PSYC 635 Week 7 Research Paper: Final Submission Example

Reviewed by Allison Pemberton, PhD · Liberty University · Updated

Loneliness among older adults drives this PSYC 635 Week 7 example, the 150-point Research Paper final submission of Liberty University PSYC 635, worth more than any other item in this MS in Psychology course, due with DB Forum 7 and Quiz 5 after the chapters on work, retirement and where people live. The paper separates loneliness from social isolation, then reports what longitudinal research has found: a meta-analysis of 70 studies tying loneliness to a 26% higher likelihood of death, a review linking it to a 29% higher risk of heart disease and a national study of older Americans connecting it to depression and functional decline. It explains why loneliness tends to feed itself and why interventions that change lonely people's expectations of others outperform those that simply add contact. Genesis 2 frames the closing section on churches.

CoursePSYC 635 Adult Psychology (PSYC635)
Module/Week7
AssignmentResearch Paper: Final Submission
Paper typeResearch paper in APA style
Lengthabout 1,306 words, 5 double-spaced pages plus title page and references. Course guide: per the course guide, a 4 to 6 page research-based paper in current APA format on the topic approved in the planning assignment, with at least 7 scholarly references in addition to the course textbook and the Bible, at least 5 of them journal articles
FormatAPA 7 student paper
Points150
SchoolLiberty University Online
ProgramMS in Psychology
Where it sitsModule/Week 7 in Liberty's published PSYC 635 course guide; current sections can differ
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for PSYC 635 Week 7

1

Research Paper: Loneliness in Later Adulthood, Its Toll on Health and the Interventions That Work Best

 

[Student Name]

School of Behavioral Sciences, Liberty University

PSYC 635: Adult Psychology

Research Paper (final submission)

[Instructor Name]

[Date]

 

The writer is a composite student and the topic stands in for one chosen in the course's planning assignment; the textbook, Scripture, the report and the journal articles are real and described from their published sources; the requirements follow Liberty's public course guide for PSYC 635.

2

Research Paper: Loneliness in Later Adulthood, Its Toll on Health and the Interventions That Work Best

Introduction

Why this part earns its pointsOpening with one older adult's ordinary day shows the problem before the statistics define it.
3

Harold is eighty. Since his wife died three years ago, he has kept the house, paid the bills and driven to the pharmacy on his own, and by most measures he is managing well. Yet on many days he speaks to no one, and he describes his evenings as the longest part of his life. Harold is not unusual. By one national estimate, over a third of Americans past 45 report feeling lonely, and close to a quarter of community-dwelling adults past 65 qualify as socially isolated (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2020). This paper argues that loneliness in later adulthood is a serious health risk, comparable to well-known risk factors, and that it has identifiable and treatable psychological causes. The sections that follow define the problem, review evidence on mortality, cardiovascular disease, depression and functional decline, explain why loneliness tends to persist, compare interventions and consider what congregations can contribute.

Loneliness and Social Isolation

Loneliness and social isolation are related but different. Isolation can be counted from the outside: how many people someone sees, how often and whether anyone shares the home. Loneliness is the inner experience: a distressing gap between the connection a person has and the connection that person longs for (Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010). A hermit by choice may feel content, while a grandmother in a busy three-generation home may feel unseen. Cavanaugh and Blanchard-Fields (2018) describe how later adulthood brings changes that can affect both, including widowhood, retirement, relocation and declining mobility. The distinction matters because the two may require different responses: a lonely person surrounded by family needs something other than more company.

Loneliness and Mortality

Why this part earns its pointsReporting pooled sample sizes and percentages lets readers compare loneliness with other health risks.
4

The strongest evidence about loneliness and survival comes from pooled data. Holt-Lunstad et al. (2015) drew together 70 prospective studies in one analysis, together covering over 3.4 million participants tracked for roughly seven years. Once age, sex and baseline health were taken into account, loneliness was associated with a 26% higher likelihood of death, social isolation with 29% and living alone with 32%. Holt-Lunstad and her coauthors placed those figures in the same range as familiar dangers such as obesity and a sedentary life. The pattern held for both objective isolation and subjective loneliness, which suggests that each poses its own risk.

