| Course | BUSI 400 Strategic Planning/Business Policy (BUSI400) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 8 |
| Assignment | Group Case Analysis 2 |
| Paper type | Group strategic case analysis |
| Length | about 486 words, 2 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: a group written case analysis applying the module/week's chapters on implementing strategies through marketing, finance, research and information systems, strategy review and evaluation, and global issues |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| Points | 125 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 8 in Liberty's published BUSI 400 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 400 Week 8
Funding, Marketing and Measuring the Plan: Hershey's Strategy From Implementation to Review
[Student Name]
School of Business, Liberty University
BUSI 400: Strategic Planning/Business Policy
Group Case Analysis 2
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
The textbook's assigned case is not public, so an implementation and evaluation analysis of a public company, The Hershey Company, stands in for it; company figures come from its filings, and the financing comparison and scorecard targets are the group's illustrative proposals.
Funding, Marketing and Measuring the Plan: Hershey's Strategy From Implementation to Review
Marketing: Segments and Positioning
The expansion targets two segments: households that buy salty snacks weekly and value familiar brands, and health-conscious adults looking for lower-sugar or better-for-you options. David and David (2017) describe positioning as defining how a product should be seen relative to competitors. The group's positioning statement: for snackers who want a treat they feel good about, Hershey's snacks combine trusted flavors with simple ingredients, backed by a brand families have known for generations. The marketing mix follows from that position. Products include familiar salty snacks alongside new items that borrow Reese's and Hershey's flavors in lower-cocoa forms. Pricing should sit slightly above store brands but below specialty natural brands, reflecting trusted quality without a premium that discourages trial. Distribution builds on Hershey's existing retailer relationships, especially convenience stores and checkout lanes, where the company is already strong. Promotion should lean on the brands' familiarity rather than on deep discounts, which build volume but erode the margins the strategy is meant to restore.
Finance: Funding a Related Acquisition
| Illustrative comparison for a $1 billion acquisition | Debt financing | Stock financing |
|---|---|---|
| Added annual interest at 5 percent | $50 million | none |
| New shares issued at an assumed $170 price | none | about 5.9 million |
| Effect on earnings per share if the acquisition adds $90 million of operating profit | Higher, after interest | Lower, from dilution |
| Main risk | Heavier debt load after the 2025 earnings decline | Dilution of existing shareholders |
Debt financing raises earnings per share when the acquisition earns more than its interest cost, but Hershey's liabilities already rose relative to equity after 2025's lower earnings (The Hershey Company, 2026). The group recommends a mix: modest new debt combined with cash flow, and no acquisition until margins recover enough to protect the company's credit standing. The table's figures are illustrative assumptions, not forecasts, but they show the essential choice chapter 8 describes: debt magnifies the gain if the acquisition performs and magnifies the strain if it does not, while new shares spread both gain and risk across more owners.
Research and Information Systems
Product research should focus on recipes that cut cocoa content without losing taste, and information systems should connect retail sales data with production planning so that new snack items are stocked where they sell. Shared data across the chocolate and snack businesses would also let marketing see which customers buy both, which is the group of households the flavor-crossover products are meant to reach.
Strategy Evaluation: Balanced Scorecard
Kaplan and Norton (1992) introduced the balanced scorecard to judge strategy through financial, customer, internal process and learning measures rather than profit alone.
| Perspective | Measure | Target | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial | Gross margin | Above 38 percent by year 2 | Chief financial officer |
| Customer | Household penetration of snack brands | Up 2 points by year 2 | Chief marketing officer |
| Internal process | New snack line on-time startup | Month 9 | Vice president, operations |
| Learning and growth | Share of innovation pipeline with lower cocoa | 40 percent | Chief growth officer |
A strategy that is never measured is only a hope with a budget. The board should review the scorecard every quarter and conduct a full strategy review annually, asking whether the underlying assumptions about cocoa costs and snack demand still hold. David and David (2017) describe strategy evaluation as three activities: reviewing the bases of the strategy, measuring performance against targets and taking corrective action. If cocoa prices fall sharply, for example, the case for diverting capital from chocolate weakens and the plan should be adjusted rather than followed mechanically.
Global Issues
Even a North American strategy has global exposure: cocoa comes from West Africa, packaging and equipment cross borders, and tariff changes can raise costs quickly. If international expansion is revisited later, Hershey should enter markets where its brands are known, through partners, before investing in its own plants.
