BUSI 464 Week 5 Research Paper: Outline Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 464 Week 5 sample paper is the Research Paper: Outline, the second graded checkpoint before the 10- to 15-page term paper on the world's trade blocs and the process of gaining membership in one. It turns the Week 3 annotated bibliography into a working plan: a thesis that membership pays when an agreement is deep and its entry terms are credible, six main sections with the claim each will make, the evidence assigned to each claim, and a planned length for every section so the draft lands inside the page range. A comparison of joining the European Union with joining a free trade area such as the Pacific-wide CPTPP gives the paper its spine. Liberty University BUSI 464 scores the outline at 50 points, due with Forum 5 in the week the BS in Business Administration course reaches Europe.

CourseBUSI 464 International Market Integration and Trade Agreements (BUSI464)
Module/Week5
AssignmentResearch Paper: Outline
Paper typeResearch paper outline
Lengthabout 701 words, 3 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: an outline of the 10- to 15-page research paper on regional trade agreements around the world and the process for joining them, building on the annotated bibliography, in current APA format
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 5 in Liberty's published BUSI 464 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 464 Week 5

1

Joining the Club: An Outline for a Research Paper on Regional Trade Agreements and Accession

 

[Student Name]

School of Business, Liberty University

BUSI 464: International Market Integration and Trade Agreements

Research Paper: Outline

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The structure follows Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 464; every source listed is real and checkable.

2

Joining the Club: An Outline for a Research Paper on Regional Trade Agreements and Accession

Working Title, Question and Thesis

Why this part earns its pointsThe thesis answers the research question in one sentence, so every section can be tested against it.
3

Working title: Joining the Club: What Regional Trade Agreements Offer and What Membership Demands

Research question (refined after the bibliography): Across the world's regions, what benefits do trade agreements deliver to members, and what price in reform and sovereignty does a newcomer pay to share in them?

Thesis: Joining a regional trade agreement pays most when the agreement is deep and its entry terms are clear and credible, because those conditions both raise trade and push the reforms that make membership worth having.

Outline

Why this part earns its pointsEach main point is written as a claim, with its evidence and source named beneath it.
4

I. Introduction (1 page)

  • Regional trade agreements now number in the hundreds, and nearly every country belongs to at least one (Lynch, 2010).
  • The paper asks what these agreements do and what joining one requires, and argues the thesis above.
  • Roadmap: background, effects, regional survey, two accession routes, lessons.

II. Background: Why Agreements Exist and Spread (2 pages)

  • Claim: Countries sign agreements both to gain market access and to avoid being left out when neighbors sign.
  • Evidence: the post-Cold War wave of agreements and its political drivers (Mansfield & Milner, 1999); the contagion of agreements as excluded exporters pressure their governments (Baldwin & Jaimovich, 2012).
  • Key terms defined early, including the difference between new trade and trade merely rerouted from outsiders, and whether regional deals help or hinder global liberalization (Freund & Ornelas, 2010).

III. What Agreements Do (2 pages)

  • Claim: On average agreements raise members' trade substantially, but the average hides wide differences.
  • Evidence: roughly a doubling of members' trade within a decade (Baier & Bergstrand, 2007); large variation across 296 agreements, with deeper and enforceable ones doing more (Kohl et al., 2016).
  • Evidence on design: agreements have grown deeper over time, adding services, investment and standards (Dür et al., 2014).

IV. A Survey of the Regions (3 pages)

  • Claim: Regions integrate in different ways, which changes what membership means.
  • Points, one paragraph each, drawn from the regional chapters in Lynch (2010): Africa's overlapping blocs and the continental free trade area; the Americas, from NAFTA and the USMCA to Mercosur; Asia's supply-chain-led integration; Europe's single market; the Eurasian Economic Union; the Gulf Cooperation Council and Arab agreements; and the Pacific Islands.
Why this part earns its pointsSection V carries the comparison that answers the second half of the research question.
5

V. Two Routes to Membership (3 pages)

  • Claim: Accession ranges from the demanding, conditional process of the European Union to the lighter, rules-based entry of a free trade area.
  • European Union: application, candidate status, negotiation chapter by chapter, adoption of EU law, ratification by every member; conditionality works when rewards are credible and costs manageable (Schimmelfennig & Sedelmeier, 2004).
  • Payoff: new members' incomes about 12 percent higher on average a decade after joining (Campos et al., 2019).
  • Free trade area: entry into the Trans-Pacific partnership through an accession working group, acceptance of existing commitments and market-access offers; the United Kingdom's accession, concluded in 2023, as the first completed case.

VI. Lessons for a Country Considering Membership (2 pages)

  • Claim: Membership is worth most when a country can meet the agreement's standards and its firms can actually use the preferences.
  • Example to develop: Mexico's experience under NAFTA, from Essay 1, shows large trade gains alongside uneven social effects, a reminder that membership's benefits depend on domestic policy as well as the treaty.
  • Example to develop: Poland's accession, from Essay 2, shows how credible entry terms drove reforms before membership and how emigration followed after it.
  • Points: depth matters more than the label; credible entry terms drive reform; firms must be able to use the rules, which argues for simple rules of origin.
  • Biblical integration: the treaty between Solomon and Hiram in 1 Kings 5 as an early trade agreement grounded in mutual benefit and kept in good faith.

