| Course | NURS 764 Learning Theories and Teaching Methods for Nurse Educators (NURS764) |
|---|---|
| Module/Week | 1 |
| Assignment | Discussion Board Forum 1 |
| Paper type | Discussion thread with one reply |
| Length | about 628 words (thread and replies). Course guide: a thread with no required word count, graded on course-related knowledge and depth, citing two peer-reviewed journal articles, with a reply to one classmate citing a different article |
| Format | APA 7 citations and reference list |
| Points | 100 |
| School | Liberty University Online |
| Program | PhD in Nursing |
| Where it sits | Module/Week 1 in Liberty's published NURS 764 course guide; current sections can differ |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 764 Week 1
Discussion Board Forum 1: A Learning Theory for My Teaching Topic
NURS 764 Learning Theories and Teaching Methods for Nurse Educators, Discussion Board Forum 1
Thread by [Student Name]
The course, the students and the classmate are composites; the theories, textbook and journal articles cited are real.
My topic for the teaching project is the golden minute, the first sixty seconds after birth in which a newborn who is not breathing should be dried, stimulated and, if still apneic, ventilated with a bag and mask. Guidelines estimate that about one in ten newborns needs some help to begin breathing (Aziz et al., 2020), so every maternal-newborn nurse will face this moment. My junior BSN students practice the steps on a manikin and pass the checklist. Yet when a limp baby is delivered on the unit, I have watched those same students step back from the warmer and wait for someone else to move.
Priyanti et al. (2026) help explain what I see. In interviews with twenty preregistration nursing students who had witnessed neonatal resuscitation in tertiary units, the authors found five themes, including feeling overwhelmed, uncertainty about their role, emotional burden that lingered after the event and a gap between simulation and the real situation. The students knew steps but did not know where to stand or what was expected of them, and few had been debriefed afterward. That is a problem of experience and meaning, not of missing content, which points me toward an experiential theory rather than another lecture.
Kolb's experiential learning theory treats learning as a loop with four stages: something is experienced directly, the learner steps back to reflect on it, ideas are formed to explain it, and those ideas are then tried out in action (Kolb, 2015). My current teaching starts with the abstract stage, a slide of the algorithm, and ends there. Under Kolb, I would reverse the order: students first watch a short recorded simulation of a limp newborn, then reflect in a guided debriefing on what they noticed and felt, then review the algorithm as an explanation of what they saw, and finally run the scenario themselves in assigned roles. Billings and Halstead (2016) describe how theory should drive the choice of strategy, and here it changes the order of the class.
The NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory supplies the design detail. Jeffries et al. (2015) describe a simulation experience shaped by context, background, design, the facilitator and the participant, and they stress an environment that is experiential, interactive, collaborative and learner centered, with trust established before the scenario begins. Two of Priyanti's themes, role uncertainty and unspoken emotional burden, map directly onto the theory's design and facilitator elements. So my scenarios will give each student a named role with a card describing it, and every run will end with a debriefing that asks how it felt before it asks what went wrong.
A student who has stood at the warmer in a named role, and talked about it afterward, has a place to stand when the real baby arrives. The outcomes I will measure follow the theory's levels: participant outcomes first, such as time to first ventilation in simulation and confidence, with patient outcomes left to clinical partners.
Reply to Hannah
Hannah, your plan to use Knowles's adult learning principles for new graduate orientation on insulin pumps fits learners who are self-directed and want immediate application. I wonder whether self-efficacy theory could add a measurable piece. Bandura (1977) argued that people's belief in their ability to perform a task predicts whether they attempt it and persist, and he identified four sources of that belief: performance accomplishments, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion and physiological states. New graduates often hesitate with pumps because a single error feels dangerous, which is a self-efficacy problem as much as a knowledge one. Building in a supervised first pump setup, a recorded example from a peer and a brief pre and post confidence rating would let you show whether orientation changed both skill and belief. Which of the four sources do you think your orientation currently neglects?
References
Aziz, K., Lee, H. C., Escobedo, M. B., Hoover, A. V., Kamath-Rayne, B. D., Kapadia, V. S., Magid, D. J., Niermeyer, S., Schmölzer, G. M., Szyld, E., Weiner, G. M., Wyckoff, M. H., Yamada, N. K., & Zaichkin, J. (2020). Part 5: Neonatal resuscitation: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 142(16 Suppl. 2), S524-S550. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000902
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2016). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (5th ed.). Elsevier.
