SOWK 431 Week 5 DB Forum 3 Example

Reviewed by Allison Pemberton, PhD · Liberty University · Updated

A fifteen-year-old cross-country runner who has quietly lost eighteen pounds anchors this SOWK 431 Week 5 example, which is Forum 3 in Liberty University SOWK 431. The BSW social work discussion is worth 50 points, follows Part 7 of the casebook and the manual's feeding and eating disorders chapter and is due in the Exam 2 week. The thread applies the DSM-5 criteria for anorexia nervosa, notes that the manual no longer requires missed periods and explains why the disorder demands urgency: Arcelus and colleagues' meta-analysis of 36 studies found it carries the highest death rate of the eating disorders. It then makes the case for family-based treatment, in which parents take charge of refeeding, drawing on Lock and colleagues' trial against individual therapy. Replies answer a classmate's fear that parents are being blamed and bring in 1 Samuel 16:7 on how God looks at the heart.

CourseSOWK 431 Social Work in Mental Health (SOWK431)
Module/Week5
AssignmentDB Forum 3
Paper typeDiscussion thread and replies
Lengthabout 481 words (thread and replies). Course guide: per the course guide, a thread of at least 300 words demonstrating course-related knowledge, with at least 2 peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course textbook and at least 1 biblical principle, and replies of at least 50 words to 2 classmates
FormatAPA 7 citations and reference list
Points50
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramBSW
Where it sitsModule/Week 5 in Liberty's published SOWK 431 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for SOWK 431 Week 5

1

Discussion Board Forum 3: Thread and Two Replies

SOWK 431 Social Work in Mental Health, Discussion Board Forum 3 (thread and two replies)

Thread by [Student Name]

The prompt, the client and the classmates' posts are composites standing in for the course's own forum; Scripture, the casebook, the manual and the journal articles are real and described from their published sources; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for SOWK 431.

Thread

Why this part earns its pointsOpening with what a coach noticed shows how social workers often learn of eating disorders through others before the teen seeks help.
2

Ava, a composite fifteen-year-old, is one of the fastest runners on her high school cross-country team. Her coach contacted the school social worker after noticing that she skipped team dinners, wore layers on warm days and had grown pale and tired. Her mother then reported that Ava has lost eighteen pounds since spring, cuts food into tiny pieces and becomes upset when the family eats out.

The DSM-5 lists three criteria for anorexia nervosa: energy intake restricted until weight is significantly low for age and health, a strong fear of gaining weight or behavior that keeps weight from rising and a disturbed experience of one's own weight or shape (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Ava's weight is now well below the expected range for her age and height, she says she is terrified of getting slow and heavy and she insists she still needs to lose more. The DSM-5 dropped the earlier requirement of missed periods, so a clinician need not wait for that sign.

Urgency matters. Arcelus et al. (2011) pooled 36 studies and found that anorexia nervosa had the highest mortality rate among the eating disorders they examined, with a meaningful share of deaths due to suicide. For adolescents, evidence favors family-based treatment, in which parents take charge of meals to restore weight and then hand control back gradually. Lock et al. (2010) randomized adolescents to family-based treatment or individual adolescent-focused therapy and found significantly higher full remission rates with family-based treatment at follow-up.

Corcoran and Walsh (2014) urge workers to see families as resources, not causes. Ava's parents are frightened but united, and her sister is protective of her. Those are strengths that family-based treatment can mobilize. My plan would include an urgent medical evaluation, referral to a family-based treatment team and coordination with her coach about training while she recovers.

At what point should a school social worker involve parents if a teen asks to keep her eating private?

Reply to Sophia

Why this part earns its pointsEach reply answers a real concern a classmate raised, as a forum reply should.
3

Sophia, you worried that putting parents in charge of meals implies they caused the disorder. Family-based treatment actually takes the opposite stance: it treats the illness as no one's fault and enlists parents because they know their child best and are present at every meal. Lock et al. (2010) showed it can outperform individual therapy, which suggests parents are a powerful resource. A social worker can say this explicitly, relieving guilt so parents can act with confidence.

Reply to Isaac

Why this part earns its pointsThe second reply carries the classmate's biblical point into how a worker might speak with a recovering teen.
4

Isaac, you cited 1 Samuel 16:7, where God tells Samuel that people judge by outward appearance but the Lord looks at the heart (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). That verse could be powerful for a teen like Ava, whose illness tells her that her worth depends on her body. A Christian social worker might, if Ava welcomes it, help her name the qualities her friends and family value, such as loyalty and courage, which have nothing to do with weight or speed.

