BUSI 815 Week 8 Qualitative Data Analysis Assignment Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 815 Week 8 sample is the Qualitative Data Analysis Assignment, the largest graded paper in Liberty University BUSI 815, worth 150 points in the DBA course's final week. Read with Creswell and Poth's chapters on writing a qualitative study and turning the story, and Yin's chapter on reporting, it analyzes three composite interview transcripts of the kind students produce in the Module/Week 6 Interview Transcript Assignment. Each interview is with a successor who took over a parent's manufacturing firm. The paper follows Creswell and Poth's data analysis spiral: managing and reading the data, memoing, coding into 21 initial codes, grouping them into categories and developing three themes tracing how successors stop leaning on a parent's name and start being obeyed in their own. A codebook table, quotations, a negative case and a reflexive note complete the analysis.

CourseBUSI 815 Qualitative Research Methods (BUSI815)
Module/Week8
AssignmentQualitative Data Analysis Assignment
Paper typeQualitative data analysis paper
Lengthabout 1,145 words, 4 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: the course guide places the assignment's length, prompts and rubric inside the course; this sample is about 1,150 words of body text plus a codebook table in current APA format, analyzing three interview transcripts from codes to themes
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points150
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramDBA
Where it sitsModule/Week 8 in Liberty's published BUSI 815 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 815 Week 8

1

From Transcript to Themes: A Qualitative Analysis of Three Successor Interviews on Earning Authority in Family Firms

 

[Student Name]

School of Business, Liberty University

BUSI 815: Qualitative Research Methods

Qualitative Data Analysis Assignment

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The interview transcripts, participants and quotations are composites standing in for the student's own Interview Transcript Assignment data; the books are real; the week, points and readings follow Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 815, which places the assignment's detailed instructions inside the course.

Why this part earns its pointsThe data section states what was analyzed and how it was prepared, which readers need before they can judge any theme.
2

From Transcript to Themes: A Qualitative Analysis of Three Successor Interviews on Earning Authority in Family Firms

The Data

This analysis uses three semi-structured interviews with second-generation successors, conducted for the Interview Transcript Assignment and transcribed verbatim. Participant A, 41, has run the machining business her father started, now about 60 people, for three years. Participant B, 38, took over his mother's commercial bakery, which employs 140 people, two years ago. Participant C, 46, has led his father's 35-employee plastics molding firm for four years. Interviews lasted 62, 80 and 71 minutes and were guided by one opening question, "Tell me how you came to lead the company," followed by prompts about specific moments. Transcripts totaled about 31,000 words. Names, places and identifying details have been changed. The analysis was guided by the research question developed in the literature review: what is it like, for a child running a small manufacturer founded by a parent, to receive that parent's authority? Each transcript was read with that question in mind, though coding remained open to topics participants raised themselves, such as Participant B's account of the firm's relationship with its union.

Procedure

Analysis followed the data analysis spiral Creswell and Poth (2018) describe, in which the researcher moves in analytic circles rather than in a fixed linear sequence. Transcripts were first organized into files and read in full twice without coding, with memos recorded in the margins on first impressions. A memo after the first reading of Participant A noted that she referred to her father by name, not as "Dad," every time she described a decision, a habit that seemed to mark a boundary between family and firm.

Initial coding then proceeded line by line, using short labels drawn as closely as possible from participants' own words. The three transcripts produced 21 initial codes, among them "using Dad's name," "the floor testing me," "the bank called me," "the fire," "keeping his desk" and "my own way." Codes were compared across transcripts, and those with similar meanings were grouped into seven categories. The categories were then examined for their relationships, and three themes were developed that together describe how participants experienced the movement of authority. Throughout, memos recorded decisions about merging, splitting or renaming codes, forming an audit trail. Yin (2018) emphasizes that a report should allow readers to follow the chain of evidence from data to conclusion, and the codebook below is designed to do that.