VII. Conclusion (1 page)

  • Restate the thesis and the answer to each part of the research question.
  • Note limits: the paper relies on studies of average effects, and accession outside Europe has few completed cases to study.
  • Close with the practical answer for a policymaker: join deep agreements whose standards the country can meet, prepare firms to use the rules, and treat entry conditions as a reform program rather than a price to be minimized.

Planned Length and Sources

The section lengths total 14 pages before the title page and references, within the 10- to 15-page requirement. The paper will cite the nine sources from the annotated bibliography plus Lynch (2010) and the Bible, meeting the requirement of 6 to 8 references beyond the course texts. Feedback on the bibliography asked for a source on accession outside Europe; Section V will use the CPTPP's published accession process for that purpose.

6

References

Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005

Baldwin, R., & Jaimovich, D. (2012). Are free trade agreements contagious? Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.03.009

Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., & Moretti, L. (2019). Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics, 103, 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.08.001

Dür, A., Baccini, L., & Elsig, M. (2014). The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. The Review of International Organizations, 9(3), 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-013-9179-8

Freund, C., & Ornelas, E. (2010). Regional trade agreements. Annual Review of Economics, 2, 139-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124455

Kohl, T., Brakman, S., & Garretsen, H. (2016). Do trade agreements stimulate international trade differently? Evidence from 296 trade agreements. The World Economy, 39(1), 97-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12272

Lynch, D. A. (2010). Trade and globalization: An introduction to regional trade agreements. Rowman & Littlefield.

Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (1999). The new wave of regionalism. International Organization, 53(3), 589-627. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551002

Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000248089

What the BUSI 464 Week 5 instructions ask

In the fifth week of BUSI 464, students read Lynch's chapter on Europe, view one presentation and three websites, post in Forum 5 and submit the Research Paper: Outline, worth 50 points. The outline sits between the Week 3 bibliography and the Week 8 paper, which must run 10 to 15 pages in APA style on the world's regional trade agreements and the process for joining them, with 6 to 8 references or more besides the textbooks and Scripture. A good outline does more than list headings: it states the thesis, gives each section a claim, names the sources that will support each claim and estimates how much space each section needs.

How this BUSI 464 Week 5 example is built

The sample opens with the working title, the research question and a one-sentence thesis. Six numbered sections follow, each with a full-sentence claim, two to four supporting points, the sources assigned to them and a target length in pages. The first three sections survey what agreements are, what they do and how they differ by region, using Lynch's regional chapters. The fourth and fifth compare two routes to membership: accession to the European Union and entry into the CPTPP, the Pacific-wide pact that replaced the original Trans-Pacific Partnership. The sixth section draws lessons for a country weighing membership, and a closing line places the biblical integration within it.

BUSI 464 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go

The outline is judged on the clarity of the thesis, the logic of the section order, the specificity of each section's claims, the match between sources and claims, and APA accuracy in the source list. Full-sentence points are easier for an instructor to assess than one-word headings, because they show what the paper will argue rather than merely what it will cover. Assigning each source to a section shows that the bibliography was gathered with purpose. Planned page counts that add up to the 10- to 15-page range signal that the student has thought about scope. Any feedback received on the bibliography should already be reflected here. Outlines that already show the paper's comparison, as this one does in Section V, make the final draft easier to grade.

BUSI 464 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points

Start from your research question and write a thesis that answers it in one sentence, then arrange sections so that each one is a step toward proving it. Write every main point as a complete sentence stating a claim. Under each, list the evidence and the source, using the bibliography you already built. Give each section a rough page count so the total fits the assignment. Decide where Scripture belongs in the argument now, rather than adding it at the end. If the bibliography revealed a gap, such as accession outside Europe, add a source for it and show it in the outline so the instructor sees the gap has been closed.

Related BUSI 464 sample papers

Other BUSI 464 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 464 Week 5 questions, answered

What is the BUSI 464 Research Paper Outline?

It is the 50-point midpoint of the term project, submitted in the fifth week and laying out the thesis, sections, claims and sources for the 10- to 15-page paper on trade agreements.

Where can I find a free BUSI 464 Week 5 sample paper?

This page has a complete BUSI 464 Week 5 outline with a thesis, six full-sentence sections, sources assigned to each claim and planned page lengths.

Should a research paper outline use full sentences?

Full-sentence points are usually better for a graded outline, because each one states the claim the section will make, which shows the argument rather than only the topics covered.

How do countries join a regional trade agreement?

They apply under the agreement's accession rules, negotiate terms with existing members, often change their own laws to meet the agreement's standards, and then win approval from every member.

What else is due in BUSI 464 Module/Week 5?

Forum 5 on Lynch's chapter about Europe, with its thread and two replies, plus one presentation and three websites on European integration and the single market.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.