| Course | BUSI 418 Research and Evidence Based Practice in Healthcare (BUSI418) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 5 |
| Assignment | Discussion Board Forum 6 |
| Paper type | Discussion thread with two replies |
| Length | about 728 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of 300 to 500 words with replies to 2 classmates of 150 to 350 words each; the thread and each reply include 2 peer-reviewed sources, the textbook and 1 biblical integration |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 50 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BS in Healthcare Administration |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 5 in Liberty's published BUSI 418 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 418 Week 5
Discussion Board Forum 6: Translating Evidence Into Practice
BUSI 418 Research and Evidence Based Practice in Healthcare, Discussion Board Forum 6
Thread by [Student Name]
The hospital, its project and the classmates are composites; the textbook, Scripture and the peer-reviewed articles cited are real.
Two years ago, our hospital adopted a policy allowing nurses to remove urinary catheters when no criteria for keeping them applied. Infection control sent a memo, the policy was posted online and catheter days fell by less than 3% in the following six months. Everyone agreed with the evidence; almost no one changed what they did. When we asked nurses why, most said they had never seen the memo, and the few who had were unsure whether physicians would object if they removed a catheter without an order. Hall and Roussel (2017) describe this gap between evidence and practice as the central challenge of evidence-based practice, and they stress that implementation requires planning as deliberate as the search for evidence.
When we looked back, the barriers matched the research closely. Huang et al. (2023) pooled 34 studies on what clinical staff know and do about preventing catheter infections and reported that heavy workload, understaffing, differing physician practices, variation in technique and poor documentation stood in the way, whereas leadership, staff education, teamwork, backing for protocols that let nurses act on their own and prompts to take catheters out all made prevention easier. Our units were short-staffed, several physicians routinely ordered catheters to stay and no one was reminded to check, so every barrier on the list was present and almost none of the facilitators.
The way we introduced the change also mattered. In a systematic review of how health care organizations use formal change models, McDonnell et al. (2026) found that change went better under leaders who communicated well and worse when teams followed a model mechanically or had no way to track how the change was going. A memo offered neither leadership nor monitoring, and nobody owned the result once it was sent.
Our second attempt matched strategies to barriers: a nurse champion on each unit, ten-minute education at huddles, an electronic prompt in the shift assessment, a conversation with the physicians who most often kept catheters and monthly reports of catheter days. James warns against being hearers of the word who deceive themselves rather than doers (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, James 1:22). An organization that knows the evidence but does not act on it has done the easy half of evidence-based practice.
Reply to Courtney
Courtney, you asked whether sending units their own data really changes behavior, since your hospital already posts quality reports that few staff seem to read. Evidence suggests it helps when the data are timely, specific to the unit and paired with a plan for what staff should do differently. Kamel et al. (2025) credited a catheter-use dashboard, along with a multidisciplinary team, for helping a Veterans Affairs hospital cut catheter infections after adopting a nurse-driven protocol. Reynolds et al. (2022), by contrast, tracked results with control charts but saw no change from the protocol alone, which suggests data must be paired with action. Hall and Roussel (2017) include evaluation and feedback as parts of implementation, not afterthoughts. The Preacher says the end of a matter is better than its beginning (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, Ecclesiastes 7:8), and monthly results are how a unit sees the end it is actually reaching. Would your units see their data monthly, or only once a year in an annual report? Monthly results, discussed at a huddle, give staff a chance to connect what they did with what changed.
Reply to Marcus
Marcus, you wondered how to choose champions for a practice change on your rehabilitation unit, where staff have seen several initiatives come and go. Research suggests influence among peers matters more than title or seniority. McDonnell et al. (2026) identified leadership and communication as key enablers of change, and champions extend both onto the units. Huang et al. (2023) found that teamwork and support for nurse-led protocols helped prevention efforts, which points to champions who are respected by peers rather than appointed for convenience. Hall and Roussel (2017) describe champions as people who model the change and answer questions where the work actually happens, on the unit and during the shift. Paul urged believers to imitate him as he imitated Christ (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016, 1 Corinthians 11:1), a reminder that people follow examples more than memos. Would your staff choose the champions themselves, perhaps by asking whom they go to with questions on a busy shift? Those people are often the natural leaders a change needs.