Heart Disease and Stroke

Loneliness also appears to affect specific illnesses. Valtorta et al. (2016) reviewed 23 papers reporting on 16 longitudinal cohorts and found that poor social relationships were associated with a 29% higher risk of new coronary heart disease and a 32% higher risk of stroke. Because the studies followed people who were free of heart disease at the start, the findings are less likely to reflect illness causing loneliness, although the authors could not rule out other shared causes. The size of these effects is similar to that of some recognized cardiovascular risk factors, so Valtorta and colleagues urged that relationships be counted in heart disease prevention. For an older adult who already has high blood pressure or diabetes, loneliness may add to a risk that is already elevated.

Depression and Functional Decline

The link with mental health is equally clear. Cacioppo et al. (2006) showed that loneliness and depressive symptoms are distinct constructs, not one condition measured twice, and that loneliness predicted later depressive symptoms in middle-aged and older adults. Luo et al. (2012) followed a national sample of more than 2,000 Americans aged 50 and older in the Health and Retirement Study over six years. Loneliness was associated with later increases in depressive symptoms and functional limitations and with higher mortality, and poor health in turn predicted greater loneliness, suggesting that the two reinforce one another. For Harold, this means that loneliness may not stay a private sorrow; it may gradually affect his mood, his mobility and his survival.

Why Loneliness Persists

If loneliness is so harmful, why do lonely people not simply seek company? Hawkley and Cacioppo (2010) propose that loneliness makes people more alert to social threat. Lonely individuals tend to expect rejection, notice negative social cues more readily and interpret ambiguous behavior as unfriendly. Those expectations lead them to act in guarded or withdrawn ways, which in turn makes others respond with less warmth, confirming the original fear. Loneliness, in this account, becomes a self-reinforcing cycle. Hawkley and Cacioppo (2010) also connect this vigilance to the body, linking loneliness with poorer sleep, higher blood pressure and heightened stress responses, which may explain part of the association with heart disease and early death. Harold may decline an invitation to a men's breakfast because he assumes no one really wants him there, and the missed breakfast becomes one more piece of evidence that he is alone.

What Helps

This mechanism has direct implications for treatment. Masi et al. (2011) pooled the intervention literature and sorted programs by what each tried to change: a person's social skills, the support around that person, the number of chances to meet others, or the distorted thinking that keeps lonely people braced for rejection. Among randomized trials, the programs aimed at that last target, the expectations and readings of others described above, showed the largest effects. Programs that simply put people in the same room were less effective. This finding fits the model proposed by Hawkley and Cacioppo (2010): if loneliness persists because of how people interpret social situations, then changing those interpretations, often through cognitive behavioral methods, addresses the cause rather than the symptom.

For older adults, effective help might therefore combine contact with cognitive work: a group that meets regularly, but where members also learn to notice and test their assumptions about how others see them. The national committee that studied the problem also urged clinics and hospitals to ask older patients about loneliness and isolation as a matter of routine, because a doctor or nurse may be one of the few regular contacts an isolated older adult has (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2020).

Limits of the Evidence

The research has important limits. Almost all of it is observational, so it shows that loneliness predicts poor outcomes but cannot prove that loneliness causes them; people who are already declining in health may become lonelier, as Luo et al. (2012) found. Most studies rely on a handful of questionnaire items answered by the person, and some older adults are slow to admit to feeling lonely. Most samples come from Western, high-income countries, which limits what can be said about other cultures, where family structures and expectations of later life differ. Finally, the intervention trials reviewed by Masi et al. (2011) varied widely in quality and length, and few followed participants long enough to show whether reduced loneliness leads to better health. None of this erases the warning in the data, but it argues for modest wording.

A Biblical Perspective

Why this part earns its pointsThe integration section ties a specific passage to a practical role for congregations, as the guide's integration requirement intends.
5

Genesis 2:18 records the first thing in creation that God names as not good, and it is the man's solitude, judged so before any sin has entered the story (English Standard Version Bible, 2001/2016). Human beings were made for relationship, and the research reviewed here can be read as evidence of that design. Congregations are well placed to respond. They already gather people across generations, and many older adults trust them. A church that trains visitation teams to listen well, to invite repeatedly despite refusals and to notice when an older member withdraws could interrupt the cycle Hawkley and Cacioppo (2010) describe.

Conclusion

Loneliness in later adulthood is far more than a private sadness. Longitudinal research links it to death, heart disease, stroke, depression and functional decline, and its effects rival those of established health risks. Because loneliness sustains itself through expectations of rejection, the most effective interventions address those expectations rather than only adding contact. Health care providers should ask older patients about loneliness as routinely as they ask about smoking, and churches can offer the persistent, welcoming relationships that research and Scripture both commend. For Harold, the most important intervention may be one person who keeps inviting him until he says yes.

