BUSI 303 Week 5 Discussion Board Forum 3 Thread Example

Reviewed by Thomas Kerrigan, MBA, CPA · Liberty University · Updated

This BUSI 303 Week 5 sample thread studies regional economic integration, the pacts in which neighboring countries lower barriers among themselves, using Brexit as the test case. After the definition, it summarizes a study that estimated what the United Kingdom's vote to leave the European Union cost its economy in the following two years, by comparing the actual economy with a statistical twin built from similar countries. The connection section relates that evidence to the textbook's levels of integration and to research showing that free trade agreements substantially raise trade between members over time. Liberty University BUSI 303 grades this Brexit-focused thread out of 50, with BS in Business Administration students posting it in Module/Week 5.

CourseBUSI 303 International Business (BUSI303)
Module/Week5
AssignmentDiscussion Board Forum 3 Thread
Paper typeKey term discussion thread
Lengthabout 329 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread of at least 200 words, not counting the key term definition and citations, summarizing an article and discussing how it relates to a chosen chapter key term, with page references and APA citations of the 3 articles read
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBS in Business Administration
Where it sitsModule/Week 5 in Liberty's published BUSI 303 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUSI 303 Week 5

1

Discussion Board Forum 3 Thread: Regional Economic Integration

BUSI 303 International Business, Discussion Board Forum 3 Thread

Thread by [Student Name]

The thread follows the course's key-term format; the textbook and the three articles cited are real, and textbook locations are given by chapter.

Key Term

Regional economic integration refers to agreements among countries in a geographic region to reduce, and ultimately remove, tariff and nontariff barriers to the free flow of goods, services and factors of production between each other (Hill & Hult, 2018, ch. 9).

Article Summary

Why this part earns its pointsThe summary explains the study's method because the comparison is what makes the estimate credible.
2

Born et al. (2019) set out to measure what the 2016 referendum on leaving the European Union cost the British economy before any change in trade rules had taken effect. Because no one can observe what would have happened without the vote, they built a synthetic version of the United Kingdom from a weighted combination of similar economies whose growth had matched Britain's before the referendum. By the end of 2018, actual British output had fallen behind its synthetic twin by about 1.7 to 2.5 percent, a gap the authors attributed largely to lower expectations about future growth.

Why this part earns its pointsHere Brexit is placed on the textbook's ladder of integration, read from the top down.
3

Connection to the Key Term

Hill and Hult (2018, ch. 9) describe integration as a progression from a free trade area to a customs union, a common market, an economic union and a political union, with benefits that include larger markets and greater efficiency. The Brexit evidence shows those benefits from the other direction: simply announcing a move backward along that progression imposed real costs. The economy began paying for leaving the bloc years before the exit took legal effect.

Research on joining blocs points the same way. Baier and Bergstrand (2007) found that a free trade agreement roughly doubled trade between member countries after about ten years. Frankel and Rose (1998) add that closer trade links tend to bring members' business cycles into step, which is one reason a common currency becomes more workable as integration deepens, a point that connects to Hill's discussion of the euro.

For a manager, the lesson is that supply chains built across a bloc depend on political commitments that can change. A firm sourcing parts across European borders should plan for the possibility of new customs checks, and the Brexit experience suggests that uncertainty alone can be costly.

4

References

Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005

Born, B., Muller, G. J., Schularick, M., & Sedlacek, P. (2019). The costs of economic nationalism: Evidence from the Brexit experiment. The Economic Journal, 129(623), 2722-2744. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uez020

Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (1998). The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. The Economic Journal, 108(449), 1009-1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00327

Hill, C. W. L., & Hult, G. T. M. (2018). Global business today (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

What the BUSI 303 Week 5 instructions ask

Module/Week 5 of BUSI 303 brings Hill's chapters 9, 10 and 11, on regional economic integration, the foreign exchange market and the international monetary system, with two presentations, two LearnSmart chapters and two threads, one for the key-term forum and one for faith and integration. The key-term thread again defines a chapter term, summarizes one article and connects it to the term in at least 200 words excluding the definition and citations, with page references to Hill and APA citations for three articles. It carries 50 points, and classmates' replies come in Module/Week 6. The Brexit referendum and its aftermath give the forum a recent, well-studied case to work with.

How this BUSI 303 Week 5 example is built

Each element the guide requires gets its own heading, from definition to connection. The definition places regional economic integration in Hill's chapter and mentions its levels, from a free trade area to political union. The summary describes the Brexit study's method, a comparison of the United Kingdom with a synthetic counterpart, and its estimate of lost output. The connection relates the finding to the textbook's discussion of the benefits and costs of integration, adds research on how much free trade agreements increase trade, and draws a lesson for firms that build supply chains across a bloc. Born, Baier and Frankel each receive a full APA entry. A short business lesson closes the connection.

BUSI 303 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go

The integration thread earns its points through a sound term from chapters 9 to 11, an honest account of the Brexit study, analysis tied to Hill, sufficient counted words and complete documentation. Brexit invites opinion, so this thread is judged on whether it reports the synthetic comparison faithfully and reasons with Hill's levels of integration instead. Missing citations, a summary without analysis or an article unrelated to the term reduce the score. Treating the article's estimate with appropriate caution, as an estimate, shows mature reading. Analysis that ends with a practical supply chain lesson scores well.

BUSI 303 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points

Pick a term from one of the three chapters and find articles that test it with evidence. Summarize the method of the article in a sentence, since how the researchers reached a conclusion matters as much as the conclusion. In the connection section, tie the finding to a specific concept in Hill, such as the levels of integration or trade creation and diversion. Add one business implication. Keep the summary short so analysis gets most of the words, and cite the textbook location and all three articles in APA format. Explain any statistical method in plain words a classmate could repeat. Remember that definitions and citations do not count toward the word minimum. Keep any comment on the politics of Brexit out of the analysis.

Related BUSI 303 sample papers

Other BUSI 303 weeks

More BS in Business Administration sample papers

BUSI 303 Week 5 questions, answered

What is the BUSI 303 Forum 3 Thread?

Forum 3's thread asks for one term from the integration and money chapters, an article read against it, and three citations, for 50 points.

Where can I find a free BUSI 303 Week 5 sample paper?

This page gives a complete BUSI 303 Week 5 key-term thread on regional economic integration and research on the cost of Brexit.

What are the levels of regional economic integration?

Hill describes a progression from a free trade area to a customs union, a common market, an economic union and finally a political union, each removing more barriers between members.

How much did the Brexit vote cost the UK economy?

One study comparing the UK with a statistical counterpart estimated its output was about 1.7 to 2.5 percent lower by the end of 2018 than it would otherwise have been.

What else is due in BUSI 303 Module/Week 5?

Alongside it come a faith thread and two LearnSmart chapters on currency markets and the monetary system. Both the faith thread and the key-term thread are graded separately.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

Ask for a custom BUSI 303 Week 5 sample · All BUSI 303 weeks · All courses