BUSI 423 Week 3 Discussion Board Forum 2 Thread Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 423 Week 3 sample thread turns to the franchisor's side of the course, asking why a growing company would franchise its units instead of owning them all. It weighs the two explanations research offers. Agency theory holds that a franchisee who owns the unit works harder than a hired manager, so franchising saves monitoring costs, especially for units far from headquarters; the capital scarcity view holds that young firms franchise because they cannot fund growth any other way. Evidence from studies of restaurant and service chains supports both, and a composite sandwich chain deciding how to open its next twenty units shows how they combine. The thread concludes that the mix of franchised and company units is a deliberate design choice. Liberty University BUSI 423 sets Forum 2's thread at 45 points, and classmates in the BS in Business Administration reply in Week 4.

CourseBUSI 423 Franchising (BUSI423)
Module/Week3
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 2 Thread
Paper typeDiscussion thread (APA document)
Lengthabout 519 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 500 words, not counting references, written in Microsoft Word in current APA format and attached to the forum
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points45
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 3 in Liberty's published BUSI 423 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 423 Week 3

1

Discussion Board Forum 2 Thread: Why Companies Choose to Franchise

BUSI 423 Franchising, Discussion Board Forum 2 Thread

Thread by [Student Name]

The forum prompt and the restaurant chain are composites; the Franchise Bible and the research cited are real, and the structure follows Liberty's public course guide for BUSI 423.

Why this part earns its pointsThe thread poses the franchisor's question directly, since the course has so far looked from the buyer's side.
2

The first two weeks looked at franchising from the buyer's side. This week's question turns it around: why would a successful company let other people own its units and keep most of the profits? Grossman and Katz (2017) describe franchising as a way to expand a proven concept faster than a company could on its own. Research offers two more specific explanations, and I think the best answer combines them.

Why this part earns its pointsEach theory is explained in plain words before the evidence, so classmates can test both.
3

The first is agency theory. A company that owns a unit must hire a manager, and a manager who earns a salary has less reason than an owner to control waste, train staff carefully or work long hours. Supervising that manager costs money, and it costs more the farther the unit is from headquarters. A franchisee, by contrast, keeps the unit's profit after royalties, so the incentive to run it well is built in. Brickley and Dark (1987) found evidence consistent with this view: in their study of franchise chains, units located farther from monitoring headquarters were more likely to be franchised than units nearby.

The second explanation is capital scarcity. A young chain may simply lack the money to open units itself, so it uses franchisees' capital to grow. Some scholars dismissed this explanation, arguing that a sound company could raise money in other ways. Combs and Ketchen (1999), however, studied restaurant chains and found that resource scarcity helped explain franchising beyond what agency theory alone predicted. Agency theory explains which units a chain franchises; capital scarcity helps explain how many it franchises, especially when the chain is young.

Consider a composite sandwich chain with thirty company-owned stores in one state, planning twenty new units. Its stores near headquarters are easy to supervise and profitable, so it has good reason to keep them. New markets three states away would be expensive to monitor, and opening twenty units at once would require more capital than the company can borrow. Franchising the distant units solves both problems. Many chains reach exactly this kind of mixed system, owning some units and franchising others, in part because company stores let the franchisor test new products and keep operating knowledge in-house.

The two explanations also predict how a chain's mix should change over time. If capital scarcity were the only reason, a chain would buy back its franchised units once it could afford them. If agency costs matter, it would keep franchising distant units even when rich, because hired managers there would still be hard to supervise. Many mature chains continue to franchise a large share of their units long after money stops being scarce, which suggests that incentives, not just capital, keep franchising attractive.

This matters for the prospective franchisee as well. A franchisor that franchises only to raise capital may lose interest in its franchisees once it is large enough to finance its own growth, while one that franchises because owner-operators run units better has a lasting reason to support them. Asking a franchisor why it franchises, and watching how its mix of company and franchised units changes over time, tells a buyer a great deal about the relationship to expect.