Why this part earns its pointsThe codebook is explained in prose as well as shown, because the table alone does not show the reasoning.
3

Codebook

Table 1 presents the three themes with their categories, definitions and an example quotation for each.

ThemeCategoriesDefinitionExample quotation
Borrowing the founder's nameInvoking the parent; deferring in public; private disagreementSuccessor exercises authority by attaching decisions to the parent's approval"I'd say, 'Dad and I talked about it,' even when we hadn't." (A)
The unplanned testCrisis without the parent; being watched; acting aloneAn unplanned event forces the successor to decide without the parent, in view of employees"When the oven line went down at two in the morning, there was nobody to call." (B)
Recognition from outsideCustomers calling first; lenders and suppliersPeople outside the family treat the successor as the decision maker, signaling the change to insiders"The day the bank called me instead of him, I felt it." (C)

The first theme gathers three categories that describe the early period after the formal transfer. The second gathers categories about a turning point. The third describes how recognition arrived from outside the firm and was then carried inside.

Findings

Theme 1: Borrowing the Founder's Name

All three participants described an early period in which their authority depended on their parent's name. Participant A said she would tell machinists that her father agreed with a decision "even when we hadn't talked," because "they would take it from him and not from me." Participant C described letting his father announce a price increase he had designed. The category of private disagreement captures what made this period painful: participants often disagreed with their parents but could not say so publicly without weakening the authority they were borrowing.

Theme 2: The Unplanned Test

Two participants identified a single unplanned event as the moment their authority changed. For Participant B, it was an oven line failure in the middle of the night, when her mother could not be reached and she decided to reroute production to a second line and call in a maintenance contractor. "The next morning nobody asked what my mother thought," she said. For Participant A, it was a fire in a grinding cell. Neither participant chose the moment that changed everything; it arrived as an emergency and passed as a test. Both described being watched as they decided, and both described the decision as acting alone for the first time.

Theme 3: Recognition from Outside

The third theme concerns how outsiders' recognition preceded and helped produce insiders' acceptance. Participant C described the day his father's longtime banker called him rather than his father about a credit line. Participant A described a major customer who began sending engineering changes to her directly. In each case, participants said, employees noticed and began to treat the outsider's choice as a signal.

Why this part earns its pointsReporting the case that does not fit, and revising the theme to account for it, is what makes the other findings credible.
4

A Negative Case

Participant C did not describe an unplanned test. His father retired on a planned date, left the building and declined to take calls about the business. C's account moved directly from borrowing his father's name to recognition from the bank, with no crisis between. This case suggests that the unplanned test may matter mainly when the founder remains present or available, and that a clean exit can do the work a crisis does in other firms. Rather than dropping the theme, the analysis revises it: the test appears to be one route to earned authority, not the only one.

Relating the Themes to the Literature

The themes both confirm and extend the succession research reviewed earlier in the course. For Handler (1990), succession is a slow exchange of roles, the founder giving ground as the successor takes it, and the theme of borrowing the founder's name fits the middle stages of that model, when the successor acts as a manager while the parent still holds symbolic authority. What the model does not describe is how the adjustment completes. These interviews suggest an answer: authority shifts not only through the parent's gradual withdrawal but through events and outside recognition that the family does not control. The theme of recognition from outside also fits the argument that a firm's edge lies in what its founder knows (Cabrera-Suárez et al., 2001), since customers and lenders appear to grant recognition once successors show command of the relational knowledge those outsiders once associated with the founder. These links are tentative, but they give the dissertation specific propositions to examine.

Trustworthiness and Limitations

Several strategies Creswell and Poth (2018) describe support the analysis. Codes stayed close to participants' language, memos formed an audit trail, and the negative case was reported and used to refine a theme. Member checking will be completed by sending each participant a summary of the themes. The researcher's background in a family firm made the theme of borrowed authority especially familiar, and a memo was written to examine whether that familiarity led to over-coding; a second reading of the transcripts found the category supported in all three. The main limitation is the small number of interviews, which allows the themes to be treated only as tentative patterns to be explored in the dissertation.

