BUSI 303 Week 7 Discussion Board Forum 4 Thread Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 303 Week 7 sample thread examines how a company should choose its route into a foreign market, the key term known as entry mode. It names Hill's six routes into a market and then summarizes Brouthers's study of European companies, where firms whose route fit their legal, cultural and cost situation reported better results. The connection relates that finding to the textbook's tradeoffs between control, risk and cost, and to the classic model of firms entering foreign markets step by step. Liberty University BUSI 303 assigns this market-entry thread to Module/Week 7 and scores it out of 50 for students completing the BS in Business Administration. It also applies the analysis to a small American food company weighing its options in Mexico.

CourseBUSI 303 International Business (BUSI303)
Module/Week7
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 4 Thread
Paper typeKey term discussion thread
Lengthabout 326 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 200 words, not counting the key term definition and citations, summarizing an article and discussing how it relates to a chosen chapter key term, with page references and APA citations of the 3 articles read
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 7 in Liberty's published BUSI 303 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 303 Week 7

1

Discussion Board Forum 4 Thread: Choosing a Foreign Market Entry Mode

BUSI 303 International Business, Discussion Board Forum 4 Thread

Thread by [Student Name]

The thread follows the course's key-term format; the textbook and the three articles cited are real, and textbook locations are given by chapter.

Key Term

Entry mode is the way a firm chooses to enter a foreign market; Hill describes six modes, exporting, turnkey projects, licensing, franchising, establishing joint ventures with a host-country firm, and setting up a wholly owned subsidiary, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages (Hill & Hult, 2018, ch. 13).

Article Summary

Why this part earns its pointsThe summary reports both the prediction and the performance test, which is what makes the article useful.
2

Brouthers (2002) studied European firms that had entered foreign markets and asked two questions: which factors explained the entry mode each firm chose, and whether firms that chose the mode those factors predicted performed better. Institutional factors, such as legal restrictions and investment risk in the host country, cultural distance and transaction cost considerations, such as the need to protect specialized assets, all helped explain the choices. Firms whose actual mode matched the mode predicted by these factors reported higher performance, measured by managers' satisfaction with financial and nonfinancial results, than firms whose choice did not match.

Why this part earns its pointsA second model adds time, so entry mode reads as a sequence of steps rather than a single choice.
3

Connection to the Key Term

Hill and Hult (2018, ch. 13) present entry mode as a tradeoff: exporting and licensing require little investment and carry little risk but give the firm less control, while joint ventures and wholly owned subsidiaries offer more control and protection of know-how at higher cost and risk. Brouthers's evidence suggests there is no best mode in general, only a best mode for a given firm and country. The right door into a market depends on the house, not just the visitor.

The classic model of internationalization adds a time dimension. Johanson and Vahlne (1977) argued that firms tend to move step by step, starting with exporting to culturally close markets and committing more resources as they learn. Their later revision emphasized that relationships in business networks, not just market knowledge, drive that process (Johanson & Vahlne, 2009).

Consider a small American salsa maker entering Mexico. High cultural familiarity with the product but limited knowledge of retail distribution suggests starting with an export arrangement through a local distributor, then moving toward a joint venture once the relationship and market knowledge have grown.

4

References

Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491013

Hill, C. W. L., & Hult, G. T. M. (2018). Global business today (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24

What the BUSI 303 Week 7 instructions ask

The final key-term forum of BUSI 303 opens in Module/Week 7 with Hill's chapters 13, 14 and 15, on entering foreign markets, exporting and importing, and global production and supply chains, plus three presentations, two LearnSmart chapters and the fourth faith and integration thread. Nothing about the format changes for the last forum. It is worth 50 points, and the replies fall in Module/Week 8 with Quiz 4 and Exam 2. Students who are considering careers in exporting or international sales often find this forum especially practical. Entry modes are a popular choice of term.

How this BUSI 303 Week 7 example is built

The thread defines entry mode with its textbook location and names the modes Hill compares. The summary reports a study that measured whether firms chose the mode predicted by institutional, cultural and transaction cost factors and whether that choice affected performance. The connection section links the finding to Hill's comparison of control, risk and cost across modes, adds the classic model of gradual internationalization and its later revision, and applies both to a small American food company deciding how to enter Mexico. Three articles appear in the reference list with the textbook, formatted in APA style. A Mexican market example keeps the advice concrete. Each article earns its place by adding something the textbook does not.

BUSI 303 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go

Here the grader looks for a precise entry-mode definition, an honest report of the European study, reasoning about control versus risk, and complete documentation. On entry mode, instructors look for an understanding of the tradeoffs among modes rather than a simple list, and for an article that tests how firms choose. A thread that lists modes without analysis, or that summarizes an article unrelated to entry, loses points, as does missing documentation. An example company with a specific country and product makes the analysis easy to evaluate. Recommending a specific mode for a specific company shows the tradeoffs have been understood. Clear headings that match the guide's parts also help.

BUSI 303 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points

Choose a term you can analyze, such as entry mode, licensing or global supply chains, and find an article that tests a claim about it. Summarize the study's design and finding in a few sentences. In the connection, use the textbook's framework to explain why the finding makes sense, and apply it to a concrete company and country. Keep the definition and citations separate from the 200 words, which means the full post will run longer. Brouthers and both Johanson and Vahlne pieces need complete APA entries. Name the mode you would recommend and say why the others fit less well. A grader should spot the definition, summary and connection at a glance. Short paragraphs keep the definition, summary and connection distinct. Name the article's sample, such as European firms, so readers can judge its reach.

Related BUSI 303 sample papers

Other BUSI 303 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 303 Week 7 questions, answered

What is the BUSI 303 Forum 4 Thread?

The final key-term post, worth 50 points, draws its term from the chapters on market entry, exporting and global production. It also cites one scholarly article.

Where can I find a free BUSI 303 Week 7 sample paper?

This page has the full BUSI 303 Week 7 key-term thread on foreign market entry modes and research on how mode choice affects performance.

What are the main foreign market entry modes?

Hill's six run from light to heavy commitment: exporting, then turnkey deals, licensing and franchising, and finally joint ventures and subsidiaries the firm owns outright.

Does the choice of entry mode affect performance?

A study of European firms found that companies choosing the mode their institutional, cultural and cost circumstances predicted performed better abroad than those that chose differently.

What else is due in BUSI 303 Module/Week 7?

The last faith thread is due too, with LearnSmart work on market entry and exporting. That faith thread carries its own points.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Ask for a custom BUSI 303 Week 7 sample · All BUSI 303 weeks · All courses