BUSI 570 Week 8 Group DB Forum 4 Replies Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 570 Week 8 sample holds the course's last two forum replies, answering group members' Forum 4 threads on leading with values. The first reply adds structure to a classmate's call for authentic leadership, using Avolio and Gardner's account of how authentic leaders develop and Walumbwa and colleagues' four-part measure, which predicted followers' attitudes beyond what ethical and transformational leadership explained. The second supports a classmate's argument that leaders must model forgiveness after a downsizing, with Cameron and Caza's work on forgiveness as an organizational virtue and Aquino, Tripp and Bies's evidence that a fair procedural climate makes forgiveness more likely than revenge, plus Colossians 3:13. Liberty University BUSI 570 awards 60 points for these MBA replies.

CourseBUSI 570 Ethical Leadership (BUSI570)
Module/Week8
AssignmentGroup DB Forum 4 Replies
Paper typeTwo discussion replies
Lengthabout 453 words (thread and replies). Course guide: replies of 200 words to 2 classmates' threads, each supported by 2 scholarly sources
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points60
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramMBA
Where it sitsModule/Week 8 in Liberty's published BUSI 570 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 570 Week 8

1

Group Discussion Board Forum 4: Replies

BUSI 570 Ethical Leadership, Group Discussion Board Forum 4: Replies

Thread by [Student Name]

The two group members and their threads are composites; the research and Scripture cited are real, and the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 570.

Reply to Priscilla

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply turns a general virtue into components a company could assess and develop.
2

Priscilla, your thread argued that authenticity is the root of every other leadership virtue, because followers can tell when a leader's stated values are a performance. I agree, and research offers a way to make authenticity something an organization can develop rather than merely admire. In the view of Avolio and Gardner (2005), authenticity sits underneath servant, transformational and ethical leadership alike, and it is developed rather than inborn, growing as leaders reflect honestly on their own experiences, including failures, and learn to regulate their behavior by their values. Walumbwa et al. (2008) then built and validated a measure across samples from China, Kenya and the United States, identifying four components: knowing one's own strengths and limits, openness in relationships, acting from inner moral standards rather than outside pressure, and giving contrary evidence a fair hearing before making up one's mind. Their measure predicted followers' attitudes and behavior beyond what ethical and transformational leadership explained. For your company, a 360-degree review built around those four components could show managers where their teams see a gap between their words and actions. The value of such a review depends on what follows it: managers would need coaching and time to act on what they learn, or the exercise would itself become a performance. Which of the four do you think your managers would find hardest to hear feedback on?

Reply to Terrence

Why this part earns its pointsThe reply supports the classmate with research on when forgiveness becomes possible, then applies Scripture to the leader's own role.
3

Terrence, your thread made a moving case that leaders must model forgiveness after a downsizing, both forgiving employees who criticized the decision and seeking forgiveness from those who were hurt by it. Cameron and Caza (2002) argued that forgiveness is an organizational virtue that helps organizations recover from injury and trauma such as downsizing, and that leaders play a central role by demonstrating it themselves. Aquino et al. (2006) studied how employees respond to being wronged and found that a climate of procedural justice shaped the response: where procedures were seen as fair, employees with status were more likely to forgive and reconcile, while in unfair climates offenses were more likely to lead to revenge. That finding suggests forgiveness cannot simply be requested; leaders have to build the fairness that makes it possible. Paul told the Colossians to bear with one another and forgive as the Lord had forgiven them (Colossians 3:13). For your company, explaining the layoff criteria openly and giving departing employees a fair process might do more to encourage forgiveness than any statement from the chief executive. Leaders can also model the second half of your argument by acknowledging mistakes in how the downsizing was handled, which makes it easier for others to let go of their own grievances. What did the company in your example communicate about how layoff decisions were made?

4

References

Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 653-668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.653

Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001

Cameron, K., & Caza, A. (2002). Organizational and leadership virtues and the role of forgiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900103

Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913

What the BUSI 570 Week 8 instructions ask

The final forum replies are due in Module/Week 8 of BUSI 570, the last week of the course, along with the week's Rae and Wong readings, a presentation and the full ethics journal, which is submitted for 100 points. Each student writes about 200 words to each of two group members' Forum 4 threads, citing two scholarly sources in each reply, and the pair is worth 60 points. Because Forum 4 follows chapter 9 of Hess and Cameron and the group presentations, members' threads often draw on the whole course, and replies can do the same, connecting a classmate's point to the positive organizational research and the Judeo-Christian ethics studied across the eight weeks.

How this BUSI 570 Week 8 example is built

The first reply affirms a classmate's view that authenticity is the root of ethical leadership and then makes the idea measurable with Walumbwa and colleagues' four components and Avolio and Gardner's emphasis on development through self-awareness, suggesting that the classmate's company use a 360-degree assessment built on those components. The second reply supports a classmate's argument that leaders should model forgiveness after layoffs, explains Cameron and Caza's view of forgiveness as a virtue that restores organizations after injury and reports Aquino, Tripp and Bies's finding that procedural justice climate determines whether employees respond to offenses with revenge or reconciliation. It applies Colossians 3:13 and ends with a practical suggestion.

BUSI 570 Week 8 grading rubric: where the points go

As in earlier forums, the final replies are graded on the 200-word length, two scholarly sources apiece and engagement with each classmate's argument through accurate course concepts. Instructors look for terms such as authentic leadership, relational transparency, internalized moral perspective, forgiveness, procedural justice and organizational virtue used correctly, and for a reply that leaves the classmate with a practical step or a question. Because this is the last forum, replies that tie a classmate's point to the course's broader themes, values embedded in practice and Scripture shaping organizational life, show the integration the course aims for. Every source cited needs an APA reference entry.

BUSI 570 Week 8 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose threads where research can turn a general claim into something a leader could practice or measure. Introduce each study by what it examined and found, in a sentence. Connect the finding to the classmate's example, and finish with a question or a concrete suggestion. Keep each reply near 200 words. Before submitting your ethics journal this week, reread the early entries; seeing how your answers changed over eight weeks is part of what the journal is designed to show. Proofread your references, since this is the last APA work of the course. If a classmate's thread draws on the group presentation, refer to it by name, since connecting the forum to the group's own work shows that the course material is being integrated rather than repeated.

Related BUSI 570 sample papers

Other BUSI 570 weeks

More MBA sample papers

BUSI 570 Week 8 questions, answered

What are the BUSI 570 Group Discussion Board Forum 4 replies?

The last forum assignment of the course: in Module/Week 8, students post two 200-word responses for 60 points, and every response must cite a pair of scholarly works.

Where can I find a free BUSI 570 Week 8 sample paper?

The final pair of BUSI 570 replies, written for Module/Week 8, is published on this page: one on authentic leadership and one on how leaders model forgiveness after a downsizing.

What is authentic leadership?

Leadership grounded in knowing oneself, being open with others, acting on one's own moral convictions and weighing other views fairly; researchers measure it with the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire.

Can forgiveness be an organizational virtue?

Research on organizational virtues treats forgiveness as a way organizations recover from injury such as downsizing, and studies find that employees are more likely to forgive than seek revenge when procedures are seen as fair.

What else is due in BUSI 570 Module/Week 8?

The complete ethics journal, worth 100 points, is submitted this week along with the final Rae and Wong readings and a presentation.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.