6

References

Cacioppo, J. T., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Thisted, R. A. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140

Cavanaugh, J. C., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2018). Adult development and aging (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

English Standard Version Bible. (2016). Crossway. (Original work published 2001)

Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40(2), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352

Luo, Y., Hawkley, L. C., Waite, L. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine, 74(6), 907-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028

Masi, C. M., Chen, H., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 219-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310377394

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Opportunities for the health care system. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25663

Valtorta, N. K., Kanaan, M., Gilbody, S., Ronzi, S., & Hanratty, B. (2016). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart, 102(13), 1009-1016. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308790

What the PSYC 635 Week 7 instructions ask

The 150-point final submission of the PSYC 635 Research Paper lands in Module/Week 7, alongside DB Forum 7 and Quiz 5, as students read chapters 11 and 12 of Cavanaugh and Blanchard-Fields on work, leisure, retirement and living environments. The topic is the one the student proposed in the Module/Week 3 planning document. Liberty's guide wants a research-based paper running four to six pages and formatted in current APA style. Beyond Cavanaugh and Blanchard-Fields and Scripture, seven scholarly works are the minimum, with journal articles making up five or more of them. That last rule means a paper resting mostly on websites or books will not meet the requirement, however well written.

How this PSYC 635 Week 7 example is built

The paper opens with Harold, an eighty-year-old widower whose days now pass without a conversation, and states its thesis that loneliness is a health risk with treatable causes. A definitions section separates the feeling of loneliness from the objective state of isolation. Three sections review evidence on mortality, heart disease and stroke, and depression and functional decline, each reporting the sample and the size of the effect. A mechanism section explains the self-reinforcing cycle Hawkley and Cacioppo describe. The intervention section reports the meta-analysis comparing four strategies. A limits section weighs the observational evidence, a section integrates Genesis 2 and the role of congregations, and the conclusion recommends routine screening in health care.

PSYC 635 Week 7 grading rubric: where the points go

The final paper is graded on research quality, organization, integration of the textbook and Scripture, writing and APA format. Research quality means meeting the source rule, seven scholarly works with five journal articles, and reporting each accurately, including sample, design and findings, rather than citing a source for a general claim it does not make. Organization shows in a clear thesis, headings that follow the argument and a conclusion that answers the question the paper posed. Integration means connecting the topic to Cavanaugh and Blanchard-Fields and to a biblical principle in a way that adds meaning. The four to six page range is part of the grade, so overlong papers lose points too.

PSYC 635 Week 7 help: mistakes that cost points

Many drafts of this PSYC 635 paper read as a string of study summaries with no argument tying them together. Write a thesis that makes a claim, such as that loneliness is a health risk with treatable causes, and organize the evidence to support it. Distinguish correlation from causation when you report longitudinal studies, and mention at least one limitation. Count your sources before submitting: seven scholarly works beyond the textbook and the Bible, with five journal articles. Use the planning document's feedback, since instructors often flag a topic that is too broad. Put the biblical integration in its own section or in the discussion, explaining how the passage bears on the topic.

Related PSYC 635 sample papers

Other PSYC 635 weeks

More MS in Psychology sample papers

PSYC 635 Week 7 questions, answered

What is the PSYC 635 Research Paper?

The course's 150-point capstone, four to six APA pages written in Module/Week 7 on the topic approved from the Module/Week 3 plan; it needs seven scholarly works, five from journals, plus Cavanaugh and Blanchard-Fields and Scripture.

Where can I find a free PSYC 635 Week 7 sample paper?

The full PSYC 635 Week 7 research paper on loneliness in later adulthood appears above, covering its links to mortality, heart disease and depression and the interventions that work best.

Is loneliness bad for older adults' health?

Yes; a meta-analysis by Holt-Lunstad and colleagues linked loneliness to a 26% higher likelihood of mortality, and other studies link it to heart disease, stroke, depression and functional decline.

What interventions reduce loneliness in older adults?

A meta-analysis by Masi and colleagues found that interventions addressing maladaptive social cognition, the expectations and interpretations that keep lonely people withdrawn, produced larger effects than those that simply increased social contact.

What is due with the PSYC 635 Research Paper final?

DB Forum 7 and Quiz 5 are due in the same Module/Week 7, so the paper should be nearly finished before that week begins.

Use it as a model, or ask for your own

This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.