4

References

Brickley, J. A., & Dark, F. H. (1987). The choice of organizational form: The case of franchising. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(2), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(87)90046-8

Combs, J. G., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (1999). Can capital scarcity help agency theory explain franchising? Revisiting the capital scarcity hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 196-207. https://doi.org/10.2307/257092

Grossman, R., & Katz, M. J. (2017). Franchise bible: How to buy a franchise or franchise your own business (8th ed.). Entrepreneur Press.

What the BUSI 423 Week 3 instructions ask

Week 3 assigns chapters 3 and 10 of the Franchise Bible, and the only graded item is the second forum thread, worth 45 points. The format repeats: 500 words or more before the reference list, drafted as a Word file in APA style and uploaded to the forum rather than typed into it. The two 250-word replies wait until Week 4, when Essay 2 and the midterm also land, which makes Week 3 the quietest stretch before the midpoint. Bringing in studies beyond the Franchise Bible gives classmates more to answer and starts a stock of sources for the essays and the Week 7 project.

How this BUSI 423 Week 3 example is built

The thread compares two theories and then combines them. It explains agency theory with the problem of the hired manager who does not own the outcome, citing evidence that distant units are more likely to be franchised, then presents the capital scarcity argument and research testing it, which found that resource constraints help explain franchising along with agency costs. A composite sandwich chain, which plans to franchise units in distant markets and keep stores near its base company-owned, shows the theories working together. The closing paragraph applies the point to a prospective franchisee: the franchisor's reasons for franchising predict how it will treat its franchisees. The document follows APA format with a reference list.

BUSI 423 Week 3 grading rubric: where the points go

Forum 2 is graded on the basis used for Forum 1. The instructor wants signs of real engagement with chapters 3 and 10 and with the question, analysis that goes beyond description, prose at a college level, a 500-word body and a properly formatted APA attachment. On a question about the franchisor's decision, instructors look for accurate explanation of the reasons firms franchise and for use of the course's terms, such as company-owned units, royalties and system growth. A thread that tests competing explanations against evidence shows more careful consideration than one that lists advantages and disadvantages, and it gives classmates a claim they can extend or dispute. Applying the analysis to a realistic company makes the reasoning concrete.

BUSI 423 Week 3 help: mistakes that cost points

Look for scholarly research on why firms franchise; agency theory and resource scarcity are the two most studied explanations, and the Academy of Management Journal and the Journal of Financial Economics have published classic tests. Explain each theory in plain language before citing evidence. Apply both to one realistic chain rather than listing pros and cons. Format the thread as an APA document with a reference list, and keep the textbook as a source. Count at least 500 words without references. Remember that Week 4 is heavy, with replies, Essay 2 and the midterm, so finishing this thread early leaves time to prepare for the exam.

Related BUSI 423 sample papers

Other BUSI 423 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 423 Week 3 questions, answered

What is the BUSI 423 Forum 2 thread?

A 45-point post due in Week 3, uploaded as an APA-formatted Word file of no fewer than 500 words, references excluded, on the franchisor's side of the business.

Where can I find a free BUSI 423 Week 3 sample paper?

You can read a complete BUSI 423 Week 3 thread here on why companies franchise, weighing agency theory and capital scarcity with research and a sandwich chain example.

Why do companies franchise instead of owning all their units?

Mainly to grow with franchisees' capital and to gain owner-operators who have stronger incentives than hired managers, which lowers the cost of monitoring distant units.

What is agency theory in franchising?

The view that a hired unit manager may not work as hard as an owner, so a franchisor that lets the unit's operator keep the profits, minus royalties, reduces the need for costly supervision.

What else is due in BUSI 423 Module/Week 3?

Nothing else is graded; students read chapters 3 and 10 of the Franchise Bible before Week 4's replies, Essay 2 and the midterm exam.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.