References
David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2017). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, concepts and cases (16th ed.). Pearson.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
The Hershey Company. (2026). Annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000047111&type=10-K
What the BUSI 400 Week 8 instructions ask
The capstone ends with chapters 8, 9 and 11 of David and David, covering implementation through marketing, finance and accounting, research and development and information systems; on strategy review, evaluation and control; and on global and international issues, with one presentation. The second Group Case Analysis, worth 125 points, is due with the sixth peer evaluation. Like the first, it asks the group to diagnose a company's situation and recommend a workable action plan, but it adds the functional and evaluation tools that complete the strategic management process. This sample applies those tools to the same public company the earlier samples examined, so the course's work forms one continuous case.
How this BUSI 400 Week 8 example is built
The analysis covers each assigned chapter in turn. A marketing section defines the target segments and positioning for the snack expansion. A finance section compares debt and equity financing for a related acquisition in an illustrative earnings-per-share table and explains the trade-off. Short sections cover research and development and information systems. A balanced scorecard then sets financial, customer, internal process and learning measures for evaluating the strategy, each with a target and an owner. A global section names the international issues that could affect the plan. The analysis ends with the review schedule the board would use to decide whether to continue, adjust or stop the strategy.
BUSI 400 Week 8 grading rubric: where the points go
The closing group case earns its points by applying chapters 8, 9 and 11 correctly, making marketing, finance and evaluation recommendations that hold together, tying each back to the strategy the group chose before, and reading as professional APA writing; the peer evaluation then adjusts each member's share. Instructors look for financial analysis that shows its assumptions, evaluation measures that are specific and owned, and global considerations relevant to the company rather than general. A case that repeats earlier analysis without adding implementation and evaluation detail misses the point of the final chapters. Clear tables help, but the group's reasoning must be written out.
BUSI 400 Week 8 help: mistakes that cost points
Start from the strategy chosen in the first group case and ask what each function must do to deliver it. Define target segments and a positioning statement in marketing terms. For financing, show a simple comparison of debt and equity with stated assumptions, and explain which risk each option creates. Build a balanced scorecard with one or two measures per perspective, each with a target and owner. Note global issues that apply to the company, such as tariffs, currencies or foreign competitors. End with how and when management will review the strategy. Assign one member to check every figure against its source. Make sure the scorecard measures connect to the objectives from the previous case analysis, so the reader can trace each target back to the strategy.
Related BUSI 400 sample papers
Other BUSI 400 weeks
- BUSI 400 Week 1: Individual AOL Exercise 1
- BUSI 400 Week 2: Group AOL Exercise 1
- BUSI 400 Week 3: Group AOL Exercise 2
- BUSI 400 Week 4: Individual Case Analysis 1
- BUSI 400 Week 5: Individual AOL Exercise 2
- BUSI 400 Week 6: Group Case Analysis 1
- BUSI 400 Week 7: Individual Case Analysis 2
More BS in Business Administration sample papers
- BUSI 370 Week 8: Faith and Learning Essay
- BUSI 372 Week 8: Forum 5 Thread and Replies
- BUSI 405 Week 8: Forum 8 Thread and Replies
- BUSI 409 Week 8: Forum 4 Replies
BUSI 400 Week 8 questions, answered
What is BUSI 400 Group Case Analysis 2?
The last group case analysis, a 125-point Module/Week 8 assignment applying David and David's chapters on functional implementation, strategy evaluation and global issues to a company case.
Where can I find a free BUSI 400 Week 8 sample paper?
Below is a complete BUSI 400 Week 8 group case analysis of Hershey's snack strategy, with an EPS comparison, balanced scorecard and global issues.
What is an EPS-EBIT analysis?
A comparison of how financing a project with debt or with new stock would affect earnings per share at different levels of operating profit, showing the trade-off between higher returns and higher risk.
What is a balanced scorecard?
A tool for evaluating strategy that sets measures and targets from four perspectives (the financial, the customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth), so strategy is judged by more than financial results.
What else is due in BUSI 400 Module/Week 8?
The sixth and final peer evaluation follows the group case; the reading is chapters 8, 9 and 11 of David and David with a presentation.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom BUSI 400 Week 8 sample · All BUSI 400 weeks · All courses