5

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Arcelus, J., Mitchell, A. J., Wales, J., & Nielsen, S. (2011). Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders: A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(7), 724-731. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74

Corcoran, J., & Walsh, J. (2014). Mental health in social work: A casebook on diagnosis and strengths-based assessment (2nd ed.). Pearson.

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Lock, J., Le Grange, D., Agras, W. S., Moye, A., Bryson, S. W., & Jo, B. (2010). Randomized clinical trial comparing family-based treatment with adolescent-focused individual therapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(10), 1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.128

What the SOWK 431 Week 5 instructions ask

Exam 2 shares Module/Week 5 with the third forum, valued at 50 points, which follows the casebook's Part 7, the manual's feeding and eating disorders chapter and a lecture. The opening post answers the instructor's question in 300 words or more and must show what the course has taught. It cites two refereed journal articles besides the casebook, draws in a principle from Scripture and uses current APA citations. Two replies to peers close the forum, each longer than 50 words. A module on eating disorders invites a thread on a condition where early recognition and family involvement can change outcomes, and where social workers in schools and clinics often see warning signs first.

How this SOWK 431 Week 5 example is built

The thread begins with Ava, a composite fifteen-year-old runner whose coach noticed she was skipping team dinners and whose weight has fallen well below what is expected for her age and height. It applies the three DSM-5 criteria for anorexia nervosa and notes the removal of the amenorrhea requirement. Arcelus and colleagues' meta-analysis explains the danger. Family-based treatment is described, with parents temporarily in charge of meals, and Lock and colleagues' trial supports it over individual therapy for adolescents. Corcoran and Walsh's attention to family strengths frames the plan. One reply addresses a classmate who worried that the model blames parents, and the other develops 1 Samuel 16:7 in a recovery context.

SOWK 431 Week 5 grading rubric: where the points go

To earn full marks on Forum 3, the main post should pass 300 words while getting the eating disorders material right, cite two journal articles that went through peer review alongside the casebook, let a scriptural principle shape part of the discussion and be followed by two replies, each over 50 words, that respond to what classmates argued. Strong threads apply each DSM-5 criterion to a case, explain the seriousness of the disorder with evidence and connect intervention choices to research rather than general advice. Sensitive topics like body image call for careful language and accurate facts. Replies should add a practical point or a source rather than agreement alone, and the biblical principle should speak to the person's worth or the family's role rather than to appearance.

SOWK 431 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost points

Write about eating disorders with care: avoid describing weights or behaviors in ways that could serve as instructions, and focus instead on criteria, risk and treatment. State the three DSM-5 criteria for anorexia nervosa precisely, and note what changed from earlier editions. Use research on mortality and treatment to show why early, family-centered care matters for adolescents. Choose a biblical principle that addresses worth or the heart rather than the body's appearance. Replies can be short, but give each a clear point. With Exam 2 due the same week, finish the thread first so replies are not rushed at the deadline.

Related SOWK 431 sample papers

Other SOWK 431 weeks

More BSW sample papers

SOWK 431 Week 5 questions, answered

What is SOWK 431 DB Forum 3?

The SOWK 431 discussion for Module/Week 5, worth 50 points and due in the Exam 2 week, where students post on an eating disorders question backed by journal articles and a biblical principle, then answer a pair of classmates.

Where can I find a free SOWK 431 Week 5 sample paper?

The full SOWK 431 Week 5 forum on anorexia nervosa in a teenage runner and the case for family-based treatment, with both replies, is on this page.

What are the DSM-5 criteria for anorexia nervosa?

Eating restricted to the point that body weight becomes significantly low, an intense fear of gaining weight or persistent behavior that blocks gain, and a distorted experience of body weight or shape; missed periods are no longer required.

What is family-based treatment for anorexia?

An outpatient approach for adolescents in which parents temporarily take charge of their child's eating to restore weight, then gradually return control to the teen as health returns, without blaming the family for the illness.

Why is anorexia nervosa considered so dangerous?

A meta-analysis by Arcelus and colleagues found that anorexia nervosa had the highest mortality rate of the eating disorders studied, with deaths from medical complications and suicide.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.