References
English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)
Hall, H. R., & Roussel, L. A. (2017). Evidence-based practice: An integrative approach to research, administration, and practice (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Huang, A., Hong, W., Zhao, B., Lin, J., Xi, R., & Wang, Y. (2023). Knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning catheter-associated urinary tract infection amongst healthcare workers: A mixed methods systematic review. Nursing Open, 10(3), 1281-1304. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1384
Kamel, M., Harris, N., Berry, A., Warsavage, T., Bessesen, M. T., & Kon, S. E. (2025). Implementation of a nurse-driven protocol for indwelling urinary catheter removal and novel utilization dashboard: A pre/postintervention observational study. Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease, 12, 20499361251317900. https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251317900
McDonnell, R., Chauhan, A., Adams, C., Cardenas, A., Moscova, M., Walsan, R., Sina, M., Munro, A., Manias, E., Mitchell, R., Gust, A., Sabesan, S., & Harrison, R. (2026). Applying change models and methods during a period of vast digital transformation: A systematic review of practice in healthcare. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 41(5), 1032-1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70092
Reynolds, S. S., Lozano, H., Fleurant, M., & Bhandari, K. (2022). Using statistical process control charts to measure changes from a nurse-driven protocol to remove urinary catheters. American Journal of Infection Control, 50(12), 1355-1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.03.005
What the BUSI 418 Week 5 instructions ask
Nothing else is graded in Module/Week 5 of BUSI 418, so Forum 6 gets the full week, with chapters 10 and 11 of the Hall and Roussel text and the lecture and web material that go with them. The chapters move from finding evidence to using it. The thread, between 300 and 500 words, should show you have absorbed that shift, and the two replies run between 150 and 350 words. Each of the three posts cites the textbook and two peer-reviewed articles and offers one biblical integration in APA form. Because changes so often stall after the announcement, a real attempt you watched, whether it worked or not, makes the richest thread.
How this BUSI 418 Week 5 example is built
The thread opens with a hospital that adopted a catheter removal policy and saw catheter days barely move. Using the textbook's discussion of moving evidence into practice, it lists the barriers that a review of 34 studies identified and matches them to what happened on the units. A review of change management in health care explains why a memo was not enough. The second attempt adds unit champions, short education, electronic reminders and monthly data. James's call to be doers of the word frames the gap between knowing and doing. The replies discuss audit and feedback and how to choose champions. Both replies close with a practical question. Every strategy in the second attempt is linked to a barrier.
BUSI 418 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go
This forum rewards specificity. Instructors want named barriers and facilitators, each tied to research, and a strategy aimed at each barrier instead of a list of good intentions. A carefully analyzed failure counts as much as a success story, because the reasons a change stalls are exactly what implementation research studies. A reply does its job when it helps a peer understand why a project lost momentum or how to keep one going after the launch. A short table pairing barriers with strategies makes that matching easy to see. Expect the usual checks on length, the two scholarly sources, a citation of Hall and Roussel, Scripture and APA formatting in each of the three posts.
BUSI 418 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points
Think back to a practice change you saw announced, and follow what actually happened over the next six months. The chapters give you language for the barriers and facilitators you observed. Pair them with two peer-reviewed studies on implementing a similar change, then build a short table that matches every barrier to one strategy and names who would own it. Say how you would know within a quarter whether the strategy was working. A verse on acting on what we know fits the theme. Disguise the hospital, and count words so the thread stays under 500 and each reply under 350.
Related BUSI 418 sample papers
Other BUSI 418 weeks
- BUSI 418 Week 1: Discussion Board Forum 1
- BUSI 418 Week 2: Literature Review Matrix
- BUSI 418 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 4
- BUSI 418 Week 4: Discussion Board Forum 5
- BUSI 418 Week 6: Levels of Evidence
- BUSI 418 Week 7: Discussion Board Forum 8
More BS in Healthcare Administration sample papers
- BUSI 304 Week 5: Group Blog 2 and Legislator Email
- BUSI 311 Week 5: Discussion Board Forum 5
- BUSI 323 Week 5: Group Discussion Board Forum 3
- BUSI 344 Week 5: Discussion Board Forum 5
BUSI 418 Week 5 questions, answered
What is BUSI 418 Discussion Board Forum 6?
The 50-point Module/Week 5 discussion in BUSI 418, drawing on chapters 10 and 11, where students analyze why an evidence-based change did or did not take hold and respond to peers.
Where can I find a free BUSI 418 Week 5 sample paper?
See this page for a full BUSI 418 Week 5 thread on why a catheter infection policy failed at first and how a second plan matched strategies to barriers, with two replies.
Why do evidence-based changes fail to take hold?
Common reasons include heavy workload, understaffing, variation among clinicians, weak documentation, poor communication and no system for monitoring progress after the change is announced.
What helps evidence-based changes succeed?
Research points to visible leadership and clear communication, staff education, reminders built into daily workflow, respected frontline champions and regular feedback of results to the people doing the work.
Is anything else due in BUSI 418 Module/Week 5?
No. Forum 6 is the only graded work that week; the Levels of Evidence assignment, which reuses the four matrix articles, comes next in Module/Week 6.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom BUSI 418 Week 5 sample · All BUSI 418 weeks · All courses