Twelve months; fixed budget; quarterly funder reports

Biblical Integration

Service to the vulnerable

  • Care for neighbors who face barriers to care; stewardship of grant funds

Conclusion

Summary of the plan and expected outcomes

  • Lower no-shows, more completed telehealth visits, a model for other clinics
Why this part earns its pointsThe closing section restates the expected outcomes, which the final plan's measures will be built to test.
5

References to Develop

  • Fifteen or more sources beyond the textbook and the Bible, including agile research, reminder studies and health equity research. Each section of the final plan will be written from the points above, so the outline is already the plan's argument in miniature.
6

References

Cohn, M. (2004). User stories applied: For agile software development. Addison-Wesley.

Gido, J., Clements, J., & Baker, R. (2018). Successful project management (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). The Scrum guide: The definitive guide to Scrum: The rules of the game. https://scrumguides.org/

Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006

What the MGMT 651 Week 4 instructions ask

Worth 50 points, the outline comes due in the fourth module of MGMT 651, together with Forum 4 and the week's Mindtap quiz, while the course reads chapters 6 and 7 of Gido and colleagues. The guide's instructions are short: write a one-to-two-page outline of the Agile Project Plan, and make it well developed, with at least three levels of headings. The outline is the plan's skeleton, and the final plan, due in Module/Week 7, must run sixteen pages with fifteen or more references besides Gido and colleagues and Scripture. A strong outline therefore does more than list section titles; it states what each section will argue, names the sources it will draw on, and shows that the project is defined clearly enough to plan in agile terms.

How this MGMT 651 Week 4 example is built

The outline begins with the project: a community health center with 14,000 patients, a no-show rate of 22 percent and a telehealth program that loses visits when patients cannot find the link. Twelve first-level sections follow, arranged as the sixteen-page plan will be. Each first-level heading carries second-level subsections, and each subsection lists third-level points, such as the product goal, the definition of done, story point estimates and release dates. Sources appear beside the points they support: the Scrum Guide for roles and events, Cohn for user stories, Serrador and Pinto for the case for agile, and research on reminders and no-shows for the business case. A short note on scope confirms that twelve sprints fit the grant's timeline.

MGMT 651 Week 4 grading rubric: where the points go

Graders ask first whether the outline is well developed and uses at least three levels of headings, as the guide requires, and on whether it lays a sound foundation for the final plan. Graders look for a logical structure that covers the parts of an agile plan, vision, roles, backlog, release and sprint planning, estimation, quality, risk and communication, and for points specific enough to show what each section will contain. Naming sources beside points shows that the research for the final plan has begun. Consistent heading levels in APA style, a length within one to two pages, and alignment with the course's agile concepts and terms complete the evaluation of this 50-point assignment.

MGMT 651 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost points

The most common weakness is an outline of single-word headings that could belong to any project. Make each heading and point specific to your project, with numbers where you have them, such as the sprint length, team size or target no-show rate. Use three levels consistently: sections, subsections and points. Plan the order of the final paper now, since the outline is its table of contents. Start gathering the fifteen references the final plan needs and place them in the outline where they will be used. Keep the outline within two pages by writing points as phrases, not sentences. Finally, check that the project is small enough to plan in sprints and large enough to fill sixteen pages.

Related MGMT 651 sample papers

Other MGMT 651 weeks

More MS in Project Management sample papers

MGMT 651 Week 4 questions, answered

What is the MGMT 651 Agile Project Plan outline?

It is a 50-point Module/Week 4 assignment: a well-developed one-to-two-page outline of the final Agile Project Plan, with at least three levels of headings.

Where can I find a free MGMT 651 Week 4 sample paper?

A complete MGMT 651 Week 4 outline for an agile plan to build a community health center's appointment reminder and telehealth check-in app is published here.

How long is the MGMT 651 Agile Project Plan?

Submitted in the seventh module for 200 points, the final plan runs sixteen pages and needs fifteen or more sources beyond the textbook and Scripture.

What should an agile project plan include?

Usually the product vision and goal, Scrum or other agile roles, the product backlog, release and sprint plans, estimation, a definition of done, risks, communication and stakeholder engagement.

What are three levels of headings in an outline?

First-level headings name the major sections, second-level headings divide each section into subsections, and third-level points sit beneath those, all kept in one consistent style.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Ask for a custom MGMT 651 Week 4 sample · All MGMT 651 weeks · All courses