Jeffries, P. R., Rodgers, B., & Adamson, K. (2015). NLN Jeffries simulation theory: Brief narrative description. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5), 292-293. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-36.5.292
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Priyanti, R. P., Hidayah, N., Asri, A., Dianita, E. M., Lin, S. C., & Tonapa, S. I. (2026). The lived experience of nursing students witnessing neonatal resuscitation in Indonesia: A phenomenological study. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000001255
What the NURS 764 Week 1 instructions ask
Discussion Board Forum 1 in NURS 764 comes in Module/Week 1, beside the Course Requirements Checklist and class introductions, with chapters from Billings and Halstead and from Bradshaw and Lowenstein and one recorded presentation. The course guide sets no word count for the thread; it is graded on course-related knowledge and its depth and breadth. Each thread must cite two peer-reviewed journal articles, and the student replies to one classmate with a different peer-reviewed article, in current APA format without a cover page. Since the six-part teaching project starts next week, this first forum is a useful place to choose the topic and test which learning theory will carry it.
How this NURS 764 Week 1 example is built
The thread begins with a problem the writer has watched in clinical rotations: students who know the steps of newborn resuscitation stand frozen when a baby needs them. It uses a qualitative study of students who witnessed resuscitation to explain why, then shows how Kolb's four-stage cycle and the Jeffries simulation framework each answer part of the problem. A short sequence of video, debriefing, a brief algorithm review and role-based practice shows the theory turning into activities. The reply suggests self-efficacy theory to a classmate building a new graduate orientation, with a specific measure to add. Each claim is tied to a source, and the reply ends with a question only the classmate can answer.
NURS 764 Week 1 grading rubric: where the points go
Forum threads in this course are generally graded on course-related knowledge shown in depth and breadth, accurate use of the two required peer-reviewed sources, application to the student's own teaching setting, the substance of the reply and graduate-level APA writing. Faculty look for a theory explained in enough detail to show it was understood, not only named, and for a link between the theory and something the educator will actually do with learners. A reply earns credit by adding a new article and a usable idea rather than praise. Because no word count is set, depth is judged by how much each paragraph contributes, so a focused thread with a clear argument usually scores better than a long survey of theories.
NURS 764 Week 1 help: mistakes that cost points
Students often open a theory forum by summarizing three or four theories in turn and never saying which one they will use. Start instead with a teaching problem you have seen, then choose the theory that explains it and show one activity the theory changes. Two peer-reviewed articles are required, so pick ones that do work in your argument: one that describes the problem in learners and one that supports the theory or method. Textbook chapters can be cited too, but they do not count toward the two articles. For your reply, read the classmate's setting closely and offer a source that fits it rather than the one you used yourself.
Related NURS 764 sample papers
Other NURS 764 weeks
- NURS 764 Week 2: Topic, Bibliography and Objectives
- NURS 764 Week 3: Discussion Board Forum 2
- NURS 764 Week 4: Classroom Teaching Plan
- NURS 764 Week 5: Innovative Strategies
- NURS 764 Week 6: Clinical Teaching Plan
- NURS 764 Week 7: Distance Learning Strategies
- NURS 764 Week 8: Final Submission
NURS 764 Week 1 questions, answered
What is NURS 764 Discussion Board Forum 1?
The 100-point Module/Week 1 forum in Liberty's nurse educator theory course, a thread on course content citing two peer-reviewed articles and a reply to one classmate.
Where can I find a free NURS 764 Week 1 sample paper?
The complete NURS 764 Week 1 forum thread on learning theory for teaching newborn resuscitation, with its reply and APA references, is posted in full for anyone to study.
What is Kolb's experiential learning cycle?
A model of learning as a loop: learners go through something directly, think back over it, build an explanation and then test that explanation in a new attempt.
What is the NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory?
A nursing framework describing how context, background, design, the facilitator and the participant shape a simulation experience and its outcomes for participants, patients and systems.
How many sources does a NURS 764 forum thread need?
Two peer-reviewed journal articles per thread, and the single reply brings in a third article the thread did not use, all formatted in current APA style.
Use it as a model, or ask for your own
This paper is an original model written by our desk for study. It is not a submitted student paper and not an official Liberty University document. Read it for structure and reasoning, then write your own to the instructions in your Canvas course. If you want a version built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
Ask for a custom NURS 764 Week 1 sample · All NURS 764 weeks · All courses