Conclusion

The analysis suggests that successors in these firms experienced authority as moving from a borrowed name, through an unplanned test or a clean exit, to recognition that began outside the firm. These tentative themes connect the course's methods to the dissertation: they will inform the propositions and interview protocol for a multiple-case study, and the negative case points to the founder's mode of exit as a variable worth selecting cases on.

5

References

Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saá-Pérez, P., & García-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Handler, W. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879001500105

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

What the BUSI 815 Week 8 instructions ask

The Qualitative Data Analysis Assignment is due in the final week, Module/Week 8, carrying 150 points, a larger share than any other single task in BUSI 815; Discussion Board Forum 6, worth 50, is due the same week, which closes on Friday. The reading is Creswell and Poth chapters 9 and 11 and Yin's sixth chapter, and a presentation. Students will find the analysis assignment's actual instructions and scoring only inside the course, since the public guide merely lists it. Because the Interview Transcript Assignment in Module/Week 6 asked students to produce transcript data, the final assignment typically asks them to analyze it, showing that they can move from raw text to codes, categories and themes and report findings with evidence.

How this BUSI 815 Week 8 example is built

The paper opens by describing the data: three interviews of 60 to 80 minutes with successors in a machining shop, a commercial bakery and a plastics molder, transcribed verbatim. It explains the analysis procedure step by step, following Creswell and Poth's spiral, with reading and memoing, initial coding, focused coding into categories and theme development. A codebook table lists the three themes, their categories, definitions and example quotations. Findings follow, each theme voiced by at least two of the three successors: borrowing the founder's name, the unplanned test and recognition from outside. A negative case from the bakery successor is reported and explained. The paper closes with trustworthiness, limitations and what the themes suggest for the dissertation.

BUSI 815 Week 8 grading rubric: where the points go

The analysis assignment is graded on rigor and transparency. Readers look for a clear description of the data and the procedure, codes that stay close to participants' words, categories and themes that follow logically from the codes, and findings supported by quotations from several participants. A codebook or data display shows the path from data to themes. Reporting a negative case and the researcher's reflexive position demonstrates honesty about the limits of the analysis. Writing should follow Creswell and Poth's guidance on representing findings and Yin's on reporting. Accuracy in describing methods and current APA format are expected. The rubric posted inside the course sets the required elements and length.

BUSI 815 Week 8 help: mistakes that cost points

Analysis papers lose points when themes appear without a visible path from the data. Describe each step you took, in order, and show at least one example of a code becoming a category and a category becoming a theme. Keep initial codes close to participants' language. Use quotations from more than one participant for each theme, and keep them short. Look actively for a case that does not fit and report it, because it strengthens rather than weakens your findings. Include a codebook or table, but explain it in prose. State how your own background shaped what you noticed. Finally, link the themes back to your research question so the reader sees what the analysis has answered.

Related BUSI 815 sample papers

Other BUSI 815 weeks

More DBA sample papers

BUSI 815 Week 8 questions, answered

What is the BUSI 815 Qualitative Data Analysis Assignment?

The 150-point paper due in the final week, Module/Week 8, in which students analyze interview data, typically from their own transcript assignment, into codes, categories and themes.

Where can I find a free BUSI 815 Week 8 sample paper?

Read a finished BUSI 815 Week 8 analysis here: of three successor interviews, with a codebook, three themes, a negative case and trustworthiness measures.

What is Creswell and Poth's data analysis spiral?

A set of overlapping activities rather than fixed steps: managing and organizing data, reading and memoing, describing and classifying codes into themes, developing and assessing interpretations, and representing the data.

What is a codebook in qualitative analysis?

A table listing each code or theme with its definition, inclusion criteria and example quotations, which keeps coding consistent and lets readers see how themes were built.

What else is due in BUSI 815 Module/Week 8?

Discussion Board Forum 6, worth 50 points, with Creswell and Poth chapters 9 and 11, Yin chapter 6 and one presentation; the final week ends on Friday.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.